skip to main content
10.1145/334012.334033acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesesweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Task response time optimization using cost-based operation motion

Published:01 May 2000Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a technique for task response time improvement based on the concept of code motion from the software domain. Relaxed Operation Motion (ROM) is a simple yet powerful approach for performing safe and useful operation motion from heavily executed portions of a design task to less visited segments. We introduce here our algorithm, how it differs from other code motion approaches, and its application to the embedded systems domain. Results of our investigation indicate that cost-guided operation motion has the potential to improve task response time significantly.

References

  1. 1.Aho, A. V.; Sethi, R.; Ullman, J.D., "Compilers: Principles, Techniques, and Tools", Addison-Wesley, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Balarin F.; Chiodo M.; Giusto P.; Hsieh H.; Jurecska A.; Lavagno L.; Passerone C.; Sangiovanni-Vincentelli A. L.; Sentovich E.; Suzuki K.; and Tabbara B., "Hardware- Software Co-Design of Embedded Systems: The POLIS Approach", Kluwer Academic Publishers, May 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Castelluccia, C.; Dabbous, W., "Generating Efficient Protocol Code from an Abstract Specification", ACM/SIGCOMM, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Hailperin, M., "Cost-Optimal Code Motion", ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 1297-1322, November 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Kam, J.B.; Ullman, J.D., "Monotone Data Flow Analysis Frameworks", Acta Informatica, 1977, pp. 305-307.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.Knoop, J.; Rtithing, O.; Steffen, B., "Lazy Code Motion", ACM SIGPLAN, Vo. 27, No. 7, pp. 224-234, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Knoop, J.; Rtithing, O., "Optimal Code Motion: Theory, and Practice", ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 1117-1155, July 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.Microsoft Research: Decision Theory & Adaptive Systems Group at: http://research.microsoft.com/msbn/default.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.Morel, E.; Renvoise C., "Global Optimization by Suppression of Partial Redundancies", Commun. ACM, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 96-103, 1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.Tabbara, B., "Function Architecture Optimization and Codesign of Embedded Systems", Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, in progress, May 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.Tabbara, B.; Tabbara, A.; Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A., "Hardware and Software Representation, Optimization, and Co-synthesis for Embedded Systems", Technical Report UCB/ERL MOO/7, January 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.Trivedi, K., "Probability and Statistics with Reliability, Queuing and Computer Science Applications", Englewood Cliffs; Prentice Hall, 1982. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.Wagner, T.; Maverick, V.; Graham, S.; Harrison, M., "Accurate Static Estimators for Program Optimization", ACM SIGPLAN, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Task response time optimization using cost-based operation motion

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CODES '00: Proceedings of the eighth international workshop on Hardware/software codesign
      May 2000
      167 pages
      ISBN:1581132689
      DOI:10.1145/334012
      • Chairmen:
      • Frank Vahid,
      • Jan Madsen

      Copyright © 2000 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 May 2000

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate280of864submissions,32%

      Upcoming Conference

      ESWEEK '24
      Twentieth Embedded Systems Week
      September 29 - October 4, 2024
      Raleigh , NC , USA
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader