Jiaheng Lu
Irena Holubová
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
The variety of data is one of the most challenging issues for the research and practice in data management systems. The data are naturally organized in different formats and models, including structured data, semi-structured data, and unstructured data. In this survey, we introduce the area of multi-model DBMSs that build a single database platform to manage multi-model data. Even though multi-model databases are a newly emerging area, in recent years, we have witnessed many database systems to embrace this category. We provide a general classification and multi-dimensional comparisons for the most popular multi-model databases. This comprehensive introduction on existing approaches and open problems, from the technique and application perspective, make this survey useful for motivating new multi-model database approaches, as well as serving as a technical reference for developing multi-model database applications.
- Ibrahim Abdelaziz, Razen Harbi, Zuhair Khayyat, and Panos Kalnis. 2017. A survey and experimental comparison of distributed SPARQL engines for very large RDF data. Proc. VLDB Endow. 10, 13 (Sept. 2017), 2049--2060. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Naoual El Aboudi and Laila Benhlima. 2018. Big data management for healthcare systems: Architecture, requirements, and implementation. Adv. Bioinformatics 2018 (2018), 4059018:1--4059018:10.Google Scholar
- Azza Abouzeid, Kamil Bajda-Pawlikowski, Daniel J. Abadi, Alexander Rasin, and Avi Silberschatz. 2009. HadoopDB: An architectural hybrid of MapReduce and DBMS technologies for analytical workloads. PVLDB 2, 1 (2009), 922--933. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aerospike, Inc. 2012. Aerospike Acquires AlchemyDB NewSQL Database. Retrieved from: http://www.aerospike.com/uncategorized/aerospike-acquires-alchemydb-newsql-database-to-build-on-predictable-speed-and-web-scale-data-management-of-aerospike-real-time-nosql-database-2/.Google Scholar
- Divy Agrawal, Sanjay Chawla, Bertty Contreras-Rojas, Ahmed K. Elmagarmid, Yasser Idris, Zoi Kaoudi, Sebastian Kruse, Ji Lucas, Essam Mansour, Mourad Ouzzani, Paolo Papotti, Jorge-Arnulfo Quiané-Ruiz, Nan Tang, Saravanan Thirumuruganathan, and Anis Troudi. 2018. RHEEM: Enabling cross-platform data processing—May the big data be with you! PVLDB 11, 11 (2018), 1414--1427. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sattam Alsubaiee, Yasser Altowim, Hotham Altwaijry, Alexander Behm, Vinayak R. Borkar, Yingyi Bu, Michael J. Carey, Inci Cetindil, Madhusudan Cheelangi, Khurram Faraaz, Eugenia Gabrielova, Raman Grover, Zachary Heilbron, Young-Seok Kim, Chen Li, Guangqiang Li, Ji Mahn Ok, Nicola Onose, Pouria Pirzadeh, Vassilis J. Tsotras, Rares Vernica, Jian Wen, and Till Westmann. 2014. AsterixDB: A scalable, open source BDMS. PVLDB 7, 14 (2014), 1905--1916. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kaleb Alway and Anisoara Nica. 2016. Constructing join histograms from histograms with q-error guarantees. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD’16). 2245--2246.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Amazon. 2017. Amazon DynamoDB—Developer Guide (API Version 2012-08-10). Retrieved from: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazondynamodb/latest/developerguide/Introduction.html.Google Scholar
- Renzo Angles, Marcelo Arenas, Pablo Barceló, Aidan Hogan, Juan Reutter, and Domagoj Vrgoč. 2017. Foundations of modern query languages for graph databases. ACM Comput. Surv. 50, 5, Article 68 (Sept. 2017), 40 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Renzo Angles and Claudio Gutiérrez. 2008. Survey of graph database models. ACM Comput. Surv. 40, 1 (2008), 1:1--1:39. Google ScholarDigital Library
- ArangoDB. 2016. Three major NoSQL data models in one open-source database. Retrieved from: https://www.arangodb.com/.Google Scholar
- ArangoDB. 2017. ArangoDB v3.3 Documentation—Data Models and Modeling. Retrieved from: https://docs.arangodb.com/3.3/Manual/DataModeling/.Google Scholar
- Michael Armbrust, Reynold S. Xin, Cheng Lian, Yin Huai, Davies Liu, Joseph K. Bradley, Xiangrui Meng, Tomer Kaftan, Michael J. Franklin, Ali Ghodsi, and Matei Zaharia. 2015. Spark SQL: Relational data processing in spark. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD’15). 1383--1394.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Abdelkader Baaziz and Luc Quoniam. 2014. How to use big data technologies to optimize operations in upstream petroleum industry. Retrieved from: CoRR abs/1412.0755.Google Scholar
- Mohamed Amine Baazizi, Houssem Ben Lahmar, Dario Colazzo, Giorgio Ghelli, and Carlo Sartiani. 2017. Schema inference for massive JSON datasets. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT’17). 222--233.Google Scholar
- Basho Technologies, Inc. 2014. Riak doc—Implementing a Document Store (version 2.2.0). Retrieved from: http://docs.basho.com/riak/kv/2.2.0/developing/usage/document-store/.Google Scholar
- Basho Technologies, Inc. 2017. Riak doc—Using Search (version 2.2.3). Retrieved from: https://docs.basho.com/riak/kv/2.2.3/developing/usage/search/.Google Scholar
- Mihaela A. Bornea, Julian Dolby, Anastasios Kementsietsidis, Kavitha Srinivas, Patrick Dantressangle, Octavian Udrea, and Bishwaranjan Bhattacharjee. 2013. Building an efficient RDF store over a relational database. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD’13). ACM, 121--132. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pierre Bourhis, Juan L. Reutter, Fernando Suárez, and Domagoj Vrgoč. 2017. JSON: Data model, query languages and schema specification. In Proceedings of the 36th ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS’17). ACM, 123--135.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alysha Brown. 2016. Welcome to our eleventh major edition of c-treeACE database technology! Retrieved from: https://www.faircom.com/insights/ctreeace-v11-announcement.Google Scholar
- Nicolas Bruno, Nick Koudas, and Divesh Srivastava. 2002. Holistic twig joins: Optimal XML pattern matching. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 310--321. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Francesca Bugiotti, Damian Bursztyn, Alin Deutsch, Ioana Ileana, and Ioana Manolescu. 2015. Invisible Glue: Scalable self-tunning multi-stores. In Proceedings of the Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR’15).Google Scholar
- Francesca Bugiotti, Luca Cabibbo, Paolo Atzeni, and Riccardo Torlone. 2014. Database design for NoSQL systems. In Conceptual Modeling, Eric Yu, Gillian Dobbie, Matthias Jarke, and Sandeep Purao (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 223--231.Google Scholar
- Rick Cattell. 2011. Scalable SQL and NoSQL data stores. SIGMOD Rec. 39, 4 (May 2011), 12--27.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fay Chang, Jeffrey Dean, Sanjay Ghemawat, Wilson C. Hsieh, Deborah A. Wallach, Mike Burrows, Tushar Chandra, Andrew Fikes, and Robert E. Gruber. 2008. Bigtable: A distributed storage system for structured data. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 26, 2, Article 4 (June 2008), 26 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alberto Hernández Chillón, Severino Feliciano Morales, Diego Sevilla, and Jesús García Molina. 2017. Exploring the visualization of schemas for aggregate-oriented NoSQL databases. In ER Forum/Demos (CEUR Workshop Proceedings), Vol. 1979. CEUR-WS.org, 72--85.Google Scholar
- Crate.io. 2017. Crate.io—Storage and Consistency v. 1.0.1. Retrieved from: https://crate.io/docs/crate/guide/en/latest/architecture/storage-consistency.html.Google Scholar
- Carlo A. Curino, Hyun J. Moon, and Carlo Zaniolo. 2008. Graceful database schema evolution: The PRISM workbench. Proc. VLDB Endow. 1, 1 (Aug. 2008), 761--772. Google ScholarDigital Library
- James Curtis. 2016. With Modules, Redis Labs turns Redis into a multi-model database. Retrieved from: https://451research.com/report-short?entityId=89003.Google Scholar
- Barb Darrow. 2013. FoundationDB Buys Akiban to Wed NoSQL and SQL Worlds. Retrieved from: https://gigaom.com/2013/07/17/foundationdb-buys-akiban-to-wed-nosql-and-sql-worlds/.Google Scholar
- DataStax, Inc. 2013. Improving Secondary Index Write Performance in 1.2. Retrieved from: http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/improving-secondary-index-write-performance-in-1-2.Google Scholar
- DataStax, Inc. 2015. What’s New in Cassandra 2.2: JSON Support. Retrieved from: http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/whats-new-in-cassandra-2-2-json-support.Google Scholar
- Ali Davoudian, Liu Chen, and Mengchi Liu. 2018. A survey on NoSQL stores. ACM Comput. Surv. 51, 2 (2018), 40:1--40:43.Google Scholar
- David J. DeWitt, Alan Halverson, Rimma V. Nehme, Srinath Shankar, Josep Aguilar-Saborit, Artin Avanes, Miro Flasza, and Jim Gramling. 2013. Split query processing in polybase. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD’13). 1255--1266.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jennie Duggan, Aaron J. Elmore, Michael Stonebraker, Magdalena Balazinska, Bill Howe, Jeremy Kepner, Sam Madden, David Maier, Tim Mattson, and Stanley B. Zdonik. 2015. The BigDAWG polystore system. SIGMOD Record 44, 2 (2015), 11--16. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ecma International. 2013. ECMA-404—The JSON Data Interchange Standard. Retrieved from: http://www.json.org/.Google Scholar
- Elmore et al. 2015. A demonstration of the BigDAWG polystore system. PVLDB 8, 12 (2015), 1908--1911. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Radwa Elshawi, Omar Batarfi, Ayman Fayoumi, Ahmed Barnawi, and Sherif Sakr. 2015. Big graph processing systems: State-of-the-art and open challenges. In Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Conference on Big Data Computing Service and Applications (BigDataService’15). 24--33. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Donald Feinberg, Merv Adrian, Nick Heudecker, Adam M. Ronthal, and Terilyn Palanca. 12 October 2015. Gartner Magic Quadrant for Operational Database Management Systems. Gartner Inc. https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/2610218.Google Scholar
- Nadime Francis, Alastair Green, Paolo Guagliardo, Leonid Libkin, Tobias Lindaaker, Victor Marsault, Stefan Plantikow, Mats Rydberg, Petra Selmer, and Andrés Taylor. 2018. Cypher: An evolving query language for property graphs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD’18). ACM, 1433--1445.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Enrico Gallinucci, Matteo Golfarelli, and Stefano Rizzi. 2018a. Schema profiling of document-oriented databases. Inf. Syst. 75 (2018), 13--25.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Enrico Gallinucci, Matteo Golfarelli, Stefano Rizzi, Alberto Abelló, and Oscar Romero. 2018b. Interactive multidimensional modeling of linked data for exploratory OLAP. Inf. Syst. 77 (2018), 86--104.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stefan Goessner. 2007. JSONPath—XPath for JSON. Retrieved from: https://goessner.net/articles/JsonPath/.Google Scholar
- Michael Hammer and Dennis McLeod. 1979. On Database Management System Architecture. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Laboratory for Computer Science, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Adam Hems, Adil Soofi, and Ernie Perez. 2013. How innovative oil and gas companies are using big data to outmaneuver the competition. Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/2IF6mz.Google Scholar
- Hewlett Packard Enterprise. 2018. Using Flex Tables—Vertica Analytics Platform, Version 9.0.x Documentation. Retrieved from: https://my.vertica.com/docs/9.0.x/HTML/index.htm#Authoring/FlexTables/FlexTableHandbook.htm.Google Scholar
- Irena Holubova and Martin Necasky. 2009. Current support of XML by the “big three.” In Proceedings of the 4th International XML Conference. 251--268.Google Scholar
- Jer-Wen Huang. 1994. MultiBase: A heterogeneous multidatabase management system. In International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC’94). 332--339.Google Scholar
- IBM Knowledge Center. 2017a. DB2 11.1 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows—Querying XML Data. Retrieved from: http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSEPGG_11.1.0/com.ibm.db2.luw.xml.doc/doc/c0023895.html.Google Scholar
- IBM Knowledge Center. 2017b. DB2 11.1 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows—XML Data Type. Retrieved from: http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSEPGG_11.1.0/com.ibm.db2.luw.xml.doc/doc/c0023366.html.Google Scholar
- InterSystems. 2015. Using Caché SQL—Defining and Building Indices. Retrieved from: http://docs.intersystems.com/latest/csp/docbook/DocBook.UI.Page.cls?KEY=GSQLOPT_indices.Google Scholar
- InterSystems. 2016. Introducing the Document Data Model in Caché 2016.2. Retrieved from: https://community.intersystems.com/post/introducing-document-data-model-cach%C3%A9-20162.Google Scholar
- InterSystems. 2017. Caché SQL Reference. Retrieved from: http://docs.intersystems.com/latest/csp/docbook/DocBook.UI.Page.cls?KEY=RSQL.Google Scholar
- ISO. 2008. ISO/IEC 9075-1:2008 Information technology—Database languages—SQL—Part 1: Framework (SQL/Framework). Retrieved from: http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=45498.Google Scholar
- JSONniq.org. 2013. JSONiq: The JSON Query Language. Retrieved from: http://jsoniq.org/.Google Scholar
- Mat Keep. 2011. MySQL Cluster 7.2 (DMR2): NoSQL, Key/Value, Memcached. Retrieved from: https://blogs.oracle.com/MySQL/entry/mysql_cluster_7_2_dmr2.Google Scholar
- Rado Kotorov. 2003. Customer relationship management: Strategic lessons and future directions. Bus. Proc. Manag. J. 9, 5 (2003), 566--571.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Feng Li, Beng Chin Ooi, M. Tamer Özsu, and Sai Wu. 2014. Distributed data management using MapReduce. ACM Comput. Surv. 46, 3, Article 31 (Jan. 2014), 42 pages.Google Scholar
- Harold Lim, Yuzhang Han, and Shivnath Babu. 2013. How to fit when no one size fits. In Proceedings of the Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR’13).Google Scholar
- Jiaheng Lu. 2017. Towards benchmarking multi-model databases. In Proceedings of the Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR’17).Google Scholar
- Jiaheng Lu and Irena Holubová. 2017. Multi-model data management: What’s new and what’s next? In Proceedings of the International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT’17). 602--605.Google Scholar
- Jiaheng Lu, Irena Holubová, and Bogdan Cautis. 2018a. Multi-model databases and tightly integrated polystores: Current practices, comparisons, and open challenges. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’18). 2301--2302.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jiaheng Lu, Zhen Hua Liu, Pengfei Xu, and Chao Zhang. 2018b. UDBMS: Road to unification for multi-model data management. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, Advances in Conceptual Modeling—ER Workshops. 285--294.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Petros Manousis, Panos Vassiliadis, and George Papastefanatos. 2013. Automating the adaptation of evolving data-intensive ecosystems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER’13). 182--196.Google ScholarDigital Library
- MarkLogic Corporation. 2017a. Application Developer’s Guide—Chapter 20 Working With JSON. Retrieved from: https://docs.marklogic.com/guide/app-dev/json.Google Scholar
- MarkLogic Corporation. 2017b. Concepts Guide—Chapter 3 Indexing in MarkLogic. Retrieved from: https://docs.marklogic.com/guide/concepts/indexing.Google Scholar
- Microsoft. 2016. LINQ (Language Integrated Query). Retrieved from: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/using-linq.Google Scholar
- Microsoft. 2017a. Azure Cosmos DB SQL syntax reference. Retrieved from: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/sql-api-sql-query-reference.Google Scholar
- Microsoft. 2017b. PolyBase Guide. Retrieved from: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/mt143171.aspx.Google Scholar
- Microsoft. 2017c. XML Data (SQL Server). Retrieved from: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/relational-databases/xml/xml-data-sql-server.Google Scholar
- Michael J. Mior. 2014. Automated schema design for NoSQL databases. In Proceedings of the SIGMOD PhD Symposium (SIGMOD’14 PhD Symposium). ACM, 41--45.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Irena Mlýnková and Martin Necaský. 2013. Heuristic methods for inference of XML schemas: Lessons learned and open issues. Informatica, Lith. Acad. Sci. 24, 4 (2013), 577--602. Google ScholarDigital Library
- MongoDB, Inc. 2017. MongoDB Manual—Indexes. Retrieved from: https://docs.mongodb.com/manual/indexes/.Google Scholar
- NuoDB. 2013. Multi-model databases: neither fish nor fowl but maybe a jigsaw puzzle? Retrieved from: http://www.nuodb.com/blog/multi-model-databases-neither-fish-nor-fowl-maybe-jigsaw-puzzle.Google Scholar
- Patrick O’Neil, Elizabeth O’Neil, Shankar Pal, Istvan Cseri, Gideon Schaller, and Nigel Westbury. 2004. ORDPATHs: Insert-friendly XML node labels. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD’04). ACM, 903--908.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Patrick E. O’Neil. 1992. The SB-tree: An index-sequential structure for high-performance sequential access. Acta Inf. 29, 3 (June 1992), 241--265. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Oracle. 2014. Oracle NoSQL Database Compared to HBase. Retrieved from: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/products/nosqldb/documentation/nosql-vs-hbase-1961722.pdf.Google Scholar
- Oracle. 2017. JSON Developer’s Guide. Retrieved from: https://docs.oracle.com/en/database/oracle/oracle-database/12.2/adjsn/toc.htm.Google Scholar
- OrientDB. 2016. A 2nd Generation Distributed Graph Database. Retrieved from: http://orientdb.com/orientdb/.Google Scholar
- OrientDB. 2017a. OrientDB ManualVersion 3.0—Multi-Model Database. Retrieved from: https://orientdb.com/docs/3.0.x/datamodeling/Tutorial-Document-and-graph-model.html.Google Scholar
- OrientDB. 2017b. OrientDB Manual—Version 3.0.x—SQL Reference. Retrieved from: https://orientdb.com/docs/3.0.x/sql/.Google Scholar
- M. Tamer Özsu. 2016. A survey of RDF data management systems. Front. Comput. Sci. 10, 3 (June 2016), 418--432. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matthew Panzarino. 2015. Apple acquires durable database company FoundationDB. Retrieved from: https://techcrunch.com/2015/03/24/apple-acquires-durable-database-company-foundationdb/.Google Scholar
- Ewa Płuciennik and Kamil Zgorzałek. 2017. The Multi-model Databases—A Review. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 141--152.Google Scholar
- Marek Polak, Martin Chytil, Karel Jakubec, Vladimir Kudelas, Peter Pijak, Martin Necasky, and Irena Holubova. 2015. Data and query adaptation using DaemonX. Comput. Inform. 34, 1 (2015). Retrieved from: http://www.cai.sk/ojs/index.php/cai/article/view/2040/688.Google Scholar
- Jovan Popovic. 2015. JSON Support in SQL Server 2016. Retrieved from: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/jocapc/2015/05/16/json-support-in-sql-server-2016/.Google Scholar
- Marko A. Rodriguez. 2015. The Gremlin graph traversal machine and language (invited talk). In Proceedings of the 15th Symposium on Database Programming Languages (DBPL’15). ACM, 1--10.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sherif Sakr and Ghazi Al-Naymat. 2010. Relational processing of RDF queries: A survey. SIGMOD Rec. 38, 4 (June 2010), 23--28. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sherif Sakr, Fuad Bajaber, Ahmed Barnawi, Abdulrahman Altalhi, Radwa Elshawi, and Omar Batarfi. 2015. Big data processing systems: State-of-the-art and open challenges. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Cloud Computing (ICCC’15). 1--8.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sherif Sakr, Anna Liu, and Ayman G. Fayoumi. 2013. The family of MapReduce and large-scale data processing systems. ACM Comput. Surv. 46, 1, Article 11 (July 2013), 44 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sherif Sakr and Eric Pardede (Eds.). 2011. Graph Data Management: Techniques and Applications. IGI Global. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cynthia M. Saracco, Don Chamberlin, and Rav Ahuja. 2006. DB2 9: pureXML Overview and Fast Start. RedBooks. Retrieved from: http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247298.html?Open.Google Scholar
- Stefanie Scherzinger, Eduardo Cunha De Almeida, Felipe Ickert, and Marcos Didonet Del Fabro. 2013. On the necessity of model checking NoSQL database schemas when building SaaS applications. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Testing the Cloud (TTC’13). ACM, 1--6.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Diego Sevilla Ruiz, Severino Feliciano Morales, and Jesús García Molina. 2015. Inferring versioned schemas from NoSQL databases and its applications. In Conceptual Modeling, Paul Johannesson, Mong Li Lee, Stephen W. Liddle, Andreas L. Opdahl, and Óscar Pastor López (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 467--480.Google Scholar
- Dharma Shukla, Shireesh Thota, Karthik Raman, Madhan Gajendran, Ankur Shah, Sergii Ziuzin, Krishnan Sundaram, Miguel Gonzalez Guajardo, Anna Wawrzyniak, Samer Boshra, Renato Ferreira, Mohamed Nassar, Michael Koltachev, Ji Huang, Sudipta Sengupta, Justin Levandoski, and David Lomet. 2015. Schema-agnostic indexing with Azure DocumentDB. Proc. VLDB Endow. 8, 12 (Aug. 2015), 1668--1679. Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Miles Smith, Philip A. Bernstein, Umeshwar Dayal, Nathan Goodman, Terry Landers, Ken W. T. Lin, and Eugene Wong. 1981. Multibase: Integrating heterogeneous distributed database systems. In Proceedings of the National Computer Conference (AFIPS’81). ACM, 487--499.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Tahara, Thaddeus Diamond, and Daniel J. Abadi. 2014. Sinew: A SQL system for multi-structured data. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD’14). ACM, 815--826.Google Scholar
- Ran Tan, Rada Chirkova, Vijay Gadepally, and Timothy G. Mattson. 2017. Enabling query processing across heterogeneous data models: A survey. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData’17). 3211--3220.Google Scholar
- The 451 Group. 2013. Neither Fish Nor Fowl: the Rise of Multi-Model Databases. Retrieved from: https://blogs.the451group.com/information_management/2013/02/08/neither-fish-nor-fowl/.Google Scholar
- The Apache Software Foundation. 2017. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL). Retrieved from: http://cassandra.apache.org/doc/latest/cql/.Google Scholar
- W3C. 2008. Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (5th ed.). Retrieved from: http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/.Google Scholar
- W3C. 2013. SPARQL 1.1 Overview. Retrieved from: http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-overview/.Google Scholar
- W3C. 2014. RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax. Retrieved from: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/.Google Scholar
- W3C. 2015a. XML Path Language (XPath) Version 1.0. Retrieved from: http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath/.Google Scholar
- W3C. 2015b. XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language (2nd ed.). Retrieved from: http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/.Google Scholar
- W3C. 2018a. LargeTripleStores. Retrieved from: https://www.w3.org/wiki/LargeTripleStores.Google Scholar
- W3C. 2018b. RdfStoreBenchmarking. Retrieved from: https://www.w3.org/wiki/RdfStoreBenchmarking.Google Scholar
- Jingjing Wang, Tobin Baker, Magdalena Balazinska, Daniel Halperin, Brandon Haynes, Bill Howe, Dylan Hutchison, Shrainik Jain, Ryan Maas, Parmita Mehta, Dominik Moritz, Brandon Myers, Jennifer Ortiz, Dan Suciu, Andrew Whitaker, and Shengliang Xu. 2017. The Myria big data management and analytics system and cloud services. In Proceedings of the Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR’17).Google Scholar
- Marcin Wylot, Manfred Hauswirth, Philippe Cudré-Mauroux, and Sherif Sakr. 2018. RDF data storage and query processing schemes: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 51, 4, Article 84 (Sept. 2018), 36 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xifeng Yan, Philip S. Yu, and Jiawei Han. 2004. Graph indexing: A frequent structure-based approach. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD’04). 335--346.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chao Zhang, Jiaheng Lu, Pengfei Xu, and Yuxing Chen. 2018. UniBench: A benchmark for multi-model database management systems. In Proceedings of the 10th Technology Conference on Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking for the Era of Artificial Intelligence (TPCTC’18). 7--23.Google Scholar
- Shijie Zhang, Meng Hu, and Jiong Yang. 2007. TreePi: A novel graph indexing method. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE’07). 966--975.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Multi-model Databases: A New Journey to Handle the Variety of Data
Recommendations
Multi-model Databases and Tightly Integrated Polystores: Current Practices, Comparisons, and Open Challenges
CIKM '18: Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge ManagementOne of the most challenging issues in the era of Big Data is the Variety of the data. In general, there are two solutions to directly manage multi-model data currently: a single integrated multi-model database system or a tightly-integrated middleware ...
Uniform data access platform for SQL and NoSQL database systems
A novel metamodel-based data integration approach is proposed, which allows to query data from heterogeneous (relational and NoSQL) database systems simultaneously.The presented method cover structural, semantic and syntactic heterogeneities of source ...
Evolution management in multi-model databases
AbstractFollowing the Gartner predictions, most of the DBMSs, both traditional relational and NoSQL, have become multi-model. However, this functionality brought on plenty of related issues. One of the most complex ones is evolution management ...
Comments