skip to main content
10.1145/3366423.3380215acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Traveling the token world: A graph analysis of Ethereum ERC20 token ecosystem

Published:20 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The birth of Bitcoin ushered in the era of cryptocurrency, which has now become a financial market attracted extensive attention worldwide. The phenomenon of startups launching Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) to raise capital led to thousands of tokens being distributed on blockchains. Many studies have analyzed this phenomenon from an economic perspective. However, little is know about the characteristics of participants in the ecosystem. To fill this gap and considering over 80% of ICOs launched based on ERC20 token on Ethereum, in this paper, we conduct a systematic investigation on the whole Ethereum ERC20 token ecosystem to characterize the token creator, holder, and transfer activity. By downloading the whole blockchain and parsing the transaction records and event logs, we construct three graphs, namely token creator graph, token holder graph, and token transfer graph. We obtain many observations and findings by analyzing these graphs. Besides, we propose an algorithm to discover potential relationships between tokens and other accounts. The reported case shows that our algorithm can effectively reveal entities and the complex relationship between various accounts in the token ecosystem.

References

  1. Saman Adhami, Giancarlo Giudici, and Stefano Martinazzi. 2018. Why do businesses go crypto? An empirical analysis of initial coin offerings. Journal of Economics and Business 100 (2018), 64–75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Sidney Amani, Myriam Bégel, Maksym Bortin, and Mark Staples. 2018. Towards verifying ethereum smart contract bytecode in Isabelle/HOL. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Certified Programs and Proofs. ACM, 66–77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Elli Androulaki, Ghassan O Karame, Marc Roeschlin, Tobias Scherer, and Srdjan Capkun. 2013. Evaluating user privacy in bitcoin. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Springer, 34–51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Nicola Atzei, Massimo Bartoletti, and Tiziana Cimoli. 2017. A survey of attacks on ethereum smart contracts (sok). In Proceedings of the International Conference on Principles of Security and Trust. Springer, 164–186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Massimo Bartoletti, Salvatore Carta, Tiziana Cimoli, and Roberto Saia. 2020. Dissecting Ponzi schemes on Ethereum: Identification, analysis, and impact. Future Generation Computer Systems 102 (2020), 259–277.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Massimo Bartoletti, Barbara Pes, and Sergio Serusi. 2018. Data mining for detecting Bitcoin Ponzi schemes. In Proceedings of the Crypto Valley Conference on Blockchain Technology. IEEE, 75–84.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Massimo Bartoletti and Livio Pompianu. 2017. An empirical analysis of smart contracts: platforms, applications, and design patterns. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Springer, 494–509.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Cristiano Bellavitis, Douglas Cumming, and Tom R Vanacker. 2019. The cross-country diffusion of new entrepreneurial practices: The case of initial coin offerings. In Proceedings of the Academy of Management, Vol. 2019. Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510, 13098.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Andreas Bogner, Mathieu Chanson, and Arne Meeuw. 2016. A decentralised sharing app running a smart contract on the ethereum blockchain. In Proceedings of the International Conference on the Internet of Things. ACM, 177–178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Christian Catalini and Joshua S Gans. 2018. Initial coin offerings and the value of crypto tokens. Technical Report. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Weili Chen, Jun Wu, Zibin Zheng, Chuan Chen, and Yuren Zhou. 2019. Market Manipulation of Bitcoin: Evidence from Mining the Mt. Gox Transaction Network. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE, 964–972.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Weili Chen, Zibin Zheng, Jiahui Cui, Edith Ngai, Peilin Zheng, and Yuren Zhou. 2018. Detecting ponzi schemes on ethereum: Towards healthier blockchain technology. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 1409–1418.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Nicolas Christin. 2013. Traveling the Silk Road: A measurement analysis of a large anonymous online marketplace. In Proceedings of the International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 213–224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. John P Conley 2017. Blockchain and the economics of crypto-tokens and initial coin offerings. Vanderbilt University Department of economics working papers17-00008 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Gianni Fenu, Lodovica Marchesi, Michele Marchesi, and Roberto Tonelli. 2018. The ICO phenomenon and its relationships with ethereum smart contract environment. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Blockchain Oriented Software Engineering. IEEE, 26–32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Christian Fisch. 2019. Initial coin offerings (ICOs) to finance new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing 34, 1 (2019), 1–22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Neil Gandal, JT Hamrick, Tyler Moore, and Tali Oberman. 2018. Price manipulation in the Bitcoin ecosystem. Journal of Monetary Economics 95 (2018), 86–96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Ilya Grishchenko, Matteo Maffei, and Clara Schneidewind. 2018. A semantic framework for the security analysis of Ethereum smart contracts. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Principles of Security and Trust. Springer, 243–269.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Sabrina T Howell, Marina Niessner, and David Yermack. 2018. Initial coin offerings: Financing growth with cryptocurrency token sales. Technical Report. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Marc Jourdan, Sebastien Blandin, Laura Wynter, and Pralhad Deshpande. 2018. Characterizing entities in the bitcoin blockchain. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Mining Workshops. IEEE, 55–62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Merve Can Kus Khalilov and Albert Levi. 2018. A survey on anonymity and privacy in bitcoin-like digital cash systems. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials 20, 3 (2018), 2543–2585.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Loi Luu, Duc-Hiep Chu, Hrishi Olickel, Prateek Saxena, and Aquinas Hobor. 2016. Making smart contracts smarter. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security. ACM, 254–269.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Damiano Di Francesco Maesa, Andrea Marino, and Laura Ricci. 2016. An analysis of the bitcoin users graph: Inferring unusual behaviours. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Complex Networks and their Applications. Springer, 749–760.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Damiano Di Francesco Maesa, Andrea Marino, and Laura Ricci. 2017. Detecting artificial behaviours in the Bitcoin users graph. Online Social Networks and Media 3 (2017), 63–74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Patrick McCorry, Siamak F Shahandashti, and Feng Hao. 2017. A smart contract for boardroom voting with maximum voter privacy. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Springer, 357–375.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Dan McGinn, David Birch, David Akroyd, Miguel Molina-Solana, Yike Guo, and William J Knottenbelt. 2016. Visualizing dynamic bitcoin transaction patterns. Big data 4, 2 (2016), 109–119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Paul Momtaz, Wolfgang Drobetz, and Henning Schroeder. 2018. Investor sentiment and initial coin offerings. The Journal of Alternative Investments 21, 4 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Satoshi Nakamoto 2008. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. (2008). Retrieved September 1, 2019 from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Fergal Reid and Martin Harrigan. 2013. An analysis of anonymity in the bitcoin system. In Security and privacy in social networks. Springer, 197–223.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. EL Sidorenko. 2019. Stablecoin as a New Financial Instrument. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference “Digital Transformation of the Economy: Challenges, Trends, New Opportunities”. Springer, 630–638.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Nick Szabo. 1996. Smart contracts: Building blocks for digital markets. (1996). Retrieved September 1, 2019 from http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/rob/Courses/InformationInSpeech/CDROM/Literature/LOTwinterschool2006/szabo.best.vwh.net/smart_contracts_2.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Christof Ferreira Torres, Julian Schütte, 2018. Osiris: Hunting for integer bugs in ethereum smart contracts. In Proceedings of the Annual Computer Security Applications Conference. ACM, 664–676.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Kentaroh Toyoda, Tomoaki Ohtsuki, and P Takis Mathiopoulos. 2017. Identification of high yielding investment programs in Bitcoin via transactions pattern analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Communications Conference. IEEE, 1–6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Marie Vasek and Tyler Moore. 2015. There’s no free lunch, even using Bitcoin: Tracking the popularity and profits of virtual currency scams. In Proceedings of the International conference on financial cryptography and data security. Springer, 44–61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Marie Vasek and Tyler Moore. 2018. Analyzing the Bitcoin Ponzi scheme ecosystem. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Springer, 101–112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Friedhelm Victor and Bianca Katharina Lüders. 2019. Measuring Ethereum-based ERC20 token networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Shermin Voshmgir. 2019. Token economy: How blockchains and smart contracts revolutionize the economy. BlockchainHub Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Zibin Zheng, Shaoan Xie, Hongning Dai, Xiangping Chen, and Huaimin Wang. 2017. An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Congress on Big Data. IEEE, 557–564.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Zibin Zheng, Shaoan Xie, Hongning Dai, Xiangping Chen, and Huaimin Wang. 2018. Blockchain challenges and opportunities: A survey. International Journal of Web and Grid Services 14 (2018), 352–375.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Traveling the token world: A graph analysis of Ethereum ERC20 token ecosystem
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            WWW '20: Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020
            April 2020
            3143 pages
            ISBN:9781450370233
            DOI:10.1145/3366423

            Copyright © 2020 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 20 April 2020

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

            Upcoming Conference

            WWW '24
            The ACM Web Conference 2024
            May 13 - 17, 2024
            Singapore , Singapore

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format