skip to main content
10.1145/3341215.3356334acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageschi-playConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Interactive Narratives in Games: Understanding Player Agency and Experience

Published:17 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

In my thesis, I define interactive narrative or storytelling as an experience in which users are allowed to decide over the direction and/or outcome of a story. Key decision-making opportunities are presented and users are required to make a choice. Understanding physiological and psychological moments experienced during these decision-making opportunities is important because it helps us pinpoint significant elements that have an impact on the user, such as user agency and engagement. The goal of this PhD work is to uncover these elements and their importance. The contribution of the presented work is twofold: (i) to analyze how an interactive narrative impacts decision-making opportunities, and (ii) present findings from different studies using interactive films and video games. The evaluation of interactive content using different platforms is important to understand users' behaviors while making decisions, thus allowing the exploration of new venues to improve their experience.

References

  1. Anders Drachen, Pejman Mirza-Babaei, and Lennart Nacke (Eds.). 2018. Games User Research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI:http: //dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198794844.001.0001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Magy El-Nasr. 2007. Interaction, narrative, and drama: Creating an adaptive interactive narrative using performance arts theories. Interaction Studies 8 (06 2007), 209--240. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/is.8.2.03elnGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Melanie C. Green and Keenan M. Jenkins. 2014. Interactive Narratives: Processes and Outcomes in User-Directed Stories. Journal of Communication 64, 3 (2014), 479--500. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12093Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. iMotions. 2018. Galvanic Skin Response. https://imotions.com/gsr/. (2018). Accessed: 2019-01--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Christoph Klimmt, Tilo Hartmann, and Andreas Frey. 2008. Effectance and Control as Determinants of Video Game Enjoyment. Cyberpsychology & behavior : the impact of the Internet, multimedia and virtual reality on behavior and society 10 (01 2008), 845--7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9942Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Michael Mateas and Andrew Stern. 2002. Architecture, Authorial Idioms and Early Observations of the Interactive Drama Facade. Technical Report Carnegie Mellon University-CS-02--198, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA" (01 2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Christopher Moser and Xiaowen Fang. 2014. Narrative Structure and Player Experience in Role-Playing Games. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 31 (12 2014), 146--156. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2014.986639Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Mark O. Riedl and Andrew Stern. 2006. Believable Agents and Intelligent Story Adaptation for Interactive Storytelling. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Technologies for Interactive Digital Storytelling and Entertainment (TIDSE'06). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1--12. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11944577_1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Supermassive Games and Sony Computer Entertainment. 2015.Until Dawn. Game [PS4]. (25 August 2015). Supermassive Games, Guildford,England, U.K. Last played August 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. David Thue, Vadim Bulitko, Marcia Spetch, and Eric Wasylishen. 2007. Interactive Storytelling: A Player Modelling Approach. In Proceedings of the Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment (AIIDE'07). AAAI Press, 43--48. http: //dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3022508.3022517Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Interactive Narratives in Games: Understanding Player Agency and Experience

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI PLAY '19 Extended Abstracts: Extended Abstracts of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts
      October 2019
      859 pages
      ISBN:9781450368711
      DOI:10.1145/3341215

      Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 October 2019

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI PLAY '19 Extended Abstracts Paper Acceptance Rate51of181submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate421of1,386submissions,30%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader