skip to main content
10.1145/3306618.3314232acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaiesConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

"Scary Robots": Examining Public Responses to AI

Published:27 January 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

How AI is perceived by the public can have significant impact on how it is developed, deployed and regulated. Some commentators argue that perceptions are currently distorted or extreme. This paper discusses the results of a nationally representative survey of the UK population on their perceptions of AI. The survey solicited responses to eight common narratives about AI (four optimistic, four pessimistic), plus views on what AI is, how likely it is to impact in respondents' lifetimes, and whether they can influence it. 42% of respondents offered a plausible definition of AI, while 25% thought it meant robots. Of the narratives presented, those associated with automation were best known, followed by the idea that AI would become more powerful than humans. Overall results showed that the most common visions of the impact of AI elicit significant anxiety. Only two of the eight narratives elicited more excitement than concern (AI making life easier, and extending life). Respondents felt they had no control over AI's development, citing the power of corporations or government, or versions of technological determinism. Negotiating the deployment of AI will require contending with these anxieties.

References

  1. Mimi An. 2017. Artificial Intelligence is Here - People Just Don't Realize It. HubSpot.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. ARM and Northstar. 2017. AI today, AI tomorrow: Awareness, acceptance and anticipation of AI: A global consumer perspective. Retrieved from http://pages.arm.com/rs/312-SAX-488/images/arm-ai-survey-report.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Brhmie Balaram, Tony Greenham, and Jasmine Leonard. 2018. Artificial Intel-ligence: real public engagement. RSA, London. Retrieved November 5, 2018 from https://www.thersa.org/discover/publications-and-articles/reports/artificial-intelligence-real-public-engagementGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Margaret A. Boden. 2016. AI: its nature and future. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Stephen Cave, Claire Craig, Kanta Dihal, Sarah Dillon, Jessica Montgomery, Beth Singler, and Lindsay Taylor. 2018. Portrayals and Perceptions of AI and Why They Matter. The Royal Society, London. Retrieved from https://royalsociety.org/~/media/policy/projects/ai-narratives/AI-narratives-workshop-findings.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Stephen Cave and Kanta Dihal. 2019. Hopes and fears for intelligent ma-chines in fiction and reality. Nature Machine Intelligence 1, 2 (February 2019), 74--78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Dawn Collis. 2009. Social Grade: A Classification Tool. Ipsos MediaCT. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20160315075958/https://www.ipsos-mo-ri.com/DownloadPublication/1285_MediaCT_thoughtpiece_Social_Grade_July09_V3_WEB.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Sarah Dillon and Jennifer Schaffer-Goddard. forthcoming. What AI Re-searchers Read: The Role of Literature in Artificial Intelligence Research. (forthcoming).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. James Dipple-Johnstone. 2018. ICO statement in response to Facebook data breach announcement. Information Commissioner's Office. Retrieved Novem-ber 5, 2018 from https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/news-and-events/news-and-blogs/2018/09/ico-statement-in-response-to-facebook-data-breach-announcement/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Helen Edwards. 2017. There's a fine line between what people want robots to do and not do for them. Quartz. Retrieved November 5, 2018 from https://qz.com/1101460/theres-a-fine-line-between-what-people-want-robots-to-do-and-not-do-for-them/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ethan Fast and Eric Horvitz. 2016. Long-Term Trends in the Public Percep-tion of Artificial Intelligence. arXiv:1609.04904v2 {cs.CL} (September 2016). Retrieved August 21, 2018 from https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04904Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Susan Gubar. 1980. C.L. Moore and the Conventions of Women's Science Fiction (C.L. Moore et les conventions de la science-fiction féminine). Science Fiction Studies 7, 1 (1980), 16--27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Roslynn D. Haynes. 2017. From madman to crime fighter: the scientist in western culture. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. IPSOS Mori and Royal Society. 2017. Public views of Machine Learning: Findings from public research and engagement conducted on behalf of the Royal Society. IPSOS Mori Social Research Institute, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Deborah G. Johnson and Mario Verdicchio. 2017. Reframing AI Discourse. Minds and Machines 27, 4 (December 2017), 575--590. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Vincent C. Müller and Nick Bostrom. 2016. Future Progress in Artificial In-telligence: A Survey of Expert Opinion. Fundamental Issues of Artificial Intel-ligence (2016), 555--572.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ofcom. 2017. Adults' media use and attitudes. Retrieved from https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/102755/adults-media-use-attitudes-2017.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jennifer Robertson. 2010. Gendering Humanoid Robots: Robo-Sexism in Japan. Body & Society 16, 2 (June 2010), 1--36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence. 2018. AI in the UK: ready, will-ing, and able? House of Lords, London. Retrieved from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201719/ldselect/ldai/100/100.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. SPACE10. ongoing. Do You Speak Human? Retrieved November 5, 2018 from http://doyouspeakhuman.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. The Pennsylvania State University. 2019. S.3.2 Hypothesis Testing (P-Value Approach). PennState: Statistics Online Courses. Retrieved January 16, 2019 from https://newonlinecourses.science.psu.edu/statprogram/reviews/statistical-concepts/hypothesis-testing/p-value-approachGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Lisa Tuttle. 2018. Women in SF. The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction. Re-trieved January 16, 2019 from http://www.sf-encyclopedia.com/entry/women_in_sfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Weber Shandwick and KRC Research. 2016. AI-Ready or not: artificial intel-ligence here we come! What consumers think & what marketers need to know. Weber Shandwick, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. "Scary Robots": Examining Public Responses to AI

                    Recommendations

                    Comments

                    Login options

                    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                    Sign in
                    • Published in

                      cover image ACM Conferences
                      AIES '19: Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society
                      January 2019
                      577 pages
                      ISBN:9781450363242
                      DOI:10.1145/3306618

                      Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

                      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International 4.0 License.

                      Publisher

                      Association for Computing Machinery

                      New York, NY, United States

                      Publication History

                      • Published: 27 January 2019

                      Permissions

                      Request permissions about this article.

                      Request Permissions

                      Check for updates

                      Qualifiers

                      • research-article

                      Acceptance Rates

                      Overall Acceptance Rate61of162submissions,38%

                    PDF Format

                    View or Download as a PDF file.

                    PDF

                    eReader

                    View online with eReader.

                    eReader