skip to main content
10.1145/3378393.3402275acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescompassConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Best Paper

Modulo: Drive-by Sensing at City-scale on the Cheap

Published:01 July 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Ambient air pollution in urban areas is a significant health hazard, with over 4.2 million deaths annually attributed to it. A crucial step in tackling these challenge is to measure air quality at a fine spatiotemporal granularity. A promising approach for several smart city projects, called drive-by sensing, is to leverage vehicles retrofitted with different sensors (pollution monitors, etc.) that can provide the desired spatiotemporal coverage at a fraction of the cost. However, deploying a drive-by sensing network at a city-scale to optimally select vehicles from a large fleet is still unexplored. In this paper, we propose Modulo -- a system to bootstrap drive-by sensing deployment by taking into consideration a variety of aspects such as spatiotemporal coverage, budget constraints. Modulo is well-suited to satisfy unique deployment constraints such as colocations with other sensors (needed for gas and PM sensor calibration), etc. We compare Modulo with two baseline algorithms on real-world taxi and bus datasets. Modulo significantly outperforms the baselines when a fleet comprises of both taxis and fixed-route vehicles such as public transport buses. Finally, we present a real-world case study that uses Modulo to select vehicles for an air pollution sensing application.

References

  1. 2016. SF Find Neighborhoods. (visited on August 2019). https://data.sfgov.org/Geographic-Locations-and-Boundaries/SF-Find-Neighborhoods/pty2-tcw4. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2019. Air Pollution (visited on March 2020). http://www9.who.int/airpollution/en/. (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 2019. Mayor launches world's largest air quality monitoring network. https://www.london.gov.uk/press-releases/mayoral/to-identify-londons-toxic-air-hotspots. (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 2019. MongoDB. (visited on August 2019). https://www.mongodb.com/. (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 2019. SFMTA Transit Data. (visited on August 2019). ftp://avl-data.sfmta.com/avl_data/avl_raw. (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 2019. World Air Quality Index. (visited on August 2019). http://aqicn.org/. (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 2020. About Ola. https://www.olacabs.com/about.html. (2020). [Online; accessed 02-March-2020].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dhruv Agarwal, Srinivasan Iyengar, and Manohar Swaminathan. 2019. System for vehicle selection in drive-by sensing. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 438--439.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2020. Interactive Map of Air Quality Monitors. https://www.epa.gov/outdoor-air-quality-data/interactive-map-air-quality-monitors.(2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Junade Ali and Vladimir Dyo. 2017. Coverage and mobile sensor placement for vehicles on predetermined routes: A greedy heuristic approach. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Yewande Awe, Jostein Nygard, Steinar Larssen, Heejoo Lee, Hari Dulal, and Rahul Kanakia. 2015. Clean air and healthy lungs: enhancing the World Bank's approach to air quality management. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Lorenzo Bracciale, Marco Bonola, Pierpaolo Loreti, Giuseppe Bianchi, Raul Amici, and Antonello Rabuffi. 2014. CRAWDAD dataset roma/taxi (v. 2014-07-17). Downloaded from https://crawdad.org/roma/taxi/20140717. (July 2014). DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.15783/C7QC7MGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. US Census Bureau. 2018. QuickFacts: San Francisco County, California. (accessed August 2019). https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/sanfranciscocountycalifornia, CA, US/PST045218. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. United States Census Bureau. 2016. 2016 U.S. Gazetteer Files. (accessed August 2019). https://www2.census.gov/geo/docs/maps-data/data/gazetteer/2016_Gazetteer/2016_gaz_place_06.txt. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Tusher Chakraborty, Akshay Uttama Nambi, Ranveer Chandra, Rahul Sharma, Manohar Swaminathan, Zerina Kapetanovic, and Jonathan Appavoo. 2018. Fall-curve: A novel primitive for IoT Fault Detection and Isolation. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. ACM, 95--107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Badri Chatterjee. 2020. Mumbai to get country's largest air quality monitoring network. shorturl.at/bjyKM. (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Dipak K Dash. 2018. India's Public Transport Is In Bad Shape Because It Needs 30 Lakh Buses, But Has Only 3 Lakh. shorturl.at/pyLS3. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Trisha Datta, Shubham Jain, and Marco Gruteser. 2014. Towards city-scale smartphone sensing of potentially unsafe pedestrian movements. In 2014 IEEE 11th international conference on mobile ad hoc and sensor systems. IEEE, 663--667.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jakob Eriksson, Lewis Girod, Bret Hull, Ryan Newton, Samuel Madden, and Hari Balakrishnan. 2008. The pothole patrol: using a mobile sensor network for road surface monitoring. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services. ACM, 29--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kaibo Fu, Wei Ren, and Wei Dong. 2017. Multihop calibration for mobile sensing: K-hop calibratability and reference sensor deployment. In IEEE INFOCOM 2017-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE, 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Yi Gao, Wei Dong, Kai Guo, Xue Liu, Yuan Chen, Xiaojin Liu, Jiajun Bu, and Chun Chen. 2016. Mosaic: A low-cost mobile sensing system for urban air quality monitoring. In IEEE INFOCOM 2016-The 35th Annual IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE, 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. David Hasenfratz, Olga Saukh, Christoph Walser, and Lothar Thiele. 2011. Poster: OpenSense Zurich: A System for Monitoring Air Pollution. (May 2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Tianfu He, Jie Bao, Ruiyuan Li, Sijie Ruan, Yanhua Li, Chao Tian, and Yu Zheng. 2018. Detecting Vehicle Illegal Parking Events using Sharing Bikes' Trajectories. In KDD. 340--349.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Dorit S Hochbaum. 1997. Approximating covering and packing problems: set cover, vertex cover, independent set, and related problems. Approximation Algorithms for NP-Hard Problem (1997), 94--143.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Central Pollution Control Board (India). 2020. Central Control Room for Air Quality Management - All India. shorturl.at/enxY6. (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Eden Strategy Institute and ONG & ONG Pte Ltd. 2018. Top 50 Smart City Governments. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Jinwei Liu, Haiying Shen, Husnu S Narman, Wingyan Chung, and Zongfang Lin. 2018. A survey of mobile crowdsensing techniques: A critical component for the internet of things. ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems 2, 3 (2018), 18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Balz Maag, Zimu Zhou, Olga Saukh, and Lothar Thiele. 2017. SCAN: Multi-hop calibration for mobile sensor arrays. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 2 (2017), 19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Suhas Mathur, Tong Jin, Nikhil Kasturirangan, Janani Chandrasekaran, Wenzhi Xue, Marco Gruteser, and Wade Trappe. 2010. Parknet: drive-by sensing of road-side parking statistics. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services. ACM, 123--136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Prashanth Mohan, Venkata N Padmanabhan, and Ramachandran Ramjee. 2008. Nericell: rich monitoring of road and traffic conditions using mobile smartphones. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Embedded network sensor systems. ACM, 323--336.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. George L Nemhauser, Laurence A Wolsey, and Marshall L Fisher. 1978. An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions---I. Mathematical programming 14, 1 (1978), 265--294.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Gustavo Niemeyer. 2008. Blog announcing Geohash (accessed August 2019). https://web.archive.org/web/20080305223755/http://blog.labix.org:80/#post-85. (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Press Trust of India. 2019. Already '[severe', Delhi's pollution likely to enter '[emergency' zone on Wednesday. shorturl.at/yGNT3. (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. World Health Organization and others. 2006. WHO Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide: global update 2005: summary of risk assessment. Technical Report. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Kevin P O'Keeffe, Amin Anjomshoaa, Steven H Strogatz, Paolo Santi, and Carlo Ratti. 2019. Quantifying the sensing power of vehicle fleets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 26 (2019), 12752--12757.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Michal Piorkowski, Natasa Sarafijanovic-Djukic, and Matthias Grossglauser. 2009. CRAWDAD dataset epfl/mobility (v. 2009-02-24). Downloaded from https://crawdad.org/epfl/mobility/20090224/cab. (Feb. 2009). DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.15783/C7J010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. C Arden Pope Iii, Richard T Burnett, Michael J Thun, Eugenia E Calle, Daniel Krewski, Kazuhiko Ito, and George D Thurston. 2002. Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. Jama 287, 9 (2002), 1132--1141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. World Population Review. 2019. Rome Population. (accessed August 2019). http://worldpopulationreview.com/world-cities/rome-population/. (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Yuecheng Rong, Zhimian Xu, Ruibo Yan, and Xu Ma. 2018. Du-parking: Spatio-temporal big data tells you realtime parking availability. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. ACM, 646--654.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Olga Saukh, David Hasenfratz, Abouzar Noori, Tamara Ulrich, and Lothar Thiele. 2012. Demo-Abstract: Route Selection of Mobile Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring. In Proc. of 9th European Conference on Wireless Sensor Networks (EWSN 2012). Springer, Trento, Italy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Modulo: Drive-by Sensing at City-scale on the Cheap

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          COMPASS '20: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies
          June 2020
          359 pages
          ISBN:9781450371292
          DOI:10.1145/3378393

          Copyright © 2020 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 July 2020

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate25of50submissions,50%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader