skip to main content
10.1145/3340531.3412717acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Learning Effective Representations for Person-Job Fit by Feature Fusion

Published:19 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Person-job fit is to match candidates and job posts on online recruitment platforms using machine learning algorithms. The effectiveness of matching algorithms heavily depends on the learned representations for the candidates and job posts. In this paper, we propose to learn comprehensive and effective representations of the candidates and job posts via feature fusion. First, in addition to applying deep learning models for processing the free text in resumes and job posts, which is adopted by existing methods, we extract semantic entities from the whole resume (and job post) and then learn features for them. By fusing the features from the free text and the entities, we get a comprehensive representation for the information explicitly stated in the resume and job post. Second, however, some information of a candidate or a job may not be explicitly captured in the resume or job post. Nonetheless, the historical applications including accepted and rejected cases can reveal some implicit intentions of the candidates or recruiters. Therefore, we propose to learn the representations of implicit intentions by processing the historical applications using LSTM. Last, by fusing the representations for the explicit and implicit intentions, we get a more comprehensive and effective representation for person-job fit. Experiments over 10 months real data show that our solution outperforms existing methods with a large margin. Ablation studies confirm the contribution of each component of the fused representation. The extracted semantic entities help interpret the matching results in the case study.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3340531.3412717.mp4

mp4

47.2 MB

References

  1. 2016. RecSys Challenge '16: Proceedings of the Recommender Systems Challenge (Boston, Massachusetts, USA). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Dzmitry Bahdanau, Kyunghyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. 2015. Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate. In ICLR,, Yoshua Bengio and Yann LeCun (Eds.).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. D. Bau, B. Zhou, A. Khosla, A. Oliva, and A. Torralba. 2017. Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representations. In CVPR. 3319--3327.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Shuqing Bian, Wayne Xin Zhao, Yang Song, Tao Zhang, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2019. Domain Adaptation for Person-Job Fit with Transferable Deep Global Match Network. In EMNLP-IJCNLP. Association for Computational Linguistics, Hong Kong, China, 4810--4820. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-1487Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Yu Cheng, Yusheng Xie, Zhengzhang Chen, Ankit Agrawal, Alok N. Choudhary, and Songtao Guo. 2013. JobMiner: a real-time system for mining job-related patterns from social media. In SIGKDD. ACM, 1450--1453. https://doi.org/10.1145/2487575.2487704Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. In NAACL-HLT. Association for Computational Linguistics, 4171--4186. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/n19--1423Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Mamadou Diaby, Emmanuel Viennet, and Tristan Launay. 2013a. Toward the next generation of recruitment tools: an online social network-based job recommender system. In ASONAM,, Jon G. Rokne and Christos Faloutsos (Eds.). ACM, 821--828. https://doi.org/10.1145/2492517.2500266Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Mamadou Diaby, Emmanuel Viennet, and Tristan Launay. 2013b. Toward the next Generation of Recruitment Tools: An Online Social Network-Based Job Recommender System. In ASONAM. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 821--828. https://doi.org/10.1145/2492517.2500266Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Yoav Goldberg. 2015. A Primer on Neural Network Models for Natural Language Processing. CoRR, Vol. abs/1510.00726 (2015). arxiv: 1510.00726 http://arxiv.org/abs/1510.00726Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Huifeng Guo, Ruiming Tang, Yunming Ye, Zhenguo Li, and Xiuqiang He. 2017. DeepFM: A Factorization-Machine based Neural Network for CTR Prediction. In IJCAI,, Carles Sierra (Ed.). ijcai.org, 1725--1731. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/239Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Xiangnan He, Kuan Deng, Xiang Wang, Yan Li, Yongdong Zhang, and Meng Wang. 2020. LightGCN: Simplifying and Powering Graph Convolution Network for Recommendation. (2020). arxiv: cs.IR/2002.02126Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Po-Sen Huang, Xiaodong He, Jianfeng Gao, Li Deng, Alex Acero, and Larry P. Heck. 2013. Learning deep structured semantic models for web search using clickthrough data. In CIKM,, Qi He, Arun Iyengar, Wolfgang Nejdl, Jian Pei, and Rajeev Rastogi (Eds.). ACM, 2333--2338. https://doi.org/10.1145/2505515.2505665Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Guolin Ke, Qi Meng, Thomas Finley, Taifeng Wang, Wei Chen, Weidong Ma, Qiwei Ye, and Tie-Yan Liu. 2017. LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree. In NIPS. 3146--3154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Yoon Kim. 2014. Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classification. In EMNLP. Association for Computational Linguistics, Doha, Qatar, 1746--1751. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/D14-1181Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. DP Kingma and Ba J Adam. 2017. A method for stochastic optimization. cornell university library. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Pang Wei Koh and Percy Liang. 2017. Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functions. In ICML (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research),, Doina Precup and Yee Whye Teh (Eds.), Vol. 70. PMLR, 1885--1894. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v70/koh17a.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ran Le, Wenpeng Hu, Yang Song, Tao Zhang, Dongyan Zhao, and Rui Yan. 2019. Towards Effective and Interpretable Person-Job Fitting. In CIKM,, Wenwu Zhu, Dacheng Tao, Xueqi Cheng, Peng Cui, Elke A. Rundensteiner, David Carmel, Qi He, and Jeffrey Xu Yu (Eds.). ACM, 1883--1892. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357384.3357949Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. LinkedIn. LinkedIn Workforce Report|United States. https://economicgraph.linkedin.com/resources/linkedin-workforce-report-march-2020Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Zachary Chase Lipton. 2016. The Mythos of Model Interpretability. CoRR, Vol. abs/1606.03490 (2016). arxiv: 1606.03490 http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.03490Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Yao Lu, Sandy El Helou, and Denis Gillet. 2013. A recommender system for job seeking and recruiting website. In WWW. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee / ACM, 963--966. https://doi.org/10.1145/2487788.2488092Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J. Malinowski, T. Keim, O. Wendt, and T. Weitzel. 2006. Matching People and Jobs: A Bilateral Recommendation Approach. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06), Vol. 6. 137c--137c.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Bhaskar Mitra, Fernando Diaz, and Nick Craswell. 2017. Learning to Match using Local and Distributed Representations of Text for Web Search. In WWW,, Rick Barrett, Rick Cummings, Eugene Agichtein, and Evgeniy Gabrilovich (Eds.). ACM, 1291--1299. https://doi.org/10.1145/3038912.3052579Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Chuan Qin, Hengshu Zhu, Tong Xu, Chen Zhu, Liang Jiang, Enhong Chen, and Hui Xiong. 2018. Enhancing Person-Job Fit for Talent Recruitment: An Ability-aware Neural Network Approach. In SIGIR. ACM, 25--34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209978.3210025Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Rohan Ramanath, Hakan Inan, Gungor Polatkan, Bo Hu, Qi Guo, Cagri Ozcaglar, Xianren Wu, Krishnaram Kenthapadi, and Sahin Cem Geyik. 2018. Towards Deep and Representation Learning for Talent Search at LinkedIn. In CIKM. ACM, 2253--2261. https://doi.org/10.1145/3269206.3272030Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Ramprasaath R. Selvaraju, Michael Cogswell, Abhishek Das, Ramakrishna Vedantam, Devi Parikh, and Dhruv Batra. 2017. Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization. In ICCV. IEEE Computer Society, 618--626. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2017.74Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ying Shan, T. Ryan Hoens, Jian Jiao, Haijing Wang, Dong Yu, and J. C. Mao. 2016. Deep Crossing: Web-Scale Modeling without Manually Crafted Combinatorial Features. In SIGKDD. ACM, 255--262. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939704Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Ilya Sutskever, Oriol Vinyals, and Quoc V. Le. 2014. Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks. In NIPS. 3104--3112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Raphael Tang, Yao Lu, Linqing Liu, Lili Mou, Olga Vechtomova, and Jimmy Lin. 2019. Distilling Task-Specific Knowledge from BERT into Simple Neural Networks. CoRR, Vol. abs/1903.12136 (2019). arxiv: 1903.12136Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is All you Need. In NIPS. 5998--6008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Jian Wang, Yi Zhang, Christian Posse, and Anmol Bhasin. 2013. Is it time for a career switch?. In WWW. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee / ACM, 1377--1388. https://doi.org/10.1145/2488388.2488509Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Huang Xu, Zhiwen Yu, Jingyuan Yang, Hui Xiong, and Hengshu Zhu. 2019. Dynamic Talent Flow Analysis with Deep Sequence Prediction Modeling. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., Vol. 31, 10 (2019), 1926--1939. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2018.2873341Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Rui Yan, Ran Le, Yang Song, Tao Zhang, Xiangliang Zhang, and Dongyan Zhao. 2019. Interview Choice Reveals Your Preference on the Market: To Improve Job-Resume Matching through Profiling Memories. In SIGKDD. ACM, 914--922. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292500.3330963Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Yingya Zhang, Cheng Yang, and Zhixiang Niu. 2015. A Research of Job Recommendation System Based on Collaborative Filtering. ISCID, Vol. 1 (03 2015), 533--538.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Chen Zhu, Hengshu Zhu, Hui Xiong, Chao Ma, Fang Xie, Pengliang Ding, and Pan Li. 2018. Person-Job Fit: Adapting the Right Talent for the Right Job with Joint Representation Learning. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, Vol. 9 (09 2018), 1--17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3234465Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CIKM '20: Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management
    October 2020
    3619 pages
    ISBN:9781450368599
    DOI:10.1145/3340531

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 19 October 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

    Upcoming Conference

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader