skip to main content
10.1145/3311927.3325336acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesidcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Co-Designing an Intelligent Conversational History Tutor with Children

Published:12 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

In a world that demands independent and cooperative problem solving to address complex social, economic, ethical, and personal concerns, core social studies content is as basic for success as reading, writing, math, and computing. Nationally, only 20% of 4th grade students are at or above Proficient level in U.S. History, the lowest among the core disciplines of social studies. Reaching proficiency requires students to ask more profound questions of the past as well as construct deeper understandings of it. This research explores the intersection of natural language dialogue and intelligent tutoring systems to enhance history learning of upper elementary students in 3rd and 4th grade. Elementary and middle school students were participants in a participatory design study to extract their design needs for the development of an educational learning technology for social studies.

References

  1. Anton Axelsson, Erik Anderberg, and Magnus Haake. 2013. Can preschoolers profit from a teachable agent based play-and-learn game in mathematics?. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Springer, 289--298.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. J Bloch. 2010. Digital storytelling: The second language writing classroom. Office of the chief information officer. Retrieved from ttp://digitalunion. osu. edu/2010/08/19/digital-storytelling-the-second-language-writing-classroom (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Sonia Chiasson and Carl Gutwin. 2005. Design principles for childrenâĂŹs technology. interfaces 7 (2005), 28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Allison Druin. 2002. The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and information technology 21, 1 (2002), 1--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jennifer Fereday and Eimear Muir-Cochrane. 2006. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International journal of qualitative methods 5, 1 (2006), 80--92.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Arthur C Graesser, Kurt VanLehn, Carolyn P Rosé, Pamela W Jordan, and Derek Harter. 2001. Intelligent tutoring systems with conversational dialogue. AI magazine 22, 4 (2001), 39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Libby Hanna, Kirsten Risden, Mary Czerwinski, and Kristin J Alexander. 1998. The role of usability research in designing children's computer products. In The design of children's technology. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 3--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Radoslava Kraleva. 2017. Designing an Interface For a Mobile Application Based on Children's Opinion. iJIM 11, 1 (2017), 53--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. James C Lester, Sharolyn A Converse, Susan E Kahler, S Todd Barlow, Brian A Stone, and Ravinder S Bhogal. 1997. The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 359--366. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Dc National Council for the Social Studies, Washington. 1988. Social Studies for Early Childhood and Elementary School Children Preparing for the 21St Century. a Report from Ncss Task Force on Early Childhood/Elementary Social Studies. National Council for the Social Studies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. United States Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences National Center for Education Statistics National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). 2010 US History Assessment. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/ushistory_2010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Joan M Shaughnessy and Thomas M Haladyna. 1985. Research on student attitude toward social studies. Social Education 49, 8 (1985), 692--95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kathy Swan, Keith C Barton, Stephen Buckles, Flannery Burke, Jim Charkins, SG Grant, Susan W Hardwick, John Lee, Peter Levine, Meira Levinson, et al. 2013. The College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies State Standards: Guidance for Enhancing the Rigor of K-12 Civics, Economics, Geography, and History. (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ruut Tikkanen and Neta Iivari. 2011. The role of music in the design process with children. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 288--305. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Shuyan Wang and Hong Zhan. 2010. Enhancing teaching and learning with digital storytelling. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE) 6, 2 (2010), 76--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    IDC '19: Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children
    June 2019
    787 pages
    ISBN:9781450366908
    DOI:10.1145/3311927

    Copyright © 2019 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 12 June 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    IDC '19 Paper Acceptance Rate41of124submissions,33%Overall Acceptance Rate172of578submissions,30%

    Upcoming Conference

    IDC '24
    Interaction Design and Children
    June 17 - 20, 2024
    Delft , Netherlands

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader