skip to main content
10.1145/3343031.3350968acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Imbalance-aware Pairwise Constraint Propagation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Pairwise constraint propagation (PCP) aims to propagate a limited number of initial pairwise constraints (PCs, including must-link and cannot-link constraints) from the constrained data samples to the unconstrained ones to boost subsequent PC-based applications. The existing PCP approaches always suffer from the imbalance characteristic of PCs, which limits their performance significantly. To this end, we propose a novel imbalance-aware PCP method, by comprehensively and theoretically exploring the intrinsic structures of the underlying PCs. Specifically, different from the existing methods that adopt a single representation, we propose to use two separate carriers to represent the two types of links. And the propagation is driven by the structure embedded in data samples and the regularization of the local, global, and complementary structures of the two carries. Our method is elegantly cast as a well-posed constrained optimization model, which can be efficiently solved. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed PCP method is capable of generating more high-fidelity PCs than the recent PCP algorithms. In addition, the augmented PCs by our method produce higher accuracy than state-of-the-art semi-supervised clustering methods when applied to constrained clustering. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first PCP method taking the imbalance property of PCs into account.

References

  1. Edoardo Amaldi and Viggo Kann. 1998. On the approximability of minimizing nonzero variables or unsatisfied relations in linear systems. Theoretical Computer Science , Vol. 209, 1--2 (1998), 237--260.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Sugato Basu, Ian Davidson, and Kiri Wagstaff. 2008. Constrained clustering: Advances in algorithms, theory, and applications .CRC Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Deng Cai, Xiaofei He, and Jiawei Han. 2005. Document clustering using locality preserving indexing. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , Vol. 17, 12 (2005), 1624--1637.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Emmanuel J Candès, Xiaodong Li, Yi Ma, and John Wright. 2011. Robust principal component analysis? J. ACM , Vol. 58, 3 (2011), 11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jie Chen, Hua Mao, Yongsheng Sang, and Zhang Yi. 2017. Subspace clustering using a symmetric low-rank representation. Knowledge-Based Systems , Vol. 127 (2017), 46--57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Mihai Cucuringu, Ioannis Koutis, Sanjay Chawla, Gary Miller, and Richard Peng. 2016. Simple and scalable constrained clustering: a generalized spectral method. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 445--454.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Sharon Fogel, Hadar Averbuch-Elor, Jacov Goldberger, and Daniel Cohen-Or. 2018. Clustering-driven deep embedding with pairwise constraints. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.08457 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Zhenyong Fu. 2015. Pairwise constraint propagation via low-rank matrix recovery. Computational Visual Media , Vol. 1, 3 (2015), 211--220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Haibo He and Edwardo A Garcia. 2008. Learning from imbalanced data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge & Data Engineering 9 (2008), 1263--1284.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Steven CH Hoi, Rong Jin, and Michael R Lyu. 2007. Learning nonparametric kernel matrices from pairwise constraints. In International Conference on Machine Learning. 361--368.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Steven CH Hoi, Wei Liu, Michael R Lyu, and Wei-Ying Ma. 2006. Learning distance metrics with contextual constraints for image retrieval. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , Vol. 2. IEEE, 2072--2078.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Yuheng Jia, Sam Kwong, and Junhui Hou. 2018. Semi-supervised spectral clustering with structured sparsity regularization. IEEE Signal Processing Letters , Vol. 25, 3 (2018), 403--407.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Chengming Jiang, Huiqing Xie, and Zhaojun Bai. 2017. Robust and Efficient Computation of Eigenvectors in a Generalized Spectral Method for Constrained Clustering. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics . 757--766.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Sepandar D. Kamvar, Dan Klein, and Christopher D. Manning. 2003. Spectral learning. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 561--566.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Brian Kulis, Sugato Basu, Inderjit Dhillon, and Raymond Mooney. 2009. Semi-supervised graph clustering: a kernel approach. Machine Learning , Vol. 74, 1 (2009), 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Zhenguo Li, Jianzhuang Liu, and Xiaoou Tang. 2008. Pairwise constraint propagation by semidefinite programming for semi-supervised classification. In International Conference on Machine Learning . 576--583.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Zhouchen Lin, Minming Chen, and Yi Ma. 2010. The augmented lagrange multiplier method for exact recovery of corrupted low-rank matrices. arXiv preprint arXiv:1009.5055 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mingxia Liu and Daoqiang Zhang. 2016. Pairwise constraint-guided sparse learning for feature selection. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics , Vol. 46, 1 (2016), 298--310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Wenhe Liu, Xiaojun Chang, Ling Chen, and Yi Yang. 2017. Early active learning with pairwise constraint for person re-identification. In Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases . Springer, 103--118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Wei Liu, Shiqian Ma, Dacheng Tao, Jianzhuang Liu, and Peng Liu. 2010. Semi-supervised sparse metric learning using alternating linearization optimization. In ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining . ACM, 1139--1148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Zhengdong Lu and Miguel A Carreira-Perpinan. 2008. Constrained spectral clustering through affinity propagation. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhiwu Lu and Horace HS Ip. 2010. Constrained spectral clustering via exhaustive and efficient constraint propagation. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Zhiwu Lu and Yuxin Peng. 2013. Exhaustive and efficient constraint propagation: A graph-based learning approach and its applications. International Journal of Computer Vision , Vol. 103, 3 (2013), 306--325.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Bac Nguyen and Bernard De Baets. 2019. Kernel distance metric learning using pairwise constraints for person re-identification. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , Vol. 28, 2 (2019), 589--600.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Nam Nguyen and Rich Caruana. 2008. Improving classification with pairwise constraints: a margin-based approach. In Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases . Springer, 113--124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Jianbo Shi and J. Malik. 2000. Normalized cuts and image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , Vol. 22, 8 (2000), 888--905.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Alexander Strehl and Joydeep Ghosh. 2002. Cluster ensembles--a knowledge reuse framework for combining multiple partitions. Journal of Machine Learning Research , Vol. 3, Dec (2002), 583--617.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Ulrike Von Luxburg. 2007. A tutorial on spectral clustering. Statistics and computing , Vol. 17, 4 (2007), 395--416.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. John Wright, Arvind Ganesh, Shankar Rao, Yigang Peng, and Yi Ma. 2009. Robust principal component analysis: Exact recovery of corrupted low-rank matrices via convex optimization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2080--2088.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Menglin Wu, Qiang Chen, and Quansen Sun. 2014. Medical image retrieval with relevance feedback via pairwise constraint propagation. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems , Vol. 8, 1 (2014), 249--268.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Wenhui Wu, Yuheng Jia, Sam Kwong, and Junhui Hou. 2018. Pairwise Constraint Propagation-Induced Symmetric Nonnegative Matrix Factorization. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 99 (2018), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Rong Yan, Jian Zhang, Jie Yang, and Alexander G Hauptmann. 2006. A discriminative learning framework with pairwise constraints for video object classification. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , Vol. 28, 4 (2006), 578--593.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Zheng Yang, Yao Hu, Haifeng Liu, Huajun Chen, and Zhaohui Wu. 2014. Matrix Completion for Cross-view Pairwise Constraint Propagation. In ACM International Conference on Multimedia. ACM, 897--900.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Hong Zeng and Yiu-ming Cheung. 2011. Semi-supervised maximum margin clustering with pairwise constraints. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , Vol. 24, 5 (2011), 926--939.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Zhao Zhang, Tommy WS Chow, and Mingbo Zhao. 2012a. Trace ratio optimization-based semi-supervised nonlinear dimensionality reduction for marginal manifold visualization. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , Vol. 25, 5 (2012), 1148--1161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Zhao Zhang, Mingbo Zhao, and Tommy WS Chow. 2012b. Marginal semi-supervised sub-manifold projections with informative constraints for dimensionality reduction and recognition. Neural Networks , Vol. 36 (2012), 97--111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Dengyong Zhou, Olivier Bousquet, Thomas N Lal, Jason Weston, and Bernhard Schölkopf. 2004. Learning with local and global consistency. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 321--328.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Xiaojin Zhu, Zoubin Ghahramani, and John D Lafferty. 2003. Semi-supervised learning using gaussian fields and harmonic functions. In International Conference on Machine Learning. 912--919.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Imbalance-aware Pairwise Constraint Propagation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MM '19: Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia
      October 2019
      2794 pages
      ISBN:9781450368896
      DOI:10.1145/3343031

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 October 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      MM '19 Paper Acceptance Rate252of936submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate995of4,171submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      MM '24
      MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
      October 28 - November 1, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader