skip to main content
10.1145/3383583.3398500acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

The Science of Science

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 August 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The rapid development of digital libraries and the proliferation of scholarly big data have created an unprecedented opportunity to explore scientific production and reward at scale. Fueled by the data exploration and computational advances in digital libraries, the science of science is an emerging multidisciplinary field that aims to quantify patterns for scientific relationships and dependencies, and how scientific progress emerges from the scholarly big data. In this tutorial, we will provide an overview of the science of science, including major topics on scientific careers, scientific collaborations and scientific ideas. We will also discuss its historical context, the state-of-art models and exciting discoveries, and promising future directions for participants interested in mining scholarly big data.

References

  1. Pierre Azoulay, Joshua Graff-Zivin, Brian Uzzi, Dashun Wang, Heidi Williams, James A Evans, Ginger Zhe Jin, Susan Feng Lu, Benjamin F Jones, Katy Börner, et al. 2018. Toward a more scientific science. Science , Vol. 361, 6408 (2018), 1194--1197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Santo Fortunato, Carl T Bergstrom, Katy Börner, James A Evans, Dirk Helbing, Stavs a Milojevi?, Alexander M Petersen, Filippo Radicchi, Roberta Sinatra, Brian Uzzi, et al. 2018. Science of science. Science, Vol. 359, 6379 (2018), eaao0185.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Lu Liu, Yang Wang, Roberta Sinatra, C Lee Giles, Chaoming Song, and Dashun Wang. 2018. Hot streaks in artistic, cultural, and scientific careers. Nature, Vol. 559, 7714 (2018), 396.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Huawei Shen, Dashun Wang, Chaoming Song, and Albert-László Barabási. 2014. Modeling and predicting popularity dynamics via reinforced poisson processes. In Twenty-eighth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Roberta Sinatra, Dashun Wang, Pierre Deville, Chaoming Song, and Albert-László Barabási. 2016. Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact. Science, Vol. 354, 6312 (2016), aaf5239.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dashun Wang, Chaoming Song, and Albert-László Barabási. 2013. Quantifying long-term scientific impact. Science, Vol. 342, 6154 (2013), 127--132.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Lingfei Wu, Dashun Wang, and James A Evans. 2019. Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. Nature, Vol. 566, 7744 (2019), 378--382.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Stefan Wuchty, Benjamin F Jones, and Brian Uzzi. 2007. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, Vol. 316, 5827 (2007), 1036--1039.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Science of Science

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        JCDL '20: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 2020
        August 2020
        611 pages
        ISBN:9781450375856
        DOI:10.1145/3383583

        Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 August 2020

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • tutorial

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate415of1,482submissions,28%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader