skip to main content
10.1145/3393712.3395336acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesperdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing for conflict: a design space for multi-viewer support in future display networks

Published:04 June 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Public display networks are increasingly seeking to provide personalised content to viewers. A key challenge in this area is to how to support conflicting personalisation requirements from multiple concurrent viewers. In this paper we present a four dimensional design space that describes a wide range of approaches to addressing this issue. This design space can be used by developers and researchers to understand how systems can be engineered to deliver an increase in the effective communications bandwidth to viewers while meeting their conflicting content requirements. This is the first attempt at systematically examining the challenges and design choices in this important emerging area.

References

  1. Florian Alt, Moritz Balz, Stefanie Kristes, Alireza Sahami Shirazi, Julian Mennenöh, Albrecht Schmidt, Hendrik Schröder, and Michael Goedicke. 2009. Adaptive user profiles in pervasive advertising environments. In European Conference on Ambient Intelligence. Springer, 276--286.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Matthias Baldauf, Peter Fröhlich, and Katrin Lasinger. 2012a. A scalable framework for markerless camera-based smartphone interaction with large public displays. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Matthias Baldauf, Katrin Lasinger, and Peter Fröhlich. 2012b. Private public screens: detached multi-user interaction with large displays through mobile augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. ACM, 27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Gilbert Beyer, Florian Köttner, Manuel Schiewe, Ivo Haulsen, and Andreas Butz. 2013. Squaring the circle: how framing influences user behavior around a seamless cylindrical display. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1729--1738.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Kristi Bushman and Alexandras Labrinidis. 2019. Utility-based scheduling for public displays with live content. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Han Cao and others. 2006. Crossmodal attention in public-private displays. In 2006 ACS/IEEE international conference on pervasive services. IEEE, 13--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Keith Cheverst, Alan Dix, Daniel Fitton, Chris Kray, Mark Rouncefield, Corina Sas, George Saslis-Lagoudakis, and Jennifer G Sheridan. 2005. Exploring bluetooth based mobile phone interaction with the hermes photo display. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices & services. ACM, 47--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Elizabeth F Churchill, Les Nelson, Laurent Denoue, and Andreas Girgensohn. 2003. The plasma poster network: Posting multimedia content in public places.. In Interact, Vol. 3. 599--606.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Sarah Clinch. 2013. Supporting user appropriation of public displays. Ph.D. Dissertation. Lancaster University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sarah Clinch, Nigel Davies, Adrian Friday, and Graham Clinch. 2013. Yarely: a software player for open pervasive display networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. 25--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Sarah Clinch, Mateusz Mikusz, Ivan Elhart, Nigel Davies, and Marc Langheinrich. 2019. Scheduling Content in Pervasive Display Systems. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 3, 4 (2019), 1--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jorgos Coenen, Niels Wouters, and Andrew Vande Moere. 2016. Synchronized wayfinding on multiple consecutively situated public displays. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 182--196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Nicholas S Dalton, Emily Collins, and Paul Marshall. 2015. Display Blindness? Looking Again at the Visibility of Situated Displays using Eye-tracking. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3889--3898.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Nigel Davies, Marc Langheinrich, Sarah Clinch, Ivan Elhart, Adrian Friday, Thomas Kubitza, and Bholanathsingh Surajbali. 2014. Personalisation and privacy in future pervasive display networks. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 2357--2366.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Nigel Davies, Marc Langheinrich, Rui Jose, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2012. Open display networks: A communications medium for the 21st century. Computer 45, 5 (2012), 58--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Vishal Doshi, Sneha Tuteja, Krishna Bharadwaj, Davide Tantillo, Thomas Marrinan, James Patton, and G Elisabeta Marai. 2017. StickySchedule: an interactive multi-user application for conference scheduling on large-scale shared displays. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jakub Dostal, Per Ola Kristensson, and Aaron Quigley. 2013. Multi-view proxemics: distance and position sensitive interaction. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. John Duncan, Robert Ward, and Kimron Shapiro. 1994. Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision. Nature 369, 6478 (1994), 313.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ivan Elhart, Marc Langheinrich, Nemanja Memarovic, and Tommi Heikkinen. 2014. Scheduling interactive and concurrently running applications in pervasive display networks. In Proceedings of The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ivan Elhart, Federico Scacchi, Evangelos Niforatos, and Marc Langheinrich. 2015. Shadowtouch: A multi-user application selection interface for interactive public displays. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 209--216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S Gilroy, P Olivier, Han Cao, D Jackson, Christian Kray, and Di Lin. 2007. CROSSBOARD: Crossmodal Access of Dense Public Displays. Technical Report Series-University of Newcastle Upon Tyne Computing Science 1005 (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Elaine M Huang, Anna Koster, and Jan Borchers. 2008. Overcoming assumptions and uncovering practices: When does the public really look at public displays?. In International Conference on Pervasive Computing. Springer, 228--243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Giulio Jacucci, Ann Morrison, Gabriela T Richard, Jari Kleimola, Peter Peltonen, Lorenza Parisi, and Toni Laitinen. 2010. Worlds of information: designing for engagement at a public multi-touch display. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2267--2276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Rui José, Nuno Otero, Shahram Izadi, and Richard Harper. 2008. Instant places: Using bluetooth for situated interaction in public displays. IEEE Pervasive Computing 7, 4 (2008), 52--57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Christian Lander, Marco Speicher, Denise Paradowski, Norine Coenen, Sebastian Biewer, and Antonio Krüger. 2015. Collaborative newspaper: Exploring an adaptive scrolling algorithm in a multi-user reading scenario. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 163--169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Marc Langheinrich, Nemanja Memarovic, Ivan Elhart, and Florian Alt. 2011. Autopoiesic content: A conceptual model for enabling situated self-generative content for public displays. In Proc. of the 1st Int. Workshop on Pervasive Urban Applications at Pervasive.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Shahzad Malik, Abhishek Ranjan, and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2005. Interacting with large displays from a distance with vision-tracked multi-finger gestural input. In Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 43--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Nicolai Marquardt, Robert Diaz-Marino, Sebastian Boring, and Saul Greenberg. 2011. The proximity toolkit: prototyping proxemic interactions in ubiquitous computing ecologies. In Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 315--326.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Francisco Martinez-Pabon, Juan Camilo Ospina-Quintero, Victor Garzon-Marin, Angela Chantre-Astaiza, Mario Muñoz-Organero, and Gustavo Ramirez-Gonzalez. 2014. Enriching public displays ads recommendations using an individual: group cooperation model. In Proceedings of The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Joseph F McCarthy, Tony J Costa, and Edy S Liongosari. 2001. Unicast, outcast & groupcast: Three steps toward ubiquitous, peripheral displays. In International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. Springer, 332--345.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. David W McDonald, Joseph F McCarthy, Suzanne Soroczak, David H Nguyen, and Al M Rashid. 2008. Proactive displays: Supporting awareness in fluid social environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 14, 4 (2008), 16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Nemanja Memarovic, Marc Langheinrich, and Florian Alt. 2012. The interacting places framework: conceptualizing public display applications that promote community interaction and place awareness. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Mateusz Mikusz, Sarah Clinch, and Nigel Davies. 2015. Are you feeling lucky?: Lottery-based scheduling for public displays. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 123--129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Mateusz Mikusz, Sarah Clinch, Peter Shaw, Nigel Davies, and Petteri Nurmi. 2018. Using Pervasive Displays to Aid Student Recall-Reflections on a Campus-Wide Trial. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Ana Hilda Morales-Aranda and Oscar Mayora-Ibarra. 2007. A context sensitive public display for adaptive multi-user information visualization. In Third International Conference on Autonomic and Autonomous Systems (ICAS'07). IEEE, 63--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Jörg Müller, Juliane Exeler, Markus Buzeck, and Antonio Krüger. 2009. Reflectivesigns: Digital signs that adapt to audience attention. In International conference on pervasive computing. Springer, 17--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Jörg Müller and Antonio Krüger. 2007. User profiling for generating bids in digital signage advertising auctions. UBIDEUM 2007 (2007), 46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Jörg Müller, Antonio Krüger, and Tsvi Kuflik. 2007. Maximizing the utility of situated public displays. In International Conference on User Modeling. Springer, 395--399.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Jörg Müller, Dennis Wilmsmann, Juliane Exeler, Markus Buzeck, Albrecht Schmidt, Tim Jay, and Antonio Krüger. 2009. Display blindness: The effect of expectations on attention towards digital signage. In International Conference on Pervasive Computing. Springer, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Masafumi Muta, Soh Masuko, Keiji Shinzato, and Adiyan Mujibiya. 2015. Interactive study of WallSHOP: multiuser connectivity between public digital advertising and private devices for personalized shopping. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 187--193.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Miguel A Nacenta, Mikkel R Jakobsen, Remy Dautriche, Uta Hinrichs, Marian Dörk, Jonathan Haber, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2012. The LunchTable: a multi-user, multi-display system for information sharing in casual group interactions. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Timo Ojala, Hannu Kukka, Tomas Lindén, Tommi Heikkinen, Marko Jurmu, Simo Hosio, and Fabio Kruger. 2010. UBI-hotspot 1.0: Large-scale long-term deployment of interactive public displays in a city center. In 2010 Fifth International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services. IEEE, 285--294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Morin Ostkamp, Gernot Bauer, and Christian Kray. 2012. Visual highlighting on public displays. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Terry Payne, Esther David, Nicholas R Jennings, and Matthew Sharifi. 2006. Auction mechanisms for efficient advertisement selection on public displays. In ECAI. 285--289.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Peter Peltonen, Esko Kurvinen, Antti Salovaara, Giulio Jacucci, Tommi Ilmonen, John Evans, Antti Oulasvirta, and Petri Saarikko. 2008. It's Mine, Don't Touch: interactions at a large multi-touch display in a city centre. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1285--1294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Santi Phithakkitnukoon, Teerayut Horanont, Giusy Di Lorenzo, Ryosuke Shibasaki, and Carlo Ratti. 2010. Activity-aware map: Identifying human daily activity pattern using mobile phone data. In International Workshop on Human Behavior Understanding. Springer, 14--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Robert Ravnik and Franc Solina. 2013. Interactive and audience adaptive digital signage using real-time computer vision. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems 10, 2 (2013), 107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Markus Rittenbruch. 2014. Evaluating the use of a very large-scale presentation and collaboration framework. In Proceedings of The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Jennifer Sheridan, Nick Bryan-Kinns, Stuart Reeves, Joe Marshall, and Giles Lane. 2011. Graffito: crowd-based performative interaction at festivals. In CHI'11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1129--1134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Garth Shoemaker, Anthony Tang, and Kellogg S Booth. 2007. Shadow reaching: a new perspective on interaction for large displays. In Proceedings of the 20th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 53--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Daniel Vogel and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2004. Interactive public ambient displays: transitioning from implicit to explicit, public to personal, interaction with multiple users. In Proceedings of the 17th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 137--146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Robert Walter, Gilles Bailly, and Jörg Müller. 2013. StrikeAPose: revealing mid-air gestures on public displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 841--850.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Tim Weißker, Andreas Berst, Johannes Hartmann, and Florian Echtler. 2016. The massive mobile multiuser framework: enabling ad-hoc realtime interaction on public displays with mobile devices. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. 168--174.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    PerDis '20: Proceedings of the 9TH ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays
    June 2020
    104 pages
    ISBN:9781450379861
    DOI:10.1145/3393712
    • Conference Chairs:
    • Vanessa Cobus,
    • Sarah Prange,
    • General Chair:
    • Sarah Clinch,
    • Program Chairs:
    • Enrico Rukzio,
    • Jan Gugenheimer

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 4 June 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    PerDis '20 Paper Acceptance Rate12of21submissions,57%Overall Acceptance Rate213of384submissions,55%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader