skip to main content
10.1145/3318464.3384711acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open Access

Physical Visualization Design

Authors Info & Claims
Published:31 May 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

We demonstrate PVD, a system that visualization designers can use to co-design the interface and system architecture of scalable and expressive visualization.

References

  1. Agrawal, S., Bruno, N., Chaudhuri, S., and Narasayya, V. R. Autoadmin: Self-tuning database systemstechnology. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 29, 3 (2006), 7--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Botello, C. Adobe InDesign CS6 Revealed. Cengage Learning, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruno, N., and Chaudhuri, S. Constrained physical design tuning. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 1, 1 (2008), 4--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chaudhuri, S., and Narasayya, V. R. An efficient, cost-driven index selection tool for microsoft sql server. In VLDB (1997), vol. 97, Citeseer, pp. 146--155.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, Y., and Wu, E. Monte carlo tree search for generating interactive data analysis interfaces. AAAI Workshop on Intelligent Process Automation (2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Design, F. Figma: the collaborative interface design tool.(2017). Retrieved September 17 (2017), 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hanrahan, P. Vizql: a language for query, analysis and visualization. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data (2006), pp. 721--721.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Moritz, D., Howe, B., and Heer, J. Falcon: Balancing interactive latency and resolution sensitivity for scalable linked visualizations. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2019), ACM, p. 694.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Satyanarayan, A., Moritz, D., Wongsuphasawat, K., and Heer, J. Vega-lite: A grammar of interactive graphics. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 23, 1 (2016), 341--350.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Tao, W., Liu, X., Wang, Y., Battle, L., Demiralp, Ç., Chang, R., and Stonebraker, M. Kyrix: Interactive pan/zoom visualizations at scale. In Computer Graphics Forum (2019), vol. 38, Wiley Online Library, pp. 529--540.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Walenz, B., Gao, J., Sonmez, E., Tian, Y., Wen, Y., Xu, C., Adair, B., and Yang, J. Fact checking congressional voting claims.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhang, Q., Zhang, H., and Wu, E. Mining precision interfaces from query logs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.02344 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Physical Visualization Design

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SIGMOD '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data
            June 2020
            2925 pages
            ISBN:9781450367356
            DOI:10.1145/3318464

            Copyright © 2020 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 31 May 2020

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • short-paper

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate785of4,003submissions,20%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader