Sindhu Kiranmai Ernala
Alex Leavitt
ABSTRACT
Many studies examining social media use rely on self-report survey questions about how much time participants spend on social media platforms. Because they are challenging to answer accurately and susceptible to various biases, these self-reported measures are known to contain error -- although the specific contours of this error are not well understood. This paper compares data from ten self-reported Facebook use survey measures deployed in 15 countries (N = 49,934) against data from Facebook's server logs to describe factors associated with error in commonly used survey items from the literature. Self-reports were moderately correlated with actual Facebook use (r = 0.42 for the best-performing question), though participants significantly overestimated how much time they spent on Facebook and underestimated the number of times they visited. People who spent a lot of time on the platform were more likely to misreport their time, as were teens and younger adults, which is notable because of the high reliance on college-aged samples in many fields. We conclude with recommendations on the most accurate ways to collect time-spent data via surveys.
- Adrian Furnham and Hua Chu Boo. 2011. A Literature Review of the Anchoring Effect. The Journal of Socio-Economics 40, 1 (2011), 35--42. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1053535710001411Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Alexander Szalai, Riccardo Petrella, and Stein Rokkan. 1977. Cross-National Comparative Survey Research: Theory and Practice. Pergamon.Google Scholar
- Richard L. Allen. 1981. The Reliability and Stability of Television Exposure. Communication Research 8, 2 (April 1981), 233--256. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009365028100800205Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard L. Allen and Benjamin F. Taylor. 1985. Media Public Affairs Exposure: Issues and Alternative Strategies. Communication Monographs 52, 2 (June 1985), 186--201. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637758509376104Google ScholarCross Ref
- Theo Araujo, Anke Wonneberger, Peter Neijens, and Claes de Vreese. 2017. How Much Time Do You Spend Online? Understanding and Improving the Accuracy of Self-Reported Measures of Internet Use. Communication Methods and Measures 11, 3 (July 2017), 173--190. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317337Google ScholarCross Ref
- W.A. Belson. 1981. The Design and Understanding of Survey Questions. Lexington Books.Google Scholar
- Adam J. Berinsky. 2018. Telling the Truth About Believing the Lies? Evidence For the Limited Prevalence of Expressive Survey Responding. The Journal of Politics 80, 1 (Jan. 2018), 211--224. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/694258Google ScholarCross Ref
- Katherine Bessière, Sara Kiesler, Robert Kraut, and Bonka S. Boneva. 2008. Effects of Internet Use and Social Resources on Changes in Depression. Information, Communication & Society 11, 1 (Feb. 2008), 47--70. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691180701858851Google ScholarCross Ref
- Moira Burke and Robert Kraut. 2016a. Online or Offline: Connecting With Close Friends Improves Well-being. (2016). https://research.fb.com/blog/2016/01/online-or-offlineconnecting-with-close-friends-improves-well-being/Google Scholar
- Moira Burke, Robert Kraut, and Cameron Marlow. 2011. Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating Uses and Users. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 571--580.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Moira Burke and Robert E Kraut. 2016b. The Relationship Between Facebook Use and Well-being Depends on Communication Type and Tie Strength. Journal of computer-mediated communication 21, 4 (2016), 265--281.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Moira Burke, Cameron Marlow, and Thomas Lento. 2010. Social Network Activity and Social Well-being. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '10. ACM Press, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 1909. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753613Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carlos A. Celis-Morales, Francisco Perez-Bravo, Luis Ibañez, Carlos Salas, Mark E. S. Bailey, and Jason M. R. Gill. 2012. Objective vs. Self-Reported Physical Activity and Sedentary Time: Effects of Measurement Method on Relationships with Risk Biomarkers. PLoS ONE 7, 5 (May 2012), e36345. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036345Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jacob Cohen. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed ed.). L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J.Google Scholar
- Claes H. de Vreese and Peter Neijens. 2016. Measuring Media Exposure in a Changing Communications Environment. Communication Methods and Measures 10, 2--3 (April 2016), 69--80. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2016.1150441Google ScholarCross Ref
- David A Ellis, Brittany I Davidson, Heather Shaw, and Kristoffer Geyer. 2019. Do Smartphone Usage Scales Predict Behavior? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 130 (2019), 86--92.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nicole B. Ellison, Charles Steinfield, and Cliff Lampe. 2007. The Benefits of Facebook "Friends:" Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12, 4 (July 2007), 1143--1168. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083--6101.2007.00367.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Nicole B. Ellison, Charles Steinfield, and Cliff Lampe. 2011. Connection Strategies: Social Capital Implications of Facebook-enabled Communication Practices. New Media & Society 13, 6 (Sept. 2011), 873--892. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444810385389Google ScholarCross Ref
- Facebook. 2018. Facebook Launches New Initiative to Help Scholars Assess Social Media's Impact on Elections. (Apr 2018). https://about.fb.com/news/2018/04/new-elections-initiative/Google Scholar
- Jessica K. Flake, Jolynn Pek, and Eric Hehman. 2017. Construct Validation in Social and Personality Research: Current Practice and Recommendations. Social Psychological and Personality Science 8, 4 (May 2017), 370--378. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1948550617693063Google ScholarCross Ref
- Floyd Jackson Fowler, Jr. 1992. How Unclear Terms Affect Survey Data. Public Opinion Quarterly 56, 2 (1992), 218. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/269312Google ScholarCross Ref
- GALLUP. 2018. Computers and the Internet. (2018). https://news.gallup.com/poll/1591/computers-internet.aspxGoogle Scholar
- Homero Gil de Zúñiga, Trevor Diehl, Brigitte Huber, and James Liu. 2017. Personality Traits and Social Media Use in 20 Countries: How Personality Relates to Frequency of Social Media Use, Social Media News Use, and Social Media Use for Social Interaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 20, 9 (Sept. 2017), 540--552. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0295Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andrew Markus Guess. 2015. A New Era of Measurable Effects? Essays on Political Communication in the New Media Age. Ph.D. Dissertation. Columbia University.Google Scholar
- Katherine Haenschen. 2019. Self-Reported Versus Digitally Recorded: Measuring Political Activity on Facebook. Social Science Computer Review (Jan. 2019), 089443931881358. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0894439318813586Google ScholarDigital Library
- J.T. Hancock, X. Liu, M. French, M. Luo, and H. Mieczkowski. 2019. Social Media Use and Psychological Well-being: A Meta-analysis. In 69th Annual International Communication Association Conference.Google Scholar
- F. Maxwell Harper and Joseph A. Konstan. 2015. The MovieLens Datasets: History and Context. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 5, 4, Article 19 (Dec. 2015), 19 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2827872Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lindsay H. Hoffman and Hui Fang. 2014. Quantifying Political Behavior on Mobile Devices over Time: A User Evaluation Study. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 11, 4 (Oct. 2014), 435--445. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.929996Google ScholarCross Ref
- Melissa G Hunt, Rachel Marx, Courtney Lipson, and Jordyn Young. 2018. No More FOMO: Limiting Social Media Decreases Loneliness and Depression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 37, 10 (2018), 751--768.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ian Hussey and Sean Hughes. 2018. Hidden Invalidity Among Fifteen Commonly Used Measures In Social and Personality Psychology. (2018). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7rbfpGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Wade C. Jacobsen and Renata Forste. 2011. The Wired Generation: Academic and Social Outcomes of Electronic Media Use Among University Students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 14, 5 (May 2011), 275--280. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0135Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jennifer Jerit, Jason Barabas, William Pollock, Susan Banducci, Daniel Stevens, and Martijn Schoonvelde. 2016. Manipulated vs. Measured: Using an Experimental Benchmark to Investigate the Performance of Self-Reported Media Exposure. Communication Methods and Measures 10, 2--3 (April 2016), 99--114. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2016.1150444Google ScholarCross Ref
- Reynol Junco. 2012a. The Relationship Between Frequency of Facebook Use, Participation in Facebook Activities, and Student Engagement. Computers & Education 58, 1 (Jan. 2012), 162--171. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.004Google ScholarDigital Library
- Reynol Junco. 2012b. Too Much Face and Not Enough Books: The Relationship Between Multiple Indices of Facebook Use and Academic Performance. Computers in Human Behavior 28, 1 (Jan. 2012), 187--198. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.026Google ScholarDigital Library
- Reynol Junco. 2013. Comparing Actual and Self-Reported Measures of Facebook Use. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 3 (May 2013), 626--631. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.007Google ScholarDigital Library
- Reynol Junco and Shelia R. Cotten. 2012. No A 4 U: The Relationship Between Multitasking and Academic Performance. Computers & Education 59, 2 (Sept. 2012), 505--514. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.023Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pascal Jürgens, Birgit Stark, and Melanie Magin. 2019. Two Half-Truths Make a Whole? On Bias in Self-Reports and Tracking Data. Social Science Computer Review (Feb. 2019), 089443931983164. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0894439319831643Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aryn C. Karpinski, Paul A. Kirschner, Ipek Ozer, Jennifer A. Mellott, and Pius Ochwo. 2013. An Exploration of Social Networking Site Use, Multitasking, and Academic Performance Among United States and European University Students. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 3 (May 2013), 1182--1192. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.011Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul A. Kirschner and Aryn C. Karpinski. 2010. Facebook® and Academic Performance. Computers in Human Behavior 26, 6 (Nov. 2010), 1237--1245. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert Kraut and Moira Burke. 2015. Internet Use and Psychological Well-being: Effects of Activity and Audience. Commun. ACM 58, 12 (Nov. 2015), 94--100. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2739043Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ethan Kross, Philippe Verduyn, Emre Demiralp, Jiyoung Park, David Seungjae Lee, Natalie Lin, Holly Shablack, John Jonides, and Oscar Ybarra. 2013. Facebook Use Predicts Declines in Subjective Well-Being in Young Adults. PLoS ONE 8, 8 (Aug. 2013), e69841. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069841Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ozan Kuru and Josh Pasek. 2016. Improving Social Media Measurement in Surveys: Avoiding Acquiescence Bias in Facebook Research. Computers in Human Behavior 57 (April 2016), 82--92. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.008Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael J. LaCour and Lynn Vavreck. 2014. Improving Media Measurement: Evidence From the Field. Political Communication 31, 3 (July 2014), 408--420. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2014.921258Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chul-joo Lee, Robert Hornik, and Michael Hennessy. 2008. The Reliability and Stability of General Media Exposure Measures. Communication Methods and Measures 2, 1--2 (May 2008), 6--22. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19312450802063024Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sonia Livingstone. 2003. On the Challenges of Cross-national Comparative Media Research. European journal of communication 18, 4 (2003), 477--500.Google Scholar
- Maike Luhmann, Louise C. Hawkley, Michael Eid, and John T. Cacioppo. 2012. Time Frames and the Distinction Between Affective and Cognitive Well-being. Journal of Research in Personality 46, 4 (Aug. 2012), 431--441. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.04.004Google ScholarCross Ref
- Teresa K. Naab, Veronika Karnowski, and Daniela Schlütz. 2019. Reporting Mobile Social Media Use: How Survey and Experience Sampling Measures Differ. Communication Methods and Measures 13, 2 (April 2019), 126--147. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1555799Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rebekah H. Nagler. 2017. Measurement of Media Exposure. In The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, Jörg Matthes, Christine S. Davis, and Robert F. Potter (Eds.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1--21. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0144Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anton J. Nederhof. 1985. Methods of Coping With Social Desirability Bias: A Review. European Journal of Social Psychology 15, 3 (July 1985), 263--280. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420150303Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nic Newman. 2019. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2019. (2019), 156.Google Scholar
- Nicole B. Ellison and danah m. boyd. 2013. Sociality Through Social Network Sites. In The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies, William H. Dutton (Ed.).Google Scholar
- Jennifer J. Otten, Benjamin Littenberg, and Jean R. Harvey-Berino. 2010. Relationship Between Self-report and an Objective Measure of Television-viewing Time in Adults. Obesity 18, 6 (June 2010), 1273--1275. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/oby.2009.371Google ScholarCross Ref
- Philip M. Podsakoff, Scott B. MacKenzie, Jeong-Yeon Lee, and Nathan P. Podsakoff. 2003. Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88, 5 (2003), 879--903. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021--9010.88.5.879Google ScholarCross Ref
- William Pollock, Jason Barabas, Jennifer Jerit, Martijn Schoonvelde, Susan Banducci, and Daniel Stevens. 2015. Studying Media Events in the European Social Surveys Across Research Designs, Countries, Time, Issues, and Outcomes. European Political Science 14, 4 (Dec. 2015), 394--421. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/eps.2015.67Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jacob Poushter, Caldwell Bishop, and Hanyu Chwe. 2018. Social Media Use Continues to Rise in Developing Countries But Plateaus Across Developed Ones. Pew Research Center 22 (2018).Google Scholar
- Markus Prior. 2009a. The Immensely Inflated News Audience: Assessing Bias in Self-Reported News Exposure. Public Opinion Quarterly 73, 1 (2009), 130--143. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp002Google ScholarCross Ref
- Markus Prior. 2009b. Improving Media Effects Research through Better Measurement of News Exposure. The Journal of Politics 71, 3 (July 2009), 893--908. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609090781Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kelly Quinn and Zizi Papacharissi. 2018. The Contextual Accomplishment of Privacy. International Journal of Communication 12 (2018), 23.Google Scholar
- Melanie Revilla, Carlos Ochoa, and Germán Loewe. 2017. Using Passive Data From a Meter to Complement Survey Data in Order to Study Online Behavior. Social Science Computer Review 35, 4 (Aug. 2017), 521--536. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0894439316638457Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. C. Schaeffer and J. Dykema. 2011. Questions for Surveys: Current Trends and Future Directions. Public Opinion Quarterly 75, 5 (Dec. 2011), 909--961. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr048Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael Scharkow. 2016. The Accuracy of Self-Reported Internet Use-A Validation Study Using Client Log Data. Communication Methods and Measures 10, 1 (Jan. 2016), 13--27. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2015.1118446Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael Scharkow and Marko Bachl. 2017. How Measurement Error in Content Analysis and Self-Reported Media Use Leads to Minimal Media Effect Findings in Linkage Analyses: A Simulation Study. Political Communication 34, 3 (July 2017), 323--343. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1235640Google ScholarCross Ref
- Frank M. Schneider, Sabine Reich, and Leonard Reinecke. 2017. Methodological Challenges of POPC for Communication Research. In Permanently Online, Permanently Connected (1 ed.), Peter Vorderer, Dorothée Hefner, Leonard Reinecke, and Christoph Klimmt (Eds.). Routledge, New York and London : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2017., 29--39. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315276472--4Google ScholarCross Ref
- Norbert Schwarz and Daphna Oyserman. 2001. Asking Questions About Behavior: Cognition, Communication, and Questionnaire Construction. The American Journal of Evaluation 22, 2 (2001), 127--160.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Aaron Smith, Laura Silver, Courtney Johnson, and Jiang Jingjing. 2019. Publics in Emerging Economies Worry Social Media Sow Division, Even as They Offer New Chances for Political Engagement. (2019).Google Scholar
- Jessica Staddon, Alessandro Acquisti, and Kristen LeFevre. 2013. Self-Reported Social Network Behavior: Accuracy Predictors and Implications for the Privacy Paradox. In 2013 International Conference on Social Computing. IEEE, Alexandria, VA, USA, 295--302. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom.2013.48Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stein Rokkan, Sidney Verba, Jean Viet, and Elina Almasy. 1969. Comparative survey analysis.Google Scholar
- Sebastian Stier, Johannes Breuer, Pascal Siegers, and Kjerstin Thorson. 2019. Integrating Survey Data and Digital Trace Data: Key Issues in Developing an Emerging Field. Social Science Computer Review (April 2019), 089443931984366. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0894439319843669Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fritz Strack. 1992. "Order Effects" in Survey Research: Activation and Information Functions of Preceding Questions. In Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research, Norbert Schwarz and Seymour Sudman (Eds.). Springer New York, New York, NY, 23--34. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978--1--4612--2848--6_3Google ScholarCross Ref
- David Tewksbury, Scott L. Althaus, and Matthew V. Hibbing. 2011. Estimating Self-Reported News Exposure Across and Within Typical Days: Should Surveys Use More Refined Measures? Communication Methods and Measures 5, 4 (Oct. 2011), 311--328. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2011.624650Google ScholarCross Ref
- Philippe Verduyn, David Seungjae Lee, Jiyoung Park, Holly Shablack, Ariana Orvell, Joseph Bayer, Oscar Ybarra, John Jonides, and Ethan Kross. 2015. Passive Facebook usage undermines affective well-being: Experimental and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144, 2 (2015), 480--488. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000057Google ScholarCross Ref
- Emily Vraga, Leticia Bode, and Sonya Troller-Renfree. 2016. Beyond Self-Reports: Using Eye Tracking to Measure Topic and Style Differences in Attention to Social Media Content. Communication Methods and Measures 10, 2--3 (April 2016), 149--164. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2016.1150443Google ScholarCross Ref
- Emily K. Vraga and Melissa Tully. 2018. Who Is Exposed to News? It Depends on How You Measure: Examining Self-Reported Versus Behavioral News Exposure Measures. Social Science Computer Review (Nov. 2018), 089443931881205. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0894439318812050Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marta Walentynowicz, Stefan Schneider, and Arthur A. Stone. 2018. The Effects of Time Frames on Self-Report. PLOS ONE 13, 8 (Aug. 2018), e0201655. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201655Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yiran Wang and Gloria Mark. 2018. The Context of College Students' Facebook Use and Academic Performance: An Empirical Study. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 418.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Richard B. Warnecke, Timothy P. Johnson, Noel Chávez, Seymour Sudman, Diane P. O'Rourke, Loretta Lacey, and John Horm. 1997. Improving Question Wording in Surveys of Culturally Diverse Populations. Annals of Epidemiology 7, 5 (July 1997), 334--342. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1047--2797(97)00030--6Google ScholarCross Ref
- James G Webster and Jacob Wakshlag. 1985. Measuring Exposure to Television. Selective exposure to communication (1985), 35--62.Google Scholar
- Anke Wonneberger and Mariana Irazoqui. 2017. Explaining Response Errors of Self-Reported Frequency and Duration of TV Exposure Through Individual and Contextual Factors. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 94, 1 (March 2017), 259--281. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077699016629372Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael Zimmer. 2010. "But the Data is Already Public": On the Ethics of Research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology 12, 4 (Dec. 2010), 313--325. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010--9227--5Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zizi Papacharissi and A. Mendelson. 2011. Toward a New(er) Sociability: Uses, Gratifications and Social Capital on Facebook. In A networked self: identity, community and culture on social network sites, Zizi Papacharissi (Ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- How Well Do People Report Time Spent on Facebook?: An Evaluation of Established Survey Questions with Recommendations
Recommendations
Mindsets Matter: How Beliefs About Facebook Moderate the Association Between Time Spent and Well-Being
CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems“Time spent on platform” is a widely used measure in many studies examining social media use and well-being, yet the current literature presents unresolved findings about the relationship between time on platform and well-being. In this paper, we ...
How does Facebook browsing affect self-awareness and social well-being: the role of narcissism
ACE '10: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment TechnologySocial networking sites such as Facebook have become extremely popular recently. In this research, we studied how Facebook browsing affects self-awareness and social well-being. Our results show that after Facebook browsing, individuals high in ...
Understanding Facebook use and the psychological affects of use across generations
Age differences between Facebook use and Facebook related outcomes were examined.Age is significantly associated with differences in the way Facebook is used.Younger adults use Facebook more frequently.Younger users are significantly more impacted by ...
Comments