skip to main content
10.1145/3378393.3402257acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescompassConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Public Access

SunDown: Model-driven Per-Panel Solar Anomaly Detection for Residential Arrays

Published:01 July 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Solar arrays often experience faults that go undetected for long periods of time, resulting in generation and revenue losses. In this paper, we present SunDown, a sensorless approach for detecting per-panel faults in solar arrays. SunDown's model-driven approach leverages correlations between the power produced by adjacent panels to detect deviations from expected behavior, can handle concurrent faults in multiple panels, and performs anomaly classification to determine probable causes. Using two years of solar data from a real home and a manually generated dataset of solar faults, we show that our approach is able to detect and classify faults, including from snow, leaves and debris, and electrical failures with 99.13% accuracy, and can detect concurrent faults with 97.2% accuracy.

References

  1. 2020. Enphase Microinverters. https://enphase.com/en-us/products-and-services/microinverters.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2020. SolarEdge Power Optimizer. https://www.solaredge.com/products/power-optimizer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Y. Akiyama, Y. Kasai, M Iwata, E Takahashi, F. Sato, and M Murakawa. 2015. Anomaly detection of solar power generation systems based on the normalization of the amount of generated electricity. In Proc. IEEE 29th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. R.W. Andrews, J.S. Stein, C. Hansen, and D. Riley. 2014. Introduction to the Open Source PVlib for Python Photovoltaic System Modelling Package. In IEEE Photovoltaic Specialist Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. Arenella, A. Greco, A. Saggese, and M. Vento. 2017. Real Time Fault Detection in Photovoltaic Cells by Cameras on Drones. In International Conference on Image Analysis and Recognition. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. N. Bashir, D. Chen, D. Irwin, and P. Shenoy. 2019. Solar-TK: A Data-driven Toolkit for Solar PV Performance Modeling and Forecasting. In IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Smart Systems (MASS).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M.D. Benedetti, F. Leonardi, F. Messina, C. Santoro, and A. Vasilakos. 2018. Anomaly Detection and Predictive Maintenance for Photovoltaic Systems. Neurocomputing (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. W. Chine, A. Mellit, V. Lughi, A. Malek, G. Sulligoi, and A.M. Pavan. 2016. A Novel Fault Diagnosis Technique for Photovoltaic Systems Based on Artificial Neural Networks. Renewable Energy (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Dhimish, V. Holmes, and M. Dales. 2017. Parallel Fault Detection Algorithm for Grid-connected Photovoltaic Plants. Renewable Energy (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. N.A. Engerer and F.P. Mills. 2014. Kpv: A Clear-sky Index for Photovoltaics. Solar Energy 105 (July 2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M. Feng, N. Bashir, P. Shenoy, D. Irwin, and B. Kosanovic. 2020. Sun-Down: Model-driven Per-Panel Solar Anomaly Detection for Residential Arrays. arXiv:2005.12181 [eess.SP]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. P.X. Gao, L. Golab, and S. Keshav. 2015. What's Wrong with my Solar Panels: a Data-Driven Approach. In EDBT/ICDT Workshops.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. E. Garoudja, F. Harrou, Y. Sun, K. Kara, A. Chouder, and S. Silvestre. 2017. Statistical Fault Detection in Photovoltaic Systems. Solar Energy (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. F. Harrou, A. Dairi, B. Taghezouit, and Y. Sun. 2019. An Unsupervised Monitoring Procedure for Detecting Anomalies in Photovoltaic Systems using a One-class Support Vector Machine. Solar Energy (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Bo Hu. 2012. Solar Panel Anomaly Detection and Classification. MS Thesis, University of Waterloo, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Y. Hu, B. Gao, X. Song, G.Y. Tian, K. Li, and X. He. 2013. Photovoltaic Fault Detection using a Parameter Based Model. Solar Energy (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. S. Iyengar, S. Lee, D. Sheldon, and P. Shenoy. 2018. Solarclique: Detecting Anomalies in Residential Solar Arrays. In ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies. 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. S. Iyengar, N. Sharma, D. Irwin, P. Shenoy, and K. Ramamritham. 2017. A Cloud-Based Black-Box Solar Predictor for Smart Homes. ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. B.K. Kang, S.T.Kim, S.H. Bae, and J.W.Park. 2012. Diagnosis of Output Power Lowering in a PV Array by Using the Kalman-filter Algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. K.A. Kim, G.S. Seo, B.H. Cho, and P.T. Krein. 2015. Photovoltaic Hot-spot Detection for Solar Panel Substrings using AC Parameter Characterization. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. G. Liu and W. Yu. 2017. A Fault Detection and Diagnosis Technique for Solar System Based on Elman Neural Network. In IEEE Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. G. Liu, W. Yu, and L. Zhu. 2018. Condition Classification and Performance of Mismatched Photovoltaic Arrays via a Pre-filtered Elman Neural Network Decision Making Tool. Solar Energy (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. E. Lorenz, D. Heinemann, H. Wickramarathne, H.G. Beyer, and S. Bofinger. 2007. Forecast of Ensemble Power Production by Grid-connected PV Systems. In 20th European PV Conference. Milano.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. E. Lorenz, J. Hurka, D. Heinemann, and H.G. Beyer. 2009. Irradiance Forecasting for the Power Prediction of Grid-connected Photovoltaic Ssystems. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. H. Mekki, A. Mellit, and H. Salhi. 2016. Artificial Neural Network-based Modelling and Fault Detection of Partial Shaded Photovoltaic Modules. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. J. Pereira and M. Silveira. 2018. Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Energy Time Series Data using Variational Recurrent Autoencoders with Attention. In IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. R. Perez, J. Schlemmer, S. Kivalov, J. Dise, P. Keelin, M. Grammatico, T. Hoff, and A. Tuohy. 2018. A New Version of the SUNY Solar Forecast Model: A Scalable Approach to Site-Specific Model Training. In 2017 IEEE 45th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. B. Schölkopf, D.W. Hogg, D. Wang, D. Foreman-Mackey, D. Janzing, C.J. Simon-Gabriel, and J. Peters. 2016. Modeling Confounding by Half-sibling Regression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. N. Sharma, P. Sharma, D. Irwin, and P. Shenoy. 2011. Predicting Solar Generation from Weather Forecasts using Machine Learning. In IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. S. Vergura. 2018. Hypothesis Tests-based Analysis for Anomaly Detection in Photovoltaic Systems in the Absence of Environmental Parameters. Energies (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Y. Zhao, Q. Liu, D. Li, D. Kang, Q. Lv, and L. Shang. 2018. Hierarchical Anomaly Detection and Multimodal Classification in Large-Scale Photovoltaic Systems. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. H. Zhu, L. Lu, J. Yao, S. Dai, and Y. Hu. 2018. Fault Diagnosis Approach for Photovoltaic Arrays Based on Unsupervised Sample Clustering and Probabilistic Neural Network Model. Solar Energy (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. SunDown: Model-driven Per-Panel Solar Anomaly Detection for Residential Arrays

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        COMPASS '20: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies
        June 2020
        359 pages
        ISBN:9781450371292
        DOI:10.1145/3378393

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 July 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate25of50submissions,50%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader