Pascal Knierim
Paweł W. Woźniak
Yomna Abdelrahman
Albrecht Schmidt
ABSTRACT
While Augmented Reality (AR) technologies are becoming increasingly available, our understanding of AR is primarily limited to controlled experiments which address use at work or for entertainment. Little is known about how it could enhance everyday interaction from a user's perspective. Personal use of AR at home may improve how users' interface with information on a daily basis. Through an online survey, we investigated attitudes towards domestic AR. We further explored the opportunities for AR at home in a technology probe. We first introduced the users to AR by offering an AR experience presented through mixed reality smart glasses. We then used a tailor-made tablet application to elicit photos illustrating how users imagine future AR experiences. Finally, we conducted semi-structured interviews based on elicited photos. Our results show that users are eager to benefit from on-demand information, assistance, enhanced sensory perception, and play offered by AR across many locations at home. We contribute insights for future AR systems designed for domestic environments.
- Ronald T. Azuma. 1997. A Survey of Augmented Reality. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 6, 4 (Aug. 1997), 355--385. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Huidong Bai, Gun A. Lee, Mukundan Ramakrishnan, and Mark Billinghurst. 2014. 3D Gesture Interaction for Handheld Augmented Reality. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2014 Mobile Graphics and Interactive Applications (SA '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 7, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2669062.2669073Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ann Blandford, Dominic Furniss, and Stephann Makri. 2016. Qualitative HCI research: Going behind the scenes. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 9, 1 (2016), 1--115.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kirsten Boehner, Janet Vertesi, Phoebe Sengers, and Paul Dourish. 2007. How HCI Interprets the Probes. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1077--1086. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240789Google ScholarDigital Library
- Leonardo Bonanni, Chia-Hsun Lee, and Ted Selker. 2005. CounterIntelligence: Augmented reality kitchen. In Proc. CHI, Vol. 2239. 45.Google Scholar
- Wendy H. Chun and Tobias Höllerer. 2013. Real-time Hand Interaction for Augmented Reality on Mobile Phones. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 307--314. https://doi.org/10.1145/2449396.2449435Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tamara Denning, Zakariya Dehlawi, and Tadayoshi Kohno. 2014. In Situ with Bystanders of Augmented Reality Glasses: Perspectives on Recording and Privacy-mediating Technologies. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2377--2386. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557352Google ScholarDigital Library
- Arindam Dey, Mark Billinghurst, Robert W. Lindeman, and J. Edward II Swan. 2018. A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00037Google Scholar
- Tom Djajadiningrat, Pei-Yin Chao, SeYoung Kim, Marleen Van Leengoed, and Jeroen Raijmakers. 2016. Mime: An AR-based System Helping Patients to Test Their Blood at Home. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 347--359. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901915Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kevin Fan, Jochen Huber, Suranga Nanayakkara, and Masahiko Inami. 2014. SpiderVision: extending the human field of view for augmented awareness. In Proceedings of the 5th Augmented Human International Conference. ACM, 49.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Peter Fröhlich, Antti Oulasvirta, Matthias Baldauf, and Antti Nurminen. 2011. On the Move, Wirelessly Connected to the World. Commun. ACM 54, 1 (Jan. 2011), 132--138. https://doi.org/10.1145/1866739.1866766Google Scholar
- Markus Funk, Andreas Bächler, Liane Bächler, Thomas Kosch, Thomas Heidenreich, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2017. Working with Augmented Reality?: A Long-Term Analysis of In-Situ Instructions at the Assembly Workplace. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 222--229. https://doi.org/10.1145/3056540.3056548Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bill Gaver, Tony Dunne, and Elena Pacenti. 1999. Design: Cultural Probes. interactions 6, 1 (Jan. 1999), 21--29. https://doi.org/10.1145/291224.291235Google ScholarDigital Library
- William W. Gaver, Andrew Boucher, Sarah Pennington, and Brendan Walker. 2004. Cultural Probes and the Value of Uncertainty. interactions 11, 5 (Sept. 2004), 53--56. https://doi.org/10.1145/1015530.1015555Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nanna Gorm and Irina Shklovski. 2017. Participant Driven Photo Elicitation for Understanding Activity Tracking: Benefits and Limitations. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1350--1361. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998214Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jan Gugenheimer, Pascal Knierim, Christian Winkler, Julian Seifert, and Enrico Rukzio. 2015. UbiBeam: Exploring the Interaction Space for Home Deployed Projector-Camera Systems. In 15th Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT) (Human-Computer Interaction -- INTERACT 2015). Bamberg, Germany, 350--366. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22698-9_23Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anuruddha Hettiarachchi and Daniel Wigdor. 2016. Annexing Reality: Enabling Opportunistic Use of Everyday Objects As Tangible Proxies in Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1957--1967. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858134Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hilary Hutchinson, Wendy Mackay, Bo Westerlund, Benjamin B. Bederson, Allison Druin, Catherine Plaisant, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Stéphane Conversy, Helen Evans, Heiko Hansen, Nicolas Roussel, and Björn Eiderbäck. 2003. Technology Probes: Inspiring Design for and with Families. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 17--24. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642616Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jisun Jang and Tomasz Bednarz. 2018. HoloSensor for Smart Home, Health, Entertainment. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2018 Appy Hour (SIGGRAPH '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 2, 2 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3213779.3213786Google ScholarDigital Library
- Can Liu, Stephane Huot, Jonathan Diehl, Wendy Mackay, and Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. 2012. Evaluating the Benefits of Real-time Feedback in Mobile Augmented Reality with Hand-held Devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2973--2976. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208706Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Carmen Juan Lizandra, Mariano Alcañiz Raya, Carlos Monserrat, Cristina Botella, Rosa María Baños, and Belén Guerrero. 2005. Using Augmented Reality to Treat Phobias. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 25, 6 (2005), 31--37. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2005.143Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rosemary Luckin and Danae Stanton Fraser. 2011. Limitless or pointless? An evaluation of augmented reality technology in the school and home. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning 3, 5 (2011), 510--524. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2011.042102Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tuuli Mattelmäki and Katja Battarbee. 2002. Empathy probes. In PDC. 266--271.Google Scholar
- Janne Paavilainen, Hannu Korhonen, Kati Alha, Jaakko Stenros, Elina Koskinen, and Frans Mayra. 2017. The PokéMon GO Experience: A Location-Based Augmented Reality Mobile Game Goes Mainstream. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2493--2498. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025871Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yvonne Rogers. 2006. Moving on from Weiser's Vision of Calm Computing: Engaging Ubicomp Experiences. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp'06). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 404--421. https://doi.org/10.1007/11853565_24Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. E. C. Santos, A. Chen, T. Taketomi, G. Yamamoto, J. Miyazaki, and H. Kato. 2014. Augmented Reality Learning Experiences: Survey of Prototype Design and Evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 7, 1 (Jan 2014), 38--56. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2013.37Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. E. C. Santos, A. Chen, T. Taketomi, G. Yamamoto, J. Miyazaki, and H. Kato. 2014. Augmented Reality Learning Experiences: Survey of Prototype Design and Evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 7, 1 (Jan 2014), 38--56. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2013.37Google ScholarCross Ref
- Albrecht Schmidt, Stefan Schneegass, Kai Kunze, Jun Rekimoto, and Woontack Woo. 2017. Workshop on Amplification and Augmentation of Human Perception. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 668--673. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3027088Google ScholarDigital Library
- Abigail Sellen, Yvonne Rogers, Richard Harper, and Tom Rodden. 2009. Reflecting Human Values in the Digital Age. Commun. ACM 52, 3 (March 2009), 58--66. https://doi.org/10.1145/1467247.1467265Google Scholar
- Maeve Serino, Kyla Cordrey, Laura McLaughlin, and Ruth L. Milanaik. 2016. Pokemon Go and augmented virtual reality games: a cautionary commentary for parents and pediatricians. Current Opinion in Pediatrics 28, 5 (2016), 673--677. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000000409Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rita Shewbridge, Amy Hurst, and Shaun K. Kane. 2014. Everyday Making: Identifying Future Uses for 3D Printing in the Home. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 815--824. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598544Google ScholarDigital Library
- M P Strzys, S Kapp, M Thees, Jochen Kuhn, P Lukowicz, P Knierim, and A Schmidt. 2017. Augmenting the thermal flux experiment: A mixed reality approach with the HoloLens. The Physics Teacher 55, 6 (2017), 376--377.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bruce Thomas, Ben Close, John Donoghue, John Squires, Phillip De Bondi, and Wayne Piekarski. 2002. First Person Indoor/Outdoor Augmented Reality Application: ARQuake. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 6, 1 (01 Feb 2002), 75--86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007790200007Google Scholar
- Vero Vanden Abeele, Erik Hauters, and Bieke Zaman. 2012. Increasing the Reliability and Validity of Quantitative Laddering Data with LadderUX. In CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2057--2062. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2223752Google Scholar
- Mark Weiser. 1999. The Computer for the 21st Century. SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev. 3, 3 (July 1999), 3--11. https://doi.org/10.1145/329124.329126Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert Xiao, Chris Harrison, and Scott E. Hudson. 2013. WorldKit: Rapid and Easy Creation of Ad-hoc Interactive Applications on Everyday Surfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 879--888. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466113Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Exploring the Potential of Augmented Reality in Domestic Environments
Recommendations
Extending Virtual Reality Display Wall Environments Using Augmented Reality
SUI '19: Symposium on Spatial User InteractionTwo major form factors for virtual reality are head-mounted displays and large display environments such as CAVE®and the LCD-based successor CAVE2®. Each of these has distinct advantages and limitations based on how they’re used. This work explores ...
Haptics in Augmented Reality
ICMCS '99: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems - Volume 2An augmented reality system merges synthetic sensory information into a user's perception of a three-dimensional environment. An important performance goal for an augmented reality system is that the user perceives a single seamless environment. In most ...
Augmented reality as perceptual reality
VSMM'06: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Interactive Technologies and Sociotechnical SystemsAs shown in Paul Milgram et al’s Reality-Virtuality Continuum (1994), Augmented Reality occupies a very unique status in the spectrum of Mixed Reality. Unlike Virtual Reality, which is completely made up of the virtual and has been the most important ...
Comments