skip to main content
survey

A Survey on Graph Drawing Beyond Planarity

Published:21 February 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Graph Drawing Beyond Planarity is a rapidly growing research area that classifies and studies geometric representations of nonplanar graphs in terms of forbidden crossing configurations. The aim of this survey is to describe the main research directions in this area, the most prominent known results, and some of the most challenging open problems.

References

  1. Eyal Ackerman. 2009. On the maximum number of edges in topological graphs with no four pairwise crossing edges. Discr. Comput. Geom. 41, 3 (2009), 365--375.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Eyal Ackerman. 2014. A note on 1-planar graphs. Discr. Appl. Math. 175 (2014), 104--108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Eyal Ackerman. 2015. On topological graphs with at most four crossings per edge. CoRR abs/1509.01932 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Eyal Ackerman, Jacob Fox, János Pach, and Andrew Suk. 2014. On grids in topological graphs. Comput. Geom. 47, 7 (2014), 710--723.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Eyal Ackerman, Radoslav Fulek, and Csaba D. Tóth. 2010. On the size of graphs that admit polyline drawings with few bends and crossing angles. In Proceedings of the GD 2010 (LNCS), Vol. 6502. Springer, 1--12. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-18469-7_1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Eyal Ackerman, Radoslav Fulek, and Csaba D. Tóth. 2012. Graphs that admit polyline drawings with few crossing angles. SIAM J. Discr. Math. 26, 1 (2012), 305--320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Eyal Ackerman, Balązs Keszegh, and Mate Vizer. 2018. On the size of planarly connected crossing graphs. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 22, 1 (2018), 11--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Eyal Ackerman and Gábor Tardos. 2007. On the maximum number of edges in quasi-planar graphs. J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A 114, 3 (2007), 563--571. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jin Akiyama and Noga Alon. 1989. Disjoint simplices and geometric hypergraphs. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 555, 1 (1989), 1--3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Md. Jawaherul Alam, Franz J. Brandenburg, and Stephen G. Kobourov. 2013. Straight-line grid drawings of 3-connected 1-planar graphs. In Proceedings of the GD 2013 (LNCS), Vol. 8242. Springer, 83--94. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-03841-4_8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Md. Jawaherul Alam, Franz J. Brandenburg, and Stephen G. Kobourov. 2015. On the book thickness of 1-planar graphs. CoRR abs/1510.05891 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Md. Jawaherul Alam, William S. Evans, Stephen G. Kobourov, Sergey Pupyrev, Jackson Toeniskoetter, and Torsten Ueckerdt. 2015. Contact representations of graphs in 3D. In Proceedings of the WADS 2015 (LNCS), Vol. 9214. Springer, 14--27. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-21840-3_2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Noga Alon and Paul Erdös. 1989. Disjoint edges in geometric graphs. Discr. Comput. Geom. 4 (1989), 287--290. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Patrizio Angelini, Michael A. Bekos, Franz J. Brandenburg, Giordano Da Lozzo, Giuseppe Di Battista, Walter Didimo, Giuseppe Liotta, Fabrizio Montecchiani, and Ignaz Rutter. 2017. On the relationship between k-planar and k-quasi-planar graphs. In Proceedings of theWG 2017 (LNCS), Vol. 10520. Springer, 59--74. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-68705-6_5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Patrizio Angelini, Michael A. Bekos, Henry Förster, and Michael Kaufmann. 2018. On RAC drawings of graphs with one bend per edge. CoRR abs/1808.10470 (2018). Accepted at GD 2018. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-030-04414-5_9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Patrizio Angelini, Michael A. Bekos, Michael Kaufmann, Philipp Kindermann, and Thomas Schneck. 2018. 1-fan-bundle-planar drawings of graphs. Theor. Comput. Sci. 723 (2018), 23--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Patrizio Angelini, Michael A. Bekos, Michael Kaufmann, and Fabrizio Montecchiani. 2017. 3D visibility representations of 1-planar graphs. In Proceedings of the GD 2017 (LNCS), Vol. 10692. Springer, 102--109. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-73915-1_9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Patrizio Angelini, Luca Cittadini, Walter Didimo, Fabrizio Frati, Giuseppe Di Battista, Michael Kaufmann, and Antonios Symvonis. 2011. On the perspectives opened by right angle crossing drawings. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 15, 1 (2011), 53--78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Patrizio Angelini, Giordano Da Lozzo, Giuseppe Di Battista, Fabrizio Frati, Maurizio Patrignani, and Vincenzo Roselli. 2015. Relaxing the constraints of clustered planarity. Comput. Geom. 48, 2 (2015), 42--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Patrizio Angelini, Giuseppe Di Battista, Walter Didimo, Fabrizio Frati, Seok-Hee Hong, Michael Kaufmann, Giuseppe Liotta, and Anna Lubiw. 2012. Large angle crossing drawings of planar graphs in subquadratic area. In Proceedings of the EGC 2011 (LNCS), Vol. 7579. Springer, 200--209. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-34191-5_19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Patrizio Angelini, Peter Eades, Seok-Hee Hong, Karsten Klein, Stephen G. Kobourov, Giuseppe Liotta, Alfredo Navarra, and Alessandra Tappini. 2018. Turning cliques into paths to achieve planarity. CoRR abs/1808.08925 (2018). Accepted at GD 2018. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-030-04414-5_5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Patrizio Angelini, Markus Geyer, Michael Kaufmann, and Daniel Neuwirth. 2012. On a tree and a path with no geometric simultaneous embedding. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 16, 1 (2012), 37--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Arthur Appel, F. James Rohlf, and Arthur J. Stein. 1979. The haloed line effect for hidden line elimination. In Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH 1979. ACM, 151--157. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=800249.807437. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Evmorfia N. Argyriou, Michael A. Bekos, Michael Kaufmann, and Antonios Symvonis. 2013. Geometric RAC simultaneous drawings of graphs. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 17, 1 (2013), 11--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Evmorfia N. Argyriou, Michael A. Bekos, and Antonios Symvonis. 2012. The straight-line RAC drawing problem is NP-hard. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 16, 2 (2012), 569--597.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Evmorfia N. Argyriou, Michael A. Bekos, and Antonios Symvonis. 2013. Maximizing the total resolution of graphs. Comput. J. 56, 7 (2013), 887--900.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Evmorfia N. Argyriou, Sabine Cornelsen, Henry Förster, Michael Kaufmann, Martin Nöllenburg, Yoshio Okamoto, Chrysanthi N. Raftopoulou, and Alexander Wolff. 2018. Orthogonal and smooth orthogonal layouts of 1-planar graphs with low edge complexity. CoRR abs/1808.10536 (2018). Accepted at GD 2018. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-030-04414-5_36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Karin Arikushi, Radoslav Fulek, Balázs Keszegh, Filip Moric, and Csaba D. Tóth. 2012. Graphs that admit right angle crossing drawings. Comput. Geom. 45, 4 (2012), 169--177. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Christopher Auer, Christian Bachmaier, Franz J. Brandenburg, Andreas Gleißner, Kathrin Hanauer, Daniel Neuwirth, and Josef Reislhuber. 2016. Outer 1-planar graphs. Algorithmica 74, 4 (2016), 1293--1320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Christopher Auer, Franz-Josef Brandenburg, Andreas Gleißner, and Kathrin Hanauer. 2012. On sparse maximal 2-planar graphs. In Graph Drawing (LNCS), Vol. 7704. Springer, 555--556. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-36763-2_50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Christopher Auer, Franz J. Brandenburg, Andreas Gleißner, and Josef Reislhuber. 2015. 1-planarity of graphs with a rotation system. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 19, 1 (2015), 67--86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. S. Avital and H. Hanani. 1966. Graphs. Gilyonot Lematematika 3 (1966), 2--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Christian Bachmaier, Franz J. Brandenburg, Kathrin Hanauer, Daniel Neuwirth, and Josef Reislhuber. 2017. NIC-planar graphs. Discr. Appl. Math. 232 (2017), 23--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Sang Won Bae, Jean-François Baffier, Jinhee Chun, Peter Eades, Kord Eickmeyer, Luca Grilli, Seok-Hee Hong, Matias Korman, Fabrizio Montecchiani, Ignaz Rutter, and Csaba D. Tóth. 2018. Gap-planar graphs. Theor. Comput. Sci. 745 (2018), 36--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Michael J. Bannister, Sergio Cabello, and David Eppstein. 2018. Parameterized complexity of 1-planarity. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 22, 1 (2018), 23--49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Imre Bárány and Günter Rote. 2005. Strictly convex drawings of planar graphs. CoRR abs/cs/0507030 (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Vladimir Batagelj, Franz-Josef Brandenburg, Walter Didimo, Giuseppe Liotta, Pietro Palladino, and Maurizio Patrignani. 2011. Visual analysis of large graphs using (X, Y)-clustering and hybrid visualizations. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 17, 11 (2011), 1587--1598. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Carlo Batini, L. Furlani, and Enrico Nardelli. 1985. What is a good diagram? A pragmatic approach. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Entity-Relationship Approach: The Use of {ER} Concept in Knowledge Representation. IEEE Computer Society and North-Holland, 312--319. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Carlo Batini, Enrico Nardelli, and Roberto Tamassia. 1986. A layout algorithm for data flow diagrams. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 12, 4 (1986), 538--546. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Richard A. Becker, Stephen G. Eick, and Allan R. Wilks. 1995. Visualizing network data. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 1, 1 (1995), 16--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Michael A. Bekos, Till Bruckdorfer, Michael Kaufmann, and Chrysanthi N. Raftopoulou. 2017. The book thickness of 1-planar graphs is constant. Algorithmica 79, 2 (2017), 444--465. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Michael A. Bekos, Sabine Cornelsen, Luca Grilli, Seok-Hee Hong, and Michael Kaufmann. 2017. On the recognition of fan-planar and maximal outer-fan-planar graphs. Algorithmica 79, 2 (2017), 401--427. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Michael A. Bekos, Emilio Di Giacomo, Walter Didimo, Giuseppe Liotta, Fabrizio Montecchiani, and Chrysanthi N. Raftopoulou. 2018. Edge partitions of optimal 2-plane and 3-plane graphs. In Proceedings of the WG 2018 (LNCS), Vol. 11159. Springer, 27--39. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-030-00256-5_3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Michael A. Bekos, Walter Didimo, Giuseppe Liotta, Saeed Mehrabi, and Fabrizio Montecchiani. 2017. On RAC drawings of 1-planar graphs. Theor. Comput. Sci. 689 (2017), 48--57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Michael A. Bekos, Henry Förster, Christian Geckeler, Lukas Holländer, Michael Kaufmann, Amadäus M. Spallek, and Jan Splett. 2018. A heuristic approach towards drawings of graphs with high crossing resolution. CoRR abs/1808.10519 (2018). Accepted at GD 2018. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-030-04414-5_19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Michael A. Bekos, Michael Kaufmann, and Chrysanthi N. Raftopoulou. 2016. On the density of non-simple 3-planar graphs. In Proceedings of the GD 2016 (LNCS), Vol. 9801. Springer, 344--356. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-50106-2_27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Michael A. Bekos, Michael Kaufmann, and Chrysanthi N. Raftopoulou. 2017. On optimal 2- and 3-planar graphs. In Proceedings of the SoCG 2017 (LIPIcs), Vol. 77. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 16:1--16:16. http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2017/7230/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Michael A. Bekos, Thomas C. van Dijk, Philipp Kindermann, and Alexander Wolff. 2016. Simultaneous drawing of planar graphs with right-angle crossings and few bends. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 20, 1 (2016), 133--158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. F. Bernhart and P. C. Kainen. 1979. The book thickness of a graph. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 27 (1979), 320--331.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Paola Bertolazzi, Giuseppe Di Battista, and Walter Didimo. 2002. Quasi-upward planarity. Algorithmica 32, 3 (2002), 474--506. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Therese C. Biedl, Giuseppe Liotta, and Fabrizio Montecchiani. 2018. Embedding-preserving rectangle visibility representations of nonplanar graphs. Discrete and Computational Geometry 60, 2 (2018), 345--380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Carla Binucci, Markus Chimani, Walter Didimo, Martin Gronemann, Karsten Klein, Jan Kratochvíl, Fabrizio Montecchiani, and Ioannis G. Tollis. 2017. Algorithms and characterizations for 2-layer fan-planarity: From caterpillar to stegosaurus. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 21, 1 (2017), 81--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Carla Binucci, Emilio Di Giacomo, Walter Didimo, Fabrizio Montecchiani, Maurizio Patrignani, Antonios Symvonis, and Ioannis G. Tollis. 2015. Fan-planarity: Properties and complexity. Theor. Comput. Sci. 589 (2015), 76--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Carla Binucci, Emilio Di Giacomo, Md. Iqbal Hossain, and Giuseppe Liotta. 2018. 1-page and 2-page drawings with bounded number of crossings per edge. Eur. J. Comb. 68 (2018), 24--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Carla Binucci, Walter Didimo, and Maurizio Patrignani. 2014. Upward and quasi-upward planarity testing of embedded mixed graphs. Theor. Comput. Sci. 526 (2014), 75--89. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Carla Binucci, Giuseppe Liotta, Fabrizio Montecchiani, and Alessandra Tappini. 2016. Partial edge drawing: Homogeneity is more important than crossings and ink. In Proceedings of the IISA. IEEE, 1--6. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7785427.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Thomas Bläsius, Stephen G. Kobourov, and Ignaz Rutter. 2013. Simultaneous embedding of planar graphs. In Handbook on Graph Drawing and Visualization., Roberto Tamassia (Ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC, 349--381.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. R Bodendiek, H Schumacher, and K Wagner. 1983. Bemerkungen zu einem Sechsfarbenproblem von G. Ringel. Abhandlungen Aus Dem Mathematischen Seminar Der Universitaet Hamburg 53, 1 (1983), 41--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Béla Bollobás. 1978. Extremal Graph Theory. Academic Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Romain Bourqui, David Auber, and Patrick Mary. 2007. How to draw clustered weighted graphs using a multilevel force-directed graph drawing algorithm. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV'07). IEEE, 757--764. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Franz Brandenburg. 2018. Recognizing IC-planar and NIC-planar graphs. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 22, 2 (2018), 239--271.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Franz-Josef Brandenburg, David Eppstein, Andreas Gleißner, Michael T. Goodrich, Kathrin Hanauer, and Josef Reislhuber. 2012. On the density of maximal 1-planar graphs. In Proceedings of the GD 2012 (LNCS), Vol. 7704. Springer, 327--338. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-36763-2_29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Franz J. Brandenburg. 2014. 1-visibility representations of 1-planar graphs. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 18, 3 (2014), 421--438.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Franz J. Brandenburg. 2018. A first order logic definition of beyond-planar graphs. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 22, 1 (2018), 51--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Franz J. Brandenburg. 2018. On fan-crossing and fan-crossing free graphs. Inf. Process. Lett. 138 (2018), 67--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Franz J. Brandenburg. 2018. Recognizing optimal 1-planar graphs in linear time. Algorithmica 80, 1 (2018), 1--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Franz J. Brandenburg, Walter Didimo, William S. Evans, Philipp Kindermann, Giuseppe Liotta, and Fabrizio Montecchiani. 2016. Recognizing and drawing IC-planar graphs. Theor. Comput. Sci. 636 (2016), 1--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Peter Braß, Eowyn Cenek, Christian A. Duncan, Alon Efrat, Cesim Erten, Dan Ismailescu, Stephen G. Kobourov, Anna Lubiw, and Joseph S. B. Mitchell. 2007. On simultaneous planar graph embeddings. Comput. Geom. 36, 2 (2007), 117--130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Peter Brass, Gyula Károlyi, and Pavel Valtr. 2003. A Turán-type extremal theorey of convex geometric graphs. Discr. Comput. Geom. 25 (2003), 275--300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Peter Braß, William O. J. Moser, and János Pach. 2005. Research Problems in Discrete Geometry. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Till Bruckdorfer, Sabine Cornelsen, Carsten Gutwenger, Michael Kaufmann, Fabrizio Montecchiani, Martin Nöllenburg, and Alexander Wolff. 2017. Progress on partial edge drawings. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 21, 4 (2017), 757--786.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Till Bruckdorfer and Michael Kaufmann. 2012. Mad at edge crossings? Break the edges!. In Proceedings of the FUN 2012 (LNCS), Vol. 7288. Springer, 40--50. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-30347-0_7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Till Bruckdorfer, Michael Kaufmann, and Andreas Lauer. 2015. A practical approach for 1/4-SHPEDs. In Proceedings of the IISA 2015. IEEE, 1--6. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7387994?arnumber=7387994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Till Bruckdorfer, Michael Kaufmann, and Fabrizio Montecchiani. 2014. 1-bend orthogonal partial edge drawing. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 18, 1 (2014), 111--131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Christoph Buchheim, Markus Chimani, Carsten Gutwenger, Michael Jünger, and Petra Mutzel. 2013. Crossings and planarization. In Handbook of Graph Drawing and Visualization, Roberto Tamassia (Ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC, 43--85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Sergio Cabello and Bojan Mohar. 2011. Crossing number and weighted crossing number of near-planar graphs. Algorithmica 60, 3 (2011), 484--504. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Sergio Cabello and Bojan Mohar. 2013. Adding one edge to planar graphs makes crossing number and 1-planarity hard. SIAM J. Comput. 42, 5 (2013), 1803--1829.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Vasilis Capoyleas and János Pach. 1992. A turán-type theorem on chords of a convex polygon. J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B 56, 1 (1992), 9--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Marie-Jose Carpano. 1980. Automatic display of hierarchized graphs for computer-aided decision analysis. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 10, 11 (1980), 705--715.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. Steven Chaplick, Myroslav Kryven, Giuseppe Liotta, Andre Löffler, and Alexander Wolff. 2017. Beyond outerplanarity. In Proceedings of the GD 2017 (LNCS), Vol. 10692. Springer, 546--559. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-73915-1_42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Steven Chaplick, Fabian Lipp, Alexander Wolff, and Johannes Zink. 2018. Compact drawings of 1-planar graphs with right-angle crossings and few bends. CoRR abs/1806.10044 (2018). Accepted at GD 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Otfried Cheong, Sariel Har-Peled, Heuna Kim, and Hyo-Sil Kim. 2015. On the number of edges of fan-crossing free graphs. Algorithmica 73, 4 (2015), 673--695. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Markus Chimani, Carsten Gutwenger, Petra Mutzel, and Christian Wolf. 2009. Inserting a vertex into a planar graph. In Proceedings of the ACM-SIAM SoDA 2009. SIAM, 375--383. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1496770.1496812. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Markus Chimani and Petr Hlinený. 2016. Inserting multiple edges into a planar graph. In Proceedings of the SoCG 2016 (LIPIcs), Vol. 51. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 30:1--30:15. http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2016/5922/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Pier Francesco Cortese and Giuseppe Di Battista. 2005. Clustered planarity. In Proceedings of the ACM SoCG 2005. ACM, 32--34. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1064092.1064093.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. J. Czap and P. Šugerek. 2017. Drawing graph joins in the plane with restrictions on crossings. Filomat 31, 2 (2017), 363--370.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. Giordano Da Lozzo, Giuseppe Di Battista, Fabrizio Frati, and Maurizio Patrignani. 2018. Computing NodeTrix representations of clustered graphs. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 22, 2 (2018), 139--176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. Hubert de Fraysseix, János Pach, and Richard Pollack. 1990. How to draw a planar graph on a grid. Combinatorica 10, 1 (1990), 41--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  89. Alice M. Dean, William S. Evans, Ellen Gethner, Joshua D. Laison, Mohammad Ali Safari, and William T. Trotter. 2007. Bar -visibility graphs. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 11, 1 (2007), 45--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  90. Hooman Reisi Dehkordi and Peter Eades. 2012. Every outer-1-plane graph has a right angle crossing drawing. Int. J. Comput. Geometry Appl. 22, 6 (2012), 543--558.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  91. Hooman Reisi Dehkordi, Peter Eades, Seok-Hee Hong, and Quan Hoang Nguyen. 2016. Circular right-angle crossing drawings in linear time. Theor. Comput. Sci. 639 (2016), 26--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  92. Erik D. Demaine and Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi. 2004. Diameter and treewidth in minor-closed graph families, revisited. Algorithmica 40, 3 (2004), 211--215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. Almut Demel, Dominik Dürrschnabel, Tamara Mchedlidze, Marcel Radermacher, and Lasse Wulf. 2018. A greedy heuristic for crossing-angle maximization. CoRR abs/1807.09483 (2018). Accepted at GD 2018. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-030-04414-5_20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Giuseppe Di Battista, Walter Didimo, and A. Marcandalli. 2002. Planarization of clustered graphs. In Proceedings of the GD 2001 (LNCS), Vol. 2265. Springer, 60--74. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F3-540-45848-4_5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. Giuseppe Di Battista, Peter Eades, Roberto Tamassia, and Ioannis G. Tollis. 1999. Graph Drawing. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  96. Giuseppe Di Battista and Roberto Tamassia. 1988. Algorithms for plane representations of acyclic digraphs. Theor. Comput. Sci. 61 (1988), 175--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  97. Giuseppe Di Battista, Roberto Tamassia, and Ioannis G. Tollis. 1992. Area requirement and symmetry display of planar upward drawings. Discr. Comput. Geom. 7 (1992), 381--401.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. Emilio Di Giacomo, Walter Didimo, Peter Eades, and Giuseppe Liotta. 2014. 2-layer right angle crossing drawings. Algorithmica 68, 4 (2014), 954--997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  99. Emilio Di Giacomo, Walter Didimo, William S. Evans, Giuseppe Liotta, Henk Meijer, Fabrizio Montecchiani, and Stephen K. Wismath. 2018. Ortho-polygon visibility representations of embedded graphs. Algorithmica 80, 8 (2018), 2345--2383. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  100. Emilio Di Giacomo, Walter Didimo, William S. Evans, Giuseppe Liotta, Henk Meijer, Fabrizio Montecchiani, and Stephen K. Wismath. 2018. New results on edge partitions of 1-plane graphs. Theor. Comput. Sci. 713 (2018), 78--84.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  101. Emilio Di Giacomo, Walter Didimo, Luca Grilli, Giuseppe Liotta, and Salvatore Agostino Romeo. 2015. Heuristics for the maximum 2-layer RAC subgraph problem. Comput. J. 58, 5 (2015), 1085--1098.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  102. Emilio Di Giacomo, Walter Didimo, and Giuseppe Liotta. 2013. Spine and radial drawings. In Handbook on Graph Drawing and Visualization., Roberto Tamassia (Ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC, 247--284.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. Emilio Di Giacomo, Walter Didimo, Giuseppe Liotta, and Henk Meijer. 2011. Area, curve complexity, and crossing resolution of non-planar graph drawings. Theory Comput. Syst. 49, 3 (2011), 565--575. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  104. Emilio Di Giacomo, Walter Didimo, Giuseppe Liotta, Henk Meijer, and Stephen K. Wismath. 2015. Planar and quasi-planar simultaneous geometric embedding. Comput. J. 58, 11 (2015), 3126--3140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  105. Emilio Di Giacomo, Walter Didimo, Giuseppe Liotta, and Fabrizio Montecchiani. 2012. h-quasi planar drawings of bounded treewidth graphs in linear area. In Proceedings of the WG 2012 (LNCS), Vol. 7551. Springer, 91--102. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-34611-8_12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  106. Emilio Di Giacomo, Walter Didimo, Giuseppe Liotta, and Fabrizio Montecchiani. 2013. Area requirement of graph drawings with few crossings per edge. Comput. Geom. 46, 8 (2013), 909--916.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  107. Emilio Di Giacomo, Walter Didimo, Giuseppe Liotta, and Fabrizio Montecchiani. 2017. Area-thickness trade-offs for straight-line drawings of planar graphs. Comput. J. 60, 1 (2017), 135--142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  108. Emilio Di Giacomo, Walter Didimo, Giuseppe Liotta, Fabrizio Montecchiani, and Ioannis G. Tollis. 2014. Techniques for edge stratification of complex graph drawings. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 25, 4 (2014), 533--543. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  109. Emilio Di Giacomo and Giuseppe Liotta. 2007. Simultaneous embedding of outerplanar graphs, paths, and cycles. Int. J. Comput. Geometry Appl. 17, 2 (2007), 139--160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  110. Emilio Di Giacomo, Giuseppe Liotta, and Fabrizio Montecchiani. 2015. Drawing outer 1-planar graphs with few slopes. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 19, 2 (2015), 707--741.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  111. Emilio Di Giacomo, Giuseppe Liotta, Maurizio Patrignani, and Alessandra Tappini. 2018. NodeTrix planarity testing with small clusters. In Proceedings of the GD 2017 (LNCS), Vol. 10692. Springer, 479--491. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-73915-1_37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  112. Emilio Di Giacomo, Giuseppe Liotta, Maurizio Patrignani, and Alessandra Tappini. 2018. Planar k-NodeTrix graphs a new family of beyond planar graphs. In Proceedings of the GD 2017 (LNCS), Vol. 10692. Springer, 609--611. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-73915-1?page=2#toc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  113. Josep Díaz, Jordi Petit, and Maria J. Serna. 2002. A survey of graph layout problems. ACM Comput. Surv. 34, 3 (2002), 313--356. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  114. Matthew Dickerson, David Eppstein, Michael T. Goodrich, and Jeremy Yu Meng. 2005. Confluent drawings: Visualizing non-planar diagrams in a planar way. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 9, 1 (2005), 31--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  115. Walter Didimo. 2013. Density of straight-line 1-planar graph drawings. Inf. Process. Lett. 113, 7 (2013), 236--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  116. Walter Didimo. 2016. Upward graph drawing. In Encyclopedia of Algorithms. 2308--2312.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  117. Walter Didimo, Peter Eades, and Giuseppe Liotta. 2010. A characterization of complete bipartite RAC graphs. Inf. Process. Lett. 110, 16 (2010), 687--691. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  118. Walter Didimo, Peter Eades, and Giuseppe Liotta. 2011. Drawing graphs with right angle crossings. Theor. Comput. Sci. 412, 39 (2011), 5156--5166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  119. Walter Didimo and Giuseppe Liotta. 2013. The crossing-angle resolution in graph drawing. In Thirty Essays on Geometric Graph Theory, Janos Pach (Ed.). Springer, New York, NY, 167--184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  120. Walter Didimo, Giuseppe Liotta, and Salvatore Agostino Romeo. 2011. A graph drawing application to web site traffic analysis. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 15, 2 (2011), 229--251.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  121. Walter Didimo, Giuseppe Liotta, and Salvatore Agostino Romeo. 2011. Topology-driven force-directed algorithms. In Proceedings of the GD 2010 (LNCS), Vol. 6502. Springer, 165--176. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-18469-7_15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  122. Walter Didimo and Fabrizio Montecchiani. 2014. Fast layout computation of clustered networks: Algorithmic advances and experimental analysis. Inf. Sci. 260 (2014), 185--199. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  123. U. Dogrusöz, E. Giral, A. Cetintas, A. Civril, and E. Demir. 2009. A layout algorithm for undirected compound graphs. Inf. Sci. 179, 7 (2009), 980--994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  124. Andreas W. M. Dress, Jack H. Koolen, and Vincent Moulton. 2002. On line arrangements in the hyperbolic plane. Eur. J. Comb. 23, 5 (2002), 549--557. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  125. Vida Dujmovic. 2015. Graph layouts via layered separators. J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B 110 (2015), 79--89. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  126. Vida Dujmovic, David Eppstein, and David R. Wood. 2017. Structure of graphs with locally restricted crossings. SIAM J. Discr. Math. 31, 2 (2017), 805--824.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  127. Vida Dujmovic and Fabrizio Frati. 2018. Stack and queue layouts via layered separators. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 22, 1 (2018), 89--99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  128. Vida Dujmovic, Joachim Gudmundsson, Pat Morin, and Thomas Wolle. 2011. Notes on large angle crossing graphs. Chicago J. Theor. Comput. Sci. 2011 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  129. Vida Dujmovic, Pat Morin, and David R. Wood. 2017. Layered separators in minor-closed graph classes with applications. J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B 127 (2017), 111--147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  130. Vida Dujmovic and David R. Wood. 2004. On linear layouts of graphs. Discr. Math. 8 Theor. Comp. Sci. 6, 2 (2004), 339--358.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  131. Vida Dujmovic and David R. Wood. 2005. Stacks, queues and tracks: Layouts of graph subdivisions. Discr. Math. 8 Theor. Comp. Sci. 7, 1 (2005), 155--202.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  132. Peter Eades, Seok-Hee Hong, Giuseppe Liotta, Naoki Katoh, and Sheung-Hung Poon. 2015. Straight-line drawability of a planar graph plus an edge. In Proceedings of the WADS 2015 (LNCS), Vol. 9214. Springer, 301--313. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-21840-3_25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  133. Peter Eades and Giuseppe Liotta. 2013. Right angle crossing graphs and 1-planarity. Discr. Appl. Math. 161, 7--8 (2013), 961--969. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  134. P. Eades, B. McKay, and N. Wormald. 1986. On an edge crossing problem. In Proceedings of the ACSC 1986. 327--334. http://users.cecs.anu.edu.au/∼bdm/papers/EdgeCrossing.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  135. Peter Eades and Nicholas C. Wormald. 1994. Edge crossings in drawings of bipartite graphs. Algorithmica 11, 4 (1994), 379--403. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  136. David Eppstein. 2000. Diameter and treewidth in minor-closed graph families. Algorithmica 27, 3 (2000), 275--291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  137. David Eppstein, Michael T. Goodrich, and Jeremy Yu Meng. 2007. Confluent layered drawings. Algorithmica 47, 4 (2007), 439--452.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  138. David Eppstein, Marc J. van Kreveld, Elena Mumford, and Bettina Speckmann. 2009. Edges and switches, tunnels and bridges. Comput. Geom. 42, 8 (2009), 790--802. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  139. William S. Evans, Michael Kaufmann, William Lenhart, Tamara Mchedlidze, and Stephen K. Wismath. 2014. Bar 1-visibility graphs vs. other nearly planar graphs. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 18, 5 (2014), 721--739.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  140. William S. Evans, Giuseppe Liotta, and Fabrizio Montecchiani. 2016. Simultaneous visibility representations of plane st-graphs using L-shapes. Theor. Comput. Sci. 645 (2016), 100--111. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  141. István Fáry. 1948. On straight-line representation of planar graphs. Acta Sci. Math. 11 (1948), 229--233.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  142. Martin Fink, Jan-Henrik Haunert, Tamara Mchedlidze, Joachim Spoerhase, and Alexander Wolff. 2012. Drawing graphs with vertices at specified positions and crossings at large angles. In Proceedings of the WALCOM (LNCS), Vol. 7157. Springer, 186--197. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-28076-4_19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  143. Jacob Fox, János Pach, and Andrew Suk. 2013. The number of edges in k-quasi-planar graphs. SIAM J. Discr. Math. 27, 1 (2013), 550--561.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  144. M. R. Garey and D. S. Johnson. 1983. Crossing number is NP-complete. SIAM J. Alg. Discr. Meth. 4 (1983), 312--316.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  145. Ashim Garg and Roberto Tamassia. 2001. On the computational complexity of upward and rectilinear planarity testing. SIAM J. Comput. 31, 2 (2001), 601--625. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  146. Jesse Geneson, Tanya Khovanova, and Jonathan Tidor. 2014. Convex geometric (k+2)-quasiplanar representations of semi-bar k-visibility graphs. Discr. Math. 331 (2014), 83--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  147. Alexander Grigoriev and Hans L. Bodlaender. 2007. Algorithms for graphs embeddable with few crossings per edge. Algorithmica 49, 1 (2007), 1--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  148. Luca Grilli. 2018. On the NP-hardness of GRacSim drawing and k-SEFE Problems. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 22, 1 (2018), 101--116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  149. Arvind Gupta and Russell Impagliazzo. 1991. Computing planar intertwines. In Proceedings of the IEEE FoCS 1991. IEEE, 802--811. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/185452. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  150. Carsten Gutwenger, Petra Mutzel, and René Weiskircher. 2005. Inserting an edge into a planar graph. Algorithmica 41, 4 (2005), 289--308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  151. Nathalie Henry, Jean-Daniel Fekete, and Michael J. McGuffin. 2007. NodeTrix: A hybrid visualization of social networks. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 13, 6 (2007), 1302--1309. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  152. Michael Hoffmann and Csaba D. Tóth. 2017. Two-planar graphs are quasiplanar. In Proceedings of the MFCS 2017 (LIPIcs), Vol. 83. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 47:1--47:14. http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2017/8081/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  153. Danny Holten. 2006. Hierarchical edge bundles: Visualization of adjacency relations in hierarchical data. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 12, 5 (2006), 741--748. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  154. Danny Holten and Jarke J. van Wijk. 2009. Force-directed edge bundling for graph visualization. Comput. Graph. Forum 28, 3 (2009), 983--990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  155. Seok-Hee Hong, Peter Eades, Naoki Katoh, Giuseppe Liotta, Pascal Schweitzer, and Yusuke Suzuki. 2015. A linear-time algorithm for testing outer-1-planarity. Algorithmica 72, 4 (2015), 1033--1054. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  156. Seok-Hee Hong and Hiroshi Nagamochi. 2016. Re-embedding a 1-plane graph into a straight-line drawing in linear time. In Proceedings of the GD 2016 (LNCS), Vol. 9801. Springer, 321--334. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-50106-2_25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  157. Seok-Hee Hong and Hiroshi Nagamochi. 2016. Testing full outer-2-planarity in linear time. In Proceedings of the WG 2015 (LNCS), Vol. 9224. Springer, 406--421. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-662-53174-7_29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  158. Seok-Hee Hong, Peter Eades, Giuseppe Liotta, and Sheung-Hung Poon. 2012. Fáry’s theorem for 1-planar graphs. In COCOON 2012 (LNCS), Vol. 7434. Springer, 335--346. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-32241-9_29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  159. John E. Hopcroft and Robert Endre Tarjan. 1974. Efficient planarity testing. J. ACM 21, 4 (1974), 549--568. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  160. Weidong Huang. 2007. Using eye tracking to investigate graph layout effects. In Proceedings of the APVIS 2007. IEEE, 97--100. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4126225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  161. Weidong Huang. 2013. Establishing aesthetics based on human graph reading behavior: Two eye tracking studies. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 17, 1 (2013), 93--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  162. Weidong Huang, Peter Eades, and Seok-Hee Hong. 2014. Larger crossing angles make graphs easier to read. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 25, 4 (2014), 452--465. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  163. Weidong Huang, Peter Eades, Seok-Hee Hong, and Chun-Cheng Lin. 2013. Improving multiple aesthetics produces better graph drawings. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 24, 4 (2013), 262--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  164. Weidong Huang, Seok-Hee Hong, and Peter Eades. 2008. Effects of crossing angles. In Proceedings of the PacificVis 2008. IEEE, 41--46. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4475457.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  165. Russell Impagliazzo and Ramamohan Paturi. 2001. On the complexity of k-SAT. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 62, 2 (2001), 367--375. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  166. Michael Jünger and Petra Mutzel (Eds.). 2004. Graph Drawing Software. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  167. Paul C. Kainen. 1974. Some recent results in topological graph theory. In Graphs Combin. (LNCS), Vol. 406. Springer, 76--108. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/BFb0066436.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  168. Dmitriy V. Karpov. 2014. An upper bound on the number of edges in an almost planar bipartite graph. J. Math. Sci. 196, 6 (2014), 737--746.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  169. Michael Kaufmann and Torsten Ueckerdt. 2014. The density of fan-planar graphs. CoRR abs/1403.6184 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  170. Michael Kaufmann and Dorothea Wagner (Eds.). 2001. Drawing Graphs. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  171. Michael Kaufmann and Roland Wiese. 2002. Embedding vertices at points: Few bends suffice for planar graphs. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 6, 1 (2002), 115--129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  172. Ken-ichi Kawarabayashi. 2009. Planarity allowing few error vertices in linear time. In Proceedings of theIEEE FoCS 2009. IEEE, 639--648. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5438591. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  173. Ken-ichi Kawarabayashi and Buce Reed. 2007. Computing crossing number in linear time. In Proceedings of the SToC 2007. ACM, 382--390. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1250790.1250848. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  174. Philipp Kindermann, Fabrizio Montecchiani, Lena Schlipf, and André Schulz. 2018. Drawing subcubic 1-planar graphs with few bends, few slopes, and large angles. CoRR abs/1808.08496 (2018). Accepted at GD 2018. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-030-04414-5_11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  175. Stephen G. Kobourov, Giuseppe Liotta, and Fabrizio Montecchiani. 2017. An annotated bibliography on 1-planarity. Computer Science Review 25 (2017), 49--67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  176. Vladimir P. Korzhik and Bojan Mohar. 2013. Minimal obstructions for 1-immersions and hardness of 1-planarity testing. J. Graph Theory 72, 1 (2013), 30--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  177. Yaakov S. Kupitz. 1979. Extremal Problems in Combinatorial Geometry. Matematisk institut, Aarhus Universitet.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  178. Charles E. Leiserson. 1980. Area-efficient graph layouts (for VLSI). In Proceedings of the FOCS. IEEE Computer Society, 270--281. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4567828. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  179. William J. Lenhart, Giuseppe Liotta, and Fabrizio Montecchiani. 2017. On partitioning the edges of 1-plane graphs. Theor. Comput. Sci. 662 (2017), 59--65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  180. John M. Lewis and Mihalis Yannakakis. 1980. The node-deletion problem for hereditary properties is NP-complete. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 20, 2 (1980), 219--230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  181. Giuseppe Liotta and Fabrizio Montecchiani. 2016. L-visibility drawings of IC-planar graphs. Inf. Process. Lett. 116, 3 (2016), 217--222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  182. Giuseppe Liotta, Fabrizio Montecchiani, and Alessandra Tappini. 2018. Ortho-polygon visibility representations of 3-connected 1-plane graphs. CoRR abs/1807.01247 (2018). Accepted at GD 2018. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-030-04414-5_37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  183. P. C. Liu and R. C. Geldmacher. 1979. On the deletion of nonplanar edges of a graph. In Proceedings of the 10th Southeastern Conference on Combinatorics, Graph Theory, and Computing. 727--738.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  184. Pierce Mike. 2014. Searching for and classifying the finite set of minor-minimal non-apex graphs. Master’s thesis. California State University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  185. Petra Mutzel. 2001. An alternative method to crossing minimization on hierarchical graphs. SIAM J. Optimization 11, 4 (2001), 1065--1080. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  186. Tomoki Nakamigawa. 2000. A generalization of diagonal flips in a convex polygon. Theor. Comput. Sci. 235, 2 (2000), 271--282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  187. Jaroslav Nešetřil, Patrice Ossona de Mendez, and David R. Wood. 2012. Characterisations and examples of graph classes with bounded expansion. Eur. J. Comb. 33, 3 (2012), 350--373. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  188. Quan Hoang Nguyen, Peter Eades, Seok-Hee Hong, and Weidong Huang. 2011. Large crossing angles in circular layouts. In Proceedings of the GD 2010 (LNCS), Vol. 6502. Springer, 397--399. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-18469-7_40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  189. T. A. J. Nicholson. 1968. Permutation procedure for minimising the number of crossings in a network. Proc. IEE 115, 1 (1968), 21--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  190. Taylor L. Ollmann. 1974. On the book thicknesses of various graphs. In Proceedings, 4th S.E. Conference on Combinatorics, Graph Theory, and Computing, Frederick Hoffman, Roy B. Levow, and Robert S. D. Thomas (Eds.). Utilitas Mathematics Publ. Inc., 459.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  191. János Pach. 2018. Geometric graph theory. In Handbook of Discr. and Comp. Geom., Third Edition. 257--279.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  192. János Pach, Rom Pinchasi, Micha Sharir, and Géza Tóth. 2005. Topological graphs with no large grids. Graphs Combin. 21, 3 (2005), 355--364. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  193. János Pach, Rom Pinchasi, Gábor Tardos, and Géza Tóth. 2004. Geometric graphs with no self-intersecting path of length three. Eur. J. Comb. 25, 6 (2004), 793--811. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  194. János Pach, Rados Raddoicic, Gábor Tardos, and Géza Tóth. 2006. Improving the crossing lemma by finding more crossings in sparse graphs. Discr. Comput. Geom. 36, 4 (2006), 527--552.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  195. János Pach, Farhad Shahrokhi, and Mario Szegedy. 1996. Applications of the crossing number. Algorithmica 16, 1 (1996), 111--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  196. János Pach and Jenö Töröcsik. 1994. Some geometric applications of dilworth’s theorem. Discr. Comput. Geom. 12 (1994), 1--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  197. János Pach and Géza Tóth. 1997. Graphs drawn with few crossings per edge. Combinatorica 17, 3 (1997), 427--439.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  198. János Pach and Rephael Wenger. 2001. Embedding planar graphs at fixed vertex locations. Graphs Combin. 17, 4 (2001), 717--728.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  199. Rom Pinchasi and Rados Raddoicic. 2003. Topological graphs with no self-intersecting cycle of length 4. In Proceedings of the ACM SoCG 2003. ACM, 98--103. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=777792.777807. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  200. Helen C. Purchase. 2000. Effective information visualisation: A study of graph drawing aesthetics and algorithms. Interacting with Computers 13, 2 (2000), 147--162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  201. Helen C. Purchase, David A. Carrington, and Jo-Anne Allder. 2002. Empirical evaluation of aesthetics-based graph layout. Empirical Software Engineering 7, 3 (2002), 233--255. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  202. Gerhard Ringel. 1965. Ein Sechsfarbenproblem auf der Kugel. Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universitaet Hamburg 29, 1--2 (1965), 107--117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  203. Maxwell J. Roberts. 2012. Underground Maps Unravelled: Explorations in Information Design. Maxwell J Roberts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  204. Neil Robertson and Paul D. Seymour. 2004. Graph minors. XX. wagner’s conjecture. J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B 92, 2 (2004), 325--357. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  205. Neil Robertson, Paul D. Seymour, and Robin Thomas. 1993. Hadwiger’s conjecture for K<sub>6</sub>-free graphs. Combinatorica 13, 3 (1993), 279--361.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  206. Marcus Schaefer. 2013. The graph crossing number and its variants: A survey. Electron. J. Combin. 20 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  207. Walter Schnyder. 1990. Embedding planar graphs on the grid. In Proceedings of the ACM-SIAM SoDA 1990. SIAM, 138--148. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id&equals;320176.320191. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  208. Thomas C. Shermer. 1996. On rectangle visibility graphs. III. external visibility and complexity. In Proceedings of the CCCG 1996. Carleton University Press, 234--239. http://www.cccg.ca/proceedings/1996/cccg1996_0039.pdf. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  209. Janet M. Six and Ioannis G. Tollis. 2013. Circular drawing algorithms. In Handbook on Graph Drawing and Visualization., Roberto Tamassia (Ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC, 285--315.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  210. S. K. Stein. 1951. Convex maps. In Proc. Am. Math. Soc., Vol. 2. 464--466.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  211. Kozo Sugiyama, Shojiro Tagawa, and Mitsuhiko Toda. 1981. Methods for visual understanding of hierarchical system structures. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 11, 2 (1981), 109--125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  212. Andrew Suk and Bartosz Walczak. 2015. New bounds on the maximum number of edges in k-quasi-planar graphs. Comput. Geom. 50 (2015), 24--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  213. Yusuke Suzuki. 2010. Optimal 1-planar graphs which triangulate other surfaces. Discr. Math. 310, 1 (2010), 6--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  214. Roberto Tamassia. 1987. On embedding a graph in the grid with the minimum number of bends. SIAM J. Comput. 16, 3 (1987), 421--444. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  215. Roberto Tamassia and Ioannis G. Tollis. 1986. A unified approach to visibility representations of planar graphs. Discr. Comput. Geom. 1, 1 (1986), 321--341. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  216. Carsten Thomassen. 1988. Rectilinear drawings of graphs. J. Graph Theory 12, 3 (1988), 335--341.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  217. C. D. Toth, J. O’Rourke, and J. E. Goodman. 2017. Handbook of Discrete and Computional Geometry, Third Edition. CRC Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  218. Klaus Truemper. 1992. Matroid Decomposition. Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  219. Leslie G. Valiant. 1981. Universality considerations in VLSI circuits. IEEE Trans. Computers 30, 2 (1981), 135--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  220. Pavel Valtr. 1997. Graph drawings with no pairwise crossing edges. In Proceedings of the GD 1997 (LNCS), Vol. 1353. Springer, 205--218. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F3-540-63938-1_63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  221. Pavel Valtr. 1998. On geometric graphs with no pairwise parallel edges. Discr. Comput. Geom. 19, 3 (1998), 461--469.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  222. Marc J. van Kreveld. 2010. The quality ratio of RAC drawings and planar drawings of planar graphs. In Proceedings of the GD 2010 (LNCS), Vol. 6502. Springer, 371--376. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-18469-7_34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  223. Massimo Vignelli. 2008. New York Subway Map, http://secondavenuesagas.com/2008/05/02/mens-vogue-calls-on-vignelli-for-a-long-awaited-update/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  224. Klaus Wagner. 1936. Bemerkungen zum vierfarbenproblem. Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 46 (1936), 26--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  225. Colin Ware, Helen C. Purchase, Linda Colpoys, and Matthew McGill. 2002. Cognitive measurements of graph aesthetics. Inf. Vis. 1, 2 (2002), 103--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  226. Martin Wattenberg. 2002. Arc diagrams: Visualizing structure in strings. In Proceedings of the INFOVIS. IEEE, 110--116. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1173155. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  227. Stephen K. Wismath. 1985. Characterizing bar line-of-sight graphs. In Proceedings of the ACM SoCG 1985. ACM, 147--152. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid&equals;323233.323253. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  228. Stephen K. Wismath. 1989. Bar-representable visibility graphs and a related network flow problem. https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/831/items/1.0051983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  229. David R. Wood. 2005. Grid drawings of k-colourable graphs. Comput. Geom. 30, 1 (2005), 25--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  230. Mihalis Yannakakis. 1989. Embedding planar graphs in four pages. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 38, 1 (1989), 36--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  231. Xin Zhang and Guizhen Liu. 2013. The structure of plane graphs with independent crossings and its applications to coloring problems. Open Math. 11, 2 (2013), 308--321.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  232. H. Zhou, Panpan Xu, X. Yuan, and H. Qu. 2013. Edge bundling in information visualization. Tsinghua Science and Technology 18, 2 (2013), 145--156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A Survey on Graph Drawing Beyond Planarity

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM Computing Surveys
            ACM Computing Surveys  Volume 52, Issue 1
            January 2020
            758 pages
            ISSN:0360-0300
            EISSN:1557-7341
            DOI:10.1145/3309872
            • Editor:
            • Sartaj Sahni
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2019 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 21 February 2019
            • Accepted: 1 October 2018
            • Revised: 1 September 2018
            • Received: 1 April 2018
            Published in csur Volume 52, Issue 1

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • survey
            • Research
            • Refereed

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format