skip to main content
research-article

Conformity of Eating Disorders through Content Moderation

Published:29 May 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

For individuals with mental illness, social media platforms are considered spaces for sharing and connection. However, not all expressions of mental illness are treated equally on these platforms. Different aggregates of human and technical control are used to report and ban content, accounts, and communities. Through two years of digital ethnography, including online observation and interviews, with people with eating disorders, we examine the experience of content moderation. We use a constructivist grounded theory approach to analysis that shows how practices of moderation across different platforms have particular consequences for members of marginalized groups, who are pressured to conform and compelled to resist. Above all, we argue that platform moderation is enmeshed with wider processes of conformity to specific versions of mental illness. Practices of moderation reassert certain bodies and experiences as 'normal' and valued, while rejecting others. At the same time, navigating and resisting these normative pressures further inscribes the marginal status of certain individuals. We discuss changes to the ways that platforms handle content related to eating disorders by drawing on the concept of multiplicity to inform design.

References

  1. Nazanin Andalibi. 2019. What Happens After Disclosing Stigmatized Experiences on Identified Social Media: Individual, Dyadic, and Social/Network Outcomes. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Nazanin Andalibi and Andrea Forte. 2018. Announcing pregnancy loss on Facebook: A decision-making framework for stigmatized disclosures on identified social network sites. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Nazanin Andalibi, Pinar Ozturk, and Andrea Forte. 2017. Sensitive Self-disclosures, Responses, and Social Support on Instagram: The Case of #Depression. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1485--1500. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998243Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Monica Anderson, Skye Toor, Lee Rainie, and Aaron Smith. 2018. Activism in the Social Media Age. Pew Research Center (11 July 2018). https://www.pewinternet.org/2018/07/11/activism-in-the-social-media-age/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Natalya N Bazarova, Yoon Hyung Choi, Victoria Schwanda Sosik, Dan Cosley, and Janis Whitlock. 2015. Social sharing of emotions on Facebook: Channel differences, satisfaction, and replies. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing. ACM, 154--164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Rena Bivens. 2017. The gender binary will not be deprogrammed: Ten years of coding gender on Facebook. New Media & Society, Vol. 19, 6 (2017), 880--898.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Rena Bivens and Oliver L Haimson. 2016. Baking gender into social media design: How platforms shape categories for users and advertisers. Social Media+Society, Vol. 2, 4 (2016), 2056305116672486.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lindsay Blackwell, Jill Dimond, Sarita Schoenebeck, and Cliff Lampe. 2017. Classification and Its Consequences for Online Harassment: Design Insights from HeartMob. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 1, CSCW (Dec. 2017), 24:1--24:19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134659Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Leah Boepple and J Kevin Thompson. 2016. A content analytic comparison of fitspiration and thinspiration websites. International Journal of Eating Disorders, Vol. 49, 1 (2016), 98--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Dina L. G. Borzekowski, Summer Schenk, Jenny L. Wilson, and Rebecka Peebles. 2010. e-Ana and e-Mia: A Content Analysis of Pro-Eating Disorder Web Sites. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 100, 8 (Aug. 2010), 1526--1534. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.172700Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Leanne Bowler, Eleanor Mattern, Wei Jeng, Jung Sun Oh, and Daqing He. 2013. I know what you are going through: answers to informational questions about eating disorders in Yahoo! Answers: a qualitative study. In Proceedings of the 76th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Beyond the Cloud: Rethinking Information Boundaries. American Society for Information Science, 6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Leanne Bowler, Jung Sun Oh, Daqing He, Eleanor Mattern, and Wei Jeng. 2012. Eating disorder questions in Yahoo! Answers: Information, conversation, or reflection? Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 49, 1 (2012), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Danah Boyd. 2010. Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In A networked self. Routledge, 47--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Danah Boyd. 2014. It's complicated: The social lives of networked teens .Yale University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Rosi Braidotti. 2000. Teratologies. In Deleuze and Feminist Theory,, Ian Buchanan and Claire Colebrook (Eds.). Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 156--172. https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-deleuze-and-feminist-theory.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Amy Bruckman. 2006. Teaching students to study online communities ethically. Journal of Information Ethics, Vol. 15, 2 (2006), 82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Eleanor R. Burgess, Kathryn E. Ringland, Jennifer Nicholas, Ashley A. Knapp, Jordan Eschler, David C. Mohr, and Madhu C. Reddy. 2019. “I think people are powerful”: The sociality of individuals managing depression. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 3, CSCW (Nov 2019), 41:1--41:29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359143Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Judith Butler. 1993. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of `Sex' .Routledge, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kellie E Carlyle, Jeanine PD Guidry, Kofoworola Williams, Ariella Tabaac, and Paul B Perrin. 2018. Suicide conversations on Instagram: contagion or caring? Journal of Communication in Healthcare, Vol. 11, 1 (2018), 12--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Patricia A Cavazos-Rehg, Melissa J Krauss, Shaina J Costello, Nina Kaiser, Elizabeth S Cahn, Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft, and Denise E Wilfley. 2019. “I just want to be skinny.”: A content analysis of tweets expressing eating disorder symptoms. PloS one, Vol. 14, 1 (2019), e0207506.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Stevie Chancellor, Andrea Hu, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2018. Norms Matter: Contrasting Social Support Around Behavior Change in Online Weight Loss Communities. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 666:1--666:14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174240Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Stevie Chancellor, Yannis Kalantidis, Jessica A. Pater, Munmun De Choudhury, and David A. Shamma. 2017. Multimodal Classification of Moderated Online Pro-Eating Disorder Content. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3213--3226. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025985Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Stevie Chancellor, Zhiyuan (Jerry) Lin, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2016a. "This Post Will Just Get Taken Down": Characterizing Removed Pro-Eating Disorder Social Media Content. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1157--1162. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858248Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Stevie Chancellor, Tanushree Mitra, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2016b. Recovery Amid Pro-Anorexia: Analysis of Recovery in Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2111--2123. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858246Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Stevie Chancellor, Jessica Annette Pater, Trustin Clear, Eric Gilbert, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2016c. #Thyghgapp: Instagram Content Moderation and Lexical Variation in Pro-Eating Disorder Communities. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1201--1213. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819963Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Umashanthi Pavalanathan, Anirudh Srinivasan, Adam Glynn, Jacob Eisenstein, and Eric Gilbert. 2017. You can't stay here: The efficacy of reddit's 2015 ban examined through hate speech. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 1, CSCW (2017), 31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Mattia Samory, Shagun Jhaver, Hunter Charvat, Amy Bruckman, Cliff Lampe, Jacob Eisenstein, and Eric Gilbert. 2018. The Internet's Hidden Rules: An Empirical Study of Reddit Norm Violations at Micro, Meso, and Macro Scales. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 2, CSCW (Nov. 2018), 32:1--32:25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274301Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Jonathan P Chang and Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil. 2019. Trouble on the Horizon: Forecasting the Derailment of Online Conversations as they Develop. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.01362 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Pamara F Chang and Natalya N Bazarova. 2016. Managing stigma: Disclosure-response communication patterns in pro-anorexic websites. Health Communication, Vol. 31, 2 (2016), 217--229.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Kathy Charmaz. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. SAGE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Robert B Cialdini and Noah J Goldstein. 2004. Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annu. Rev. Psychol., Vol. 55 (2004), 591--621.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Kate Crawford and Tarleton Gillespie. 2016. What is a flag for? Social media reporting tools and the vocabulary of complaint. New Media & Society, Vol. 18, 3 (March 2016), 410--428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814543163Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Sky Croeser. 2016. Thinking Beyond `Free Speech' in Responding to Online Harassment. Ada: a journal of new media, gender, and culture, Vol. 10 (2016), online--online.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Munmun De Choudhury. 2015. Anorexia on Tumblr: A Characterization Study. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Digital Health 2015 (DH '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 43--50. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750511.2750515Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Tisha Dejmanee. 2013. Bodies of technology : performative flesh, pleasure and subversion in cyberspace. Gender Questions, Vol. 1, 1 (Jan. 2013), 3--17. https://journals.co.za/content/genderq/1/1/EJC167619Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Michael A. DeVito, Ashley Marie Walker, and Jeremy Birnholtz. 2018. `Too Gay for Facebook': Presenting LGBTQGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Identity Throughout the Personal Social Media Ecosystem. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 2, CSCW (Nov. 2018), 44:1--44:23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274313Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Jill P Dimond, Michaelanne Dye, Daphne LaRose, and Amy S Bruckman. 2013. Hollaback!: the role of storytelling online in a social movement organization. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 477--490.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Bryan Dosono and Bryan Semaan. 2019. Moderation Practices as Emotional Labor in Sustaining Online Communities: The Case of AAPI Identity Work on Reddit. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Paul Dourish. 2006. Implications for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems. 541--550.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Maeve Duggan. 2017. Online harassment 2017. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Brianna Dym, Jed R Brubaker, Casey Fiesler, and Bryan Semaan. 2019. "Coming Out Okay": Community Narratives for LGBTQ Identity Recovery Work. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359256Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Elizabeth V Eikey. 2016. Privacy and weight loss apps: a first look at how women with eating disorders use social features. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work. 413--415.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Elizabeth V Eikey and Kayla M Booth. 2017. Recovery and maintenance: how women with eating disorders use Instagram. iConference 2017 Proceedings (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Elizabeth V Eikey and Madhu C Reddy. 2017. ?It's Definitely Been a Journey": A Qualitative Study on How Women with Eating Disorders Use Weight Loss Apps. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 642--654.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Elizabeth Victoria Eikey, Madhu C Reddy, Kayla M Booth, Lynette Kvasny, Johnna L Blair, Victor Li, and Erika S Poole. 2017. Desire to be underweight: Exploratory study on a weight loss app community and user perceptions of the impact on disordered eating behaviors. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, Vol. 5, 10 (2017), e150.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Jessica L. Feuston and Anne Marie Piper. 2018. Beyond the Coded Gaze: Analyzing Expression of Mental Health and Illness on Instagram. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 2, CSCW (Nov. 2018), 51:1--51:21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274320Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Jessica L. Feuston and Anne Marie Piper. 2019. Everyday Experiences: Small Stories and Mental Illness on Instagram. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 265:1--265:14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300495 event-place: Glasgow, Scotland Uk.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Casey Fiesler, Michaelanne Dye, Jessica L Feuston, Chaya Hiruncharoenvate, Clayton J Hutto, Shannon Morrison, Parisa Khanipour Roshan, Umashanthi Pavalanathan, Amy S Bruckman, Munmun De Choudhury, et al. 2017. What (or who) is public?: Privacy settings and social media content sharing. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 567--580.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Casey Fiesler, Jialun "Aaron" Jiang, Joshua McCann, Kyle Frye, and Jed R. Brubaker. 2018. Reddit Rules! Characterizing an Ecosystem of Governance. In Twelfth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM18/paper/view/17898Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Casey Fiesler and Nicholas Proferes. 2018. “Participant” perceptions of Twitter research ethics. Social Media+Society, Vol. 4, 1 (2018), 2056305118763366.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Rachel A Fleming-May and Laura E Miller. 2010. I'm scared to look but I'm dying to know: information seeking and sharing on Pro-Ana weblogs. In Proceedings of the 73rd ASIS&T Annual Meeting on Navigating Streams in an Information Ecosystem-Volume 47. American Society for Information Science, 61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Michel Foucault. 2003. Madness and civilization .Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Michel Foucault. 2012. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison .Vintage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Arthur W. Frank. [n. d.]. The Wounded Storyteller. https://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/W/bo14674212.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Mary Anne Franks. [n. d.]. The Free Speech Black Hole: Can The Internet Escape the Gravitational Pull of the First Amendment? Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University ([n. d.]). https://knightcolumbia.org/content/the-free-speech-black-hole-can-the-internet-escape-the-gravitational-pull-of-the-first-amendmentGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Christian Fuchs. 2013. Internet and Surveillance: The Challenges of Web 2.0 and Social Media. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Ysabel Gerrard. 2018. Beyond the hashtag: Circumventing content moderation on social media. New Media & Society, Vol. 20, 12 (2018), 4492--4511.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Tarleton Gillespie. 2018. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions that Shape Social Media. Yale University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Debbie Ging and Sarah Garvey. 2018. `Written in these scars are the stories I can't explain': A content analysis of pro-ana and thinspiration image sharing on Instagram. New Media & Society, Vol. 20, 3 (2018), 1181--1200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Eric Goldman. 2010. Unregulating Online Harassment. Denver University Law Review Online, Vol. 57 (2010), 59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Mary L Gray and Siddharth Suri. 2019. Ghost Work: How to Stop Silicon Valley from Building a New Global Underclass .Eamon Dolan Books, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. James Grimmelmann. 2015. The Virtues of Moderation. Yale Journal of Law and Technology (2015), 42--109. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/yjolt17&i=42Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Oliver L Haimson, Jed R Brubaker, Lynn Dombrowski, and Gillian R Hayes. 2015a. Disclosure, stress, and support during gender transition on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 1176--1190.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Oliver L Haimson, Jed R Brubaker, Lynn Dombrowski, and Gillian R Hayes. 2016. Digital footprints and changing networks during online identity transitions. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2895--2907.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Oliver L Haimson and Anna Lauren Hoffmann. 2016. Constructing and enforcing" authentic" identity online: Facebook, real names, and non-normative identities. First Monday, Vol. 21, 6 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Oliver L Haimson, Kathryn E Ringland, and Gillian R Hayes. 2015b. Marginalized populations and research ethics online. In CSCW Workshop on Ethics for Studying Sociotechnical Systems in a Big Data World (CSCW Workshop on Ethics for Studying Sociotechnical Systems in a Big Data World), Vol. 5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Max Halupka. 2014. Clicktivism: A systematic heuristic. Policy & Internet, Vol. 6, 2 (2014), 115--132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Foad Hamidi, Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, and Stacy M Branham. 2018. Gender recognition or gender reductionism?: The social implications of embedded gender recognition systems. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Donna J Haraway. 2013. When species meet. Vol. 3. U of Minnesota Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Libby Hemphill and Andrew J Roback. 2014. Tweet acts: how constituents lobby congress via Twitter. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. ACM, 1200--1210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Dorothy Howard and Lilly Irani. 2019. Ways of Knowing When Research Subjects Care. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Lilly C. Irani and M. Six Silberman. 2013. Turkopticon: Interrupting worker invisibility in amazon mechanical turk. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 611--620.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Grace YoungJoo Jeon, Nicole B Ellison, Bernie Hogan, and Christine Greenhow. 2016. First-generation students and college: The role of Facebook networks as information sources. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 887--899.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Shagun Jhaver, Darren Scott Appling, Eric Gilbert, and Amy Bruckman. 2019 a. “Did You Suspect the Post Would be Removed?”: Understanding User Reactions to Content Removals on Reddit. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., Vol. 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359294Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Shagun Jhaver, Iris Birman, Eric Gilbert, and Amy Bruckman. 2019 b. Human-Machine Collaboration for Content Regulation: The Case of Reddit Automoderator. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., Vol. 26, 5 (July 2019), 31:1--31:35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3338243Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Shagun Jhaver, Amy Bruckman, and Eric Gilbert. 2019 c. Does Transparency in Moderation Really Matter?: User Behavior After Content Removal Explanations on Reddit. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., Vol. 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359252Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Shagun Jhaver, Sucheta Ghoshal, Amy Bruckman, and Eric Gilbert. 2018. Online Harassment and Content Moderation: The Case of Blocklists. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., Vol. 2, CSCW (March 2018), 12:1--12:33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3185593Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Jialun “Aaron” Jiang, Charles Kiene, Skyler Middler, Jed R. Brubaker, and Casey Fiesler. 2019. Moderation Challenges in Voice-based Online Communities on Discord. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Adrienne S Juarascio, Amber Shoaib, and C Alix Timko. 2010. Pro-eating disorder communities on social networking sites: a content analysis. Eating disorders, Vol. 18, 5 (2010), 393--407.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Anna Keski-Rahkonen and Federica Tozzi. 2005. The process of recovery in eating disorder sufferers' own words: An Internet-based study. International Journal of Eating Disorders, Vol. 37, S1 (2005), S80--S86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  82. Charles Kiene, Jialun “Aaron” Jiang, and Benjamin Mako Hill. 2019. Technological Frames and User Innovation: Exploring Technological Change in Community Moderation Teams. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Arthur Kleinman. 1989. The Illness Narratives: Suffering, Healing, And The Human Condition reprint edition ed.). Basic Books, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Priya Kumar and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2015. The modern day baby book: Enacting good mothering and stewarding privacy on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 1302--1312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Lakesha Lafayett. 2017. The Problematic Whitewashing of Eating Disorder Recovery. https://www.nationaleatingdisorders.org/blog/problematic-whitewashing-eating-disorder-recoveryGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Cliff Lampe and Paul Resnick. 2004. Slash(Dot) and Burn: Distributed Moderation in a Large Online Conversation Space. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 543--550. https://doi.org/10.1145/985692.985761 event-place: Vienna, Austria.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  87. Cliff A.C. Lampe, Erik Johnston, and Paul Resnick. 2007. Follow the Reader: Filtering Comments on Slashdot. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1253--1262. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240815 event-place: San Jose, California, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. landoflobsters. 2019. Changes to Our Policy Against Bullying and Harassment. Reddit (30 September 2019). https://www.reddit.com/r/announcements/comments/dbf9nj/changes_to_our_policy_against_bullying_and/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Yu-Hao Lee and Gary Hsieh. 2013. Does slacktivism hurt activism?: the effects of moral balancing and consistency in online activism. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 811--820.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Brenda A LeFrancc ois, Robert Menzies, and Geoffrey Reaume. 2013. Mad matters: A critical reader in Canadian mad studies .Canadian Scholars' Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. A Lenhart, M Ybarra, K Zickuhr, and M Price-Feeney. 2016. Online Harassment, Digital Abuse, and Cyberstalking in America. Data & Society Research Institute. Center for Innovative Public Health Research. Retrieved from: https://datasociety. net/pubs/oh/Online_Harassment_2016. pdf (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Philip LeVine and Ron Scollon. 2004. Multimodal Discourse Analysis as the Confluence of Discourse and Technology. In Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis, Philip LeVine and Ron Scollon (Eds.). Georgetown University Press, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. Stephen P Lewis and Alexis E Arbuthnott. 2012. Searching for thinspiration: the nature of internet searches for pro-eating disorder websites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, Vol. 15, 4 (2012), 200--204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  94. Ian Li, Anind Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 557--566.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  95. Jessa Lingel. 2019. The gentrification of the internet. http://culturedigitally.org/2019/03/the-gentrification-of-the-internet/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. Deanna Linville, Tiffany Brown, Katrina Sturm, and Tori McDougal. 2012. Eating disorders and social support: perspectives of recovered individuals. Eating Disorders, Vol. 20, 3 (2012), 216--231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  97. Fannie Liu, Denae Ford, Chris Parnin, and Laura Dabbish. 2017. Selfies as social movements: Influences on participation and perceived impact on stereotypes. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 1, CSCW (2017), 72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. James D. Livingston and Jennifer E. Boyd. 2010. Correlates and consequences of internalized stigma for people living with mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 71, 12 (Dec. 2010), 2150--2161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.030Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  99. Helen Malson. 1999. Womæn under erasure: Anorexic bodies in postmodern context. Journal of community & applied social psychology, Vol. 9, 2 (1999), 137--153.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  100. Ben Marder, Adam Joinson, Avi Shankar, and David Houghton. 2016. The extended `chilling' effect of Facebook: The cold reality of ubiquitous social networking. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 60 (2016), 582--592.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  101. Aiden McGillicuddy, Jean-Gregoire Bernard, and Jocelyn Cranefield. 2016. Controlling Bad Behavior in Online Communities: An Examination of Moderation Work. ICIS 2016 Proceedings (Dec. 2016). https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2016/SocialMedia/Presentations/23Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. Bharat Mehra, Cecelia Merkel, and Ann Peterson Bishop. 2004. The internet for empowerment of minority and marginalized users. New media & society, Vol. 6, 6 (2004), 781--802.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. Kaitlynn Mendes, Jessica Ringrose, and Jessalynn Keller. 2018. #MeToo and the promise and pitfalls of challenging rape culture through digital feminist activism. European Journal of Women's Studies, Vol. 25, 2 (May 2018), 236--246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506818765318Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  104. Annemarie Mol. 2002. The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice .Duke University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  105. Dhiraj Murthy. 2008. Digital ethnography: An examination of the use of new technologies for social research. Sociology, Vol. 42, 5 (2008), 837--855.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  106. Dhiraj Murthy. 2011. Emergent digital ethnographic methods for social research. Handbook of emergent technologies in social research (2011), 158--179.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. Sarah Myers West. 2018. Censored, suspended, shadowbanned: User interpretations of content moderation on social media platforms. New Media & Society, Vol. 20, 11 (Nov. 2018), 4366--4383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818773059Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  108. Jung Sun Oh, Daqing He, Wei Jeng, Eleanor Mattern, and Leanne Bowler. 2013. Linguistic characteristics of eating disorder questions on Yahoo! Answers-content, style, and emotion. In Proceedings of the 76th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Beyond the Cloud: Rethinking Information Boundaries. American Society for Information Science, 87.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  109. Kathleen O'Leary, Arpita Bhattacharya, Sean A Munson, Jacob O Wobbrock, and Wanda Pratt. 2017. Design opportunities for mental health peer support technologies. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 1470--1484.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  110. Alexandra Olteanu, Sarah Vieweg, and Carlos Castillo. 2015. What to expect when the unexpected happens: Social media communications across crises. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing. ACM, 994--1009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  111. Onlinecensorship.org. 2019. Offline-Online. https://onlinecensorship.org/content/infographics Retrieved September 20, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. John E Pachankis. 2007. The psychological implications of concealing a stigma: A cognitive-affective-behavioral model. Psychological bulletin, Vol. 133, 2 (2007), 328.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  113. Jessica A. Pater, Oliver L. Haimson, Nazanin Andalibi, and Elizabeth D. Mynatt. 2016a. “Hunger Hurts but Starving Works”: Characterizing the Presentation of Eating Disorders Online. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1185--1200. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820030Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  114. Jessica A. Pater, Moon K. Kim, Elizabeth D. Mynatt, and Casey Fiesler. 2016b. Characterizations of Online Harassment: Comparing Policies Across Social Media Platforms. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 369--374. https://doi.org/10.1145/2957276.2957297 event-place: Sanibel Island, Florida, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  115. Jessica A. Pater, Lauren E. Reining, Andrew D. Miller, Tammy Toscos, and Elizabeth D. Mynatt. 2019. "Notjustgirls": Exploring Male-related Eating Disordered Content Across Social Media Platforms. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 651:1--651:13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300881 event-place: Glasgow, Scotland Uk.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  116. Jon Penney. 2017. Internet surveillance, regulation, and chilling effects online: A comparative case study. Internet Policy Review (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  117. Shruti Phadke, Jonathan Lloyd, James Hawdon, Mattia Samory, and Tanushree Mitra. 2018. Framing Hate with Hate Frames: Designing the Codebook. In Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 201--204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  118. Sarah Pink, Heather A. Horst, John Postill, Larissa Hjorth, Tania Lewis, and Jo Tacchi. 2016. Digital ethnography: Principles and Practice .SAGE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  119. Radha Iyengar Plumb. 2019. An Independent Report on How We Measure Content Moderation. Facebook Newsroom (23 May 2019). https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2019/05/dtag-report/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  120. Rebecca Puhl and Young Suh. 2015. Stigma and eating and weight disorders. Current psychiatry reports, Vol. 17, 3 (2015), 10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  121. Bryce J Renninger. 2015. “Where I can be myself... where I can speak my mind”: Networked counterpublics in a polymedia environment. New Media & Society, Vol. 17, 9 (2015), 1513--1529.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  122. Sarah Roberts. 2016. Digital Refuse: Canadian Garbage, Commercial Content Moderation and the Global Circulation of Social Media's Waste. Wi: Journal of Mobile Media (Jan. 2016). https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/commpub/14Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  123. Sarah T Roberts. 2019. Behind the Screen: Content Moderation in the Shadows of Social Media .Yale University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  124. James P Roehrig and Carmen P McLean. 2010. A comparison of stigma toward eating disorders versus depression. International Journal of Eating Disorders, Vol. 43, 7 (2010), 671--674.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  125. Nicolas Rüsch, Matthias C. Angermeyer, and Patrick W. Corrigan. 2005. Mental illness stigma: Concepts, consequences, and initiatives to reduce stigma. European Psychiatry, Vol. 20, 8 (Dec. 2005), 529--539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2005.04.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  126. Shruti Sannon, Elizabeth L. Murnane, Natalya N. Bazarova, and Geri Gay. 2019. "I Was Really, Really Nervous Posting It": Communicating About Invisible Chronic Illnesses Across Social Media Platforms. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 353:1--353:13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300583 event-place: Glasgow, Scotland Uk.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  127. Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Stacy M. Branham, and Foad Hamidi. 2018. Safe Spaces and Safe Places: Unpacking Technology-Mediated Experiences of Safety and Harm with Transgender People. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 2, CSCW (Nov. 2018), 155:1--155:27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274424Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  128. Lynne Schrum. 1995. Framing the debate: Ethical research in the information age. Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 1, 3 (1995), 311--326.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  129. Andrew Scull. 2015. Madness in Civilization: A Cultural History of Insanity, from the Bible to Freud, from the Madhouse to Modern Medicine .Princeton University Press. 432 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  130. Joseph Seering, Robert Kraut, and Laura Dabbish. 2017. Shaping Pro and Anti-Social Behavior on Twitch Through Moderation and Example-Setting. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 111--125. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998277 event-place: Portland, Oregon, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  131. Joseph Seering, Tony Wang, Jina Yoon, and Geoff Kaufman. 2019. Moderator engagement and community development in the age of algorithms. New Media & Society, Vol. 21, 7 (July 2019), 1417--1443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818821316Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  132. Leslie Regan Shade. 2003. Weborexics: The ethical issues surrounding pro-ana websites. (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  133. Heather Anne Swanson. 2018. Landscapes, by comparison. In The World Multiple: The Quotidian Politics of Knowing and Generating Entangled Worlds,, Kei'ichi Omura, Grant Otsuki, Shiho Satsuka, and Atsuro Morita (Eds.). Routledge, Chapter 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  134. Marika Tiggemann and Mia Zaccardo. 2018. `Strong is the new skinny': A content analysis of #fitspiration images on Instagram. Journal of health psychology, Vol. 23, 8 (2018), 1003--1011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  135. Walter Vandereycken and Ina Van Humbeeck. 2008. Denial and concealment of eating disorders: a retrospective survey. European Eating Disorders Review, Vol. 16, 2 (2008), 109--114. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.857Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  136. Aditya Vashistha, Abhinav Garg, Richard Anderson, and Agha Ali Raza. 2019. Threats, Abuses, Flirting, and Blackmail: Gender Inequity in Social Media Voice Forums. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  137. Jessica Vitak, Kalyani Chadha, Linda Steiner, and Zahra Ashktorab. 2017. Identifying Women's Experiences With and Strategies for Mitigating Negative Effects of Online Harassment. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 1231--1245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  138. Tao Wang, Markus Brede, Antonella Ianni, and Emmanouil Mentzakis. 2017. Detecting and characterizing eating-disorder communities on social media. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 91--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  139. Donghee Yvette Wohn. 2019. Volunteer Moderators in Twitch Micro Communities: How They Get Involved, the Roles They Play, and the Emotional Labor They Experience. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  140. David Wood. 2003. Foucault and panopticism revisited. Surveillance & Society, Vol. 1, 3 (2003), 234--239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  141. Diyi Yang, Zheng Yao, Joseph Seering, and Robert Kraut. 2019. The Channel Matters: Self-disclosure, Reciprocity and Social Support in Online Cancer Support Groups. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 31:1--31:15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300261 event-place: Glasgow, Scotland Uk.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Conformity of Eating Disorders through Content Moderation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader