skip to main content
10.1145/3384613.3384639acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccaeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Intent Sets: Architectural Choices for Building Practical Chatbots

Published:16 May 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

"Chatbot" is a colloquial term used to refer to software components that possess the ability to interact with the end-user using natural language phrases. Many commercial platforms are offering sophisticated dashboards to build these chatbots with no or minimal coding. However, the job of composing the chatbot from real-world scenarios is not a trivial activity and requires a significant understanding of the problem as well as the domain. In this work, we present the concept of Intent Sets - an Architectural choice, that impacts the overall accuracy of the chatbot. We show that the same chatbot can be built choosing one out of many possible Intent Sets. We also present our observations collected through a set of experiments while building the same chatbot over three commercial platforms - Google Dialogflow, IBM Watson Assistant and Amazon Lex.

References

  1. Junwei Bao, Duyu Tang, Nan Duan, Zhao Yan, Yuanhua Lv, Ming Zhou, and Tiejun Zhao. 2018. Table-to-text: Describing table region with natural language. In Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Petter Bae Brandtzaeg and Asbjørn Følstad. 2018. Chatbots: changing user needs and motivations. interactions 25, 5 (2018), 38--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ana Paula Chaves and Marco Aurelio Gerosa. 2019. How should my chatbot interact? A survey on human-chatbot interaction design. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.02743 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. ESPNcricinfo.com. 1993. Statsguru | Searchable Cricket Statistics database. http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html [On line; accessed 9-December-2019].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ethan Fast, Binbin Chen, Julia Mendelsohn, Jonathan Bassen, and Michael S Bernstein. 2018. Iris: A conversational agent for complex tasks. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 473.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jianfeng Gao, Michel Galley, and Lihong Li. 2019. Neural Approaches to Conversational AI: Question Answering, Task-oriented Dialogues and Social Chatbots. Now Foundations and Trends.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gidi Shperber. 2017. ChatBots vs Reality: how to build an efficient chatbot, with wise usage of NLP. https://towardsdatascience.com/chatbots-vs-reality-how-to-buildan-efficient-chatbot-with-wise-usage-of-nlp-77f41949bf08[Online; accessed 9-December-2019].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Robin Håvik, Jo Dugstad Wake, Eivind Flobak, Astri Lundervold, and Frode Guribye. 2018. A Conversational Interface for Self-screening for ADHD in Adults. In International Conference on Internet Science. Springer, 133--144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kezban Dilek Onal, Ye Zhang, Ismail Sengor Altingovde, Md Mustafizur Rahman, Pinar Karagoz, Alex Braylan, Brandon Dang, Heng-Lu Chang, Henna Kim, Quinten McNamara, et al. 2018. Neural information retrieval: At the end of the early years. Information Retrieval Journal 21, 2-3 (2018), 111--182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Saurabh Srivastava and TV Prabhakar. 2019. Hospitality of chatbot building platforms. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on Software Qualities and Their Dependencies. ACM, 12--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. theta.co.nz. 1995. FAQ Bot - AI chatbot that answers questions, instantly, 24/7. https://www.theta.co.nz/technologies/faq-bot/ [Online; accessed 9-December-2019].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Svitlana Vakulenko and Vadim Savenkov. 2017. Tableqa: Question answering on tabular data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.06504 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lisa Waldera. 2019. Development of a Preliminary Measurement Tool of User Satisfaction for Information-Retrieval Chatbots. B.S. thesis. University of Twente.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Xinyi Wang, Samuel S Sohn, and Mubbasir Kapadia. 2019. Towards a Conversational Interface for Authoring Intelligent Virtual Characters. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. ACM, 127--129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Zhao Yan, Nan Duan, Junwei Bao, Peng Chen, Ming Zhou, Zhoujun Li, and Jianshe Zhou. 2016. Docchat: An information retrieval approach for chatbot engines using unstructured documents. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 516--525.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Intent Sets: Architectural Choices for Building Practical Chatbots

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICCAE 2020: Proceedings of the 2020 12th International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering
        February 2020
        231 pages
        ISBN:9781450376785
        DOI:10.1145/3384613

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 16 May 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)28
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader