skip to main content
10.1145/3313831.3376599acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Neo-Noumena: Augmenting Emotion Communication

Published:23 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The subjective experience of emotion is notoriously difficult to interpersonally communicate. We believe that technology can challenge this notion through the design of neuroresponsive systems for interpersonal communication. We explore this through "Neo-Noumena", a communicative neuroresponsive system that uses brain-computer interfacing and artificial intelligence to read one's emotional states and dynamically represent them to others in mixed reality through two head-mounted displays. In our study five participant pairs were given Neo-Noumena for three days, using the system freely. Measures of emotional competence demonstrated a statistically significant increase in participants' ability to interpersonally regulate emotions. Furthermore, participant interviews revealed themes regarding Spatiotemporal Actualization, Objective Representation, and Preternatural Transmission. We also suggest design strategies for future augmented emotion communication systems. We intend that work gives guidance towards a future in which our ability to interpersonally communicate emotion is augmented beyond traditional experience.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn6772vf.mp4

mp4

15.3 MB

References

  1. Bai, Zhen, Blackwell, Alan F, and Coulouris, George. 2015. Exploring expressive augmented reality: The FingAR puppet system for social pretend play. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ACM, 1035--1044.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Beck, Luna, Kumschick, Irina R, Eid, Michael, and Klann-Delius, Gisela. 2012. Relationship between language competence and emotional competence in middle childhood. Emotion 12, 3, 503.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bene?, Bedrich and Hartman, Christopher. 2006. Autonomous boids. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds 17, 3--4, 199--206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bermejo-Martins, Elena, López?Dicastillo, Olga, and Mujika, Agurtzane. 2018. An exploratory trial of a health education programme to promote healthy lifestyles through social and emotional competence in young children: Study protocol. Journal of advanced nursing 74, 1, 211--222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bies, Alexander J, Blanc-Goldhammer, Daryn R, Boydston, Cooper R, Taylor, Richard P, and Sereno, Margaret E. 2016. Aesthetic responses to exact fractals driven by physical complexity. Frontiers in human neuroscience 10, 210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Boehner, Kirsten, Depaula, Rogerio, Dourish, Paul, and Sengers, Phoebe. 2005. Affect: from information to interaction. In Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility ACM, 59--68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Boehner, Kirsten, Depaula, Rogério, Dourish, Paul, and Sengers, Phoebe. 2007. How emotion is made and measured. International Journal of HumanComputer Studies 65, 4, 275--291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Brasseur, Sophie, Grégoire, Jacques, Bourdu, Romain, and Mikolajczak, Moïra. 2013. The profile of emotional competence (PEC): Development and validation of a self-reported measure that fits dimensions of emotional competence theory. Plos one 8, 5, e62635.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Braun, Virginia and Clarke, Victoria. 2012. Thematic analysis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Cauchard, Jessica R, Zhai, Kevin Y, Spadafora, Marco, and Landay, James A. 2016. Emotion encoding in human-drone interaction. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on HumanRobot Interaction (HRI) IEEE, 263--270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Chen, Min, Zhou, Ping, and Fortino, Giancarlo. 2016. Emotion communication system. IEEE Access 5, 326--337.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Ciarrochi, Joseph, Scott, Greg, Deane, Frank P, and Heaven, Patrick Cl. 2003. Relations between social and emotional competence and mental health: A construct validation study. Personality and Individual Differences 35, 8, 1947--1963.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Delgado-Mata, Carlos, Martinez, Jesus Ibanez, Bee, Simon, Ruiz-Rodarte, Rocio, and Aylett, Ruth. 2007. On the use of virtual animals with artificial fear in virtual environments. New Generation Computing 25, 2, 145--169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Denham, Susanne A, Blair, Kimberly A, Demulder, Elizabeth, Levitas, Jennifer, Sawyer, Katherine, Auerbach--Major, Sharon, and Queenan, Patrick. 2003. Preschool emotional competence: Pathway to social competence? Child development 74, 1, 238--256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Faltaous, Sarah, Haas, Gabriel, Barrios, Liliana, Seiderer, Andreas, Rauh, Sebastian Felix, Chae, Han Joo, Schneegass, Stefan, and Alt, Florian. 2019. BrainShare: A Glimpse of Social Interaction for Locked-in Syndrome Patients. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ACM, LBW0155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Fan, Jianyu, Thorogood, Miles, and Pasquier, Philippe. 2016. Automatic soundscape affect recognition using a dimensional approach. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 64, 9, 646--653.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Freedberg, David and Gallese, Vittorio. 2007. Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience. Trends in cognitive sciences 11, 5, 197--203.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Frey, Jérémy, Grabli, May, Slyper, Ronit, and Cauchard, Jessica R. 2018. Breeze: Sharing Biofeedback Through Wearable Technologies. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ACM, 645.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Grnfelde, M?ra. 2018. The Four Dimensions of Embodiment and the Experience of Illness. AVANT. Pismo Awangardy Filozoficzno-Naukowej, 2, 107127.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Hecht, Heiko, Welsch, Robin, Viehoff, Jana, and Longo, Matthew R. 2019. The shape of personal space. Acta psychologica 193, 113--122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Hodzic, Sabina, Ripoll, Pilar, Lira, Eva, and Zenasni, Franck. 2015. Can intervention in emotional competences increase employability prospects of unemployed adults? Journal of Vocational Behavior 88, 28--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Homan, Richard W, Herman, John, and Purdy, Phillip. 1987. Cerebral location of international 10-- 20 system electrode placement. Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology 66, 4, 376--382.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Howell, Noura, Chuang, John, De Kosnik, Abigail, Niemeyer, Greg, and Ryokai, Kimiko. 2018. Emotional Biosensing: Exploring Critical Alternatives. Proceedings of the ACM on HumanComputer Interaction 2, CSCW, 69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Howell, Noura, Devendorf, Laura, Tian, Rundong Kevin, Vega Galvez, Tomás, Gong, Nan-Wei, Poupyrev, Ivan, Paulos, Eric, and Ryokai, Kimiko. 2016. Biosignals as social cues: Ambiguity and emotional interpretation in social displays of skin conductance. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems ACM, 865--870.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Howell, Noura, Devendorf, Laura, Vega Gálvez, Tomás Alfonso, Tian, Rundong, and Ryokai, Kimiko. 2018. Tensions of data-driven reflection: A case study of real-time emotional biosensing. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ACM, 431.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Ibáñez, Jesús. 2011. Showing emotions through movement and symmetry. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 1, 561--567.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Introna, Lucas D. 1996. Notes on ateleological information systems development. Information Technology & People 9, 4, 20--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Kemp, Charles, Xu, Yang, and Regier, Terry. 2018. Semantic typology and efficient communication. Annual Review of Linguistics 4, 109--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Kitson, Alexandra, Dipaola, Steve, and Riecke, Bernhard E. 2019. Lucid Loop: A Virtual Deep Learning Biofeedback System for Lucid Dreaming Practice. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ACM, LBW1322.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Kitson, Alexandra, Schiphorst, Thecla, and Riecke, Bernhard E. 2018. Are you dreaming?: a phenomenological study on understanding lucid dreams as a tool for introspection in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ACM, 343.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Koelstra, Sander, Muhl, Christian, Soleymani, Mohammad, Lee, Jong-Seok, Yazdani, Ashkan, Ebrahimi, Touradj, Pun, Thierry, Nijholt, Anton, and Patras, Ioannis. 2011. Deap: A database for emotion analysis; using physiological signals. IEEE transactions on affective computing 3, 1, 18--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Kotsou, Ilios, Nelis, Delphine, Grégoire, Jacques, and Mikolajczak, Moïra. 2011. Emotional plasticity: Conditions and effects of improving emotional competence in adulthood. Journal of Applied Psychology 96, 4, 827.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. La Delfa, Joseph, Baytas, Mehmet Aydin, Wichtowski, Olivia, Khot, Rohit Ashok, and Mueller, Florian Floyd. 2019. Are Drones Meditative? In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ACM, INT046.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. La Delfa, Joseph, Jarvis, Robert, Khot, Rohit Ashok, and Mueller, Florian'floyd'. 2018. Tai Chi In The Clouds: Using Micro UAV's To Support Tai Chi Practice. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts ACM, 513--519.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Leijnen, Stefan and Van Veen, Fjodor. 2016. ArkaNet: Investigating Emergent Gameplay and Emergence.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu, Yisi, Sourina, Olga, and Nguyen, Minh Khoa. 2010. Real-time EEG-based human emotion recognition and visualization. In 2010 international conference on cyberworlds IEEE, 262--269.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Lo, Shao-Kang. 2008. The nonverbal communication functions of emoticons in computer-mediated communication. CyberPsychology & Behavior 11, 5, 595--597.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Mann, Steve. 2001. Wearable computing: Toward humanistic intelligence. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16, 3, 10--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Martínez, Ruiz Xicoténcatl. 2019. Interpreting Poetics, Cognitions and Aesthetic Emotion. In Time for Educational Poetics Brill Sense, 71--75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Mikolajczak, Moïra, Avalosse, Hervé, Vancorenland, Sigrid, Verniest, Rebekka, Callens, Michael, Van Broeck, Nady, Fantini-Hauwel, Carole, and Mierop, Adrien. 2015. A nationally representative study of emotional competence and health. Emotion 15, 5, 653.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Nunes, Francisco, Verdezoto, Nervo, Fitzpatrick, Geraldine, Kyng, Morten, Grönvall, Erik, and Storni, Cristiano. 2015. Self-care technologies in HCI: Trends, tensions, and opportunities. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 22, 6, 33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Pelowski, Matthew, Markey, Patrick S, Forster, Michael, Gerger, Gernot, and Leder, Helmut. 2017. Move me, astonish me? delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna integrated model of top-down and bottom-up processes in art perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates. Physics of Life Reviews 21, 80--125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Pelowski, Matthew, Markey, Patrick S, Lauring, Jon O, and Leder, Helmut. 2016. Visualizing the impact of art: An update and comparison of current psychological models of art experience. Frontiers in human neuroscience 10, 160.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Picard, Rosalind W., Vyzas, Elias, and Healey, Jennifer. 2001. Toward machine emotional intelligence: Analysis of affective physiological state. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, 10, 1175--1191.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Roo, Joan Sol, Gervais, Renaud, and Hachet, Martin. 2016. Inner garden: An augmented sandbox designed for self-reflection. In Proceedings of the TEI'16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction ACM, 570--576.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Rude, Stephanie, Gortner, Eva-Maria, and Pennebaker, James. 2004. Language use of depressed and depression-vulnerable college students. Cognition & Emotion 18, 8, 1121--1133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Schutte, Nicola S, Malouff, John M, Bobik, Chad, Coston, Tracie D, Greeson, Cyndy, Jedlicka, Christina, Rhodes, Emily, and Wendorf, Greta. 2001. Emotional intelligence and interpersonal relations. The Journal of social psychology 141, 4, 523--536.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Semertzidis, Nathan Arthur, Sargeant, Betty, Dwyer, Justin, Mueller, Florian Floyd, and Zambetta, Fabio. 2019. Towards Understanding the Design of Positive Pre-sleep Through a Neurofeedback Artistic Experience. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ACM, 574.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Sliwinski, Jacek. 2019. Mindfulness and HCI. In Handbook of Research on Human-Computer Interfaces and New Modes of Interactivity IGI Global, 314--332.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Spehar, Branka, Clifford, Colin Wg, Newell, Ben R, and Taylor, Richard P. 2003. Universal aesthetic of fractals. Computers & Graphics 27, 5, 813--820.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Springham, Neil and Huet, Val. 2018. Art as relational encounter: An ostensive communication theory of art therapy. Art Therapy 35, 1, 4--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Street, Nichola, Forsythe, Alexandra M, Reilly, Ronan, Taylor, Richard, and Helmy, Mai S. 2016. A complex story: Universal preference vs. individual differences shaping aesthetic response to fractals patterns. Frontiers in human neuroscience 10, 213.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Tarvainen, Mika P, Hiltunen, Jaana K, Ranta-Aho, Perttu O, and Karjalainen, Pasi A. 2004. Estimation of nonstationary EEG with Kalman smoother approach: an application to event-related synchronization (ERS). IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 51, 3, 516--524.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Häuslschmid, Renate, and Hussmann, Heinrich. 2019. A Review & Analysis of Mindfulness Research in HCI: Framing Current Lines of Research and Future Opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ACM, 457.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Thorogood, Miles, Fan, Jianyu, and Pasquier, Philippe. 2019. A framework for computer-assisted sound design systems supported by modelling affective and perceptual properties of soundscape. Journal of New Music Research, 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Tishby, Naftali, Pereira, Fernando C, and Bialek, William. 2000. The information bottleneck method. arXiv preprint physics/0004057.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Verbeek, Peter-Paul. 2015. Beyond interaction: A short introduction to mediation theory. Interactions 22, 3, 26--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Neo-Noumena: Augmenting Emotion Communication

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2020
        10688 pages
        ISBN:9781450367080
        DOI:10.1145/3313831

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 April 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format