skip to main content
10.1145/3345768.3355936acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

802.11ac Frame Aggregation is Bottlenecked: Revisiting the Block ACK

Published:25 November 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Frame aggregation improves performance of 802.11 networks by eliminating many overheads the single-frame transmissions incur. An originator builds and sends an aggregate (A-MPDU) of packets (MPDUs or subframes) from a window of 64 sequence numbers, and a block ACK then acknowledges the same window. The mechanism works fine till there are no packet losses. With the advent of packet losses (and their subsequent reporting by the block ACK), holes appear in the originator's aggregation window. An A-MPDU constructed immediately after by the originator then becomes smaller in size due to these holes. We discuss the effect of such inadvertent shortening of transmitted A-MPDUs on the performance of WLAN. We propose modifications to the block ACK and aggregation mechanisms, and show through our ns-3 simulations that the change improves the network throughput by up to 20% in hidden node scenario in simple basic service sets (BSSs) consisting of 32 to 48 STAs. Our analysis shows that improvement in the worst case throughput can be as high as 400% for the highest VHT MCS indexes with our proposed modifications.

References

  1. R. Anwar, K. Nishat, M. Ali, Z. Akhtar, H. Niaz, and I. A. Qazi. 2014. Loss differentiation: Moving onto high-speed wireless LANs. In IEEE INFOCOM 2014 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. 2463--2471.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. H. Assasa, S. Kumar Saha, A. Loch, D. Koutsonikolas, and J. Widmer. 2018. Medium Access and Transport Protocol Aspects in Practical 802.11 ad Networks. In 2018 IEEE 19th International Symposium on "A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks" (WoWMoM). 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Seongho Byeon, Kangjin Yoon, Okhwan Lee, Sunghyun Choi, Woonsun Cho, and Seungseok Oh. 2014. MoFA: Mobility-aware Frame Aggregation in Wi-Fi. Proceedings of the 10th ACM International on Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies (CoNEXT '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 41--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. Chung, T. Chung, B. Kang, and J. Kim. 2013. A-MPDU using fragmented MPDUs for IEEE 802.11ac MU-MIMO WLANs. In 2013 IEEE International Conference of IEEE Region 10 (TENCON 2013). 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. H. Hassan, J. M. Garcia, and C. Bockstal. 2006. Aggregate Traffic Models for VoIP Applications. In Int. Conf. on Digital Telecom. (ICDT'06) . 70--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Muhammad Inamullah and Bhaskaran Raman. 2018. Poster: Frame Aggregation in 802.11ac: Need for Modified Block ACK. In The 24th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, October 29-November 2, 2018, New Delhi, India (MobiCom '18). ACM, 3. https://doi.org/10.1145/3241539.3267736Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Y. Kim, E. Monroy, Okhwan Lee, Kyung-Joon Park, and Sunghyun Choi. 2012. Adaptive two-level frame aggregation in IEEE 802.11n WLAN. In 2012 18th Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications (APCC). 658--663.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. James F. Kurose and Keith W. Ross. 2012. Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach 6th ed.). Pearson.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J. Liu, M. Yao, and Z. Qiu. 2015. Enhanced Two-Level Frame Aggregation with Optimized Aggregation Level for IEEE 802.11n WLANs. IEEE Communications Letters , Vol. 19, 12 (Dec 2015), 2254--2257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. A. Majeed and N. B. Abu-Ghazaleh. 2012. Packet aggregation in multi-rate wireless LANs. In 2012 9th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON) . 452--460.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. N. Mishra, A. Chaurasia, A. Kallavi, B. Raman, and P. Kulkarni. 2015. Usage of 802.11n in practice: A measurement study. 2015 7th International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS). 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. T. Nakajima, Y. Utsunomiya, Y. Nishibayashi, T. Tandai, T. Adachi, and M. Takagi. 2005. Compressed Block Ack, an efficient selective repeat mechanism for IEEE802.11n. In 2005 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, Vol. 3. 1479--1483.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ioannis Pefkianakis, Yun Hu, Starsky H.Y. Wong, Hao Yang, and Songwu Lu. 2010. MIMO Rate Adaptation in 802.11N Wireless Networks. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 257--268.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Eldad Perahia and Robert Stacey. 2013. Next Generation Wireless LANs: 802.11N and 802.11Ac 2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. J. Saldana, J. Ruiz-Mas, and J. Almodóvar. 2017. Frame Aggregation in Central Controlled 802.11 WLANs: The Latency Versus Throughput Tradeoff. IEEE Communications Letters , Vol. 21, 11 (Nov 2017), 2500--2503.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. D. Skordoulis, Q Ni, H Chen, A. P. Stephens, Changwen Liu, and A. Jamalipour. 2008. IEEE 802.11N MAC Frame Aggregation Mechanisms for Next-generation High-throughput WLANs. Wireless Comm. , Vol. 15, 1 (Feb. 2008), 40--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. Yazid and A. Ksentini. 2018. Modeling and Performance Analysis of the Main MAC and PHY Features of the 802.11ac Standard: A-MPDU Aggregation vs Spatial Multiplexing. IEEE Trans. on Veh. Tech. , Vol. 67, 11 (Nov 2018), 10243--10257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. 802.11ac Frame Aggregation is Bottlenecked: Revisiting the Block ACK

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MSWIM '19: Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems
        November 2019
        340 pages
        ISBN:9781450369046
        DOI:10.1145/3345768

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 November 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate398of1,577submissions,25%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader