skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Perceived-Value-driven Optimization of Energy Consumption in Smart Homes

Published:09 April 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Residential energy consumption has been rising rapidly during the last few decades. Several research efforts have been made to reduce residential energy consumption, including demand response and smart residential environments. However, recent research has shown that these approaches may actually cause an increase in the overall consumption, due to the complex psychological processes that occur when human users interact with these energy management systems. In this article, using an interdisciplinary approach, we introduce a perceived-value driven framework for energy management in smart residential environments that considers how users perceive values of different appliances and how the use of some appliances are contingent on the use of others. We define a perceived-value user utility used as an Integer Linear Programming (ILP) problem. We show that the problem is NP-Hard and provide a heuristic method called COndensed DependencY (CODY). We validate our results using synthetic and real datasets, large-scale online experiments, and a real-field experiment at the Missouri University of Science and Technology Solar Village. Simulation results show that our approach achieves near optimal performance and significantly outperforms previously proposed solutions. Results from our online and real-field experiments also show that users largely prefer our solution compared to a previous approach.

References

  1. U.S. Energy Information Administration. April 2015. Annual Energy Outlook 2015 with Projections to 2040. Retrieved from http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/0383(2015).pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. U.S. Energy Information Administration. September 24, 2015. Electric Power Monthly. Retrieved from http://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/current_year/september2015.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Réka Albert and Albert lászló Barabási. 2002. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys 74, 1 (2002), 47--97. DOI:10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. AlertMe. 2013. Retrieved from http://www.alertme.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Amazon Mechanical Turk. 2017. Retrieved from https://www.mturk.com/mturk/welcome.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Marc Beaudin and Hamidreza Zareipour. 2015. Home energy management systems: A review of modelling and complexity. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 45 (2015), 318–335. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.046Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Shameek Bhattacharjee, Aditya Thakur, Simone Silvestri, and Sajal K. Das. 2017. Statistical security incident forensics against data falsification in smart grid advanced metering infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM on Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy. ACM, 35–45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Liming Chen, Chris Nugent, Maurice Mulvenna, Dewar Finlay, Xin Hong, and Michael Poland. 2008. Using event calculus for behaviour reasoning and assistance in a smart home. In Smart Homes and Health Telematics. Springer, 81–89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Stefano Ciavarella, Jhi-Young Joo, and Simone Silvestri. 2016. Managing contingencies in smart grids via the Internet of things. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 7, 4 (2016), 2134–2141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. December 17, 2015. Reports on Demand Response 8 Advanced Metering. Retrieved March 3, 2020 from http://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/indus-act/demand-response/dem-res-adv-metering.asp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Thomas H. Cormen, Charles E. Leiserson, Ronald L. Rivest, and Clifford Stein. 2009. Introduction to Algorithms. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Pietro Cottone, Salvatore Gaglio, Giuseppe Lo Re, and Marco Ortolani. 2015. User activity recognition for energy saving in smart homes. Perv. Mobile Comput. 16 PA (2015), 156–170. DOI:10.1016/j.pmcj.2014.08.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Debraj De, Wen-Zhan Song, Mingsen Xu, Cheng-Liang Wang, Diane Cook, and Xiaoming Huo. 2012. Findinghumo: Real-time tracking of motion trajectories from anonymous binary sensing in smart environments. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS’12).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Debraj De, Shaojie Tang, Wen-Zhan Song, Diane Cook, and Sajal K. Das. 2012. ActiSen: Activity-aware sensor network in smart environments. Perv. Mobile Comput. 8, 5 (2012), 730–750.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Alessandra De Paola, Marco Ortolani, Giuseppe Lo Re, Giuseppe Anastasi, and Sajal K. Das. 2014. Intelligent management systems for energy efficiency in buildings: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 47, 1 (2014), 13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Magali A. Delmas, Miriam Fischlein, and Omar I. Asensio. 2013. Information strategies and energy conservation behavior: A meta-analysis of experimental studies from 1975 to 2012. Energy Policy 61 (2013), 729–739. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.109Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Robert Earle and Ahmad Faruqui. 2006. Toward a new paradigm for valuing demand response. Electr. J. 19, 4 (2006), 21–31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Albert-Georg Lang, and Axel Buchner. 2007. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39, 2 (2007), 175–191.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. James Griffin. 1986. Well-being: Its meaning, measurement and moral importance. (1986). https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198248431.001.0001/acprof-9780198248439.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Bernd Hayo and Wolfgang Seifert. 2003. Subjective economic well-being in Eastern Europe. J. Econ. Psychol. 24, 3 (2003), 329–348.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Joseph Herkert and Timothy Kostyk. 2015. Societal implications of the smart grid: Challenges for engineering. In Engineering Identities, Epistemologies and Values. Springer, 287–306.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sungpack Hong, Nicole C. Rodia, and Kunle Olukotun. 2013. On fast parallel detection of strongly connected components (SCC) in small-world graphs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC’13). ACM, New York, NY, Article 92, 11 pages. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2503210.2503246Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Rikke Hagensby Jensen, Jesper Kjeldskov, and Mikael B. Skov. 2018. Assisted shifting of electricity use: A long-term study of managing residential heating. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 25, 5 (2018), 33 pages. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3210310Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Kumarsinh Jhala, Balasubramaniam Natarajan, and Anil Pahwa. 2019. Prospect theory based active consumer behavior under variable electricity pricing. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 10, 3 (2019), 2809–2819. DOI:10.1109/TSG.2018.2810819Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Xiaofan Jiang, Minh Van Ly, Jay Taneja, Prabal Dutta, and David Culler. 2009. Experiences with a high-fidelity wireless building energy auditing network. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys’09).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Xin Jin, Kyri Baker, Steven Isley, and Dane Christensen. 2017. User-preference-driven model predictive control of residential building loads and battery storage for demand response. In Proceedings of the IEEE Annual Conference of the American Automatic Control Council (ACC’17).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Corey Lee M. Keyes. 1998. Social well-being. Soc. Psychol. Quart. (1998), 121–140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Ravi Kumar and Sergei Vassilvitskii. 2010. Generalized distances between rankings. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 571–580.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. 2008. Home Energy Saver and Score: Engineering Documentation. Retrieved from http://hes-documentation.lbl.gov/calculation-methodology/calculation-of-energy-consumption/major-appliances/miscellaneous-equipment-energy-consumption/default-energy-consumption-of-mels.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Jing Liao, Georgia Elafoudi, Lina Stankovic, and Vladimir Stankovic. 2014. Non-intrusive appliance load monitoring using low-resolution smart meter data. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm’14).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Daniel Livengood and Richard Larson. 2009. The energy box: Locally automated optimal control of residential electricity usage. Serv. Sci. 1, 1 (2009), 1–16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Magnus S. Magnusson, Judee K. Burgoon, and Maurizio Casarrubea. 2015. Discovering Hidden Temporal Patterns in Behavior and Interaction. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). 2016. NAICS Code 443141 – Household Appliance Stores. Retrieved from https://classcodes.com/lookup/naics-code-443141/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Mark Newman. 2010. Networks: An Introduction. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. C. Nugent and J. C. Augusta. 2006. A logical approach to adl recognition for alzheimer’s patients. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Smart Living and Public Health (ICOST’06).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Michael Angelo A. Pedrasa, Ted D. Spooner, and Iain F. MacGill. 2010. Coordinated scheduling of residential distributed energy resources to optimize smart home energy services. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 1, 2 (2010), 134–143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Manisa Pipattanasomporn, Murat Kuzlu, and Saifur Rahman. 2012. An algorithm for intelligent home energy management and demand response analysis. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 3, 4 (2012), 2166–2173.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. PulseEnergy Inc. 2013. Barkeley Energy Dashboard.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Andreas Reinhardt, Paul Baumann, Daniel Burgstahler, Matthias Hollick, Hristo Chonov, Marc Werner, and Ralf Steinmetz. 2012. On the accuracy of appliance identification based on distributed load metering data. In IFIP SustainIT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Carol D. Ryff. 1989. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 57, 6 (1989), 1069.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Sergio Salinas, Ming Li, and Pan Li. 2013. Multi-objective optimal energy consumption scheduling in smart grids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 4, 1 (2013), 341–348.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. S. Shanu, J. Idiculla, Q. Qureshi, Y. Jhala, and S. Bhattacharya. 2016. A graph theoretic approach for modelling wildlife corridors. ArXiv e-prints (March 2016). arxiv:q-bio.QM/1603.01939Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Simone Silvestri, D. A. Baker, and Valeria Dolce. 2017. Integration of social behavioral modeling for energy optimization in smart environments. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Social Sensing (SocialSens’17). ACM, New York, NY, 97–97. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3055601.3055618Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Kin Cheong Sou, James Weimer, Henrik Sandberg, and Karl Henrik Johansson. 2011. Scheduling smart home appliances using mixed integer linear programming. In Proceedings of the IEEE European Control Conference and the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC-ECC’11).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. P. Suppes. 1965. Preference, utility and subjective probability. In Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush and E. H. Galanter (eds.), Vol. 3, 249–410.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. R. Tarjan. 1972. Depth-first search and linear graph algorithms. SIAM J. Comput. 1, 2 (1972), 146–160. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1137/0201010 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1137/0201010Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Supun Tiptipakorn and Wei-Jen Lee. 2007. A residential consumer-centered load control strategy in real-time electricity pricing environment. In Proceedings of the IEEE North American Power Symposium (NAPS’07).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Common Houshold Appliance Energy Use. 2014. Retrieved from http://www.mea.coop/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/High-Bill-Packet.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Tim Van Kasteren, Athanasios Noulas, Gwenn Englebienne, and Ben Kröse. 2008. Accurate activity recognition in a home setting. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. 1–9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1409635.1409637Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Naouar Yaagoubi and Hussein T. Mouftah. 2015. User-aware game theoretic approach for demand management. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 6, 2 (2015), 716–725.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Chengpeng Ye, Ye Xia, Yunchuan Sun, Shenling Wang, Hongli Yan, and Rashid Mehmood. 2015. ERAR: An event-driven approach for real-time activity recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Identification, Information and Knowledge in the Internet of Things (IIKI’15). 288–293.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Juan Ye, Simon Dobson, and Susan McKeever. 2012. Situation identification techniques in pervasive computing: A review. Perv. Mobile Comput. 8, 1 (2012), 36–66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Juan Ye, Graeme Stevenson, and Simon Dobson. 2015. USMART: An unsupervised semantic mining activity recognition technique. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 4, 4 (2015), 16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Andrea Zanella, Nicola Bui, Angelo Castellani, Lorenzo Vangelista, and Michele Zorzi. 2014. Internet of things for smart cities. IEEE IoT J. 1, 1 (2014), 22–32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Ahmed Zoha, Alexander Gluhak, Muhammad Ali Imran, and Sutharshan Rajasegarar. 2012. Non-intrusive load monitoring approaches for disaggregated energy sensing: A survey. Sensors 12, 12 (2012), 16838–16866.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Perceived-Value-driven Optimization of Energy Consumption in Smart Homes

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Internet of Things
      ACM Transactions on Internet of Things  Volume 1, Issue 2
      May 2020
      176 pages
      EISSN:2577-6207
      DOI:10.1145/3394117
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 April 2020
      • Accepted: 1 November 2019
      • Revised: 1 September 2019
      • Received: 1 January 2019
      Published in tiot Volume 1, Issue 2

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format