Abstract
Presentations of virtual cultural heritage artifacts are often communicated via the medium of interactive digital storytelling. The synergy of a storied narrative embedded within a 3D virtual reconstruction context has high consumer appeal and edutainment value. We investigate if 360° videos presented through virtual reality further contribute to user immersion for the application of preserving intangible cultural heritage. A case study then analyzes whether conventional desktop media is significantly different from virtual reality as a medium for immersion in intangible heritage contexts. The case study describes bridge diving at Stari Most, the old bridge in Mostar Bosnia. This application aims to present and preserve the bridge diving tradition at this site. The project describes the site and history along with cultural connections, and a series of quiz questions are presented after viewing all of the materials. Successful completion of the quiz allows a user to participate in a virtual bridge dive. The subjective evaluation provided evidence to suggest that our method is successful in preserving intangible heritage and communicating ideas in key areas of concern for this heritage that can be used to develop a preservation framework in the future. It was also possible to conclude that experience within the virtual reality framework did not affect effort expectancy for the web application, but the same experience significantly influenced the performance expectancy construct.
- 3D CoForm. 2009. 3D CoForm Website. Retrieved June 14, 2018 from http://www.culturalinformatics.org.uk/.Google Scholar
- E. Ahmed and R. Ward. 2016. Analysis of factors influencing acceptance of personal, academic and professional development e-portfolios. Campus-Wide Information Systems 63 (2016), 152--161.Google Scholar
- Irene Aicardi, Filiberto Chiabrando, Andrea Maria Lingua, and Francesca Noardo. 2018. Recent trends in cultural heritage 3D survey: The photogrammetric computer vision approach. Journal of Cultural Heritage 32 (2018), 257--266.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eike Anderson, Leigh McLoughlin, Fotis Liarokapis, Christopher Peters, Panagiotis Petridis, and Sara de Freitas. 2010. Developing serious games for cultural heritage: A state-of-the-art review. Virtual Reality 14, 12 (2010), 255--275.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ferran Argelaguet and Carlos Andujar. 2013. A survey of 3D object selection techniques for virtual environments. Computers 8 Graphics 37, 3 (2013), 121--136.Google Scholar
- L. Argyriou, D. Economou, and V. Bouki. 2017. 360-degree interactive video application for cultural heritage education. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network. 297--304.Google Scholar
- D. Arnold and G. Geser. 2007. Research Agenda for the Applications of ICT to Cultural Heritage. Archaeolingua, Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar
- Ruth Aylett. 2000. Emergent narrative, social immersion and “storification.” In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Narrative and Interactive Learning Environments. 35--44.Google Scholar
- Manon Bertrand and Stéphane Bouchard. 2008. Applying the technology acceptance model to VR with people who are favorable to its use. Journal of Cyber Therapy 8 Rehabilitation 1, 2 (2008), 200--210.Google Scholar
- Doug A. Bowman and Chadwick A. Wingrave. 2001. Design and evaluation of menu systems for immersive virtual environments. In Proceedings of the IEEE 2001 Virtual Reality Conference (VR’01). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 149--156.Google Scholar
- Plewe Brandon. 2002. The nature of uncertainty in historical geographic information. Transactions in GIS 6, 4 (2002), 431--456.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Erik Champion. 2016. Entertaining the similarities and distinctions between serious games and virtual heritage projects. Entertainment Computing 14 (May 2016), 67--74.Google Scholar
- Dimitrios Christopoulos, Pavlos Mavridis, Anthousis Andreadis, and John N. Karigiannis. 2013. Digital storytelling within virtual environments: “The battle of Thermopylae.” In Transactions on Edutainment IX. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7544. Springer, 29--48. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37042-7_2Google ScholarCross Ref
- Karin Coninx, Frank Van Reeth, and Eddy Flerackers. 1997. A hybrid 2D/3D user interface for immersive object modeling. In Proceedings of Computer Graphics International. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 47--55.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Raimund Dachselt and Anett Hübner. 2007. Three-dimensional menus: A survey and taxonomy. Computers 8 Graphics 31, 1 (2007), 53--65.Google Scholar
- Fred D. Davis. 1986. A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. Ph.D. Dissertation. MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Fred D. Davis. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 3 (Sept. 1989), 319--340. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/249008Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fred D. Davis, Richard P. Bagozzi, and Paul R. Warshaw. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35, 8 (Aug. 1989), 982--1003. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Denard and S. Hermon. 2009. London Charter. Retrieved June 14, 2018 from http://www.londoncharter.org/history.html.Google Scholar
- Yuanfa Dong, Mark Webb, Carlo Harvey, Kurt Debattista, and Alan Chalmers. 2017. Multisensory virtual experience of tanning in medieval coventry. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2312/gch.20171297Google ScholarDigital Library
- Declan Dowling, Colm O. Fearghail, Aljoscha Smolic, and Sebastian Knorr. 2018. Faoladh: A case study in cinematic VR storytelling and production. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ahmed Elmezeny, Nina Edenhofer, and Jeffrey Wimmer. 2018. Immersive storytelling in 360-degree videos: An analysis of interplay between narrative and technical immersion. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research 11 (April 2018), 1--15.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Laia Pujol-Tost and Maria Economou. 2008. Educational tool or expensive toy? Evaluating VR evaluation and its relevance for virtual heritage. In New Heritage: New Media and Cultural Heritage, Y. E. Kalay, T. Kvan, and J. Affleck (Eds.). Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon, 242--260.Google Scholar
- M. H. Fagan, V. Pandey, and C. Kilmon. 2012. Exploring the adoption of a virtual reality simulation: The role of perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness and personal innovativeness. Campus-Wide Information Systems 29, 2 (2012), 117--127.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dominique Gerber and Dominique Bechmann. 2005. The spin menu: A menu system for virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality (VR ’05). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 271--272.Google Scholar
- A. Grande and V. Bendicho. 2011. The Principles of the Seville Charter. Retrieved June 14, 2018 from http://smartheritage.com/seville-principles/seville-charter-project.Google Scholar
- Sarajevo Graphics Group. 2018. Mostar Cliff Diving VR—WebGL version. Retrieved March 27, 2019 from http://h.etf.unsa.ba/mostar-jumps/WebGLEng/.Google Scholar
- Sarajevo Graphics Group. 2018. Sarajevo Charter. Retrieved March 27, 2019 from http://h.etf.unsa.ba/sarajevocharter/.Google Scholar
- Pierre Grussenmeyer, Tania Landes, Thomas Voegtle, and Konrad Ringle. 2008. Comparison methods of terrestrial laser scanning, photogrammetry and tacheometry data for recording of cultural heritage buildings. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 37, B5 (2008), 213--218.Google Scholar
- Jassim Happa, Thomas Bashford-Rogers, Alexander Wilkie, Alessandro Artusi, Kurt Debattista, and Alan Chalmers. 2012. Cultural heritage predictive rendering. Computer Graphics Forum 31, 6 (2012), 1823--1836.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Richard Heiberger and Naomi Robbins. 2014. Design of diverging stacked bar charts for Likert scales and other applications. Journal of Statistical Software 57, 5 (April 2014), 1--32.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vedad Hulusic, Carlo Harvey, Kurt Debattista, Nicolas Tsingos, Steve Walker, David Howard, and Alan Chalmers. 2012. Acoustic rendering and auditory-visual cross-modal perception and interaction. Computer Graphics Forum 31, 1 (2012), 102--131. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2011.02086.xGoogle ScholarDigital Library
- I. Ivkovic, N. Klisura, and S. Sljivo. 2018. Bridges of Sarajevo. In Proceedings of the Central European Seminar on Computer Graphics. 107--114.Google Scholar
- Jeff Sauro and James R. Lewis. 2016. Quantifying the User Experience: Practical Statistics for User Research. Morgan Kaufmann.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Richard H. Jacoby and Stephen R. Ellis. 1992. Using virtual menus in a virtual environment. In Visual Data Interpretation, Vol. 1668. International Society for Optics and Photonics, Bellingham, WA, 39--49.Google Scholar
- Jonathan Lazar, Jinjuan Heidi Feng, and Harry Hochheiser. 2010. Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley Publishing.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Patrick Lemoine, Frederic Vexo, and Daniel Thalmann. 2003. Interaction techniques: 3D menus-based paradigm. In Proceedings of the 1st Research Workshop on Augmented Virtual Reality (AVIR’03).Google Scholar
- Sandy Louchart and Ruth Aylett. 2003. Solving the narrative paradox in VEs—Lessons from RPGs. In Intelligent Virtual Agents, T. Rist, R. S. Aylett, D. Ballin, and J. Rickel (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Germany, 244--248.Google Scholar
- Kerry T. Manis and Danny Choi. 2018. The virtual reality hardware acceptance model (VR-HAM): Extending and individuating the technology acceptance model (TAM) for virtual reality hardware. Journal of Business Research 100 (2018), 503--513.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bonn Maria, Kendall Lori, and McDonough Jerome. 2016. Preserving intangible heritage: Defining a research agenda. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 53, 1 (2016), 1--5.Google Scholar
- John McCarthy. 2014. Multi-image photogrammetry as a practical tool for cultural heritage survey and community engagement. Journal of Archaeological Science 43 (2014), 175--185.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniel Mendes, Daniel Medeiros, Maurício Sousa, Eduardo Cordeiro, Alfredo Ferreira, and Joaquim A. Jorge. 2017. Design and evaluation of a novel out-of-reach selection technique for VR using iterative refinement. Computers 8 Graphics 67 (2017), 95--102.Google Scholar
- Helen C. Miles, Andrew T. Wilson, Frédéric Labrosse, Bernard Tiddeman, Seren Griffiths, Ben Edwards, Panagiotis D. Ritsos, et al. 2016. Alternative representations of 3D-reconstructed heritage data. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 9, 1 (2016), 4.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hermitage Museum and Videofabrika. 2017. The Hermitage VR Experience. Retrieved June 14, 2018 from http://www.inavateonthenet.net/case-studies/article/immersive-history-russia-s-hermitage-museum-embraces-vr.Google Scholar
- F. Nicolucci and S. Hermon. 2004. A fuzzy logic approach to reliability in archaeological virtual reconstruction. In Proceedings of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA’04). 1--8.Google Scholar
- Cecilia Pisa, Fabiana Zeppa, and Gabriele Fangi. 2011. Spherical photogrammetry for cultural heritage: San Galgano Abbey and the Roman Theater, Sabratha. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 4, 3 (Dec. 2011), Article 9, 15 pages. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2069276.2069278Google ScholarDigital Library
- Athena Plus. 2017. Digital Cultural Heritage and Tourism: Recommendations for Cultural Institutions. Retrieved June 14, 2018 from http://www.athenaplus.eu/index.php?en/220/digital-cultural-heritage-and-tourism-recommendations-for-cultural-institutions.Google Scholar
- Fabio Remondino, Stefano Girardi, Alessandro Rizzi, and Lorenzo Gonzo. 2009. 3D modeling of complex and detailed cultural heritage using multi-resolution data. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 2, 1 (July 2009), Article 2, 20 pages. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1551676.1551678Google ScholarDigital Library
- Selma Rizvic, Dusanka Boskovic, Vensada Okanovic, and Sanda Sljivo. 2017. Kyrenia—Hyper storytelling pilot application. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage.Google Scholar
- S. Rizvic, N. Djapo, F. Alispahic, B. Hadzihalilovic, F. F. Cengic, A. Imamovic, V. Okanovic, and D. Boskovic. 2017. Guidelines for interactive digital storytelling presentations of cultural heritage. In Proceedings of the 2017 9th International Conference on Virtual Worlds and Games for Serious Applications (VS-Games’17) 253--259.Google Scholar
- Ruth Aylett. 1999. Narrative in Virtual Environments—Towards Emergent Narrative. AAAI Technical Report FS-99-01. AAAI.Google Scholar
- Paola Salomoni, Catia Prandi, Marco Roccetti, Lorenzo Casanova, Luca Marchetti, and Gustavo Marfia. 2017. Diegetic user interfaces for virtual environments with HMDs: A user experience study with Oculus Rift. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 11, 2 (2017), 173--184.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sarajevo Graphics Group. 2018. Mostar VR Gameplay. Retrieved April 21, 2020 from https://youtu.be/v-HoWOKOtMs.Google Scholar
- Sarajevo Graphics Group. 2018. VR Simulation of Mostar Bridge Diving. Retrieved April 21, 2020 from https://tinyurl.com/sarajevographicsgroup.Google Scholar
- Henrik Schoenau-Fog. 2015. Adaptive storyworlds: Utilizing the space-time continuum in interactive digital storytelling. In Interactive Storytelling, H. Schoenau-Fog, L. E. Bruni, S. Louchart, and S. Baceviciute (Eds.). Springer, 58--65.Google Scholar
- Elmedin Selmanovic, Selma Rizvic, Carlo Harvey, Dusanka Boskovic, Vedad Hulusic, Malek Chahin, and Sanda Sljivo. 2018. VR video storytelling for intangible cultural heritage preservation. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2312/gch.20181341Google Scholar
- Rod Sims. 1997. Interactivity: A forgotten art?Computers in Human Behavior 13, 2 (1997), 157--180.Google Scholar
- Efstathios Stavrakis, Andreas Aristidou, Maria Savva, Stephania Loizidou Himona, and Yiorgos Chrysanthou. 2012. Digitization of Cypriot folk dances. In Progress in Cultural Heritage Preservation, M. Ioannides, D. Fritsch, J. Leissner, R. Davies, F. Remondino, and R. Caffo (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Germany, 404--413.Google Scholar
- Jonathan Steuer. 1992. Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication 42, 4 (1992), 73--93.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stella Sylaiou, Katerina Mania, Ioannis Paliokas, Laia Pujol, Vassilis Killintzis, and Fotis Liarokapis. 2017. Exploring the educational impact of diverse technologies in online virtual museums. International Journal of Arts and Technology 10 (Jan. 2017), 58.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bjoern Flindt Temte and Henrik Schoenau-Fog. 2012. Coffee tables and cryo chambers: A comparison of user experience and diegetic time between traditional and virtual environment-based roleplaying game scenarios. In Interactive Storytelling, D. Oyarzun, F. Peinado, R. M. Young, A. Elizalde, and G. Méndez (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Germany, 102--113.Google Scholar
- Ashima Thomas, Abhi Kumar, Race Krehel, Kay Vasey, Eng Tat Khoo, Tim Marsh, and Benjamin Li. 2018. Oceans we make: Immersive VR storytelling. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH Asia 2018 Virtual and Augmented Reality (SA’18). 1--2.Google ScholarDigital Library
- UNESCO. 2019. What Is Intangible Cultural Heritage. Retrieved September 1, 2019 from https://ich.unesco.org/en/what-is-intangible-heritage-00003.Google Scholar
- ICH UNESCO. 2003. Text of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Retrieved April 21, 2020 from https://ich.unesco.org/en/convention.Google Scholar
- Marilena Vecco. 2010. A definition of cultural heritage: From the tangible to the intangible. Journal of Cultural Heritage 11, 3 (2010), 321--324.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Viswanath Venkatesh and Fred D. Davis. 1996. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences 27, 3 (1996), 451--481. DOI:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Viswanath Venkatesh, Michael G. Morris, Gordon B. Davis, and Fred D. Davis. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27 (2003), 425--478.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Virtual Reality Toolkit. 2018. VRTK—Virtual Reality Toolkit. Retrieved June 14, 2018 from https://vrtoolkit.readme.io.Google Scholar
- Naci Yastikli. 2007. Documentation of cultural heritage using digital photogrammetry and laser scanning. Journal of Cultural Heritage 8, 4 (2007), 423--427.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Haci Murat Yilmaz, Murat Yakar, Saadet Armagan Gulec, and O. Nuri Dulgerler. 2007. Importance of digital close-range photogrammetry in documentation of cultural heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage 8, 4 (2007), 428--433.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Improving Accessibility to Intangible Cultural Heritage Preservation Using Virtual Reality
Recommendations
Generating Embodied Storytelling and Interactive Experience of China Intangible Cultural Heritage “Hua'er” in Virtual Reality
CHI EA '22: Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsHua'er, a type of traditional oral performance, is one of the national intangible cultural heritages (ICH) in China. Experts have been trying to enhance public's awareness of Hua'er protection through digital documentation technology, but there's no ...
Application of Virtual Reality Technology in the Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage: —Take the “Lion dance” in Shehuo as an example
ICMSSP '22: Proceedings of the 2022 7th International Conference on Multimedia Systems and Signal ProcessingChina is an ancient civilization with a long history and culture, and has accumulated many precious cultural heritages over thousands of years. Intangible cultural heritage is a very important part of it. Because the intangible cultural heritage is ...
Constructing Embodied Interaction of Intangible Cultural Heritage Course through Immersive Virtual Reality
Chinese CHI '21: Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium of Chinese CHIWith the development of digital technology, intangible cultural heritage (ICH) enthusiasts have an increasingly high demand for the learning experience of intangible cultural heritage. The appearance of intangible cultural heritage experience courses ...
Comments