skip to main content
10.1145/3379503.3403562acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Physio-Stacks: Supporting Communication with Ourselves and Others via Tangible, Modular Physiological Devices

Published:05 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Our physiological activity reflects our inner workings. However, we are not always aware of it in full detail. Physiological devices allow us to monitor and create adaptive systems and support introspection. Given that these devices have access to sensitive data, it is vital that users have a clear understanding of the internal mechanisms (extrospection), yet the underlying processes are hard to understand and control, resulting in a loss of agency. In this work, we focus on bringing the agency back to the user, by using design guidelines based on principles of honest communication and driven by positive activities. To this end, we conceived a tangible, modular approach for the construction of physiological interfaces that can be used as a prototyping toolkit by designers and researchers, or as didactic tools by educators and pupils. We show the potential of such an approach with a set of examples, supporting introspection, dialog, music creation, and play.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

a19-roo-supplement.mp4

mp4

113.7 MB

References

  1. Mike Ambinder. 2011. Biofeedback in gameplay: How valve measures physiology to enhance gaming experience. In Game Developers Conference Proceedings, GCD ’11, Vol. 22. Game Developers Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, 27–33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Judith Amores, Xavier Benavides, and Pattie Maes. 2016. PsychicVR: Increasing Mindfulness by Using Virtual Reality and Brain Computer Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2889442Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Judith Amores, Anna Fuste, and Robert Richer. 2019. Deep Reality: Towards Increasing Relaxation in VR by Subtly Changing Light, Sound and Movement Based on HR, EDA, and EEG. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3311770Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ilhan Aslan and Elisabeth André. 2017. Tangibleheart: Enabling Critical and Shared Reflections of Heart Behaviors. In Proceedings of the 31st British Computer Society Human Computer Interaction Conference(HCI ’17). BCS Learning & Development Ltd., Swindon, UK, 62:1–62:2. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/HCI2017.62Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ilhan Aslan, Hadrian Burkhardt, Julian Kraus, and Elisabeth André. 2016. Hold My Heart and Breathe with Me: Tangible Somaesthetic Designs. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction(NordiCHI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 92:1–92:6. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2996727Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Susanne Bødker. 1987. Through the Interface - a Human Activity Approach to User Interface Design. DAIMI Report Series 16, 224 (Apr. 1987), 1. https://doi.org/10.7146/dpb.v16i224.7586Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Liam Bullingham and Ana C Vasconcelos. 2013. ‘The presentation of self in the online world’: Goffman and the study of online identities. Journal of information science 39, 1 (2013), 101–112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Daniel E Callan, Cengiz Terzibas, Daniel B Cassel, Masa-aki Sato, and Raja Parasuraman. 2016. The brain is faster than the hand in split-second intentions to respond to an impending hazard: a simulation of neuroadaptive automation to speed recovery to perturbation in flight attitude. Frontiers in human neuroscience 10 (2016), 187.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Rafael A Calvo and Dorian Peters. 2014. Positive computing: technology for wellbeing and human potential. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Guillaume Chanel and Christian Mühl. 2015. Connecting Brains and Bodies: Applying Physiological Computing to Support Social Interaction. Interacting with Computers 27, 5 (04 2015), 534–550. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwv013Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Eun Kyoung Choe, Saeed Abdullah, Mashfiqui Rabbi, Edison Thomaz, Daniel A. Epstein, Felicia Cordeiro, Matthew Kay, Gregory D. Abowd, Tanzeem Choudhury, James Fogarty, Bongshin Lee, Mark Matthews, and Julie A. Kientz. 2017. Semi-Automated Tracking: A Balanced Approach for Self-Monitoring Applications. IEEE Pervasive Computing 16, 1 (Jan. 2017), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2017.18Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, Haining Zhu, Nathalie Henry Riche, and Dominikus Baur. 2017. Understanding Self-reflection: How People Reflect on Personal Data Through Visual Data Exploration. In Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare(PervasiveHealth ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1145/3154862.3154881Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Eun Kyoung Choe, Nicole B. Lee, Bongshin Lee, Wanda Pratt, and Julie A. Kientz. 2014. Understanding Quantified-selfers’ Practices in Collecting and Exploring Personal Data. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1143–1152. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557372Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kyung Yun Choi and Hiroshi Ishii. 2020. AmbienBeat: Wrist-Worn Mobile Tactile Biofeedback for Heart Rate Rhythmic Regulation. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 17–30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S Mealla Cincuegrani, Sergi Jordà, and Aleksander Väljamäe. 2016. Physiopucks: Increasing user motivation by combining tangible and implicit physiological interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 23, 1(2016), 4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. AD Craig. 2003. Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Current opinion in neurobiology 13, 4 (2003), 500–505.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. G. Davies, E. Raywood, H. Douglas, K. Kapoor, L. Stott, G. Saul, J. Booth, T. Kuzhagaliyev, and E. Main. 2019. WS18-1 Multi-professional expertise and high performance informatics infrastructure supports innovative health technology research and clinical care in cystic fibrosis: Project Fizzyo. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis 18 (2019), S33. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1569-1993(19)30223-1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Andrew Dekker and Erik Champion. 2007. Please Biofeed the Zombies: Enhancing the Gameplay and Display of a Horror Game Using Biofeedback. In DiGRA Conference. Digital Games Research Association, Tokyo, Japan, 1–2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Pieter Desmet and Marc Hassenzahl. 2012. Towards Happiness: Possibility-Driven Design. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25691-2_1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Pieter Desmet and Paul Hekkert. 2007. Framework of product experience. International journal of design 1, 1 (2007), 57–66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Pieter MA Desmet and Paul Hekkert. 2009. Special Issue Editorial: Design & emotion. International Journal of Design 3, 2 (2009), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Pieter MA Desmet and Anna E Pohlmeyer. 2013. Positive design: An introduction to design for subjective well-being. International journal of design 7, 3 (2013), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Stephen H Fairclough. 2009. Fundamentals of physiological computing. Interacting with computers 21, 1-2 (2009), 133–145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Norman Farb, Jennifer Daubenmier, Cynthia J Price, Tim Gard, Catherine Kerr, Barnaby D Dunn, Anne Carolyn Klein, Martin P Paulus, and Wolf E Mehling. 2015. Interoception, contemplative practice, and health. Frontiers in psychology 6 (2015), 763.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Jérémy Frey. 2016. Remote Heart Rate Sensing and Projection to Renew Traditional Board Games and Foster Social Interactions. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1865–1871. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892391Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Jérémy Frey, Renaud Gervais, Stéphanie Fleck, Fabien Lotte, and Martin Hachet. 2014. Teegi: Tangible EEG Interface. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology(UIST ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1145/2642918.2647368Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Jérémy Frey, Renaud Gervais, Thibault Lainé, Maxime Duluc, Hugo Germain, Stéphanie Fleck, Fabien Lotte, and Martin Hachet. 2017. Scientific Outreach with Teegi, a Tangible EEG Interface to Talk About Neurotechnologies. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 405–408. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3052971Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Jérémy Frey, May Grabli, Ronit Slyper, and Jessica R. Cauchard. 2018. Breeze: Sharing Biofeedback Through Wearable Technologies. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 645:1–645:12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174219Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Renaud Gervais, Jérémy Frey, Alexis Gay, Fabien Lotte, and Martin Hachet. 2016. TOBE: Tangible Out-of-Body Experience. In Proceedings of the TEI ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2839486Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Asma Ghandeharioun and Rosalind Picard. 2017. BrightBeat: Effortlessly Influencing Breathing for Cultivating Calmness and Focus. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1624–1631. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3053164Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Erving Goffman 1978. The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth London, Londen, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Marc Hassenzahl. 2004. The Thing and I: Understanding the Relationship Between User and Product. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2967-5_4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Jonathan L Helm, David Sbarra, and Emilio Ferrer. 2012. Assessing cross-partner associations in physiological responses via coupled oscillator models.Emotion 12, 4 (2012), 748.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. James Hollan, Edwin Hutchins, and David Kirsh. 2000. Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 7, 2(2000), 174–196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Kristina Höök, Martin P. Jonsson, Anna Ståhl, and Johanna Mercurio. 2016. Somaesthetic Appreciation Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3131–3142. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858583Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Michael S. Horn, Erin Treacy Solovey, R. Jordan Crouser, and Robert J.K. Jacob. 2009. Comparing the Use of Tangible and Graphical Programming Languages for Informal Science Education. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 975–984. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518851Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Eva Hornecker and Jacob Buur. 2006. Getting a Grip on Tangible Interaction: A Framework on Physical Space and Social Interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124838Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Noura Howell, Greg Niemeyer, and Kimiko Ryokai. 2019. Life-Affirming Biosensing in Public: Sounding Heartbeats on a Red Bench. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 680:1–680:16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300910Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Yu-Chun Huang and Chung-Hay Luk. 2015. Heartbeat Jenga: A Biofeedback Board Game to Improve Coordination and Emotional Control. In Design, User Experience, and Usability: Interactive Experience Design, Aaron Marcus (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 263–270.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Katherine Isbister. 2016. How games move us: Emotion by design. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Sergi Jordà, Günter Geiger, Marcos Alonso, and Martin Kaltenbrunner. 2007. The reacTable: Exploring the Synergy Between Live Music Performance and Tabletop Tangible Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction(TEI ’07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1145/1226969.1226998Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Majeed Kazemitabaar, Jason McPeak, Alexander Jiao, Liang He, Thomas Outing, and Jon E. Froehlich. 2017. MakerWear: A Tangible Approach to Interactive Wearable Creation for Children. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025887Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Raph Koster. 2013. Theory of fun for game design. O’Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol, CA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Ilkka Kosunen, Jussi Palomäki, Michael Laakasuo, Kai Kuikkaniemi, Niklas Ravaja, and Giulio Jacucci. 2018. Heart-rate sonification biofeedback for poker. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 120 (2018), 14–21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Jieun Lee, Jung K Kim, and Amy Wachholtz. 2015. The benefit of heart rate variability biofeedback and relaxation training in reducing trait anxiety. Han’guk Simni Hakhoe chi. Kon’gang= The Korean journal of health psychology 20, 2 (2015), 391.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Victor R. Lee and Joel Drake. 2013. Quantified Recess: Design of an Activity for Elementary Students Involving Analyses of Their Own Movement Data. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children(IDC ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 273–276. https://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485822Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Claude Lévi-Strauss. 1963. Totemism. Beacon Press, Boston, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Rong-Hao Liang, Bin Yu, Mengru Xue, Jun Hu, and Loe M. G. Feijs. 2018. BioFidget: Biofeedback for Respiration Training Using an Augmented Fidget Spinner. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 613:1–613:12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174187Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Fannie Liu, Laura Dabbish, and Geoff Kaufman. 2017. Can Biosignals Be Expressive?: How Visualizations Affect Impression Formation from Shared Brain Activity. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW (Dec. 2017), 71:1–71:21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134706Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Fannie Liu, Laura Dabbish, and Geoff Kaufman. 2017. Supporting Social Interactions with an Expressive Heart Rate Sharing Application. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 3 (Sept. 2017), 77:1–77:26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130943Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Sarah Martindale, Ben Bedwell, Robert Phillips, and Micaella Pedros. 2017. ”Proof in the Pudding”: Designing IoT Plants to Promote Wellbeing. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems(DIS ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 529–540. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064743Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Timothy S McNerney. 1999. Tangible programming bricks: An approach to making programming accessible to everyone. Ph.D. Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Timothy S. McNerney. 2004. From Turtles to Tangible Programming Bricks: Explorations in Physical Language Design. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 8, 5 (Sept. 2004), 326–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-004-0295-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Nick Merrill and Coye Cheshire. 2017. Trust Your Heart: Assessing Cooperation and Trust with Biosignals in Computer-Mediated Interactions. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing(CSCW ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998286Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Luisa Meyerholz, Julia Irzinger, Michael Witthöft, Alexander L Gerlach, and Anna Pohl. 2019. Contingent biofeedback outperforms other methods to enhance the accuracy of cardiac interoception: A comparison of short interventions. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry 63 (2019), 12–20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Jelena Mladenović, Jérémy Frey, and Jessica R. Cauchard. 2018. Dišimo: Anchoring Our Breath. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3186517Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Florian ’Floyd’ Mueller, Richard Byrne, Josh Andres, and Rakesh Patibanda. 2018. Experiencing the Body As Play. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 210:1–210:13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173784Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche. 1974. The gay science: With a prelude in German rhymes and an appendix of songs. Vol. 985. Vintage Books, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Don Norman. 2013. The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic books, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Don Norman. 2014. Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Diversion Books, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Leyla Norooz, Matthew Louis Mauriello, Anita Jorgensen, Brenna McNally, and Jon E. Froehlich. 2015. BodyVis: A New Approach to Body Learning Through Wearable Sensing and Visualization. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1025–1034. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702299Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Rakesh Patibanda, Florian ’Floyd’ Mueller, Matevz Leskovsek, and Jonathan Duckworth. 2017. Life Tree: Understanding the Design of Breathing Exercise Games. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play(CHI PLAY ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3116595.3116621Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Rosalind W Picard. 2000. Affective computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. David Premack and Guy Woodruff. 1978. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?Behavioral and brain sciences 1, 4 (1978), 515–526.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Mirjana Prpa, Kıvanç Tatar, Jules Françoise, Bernhard Riecke, Thecla Schiphorst, and Philippe Pasquier. 2018. Attending to Breath: Exploring How the Cues in a Virtual Environment Guide the Attention to Breath and Shape the Quality of Experience to Support Mindfulness. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196765Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Robert Reiner. 2008. Integrating a portable biofeedback device into clinical practice for patients with anxiety disorders: Results of a pilot study. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback 33, 1 (2008), 55–61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Mitchel Resnick, John Maloney, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, Natalie Rusk, Evelyn Eastmond, Karen Brennan, Amon Millner, Eric Rosenbaum, Jay S Silver, Brian Silverman, 2009. Scratch: Programming for all.Commun. Acm 52, 11 (2009), 60–67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Joan Sol Roo and Jeremy Frey. 2019. Modular Biofeedback: Build Your Own Tangible Experience. In The Second Neuroadaptive Technology Conference. Neuroadaptive Technology Conference, Liverpool, UK, 36–38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Joan Sol Roo, Renaud Gervais, Jeremy Frey, and Martin Hachet. 2017. Inner Garden: Connecting Inner States to a Mixed Reality Sandbox for Mindfulness. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1459–1470. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025743Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Richard M Ryan and Edward L Deci. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.American psychologist 55, 1 (2000), 68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Richard M Ryan, C Scott Rigby, and Andrew Przybylski. 2006. The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and emotion 30, 4 (2006), 344–360.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Bert Schiettecatte and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2008. AudioCubes: A Distributed Cube Tangible Interface Based on Interaction Range for Sound Design. In Proceedings of the 2Nd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction(TEI ’08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1347390.1347394Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Mark S Schwartz and Frank Andrasik. 2003. Biofeedback: A practitioner’s guide. Guilford Publications, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Abigail Sellen, Yvonne Rogers, Richard Harper, and Tom Rodden. 2009. Reflecting human values in the digital age. Commun. ACM 52, 3 (2009), 58–66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Tomoya Shimokakimoto, Asaki Miura, and Kenji Suzuki. 2014. bioToys: biofeedback toys for playful and self-determined physiotherapeutic activities. Artificial Life and Robotics 19, 2 (2014), 150–156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Tomoya Shimokakimoto, Tomoyuki Ueno, Nanao Akimichi, and Kenji Suzuki. 2016. Building blocks system for a prosthesis training of a child with congenital amputee. In 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE, IEEE, Orlando, FL, USA, 5034–5037.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Tobias Sonne and Mads Møller Jensen. 2016. ChillFish: A Respiration Game for Children with ADHD. In Proceedings of the TEI ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 271–278. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2839480Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Tobias Sonne, Timothy Merritt, Paul Marshall, Johanne J. Lomholt, Jörg Müller, and Kaj Grønbæk. 2017. Calming Children When Drawing Blood Using Breath-based Biofeedback. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems(DIS ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 725–737. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064742Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Misha Sra, Xuhai Xu, and Pattie Maes. 2018. BreathVR: Leveraging Breathing As a Directly Controlled Interface for Virtual Reality Games. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 340:1–340:12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173914Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Ekaterina Stepanova. 2018. Virtual reality as a medium for designing and understanding transformative experiences: the case of the overview effect. Ph.D. Dissertation. Communication, Art & Technology: School of Interactive Arts and Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. S Sudarsan, IEEE Student Member, and E Chandra Sekaran. 2012. Design and development of EMG controlled prosthetics limb. Procedia engineering 38(2012), 3547–3551.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Melanie Swan. 2013. The quantified self: Fundamental disruption in big data science and biological discovery. Big data 1, 2 (2013), 85–99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Alice Thudt, Uta Hinrichs, Samuel Huron, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2018. Self-Reflection and Personal Physicalization Construction. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173728Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Bret Victor. 2014. Humane Representation of Thought: A Trail Map for the 21st Century. In Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2014 ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Systems, Programming, and Applications: Software for Humanity(SPLASH ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 5. https://doi.org/10.1145/2660252.2661746Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Jay Vidyarthi, Bernhard E. Riecke, and Diane Gromala. 2012. Sonic Cradle: Designing for an Immersive Experience of Meditation by Connecting Respiration to Music. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 408–417. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318017Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Jennifer R Whitson. 2013. Gaming the quantified self. Surveillance & Society 11, 1/2 (2013), 163–176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. Donald A. Williamson and Edward B. Blanchard. 1979. Heart rate and blood pressure biofeedback. Biofeedback and Self-regulation 4, 1 (Mar 1979), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998947Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. Craig Wisneski, Hiroshi Ishii, Andrew Dahley, Matt Gorbet, Scott Brave, Brygg Ullmer, and Paul Yarin. 1998. Ambient Displays: Turning Architectural Space into an Interface between People and Digital Information. In Cooperative Buildings: Integrating Information, Organization, and Architecture, Norbert A. Streitz, Shin’ichi Konomi, and Heinz-Jürgen Burkhardt (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 22–32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Jonathan R Wolpaw, Dennis J McFarland, Gregory W Neat, and Catherine A Forneris. 1991. An EEG-based brain-computer interface for cursor control. Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology 78, 3(1991), 252–259.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. Bin Yu, Nienke Bongers, Alissa van Asseldonk, Jun Hu, Mathias Funk, and Loe Feijs. 2016. LivingSurface: Biofeedback Through Shape-changing Display. In Proceedings of the TEI ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 168–175. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2839469Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. Bin Yu, Mathias Funk, Jun Hu, and Loe Feijs. 2018. Unwind: a musical biofeedback for relaxation assistance. Behaviour & Information Technology 37, 8 (2018), 800–814.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  92. Bin Yu, Jun Hu, Mathias Funk, and Loe Feijs. 2018. DeLight: Biofeedback Through Ambient Light for Stress Intervention and Relaxation Assistance. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 22, 4 (Aug. 2018), 787–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-018-1141-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  93. Victor Zykov, Andrew Chan, and Hod Lipson. 2007. Molecubes: An open-source modular robotics kit. In IROS-2007 Self-Reconfigurable Robotics Workshop. Citeseer, IEEE, San Diego, CA, USA, 3–6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    MobileHCI '20: 22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
    October 2020
    418 pages
    ISBN:9781450375160
    DOI:10.1145/3379503

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 5 October 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format