skip to main content
10.1145/3313831.3376792acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Researching AI Legibility through Design

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Everyday interactions with computers are increasingly likely to involve elements of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Encompassing a broad spectrum of technologies and applications, AI poses many challenges for HCI and design. One such challenge is the need to make AI's role in a given system legible to the user in a meaningful way. In this paper we employ a Research through Design (RtD) approach to explore how this might be achieved. Building on contemporary concerns and a thorough exploration of related research, our RtD process reflects on designing imagery intended to help increase AI legibility for users. The paper makes three contributions. First, we thoroughly explore prior research in order to critically unpack the AI legibility problem space. Second, we respond with design proposals whose aim is to enhance the legibility, to users, of systems using AI. Third, we explore the role of design-led enquiry as a tool for critically exploring the intersection between HCI and AI research.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

a663-lindley-presentation.mp4

mp4

413.9 MB

References

  1. Saleema Amershi, Max Chickering, Steven M. Drucker, Bongshin Lee, Patrice Simard, and Jina Suh. 2015. ModelTracker. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 337--346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702509Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Saleema Amershi, Kori Inkpen, Jaime Teevan, Ruth Kikin-Gil, Eric Horvitz, Dan Weld, Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Adam Fourney, Besmira Nushi, Penny Collisson, Jina Suh, Shamsi Iqbal, and Paul N. Bennett. 2019. Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1--13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300233Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Mike Ananny and Kate Crawford. 2018. Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media Soc. 20, 3 (March 2018), 973--989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676645Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Timo Arnall. 2006. A graphic language for touchbased interactions. In Mobile Interaction with the Real World. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi= 10.1.1.95.9464&rep=rep1&type=pdf#page=18Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Matthew Arnold, Rachel K. E. Bellamy, Michael Hind, Stephanie Houde, Sameep Mehta, Aleksandra Mojsilovic, Ravi Nair, Karthikeyan Natesan Ramamurthy, Darrell Reimer, Alexandra Olteanu, David Piorkowski, Jason Tsay, and Kush R. Varshney. 2018. FactSheets: Increasing Trust in AI Services through Supplier's Declarations of Conformity. (2018). Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1808.07261Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Kai Arulkumaran, Antoine Cully, and Julian Togelius. 2019. AlphaStar: An Evolutionary Computation Perspective. (February 2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3319619.3321894Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Thomas Binder and Johan Redström. 2006. Exemplary design research. In Proceedings of Wonderground, Design Research Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. John Blythe and Shane Johnson. 2018. Rapid evidence assessment on labelling schemes and implications for consumer IoT security. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/rapidevidence-assessment-on-labelling-schemes-for-iotsecurityGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Nick Bostrom. 2014. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jenna Burrell. 2016. How the machine ?thinks': Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data Soc. 3, 1 (January 2016), 205395171562251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Stephen Cave and Seán S. ÓhÉigeartaigh. 2018. An AI Race for Strategic Advantage. In Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society - AIES '18, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 36--40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3278721.3278780Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Andy Crabtree and Richard Mortier. 2015. Human Data Interaction: Historical Lessons from Social Studies and CSCW. In ECSCW 2015: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19--23 September 2015, Oslo, Norway. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 3--21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--20499--4_1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Nigel Cross. 2011. Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think And Work. Bloomsbury.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Yiming Ding, Jae Ho Sohn, Michael G. Kawczynski, Hari Trivedi, Roy Harnish, Nathaniel W. Jenkins, Dmytro Lituiev, Timothy P. Copeland, Mariam S. Aboian, Carina Mari Aparici, Spencer C. Behr, Robert R. Flavell, Shih-Ying Huang, Kelly A. Zalocusky, Lorenzo Nardo, Youngho Seo, Randall A. Hawkins, Miguel Hernandez Pampaloni, Dexter Hadley, and Benjamin L. Franc. 2019. A Deep Learning Model to Predict a Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease by Using 18 F-FDG PET of the Brain. Radiology 290, 2 (February 2019), 456--464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018180958Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Andreas Drichoutis, Panagiotis Lazaridis, and Rodolfo Nayga Jr. 2006. Consumers' use of nutritional labels: a review of research studies and issues. Acad. Mark. Sci. Rev. (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Abigail C. Durrant, John Vines, Jayne Wallace, and Joyce S. R. Yee. 2017. Research Through Design: Twenty-First Century Makers and Materialities. Des. Issues 33, 3 (July 2017), 3--10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00447Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Jennifer Ferreira, Pippin Barr, and James Noble. 2002. The Semiotics of User Interface Redesign. In Proceedings of the Sixth Australasian conference on User interface, 47--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jennifer Ferreira, James Noble, and Robert Biddle. 2006. A case for iconic icons. In Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology Series, 87--90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lois Frankel and Martin Racine. 2010. The Complex Field of Research: for Design, through Design, and about Design. Des. Res. Soc. (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. William Gaver. 1986. Auditory Icons: Using Sound in Computer Interfaces. Human-Computer Interact. 2, 2 (June 1986), 167--177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0202_3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. William Gaver. 2012. What should we expect from research through design? In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '12, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 937--946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208538Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. William Gaver and Kristina Höök. 2017. What makes a good CHI design paper? Interactions 24, 3 (2017), 20--21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3076255Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Elizabeth Gibney. 2016. Google AI algorithm masters ancient game of Go. Nature 529, 7587 (January 2016), 445--446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/529445aGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Karamjit S. Gill. 2016. Artificial super intelligence: beyond rhetoric. AI Soc. 31, 2 (May 2016), 137-- 143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-016-0651xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. David Gittins. 1986. Icon-based human-computer interaction. Int. J. Man. Mach. Stud. 24, 6 (June 1986), 519--543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020--7373(86)80007-Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Joseph Gogeun. 1993. On Notation. In Tools10: Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems, Prentice Hall, 47--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Samuel Greengard. 2018. Weighing the impact of GDPR. Commun. ACM 61, 11 (October 2018), 16-- 18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3276744Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Hamed Haddadi, Richard Mortier, Derek McAuley, and Jon Crowcroft. 2012. Human Data-Interaction.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. P Hayes and K Ford. 1995. Turing test considered harmful. Int. Jt. Conf. Artif. Intell. (1995), 972--977. Retrieved from http://www.csee.umbc.edu/courses/471/papers/haye s95.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Jonathan L. Herlocker, Joseph A. Konstan, and John Riedl. 2000. Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '00, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 241--250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.358995Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Sarah Holland, Ahmed Hosny, Sarah Newman, Joshua Joseph, and Kasia Chmielinski. 2018. The Dataset Nutrition Label: A Framework To Drive Higher Data Quality Standards. May (2018). Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1805.03677Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Frank R. Kardes. 1988. Spontaneous Inference Processes in Advertising: The Effects of Conclusion Omission and Involvement on Persuasion. J. Consum. Res. 15, 2 (September 1988), 225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/209159Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Patrick Gage Kelley, Joanna Bresee, Lorrie Faith Cranor, and Robert W. Reeder. 2009. A ?nutrition label" for privacy. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security SOUPS '09, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1572532.1572538Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Patrick Gage Kelley, Lucian Cesca, Joanna Bresee, and Lorrie Faith Cranor. 2010. Standardizing privacy notices. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '10, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753561Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Asle H. Kiran and Peter-Paul Verbeek. 2010. Trusting Our Selves to Technology. Knowledge, Technol. Policy 23, 3--4 (December 2010), 409-- 427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-010--9123-Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Joerg Koenigstorfer and Hans Baumgartner. 2016. The Effect of Fitness Branding on Restrained Eaters' Food Consumption and Postconsumption Physical Activity. J. Mark. Res. 53, 1 (February 2016), 124--138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.12.0429Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Min Kyung Lee. 2018. Understanding perception of algorithmic decisions: Fairness, trust, and emotion in response to algorithmic management. Big Data Soc. 5, 1 (June 2018), 205395171875668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718756684Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Hsuan Lin, Yu-Chen Hsieh, and Fong-Gong Wu. 2016. A study on the relationships between different presentation modes of graphical icons and users' attention. Comput. Human Behav. 63, (October 2016), 218--228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Joseph Lindley, Sara Canizzaro, Rob Procter, and Paul Coulton. 2019. Adoption and Acceptabillity. In Cybersecurity of the Internet of Things, K Pothong, I Brass and M Carr (eds.). PETRAS IoT Research Hub. Retrieved from https://www.petrashub.org/petras-stream-report/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Joseph Lindley, Paul Coulton, and Miriam Sturdee. 2017. Implications for Adoption. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 265--277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025742Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Xiaoyue Ma, Nada Matta, Jean-Pierre Cahier, Chunxiu Qin, and Yanjie Cheng. 2015. From action icon to knowledge icon: Objective-oriented icon taxonomy in computer science. Displays 39, (October 2015), 68--79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2015.08.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Aaron Marcus. 2002. Information Visualization for Advanced Vehicle Displays. Inf. Vis. 1, 2 (June 2002), 95--102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500016Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Aaron Marcus. 2003. Icons, symbols, and signs. interactions 10, 3 (May 2003), 37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/769759.769774Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Evgeny Morozov. 2013. To Save Everything Click Here: Technology, Solutionism and the Urge to Fix Problems That Don't Exist. Allen Lane Penguin Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Richard Mortier, Hamed Haddadi, Tristan Henderson, Derek McAuley, and Jon Crowcroft. 2014. Human-Data Interaction: The Human Face of the Data-Driven Society. SSRN Electron. J. (2014). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2508051Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Kayur Patel, Naomi Bancroft, Steven M. Drucker, James Fogarty, Andrew J. Ko, and James Landay. 2010. Gestalt. In Proceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology - UIST '10, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1866029.1866038Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Emilee Rader, Kelley Cotter, and Janghee Cho. 2018. Explanations as Mechanisms for Supporting Algorithmic Transparency. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1--13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173677Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. "Why Should I Trust You?" Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining - KDD '16, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1135--1144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Neelima Sailaja, Andy Crabtree, and Phil Stenton. 2017. Challenges of using Personal Data to Drive Personalised Electronic Programme Guides. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 5226-- 5231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025986Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Thomas Albert Sebeok. 2001. Signs: An Introduction to Semiotics. University of Toronto Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Roger Silverstone. 2006. Domesticating domestication. Reflecting on the life of a concept. In Domestication Of Media And Technology, Thomas Berker, Maren Hartmann, Yves Punie and Katie Ward (eds.). Open University Press, 229--247.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Pieter Stappers and Elisa Giaccardi. 2019. 43. Research through Design. In The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd Ed. Retrieved September 6, 2019 from https://www.interactiondesign.org/literature/book/the-encyclopedia-ofhuman-computer-interaction-2nd-ed/researchthrough-designGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Alan Turing. 1950. Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind LIX, 236 (1950), 433--460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Hassan Ugail and Ahmad Al-dahoud. 2019. A genuine smile is indeed in the eyes -- The computer aided non-invasive analysis of the exact weight distribution of human smiles across the face. Adv. Eng. Informatics 42, February (October 2019), 100967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2019.100967Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Mark Weiser. 1999. The computer for the 21 st century. ACM SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev. 3, 3 (July 1999), 3--11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/329124.329126Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Daniel S. Weld and Gagan Bansal. 2019. The challenge of crafting intelligible intelligence. Commun. ACM 62, 6 (May 2019), 70--79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3282486Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Ke Yang, Julia Stoyanovich, Abolfazl Asudeh, Bill Howe, HV Jagadish, and Gerome Miklau. 2018. A Nutritional Label for Rankings. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Management of Data - SIGMOD '18, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1773--1776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3183713.3193568Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Hum. factors Comput. Syst. CHI '07 (2007), 493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. CES Day One: AI Is Everywhere - SyncedReview Medium. Retrieved September 6, 2019 from https://medium.com/syncedreview/ces-day-one-aiis-everywhere-6b13f3999596Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Researching AI Legibility through Design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2020
      10688 pages
      ISBN:9781450367080
      DOI:10.1145/3313831

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 April 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format