skip to main content
10.1145/3369457.3369506acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Older Adults' Perception and Use of Voice User Interfaces: A Preliminary Review of the Computing Literature

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 January 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Voice User Interfaces (VUIs) are quickly becoming ubiquitous. The natural language interface of VUIs may be more usable for some groups of users, such as those who may face challenges using physical input methods including older adults and people living with a disability. This study explores research on the use of VUIs by one such group, older adults. We conducted a systematic literature review of research published in the Association of Computing Machinery Digital Library that addresses perception and use of VUIs by older adults. We identified an emerging body of research examining older adults' use and perceptions of VUIs. This research revealed several potential benefits of voice interaction for older adults while also highlighting how the novelty of the technology may be a barrier to adoption. We conclude with a call for further HCI research in this area.

References

  1. Mohammad Rafayet Ali, Kimberly Van Orden, Kimberly Parkhurst, Shuyang Liu, Viet-Duy Nguyen, Paul Duberstein, and M Ehsan Hoque. 2018. Aging and Engaging: A Social Conversational Skills Training Program for Older Adults. In 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 55--66. https://doi.org/10.1145/3172944.3172958Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Australian Communications and Media Autority. 2018. Report communications. Communications report 2017-2018 (2018), 162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Steven Baker, Jenny Waycott, Sonja Pedell, Thuong Hoang, and Elizabeth Ozanne. 2016. Older People and Social Participation: From Touch-Screens to Virtual Realities. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Interactive Technology and Ageing Populations (ITAP '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 34--43. https://doi.org/10.1145/2996267.2996271Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Timothy W Bickmore, Lisa Caruso, and Kerri Clough-Gorr. 2005. Acceptance and Usability of a Relational Agent Interface by Urban Older Adults. In CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHIEA '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1212--1215. https://doi.org/10.1145/1056808.1056879Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Robin N Brewer and Anne Marie Piper. 2017. xPress: Rethinking Design for Aging and Accessibility Through an IVR Blogging System. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW (dec 2017), 26:1----26:17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3139354Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Michael H. Cohen, James P. Giangola, and Jennifer Balogh. 2004. Voice User Interface Design. Addison-Wesley, Boston.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Aurora Constantin, Catherine Lai, Elaine Farrow, Beatrice Alex, Ruth Pel-Littel, Henk Herman Nap, and Johan Jeuring. 2019. "Why is the Doctor a Man": Reactions of Older Adults to a Virtual Training Doctor. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHIEA '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, LBW1719:1----LBW1719:6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312811Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Wan He, Daniel Goodkind, and Paul Kowal. 2016. An Aging World: 2015 International Population Reports. Aging March (2016), 165. https://doi.org/P95/09-1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Adineh Hosseinpanah, Nicole C Krämer, and Carolin Stra\ssmann. 2018. Empathy for Everyone?: The Effect of Age When Evaluating a Virtual Agent. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction (HAI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 184--190. https://doi.org/10.1145/3284432.3284442Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers. 2012. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jaros\law Kowalski, Anna Jaskulska, Kinga Skorupska, Katarzyna Abramczuk, Cezary Biele, Wies\law Kopeć, and Krzysztof Marasek. 2019. Older Adults and Voice Interaction: A Pilot Study with Google Home. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHIEA '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, LBW0187:1----LBW0187:6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312973Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Eun Ju Lee, Clifford Nass, and Scott Brave. 2000. Can Computer-generated Speech Have Gender?: An Experimental Test of Gender Stereotype. In CHI '00 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHIEA '00). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 289--290. https://doi.org/10.1145/633292.633461Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. John Lyons. 1991. Natural Language and Universal Grammar: Essays in Linguistic Theory. Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165877Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Siddharth Mehrotra, Vivian Genaro Motti, Helena Frijns, Tugce Akkoc, Sena Bü\csra Yengeç, Oguz Calik, Marieke M M Peeters, and Mark A Neerincx. 2016. Embodied Conversational Interfaces for the Elderly User. In Proceedings of the 8th Indian Conference on Human Computer Interaction (IHCI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 90--95. https://doi.org/10.1145/3014362.3014372Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. David Moher. 2009. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Annals of Internal Medicine 151, 4 (2009), 264. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Christiane Opfermann, Karola Pitsch, Ramin Yaghoubzadeh, and Stefan Kopp. 2017. The Communicative Activity of âĂIJMaking SuggestionsâĂİ as an Interactional Process: Towards a Dialog Model for HAI. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction (HAI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 161--170. https://doi.org/10.1145/3125739.3125752Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lingyun Qiu and Izak Benbasat. 2005. Online Consumer Trust and Live Help Interfaces: The Effects of Text-to-Speech Voice and Three-Dimensional Avatars. International Journal of HumanâĂŞComputer Interaction 19, 1 (2005), 75--94. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc1901_6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. S Schlögl, G Chollet, M Garschall, M Tscheligi, and G Legouverneur. 2013. Exploring Voice User Interfaces for Seniors. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 52:1----52:2. https://doi.org/10.1145/2504335.2504391Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Candace L Sidner, Timothy Bickmore, Bahador Nooraie, Charles Rich, Lazlo Ring, Mahni Shayganfar, and Laura Vardoulakis. 2018. Creating New Technologies for Companionable Agents to Support Isolated Older Adults. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 8, 3 (jul 2018), 17:1----17:27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3213050Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jaisie Sin and Cosmin Munteanu. 2019. A Preliminary Investigation of the Role of Anthropomorphism in Designing Telehealth Bots for Older Adults. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHIEA '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, LBW1820:1--LBW1820:6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312941Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Anjeli Singh, Andrea Johnson, Hanan Alnizami, and Juan E Gilbert. 2011. The Potential Benefits of Multi_modal Social Interaction on the Web for Senior Users. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 27, 2 (dec 2011), 135--141. https://doi.org/10.5555/2038836.2038856Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Nirmalya Thakur and Chia Y Han. 2018. An Approach to Analyze the Social Acceptance of Virtual Assistants by Elderly People. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Internet of Things (IOT '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3277593.3277616Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Christiana Tsiourti, Emilie Joly, Cindy Wings, Maher Ben Moussa, and Katarzyna Wac. 2014. Virtual Assistive Companions for Older Adults: Qualitative Field Study and Design Implications. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth '14). ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), ICST, Brussels, Belgium, Belgium, 57--64. https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2014.254943Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Michel Vacher, Sybille Caffiau, François Portet, Brigitte Meillon, Camille Roux, Elena Elias, Benjamin Lecouteux, and Pedro Chahuara. 2015. Evaluation of a Context-Aware Voice Interface for Ambient Assisted Living: Qualitative User Study vs. Quantitative System Evaluation. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 7, 2 (may 2015), 5:1----5:36. https://doi.org/10.1145/2738047Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Toshiki Yamanaka, Yutaka Takase, and Yukiko I Nakano. 2016. Assessing the Communication Attitude of the Elderly Using Prosodic Information and Head Motions. In The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI '16). IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 539--540. https://doi.org/10.5555/2906831.2906966Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Randall Ziman and Greg Walsh. 2018. Factors Affecting Seniors' Perceptions of Voice-enabled User Interfaces. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHIEA '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, LBW591:1----LBW591:6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188575Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Older Adults' Perception and Use of Voice User Interfaces: A Preliminary Review of the Computing Literature

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          OzCHI '19: Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction
          December 2019
          631 pages
          ISBN:9781450376969
          DOI:10.1145/3369457

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 10 January 2020

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader