skip to main content
10.1145/3341216.3342212acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Contextual Multi-Armed Bandits for Link Adaptation in Cellular Networks

Published:14 August 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Cellular networks dynamically adjust the transmission parameters for a wireless link in response to its time-varying channel state. This is known as link adaptation, where the typical goal is to maximize the link throughput. State-of-the-art outer loop link adaptation (OLLA) selects the optimal transmission parameters based on an approximate, offline, model of the wireless link. Further, OLLA refines the offline model by dynamically compensating any deviations from the observed link performance. However, in practice, OLLA suffers from slow convergence and a sub-optimal link throughput. In this paper, we propose a link adaptation approach that overcomes the shortcomings of OLLA through a novel learning scheme. Our approach relies on contextual multi-armed bandits (MAB), where the context vector is composed of the instantaneous wireless channel state along with side information about the link. For a given context, our approach learns the success probability for each of the available transmission parameters, which is then exploited to select the throughput-maximizing parameters. Through numerical experiments, we show that our approach converges faster than OLLA and achieves a higher steady-state link throughput. For frequent and infrequent channel reports respectively, our scheme outperforms OLLA by 15% and 25% in terms of the steady-state link throughput.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p44-saxena.mp4

mp4

670 MB

References

  1. 3rd Generation Partnership Project. 2016. Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical layer procedures. Technical Report 36.213 v12.3.0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Kari Aho, Olli Alanen, and Jorma Kaikkonen. 2011. CQI reporting imperfections and their consequences in LTE networks. In Proceedings of ICN.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Francisco Blanquez-Casado, Gerardo Gomez, Maria del Carmen Aguayo-Torres, and Jose Tomas Entrambasaguas. 2016. eOLLA: an enhanced outer loop link adaptation for cellular networks. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking 2016, 1 (16 Jan 2016), 20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. V. Buenestado, J. M. Ruiz-Avilés, M. Toril, S. Luna-Ramírez, and A. Mendo. 2014. Analysis of Throughput Performance Statistics for Benchmarking LTE Networks. IEEE Communications Letters 18, 9 (Sept 2014), 1607--1610.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Wei Chu, Lihong Li, Lev Reyzin, and Robert Schapire. 2011. Contextual bandits with linear payoff functions. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 208--214.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. R. Combes and A. Proutiere. 2015. Dynamic Rate and Channel Selection in Cognitive Radio Systems. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 33, 5 (May 2015), 910--921.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. R. C. Daniels, C. M. Caramanis, and R. W. Heath. 2010. Adaptation in Convolutionally Coded MIMO-OFDM Wireless Systems Through Supervised Learning and SNR Ordering. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 59, 1 (Jan 2010), 114--126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. R. A. Delgado, K. Lau, R. Middleton, R. S. Karlsson, T. Wigren, and Y. Sun. 2017. Fast Convergence Outer Loop Link Adaptation with Infrequent Updates in Steady State. In 2017 IEEE 86th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall). 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Durán, M. Toril, F. Ruiz, and A. Mendo. 2015. Self-Optimization Algorithm for Outer Loop Link Adaptation in LTE. IEEE Communications Letters 19, 11 (Nov 2015), 2005--2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Yun Chao Hu, Milan Patel, Dario Sabella, Nurit Sprecher, and Valerie Young. 2015. Mobile edge computing - A key technology towards 5G. ETSI white paper 11, 11 (2015), 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. ITU-R. 1997. Guidelines for evaluation of radio transmission technologies for IMT-2000. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. T. L. Jensen, S. Kant, J. Wehinger, and B. H. Fleury. 2010. Fast Link Adaptation for MIMO OFDM. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 59, 8 (Oct 2010), 3766--3778.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. S. Katri Pulliyakode and S. Kalyani. 2017. Reinforcement learning techniques for Outer Loop Link Adaptation in 4G/5G systems. ArXiv e-prints (Aug. 2017). arXiv:stat.ML/1708.00994Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lihong Li, Wei Chu, John Langford, and Robert E Schapire. 2010. A contextual-bandit approach to personalized news article recommendation. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web. ACM, 661--670. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A.F. Molisch. 2010. Wireless Communications. Wiley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Philipp Moritz, Robert Nishihara, Stephanie Wang, Alexey Tumanov, Richard Liaw, Eric Liang, Melih Elibol, Zongheng Yang, William Paul, Michael I Jordan, et al. 2018. Ray: A distributed framework for emerging {AI} applications. In 13th {USENIX} Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation ({OSDI} 18). 561--577. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. S. Park, R. C. Daniels, and R. W. Heath. 2015. Optimizing the Target Error Rate for Link Adaptation. In 2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM). 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Vidit Saxena. 2016. py-itpp: Python library for signal processing and communications research. https://github.com/vidits-kth/py-itppGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. V. Saxena, J. Jaldén, M. Bengtsson, and H. Tullberg. 2018. Deep Learning for Frame Error Probability Prediction in BICM-OFDM Systems. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). 6658--6662.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. M. Shikh-Bahaei. 2007. Joint Optimization Of Transmission Rate and Outer-Loop SNR Target Adaptation Over Fading Channels. IEEE Transactions on Communications 55, 3 (March 2007), 398--403.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Sander Wahls and H Vincent Poor. 2013. An outer loop link adaptation for BICM-OFDM that learns. In 2013 IEEE 14th Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC). IEEE, 719--723.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Shangxing Wang, Hanpeng Liu, Pedro Henrique Gomes, and Bhaskar Krishnamachari. 2018. Deep reinforcement learning for dynamic multichannel access in wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking 4, 2 (2018), 257--265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Contextual Multi-Armed Bandits for Link Adaptation in Cellular Networks

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          NetAI'19: Proceedings of the 2019 Workshop on Network Meets AI & ML
          August 2019
          96 pages
          ISBN:9781450368728
          DOI:10.1145/3341216

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 14 August 2019

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          NetAI'19 Paper Acceptance Rate13of38submissions,34%Overall Acceptance Rate13of38submissions,34%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader