skip to main content
research-article

WProfX: A Fine-grained Visualization Tool for Web Page Loads

Published:18 June 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Web page performance is crucial in today's Internet ecosystem, and Web developers use various developer tools to analyze their page load performance. However, existing tools cannot be used to identify the critical bottlenecks during the page load process. In this work, we design an online tool called WProfX that allows Web developers to visually identify bottlenecks in their page structure. The key to WProfX is that unlike existing Web performance tools, WProfX not only visualizes the page load activity timings, but also extracts the dependencies between the activities. Using the dependency structure, WProfX identifies the critical bottleneck activities. This lets a developer quickly identify why their page is loading slow and conduct what-if analyses to study the effect of different optimizations.

WProfX uses low-level tracing information exposed by most major browsers to extract the relationship between page load activities. The result is that WProfX works with most major browsers and newer browser versions. WProfX visualizes the page load process as a dependency graph of semantically meaningful Web activities and identifies the critical bottlenecks. We evaluate WProfX with 14 Web developers who perform three what-if analysis tasks involving identifying the page load bottleneck and evaluating the effect of a page optimization. All the participants were able to complete the tasks with WProfX, compared to less than 60% when using the popular developer tools available today. WProfX is currently being used by Web developers in a large telecom and at a Silicon Valley startup.

References

  1. Chrome devtools. https://developers.google.com/web/tools/chrome-devtools/. (Accessed on09/19/2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ericsson mobility report june 2015: http://www.ericsson.com/res/docs/2015/ericsson-mobility-report-june-2015.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Firefox and Page Load Speed. https://blog.mozilla.org/metrics/2010/04/05/firefox-page-load-speed-%E2%80%93-part-ii/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Google Pagespeed Insights. https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. The new, fast browser for mac, pc and linux | firefox. https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/. (Accessedon 09/19/2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Page Load Speed Impacts Buying Decisions. https://smallbiztrends.com/2019/02/page-load-speed-impacts-buying-decisions.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. PageSpeed Insights. https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. The Trace Event Profiling Tool.https://www.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/trace-event-profiling-tool.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. W3C: Document Object Model.http://www.w3.org/DOM/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. WebPagetest, Website Performance and Optimization Test. https://www.webpagetest.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. Abran, A. Khelifi, W. Suryn, and A. Seffah. Usability meanings and interpretations in iso standards. Software quality journal, 11(4):325--338, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. A. Apaolaza and M. Vigo. Assisted pattern mining for discovering interactive behaviours on the web. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 130:196--208, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. P. Baudisch and C. Gutwin. Multiblending: displaying overlapping windows simultaneously without the drawbacks of alpha blending. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 367--374. ACM,2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. Bostock, V. Ogievetsky, and J. Heer. D3: Data-driven documents.IEEE Trans. Visualization & Comp. Graphics (Proc. InfoVis), 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Butkiewicz, D. Wang, Z. Wu, H. V. Madhyastha, and V. Sekar. Klotski: Reprioritizing web content to improve user experience on mobile devices. In 12th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 15), pages 439--453, Oakland, CA, 2015. USENIX Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. I. Cho, W. Dou, D. X. Wang, E. Sauda, and W. Ribarsky. Vairoma: A visual analytics system for making sense of places, times, and events in roman history. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 22(1):210--219, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. M. Dasari, C. Kelton, J. Nejati, A. Balasubramanian, and S. R. Das. Demystifying hardware bottlenecks in mobile web quality of experience. In Proceedings of the SIGCOMM Posters and Demos, SIGCOMM Posters and Demos '17, page43--45, New York, NY, USA, 2017. Association for Computing Machinery.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. Dasari, S. Vargas, A. Bhattacharya, A. Balasubramanian, S. R. Das, and M. Ferdman. Impact of device performance on mobile internet qoe. In Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference 2018, pages 1--7. ACM, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. A. Dix. Human-computer interaction. Springer, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. J. Fulda, M. Brehmel, and T. Munzner. Timeline curator: Interactive authoring of visual timelines from unstructured text. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 22(1):300--309, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. T. Geymayer, M. Steinberger, A. Lex, M. Streit, and D. Schmalstieg. Show me the invisible: visualizing hidden content. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 3705--3714. ACM, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. U. Goel, M. Steiner, W. Na, M. P. Wittie, M. Flack, and S. Ludin. Are 3 rd parties slowing down the mobile web? In Proceedings of the Eighth Wireless of the Students, by the Students, and for the Students Workshop, pages 18--20. ACM,2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Google. Time to interactive. https://github.com/WPO-Foundation/webpagetest/blob/master/docs/Metrics/TimeToInteractive.md. (Accessed on 11/31/2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Google. LightHouse. https://developers.google.com/web/tools/lighthouse, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. T. Grossman, G. Fitzmaurice, and R. Attar. A survey of software learnability: metrics, methodologies and guidelines. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 649--658. ACM, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. J. Hibschman and H. Zhang. Unravel: Rapid web application reverse engineering via interaction recording, source tracing, and library detection. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology, pages 270--279. ACM, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. J. Hibschman and H. Zhang. Telescope: Fine-tuned discovery of interactive web ui feature implementation. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pages 233--245. ACM, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. D. Imms. Speed index: Measuring page load time a different way. http://bit.ly/2dbuUpr, September 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. C. Kelton, J. Ryoo, A. Balasubramanian, and S. R. Das. Improving user perceived page load times using gaze. In Proceedings of the 11th USENIX Conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, NSDI'17, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. B. Lafreniere and T. Grossman. Blocks-to-cad: A cross-application bridge from minecraft to 3d modeling. In The 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pages 637--648. ACM, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. T. D. LaToza and B. A. Myers. Developers ask reachability questions. In Proceedings of the 32Nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering-Volume 1, pages 185--194. ACM, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Z. Li, M. Zhang, Z. Zhu, Y. Chen, A. Greenberg, and Y.-M. Wang. WebProphet: automating performance prediction for web services. In Proc. of the USENIX conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI), 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. W. McGrath, D. Drew, J. Warner, M. Kazemitabaar, M. Karchemsky, D. Mellis, and B. Hartmann. Bifröst: Visualizing and checking behavior of embedded systems across hardware and software. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pages 299--310. ACM, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. K. Mehner. Javis: A uml-based visualization and debugging environment for concurrent java programs. In Software Visualization, pages 163--175. Springer, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. B. Meyer. Object-oriented software construction, volume 2. Prentice hall New York, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. J. Nejati and A. Balasubramanian. An In-depth Study of Mobile Browser Performance. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW '16, pages 1305--1315, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. R. Netravali, A. Goyal, J. Mickens, and H. Balakrishnan. Polaris: Faster page loads using fine-grained dependency tracking. In13th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 16). USENIX Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. R. Netravali and J. Mickens. Prophecy: Accelerating mobile page loads using final-state write logs. In 15th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 18), pages 249--266, Renton, WA, 2018. USENIX Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. R. Netravali, V. Nathan, J. Mickens, and H. Balakrishnan. Vesper: Measuring time-to-interactivity for web pages. In 15th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 18), pages 217--231, Renton, WA, 2018. USENIX Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. J. Nielsen.Usability engineering. Elsevier, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. S. Panicker. W3c paint timing working draft. http://bit.ly/2f2CGSk.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. F. Paternò, A. G. Schiavone, and P. Pitardi. Timelines for mobile web usability evaluation. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, pages 88--91, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. M. Pinzger, K. Graefenhain, P. Knab, and H. C. Gall. A tool for visual understanding of source code dependencies. In Program Comprehension, 2008. ICPC 2008. The 16th IEEE International Conference on, pages 254--259. IEEE, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. V. Ruamviboonsuk, R. Netravali, M. Uluyol, and H. V. Madhyastha. Vroom: Accelerating the mobile web with server-aided dependency resolution. In Proceedings of the Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication, pages 390--403. ACM, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. X. S. Wang, A. Balasubramanian, A. Krishnamurthy, and D. Wetherall. Demystify page load performance with wprof. In Proc. of the USENIX conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI), 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. X. S. Wang, A. Balasubramanian, A. Krishnamurthy, and D. Wetherall. How speedy is spdy? In Proceedings of the 11thUSENIX Conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, NSDI'14, pages 387--399, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2014. USENIX Association.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. J. Zhao, S. M. Drucker, D. Fisher, and D. Brinkman. Timeslice: Interactive faceted browsing of timeline data. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI '12, pages 433--436, New York,NY, USA, 2012. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Y. Zhu, J. Yu, and J. Wu. Chroring: A time-oriented visual approach to represent writer's history. Vis. Comput.,32(9):1133--1149, Sept. 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. WProfX: A Fine-grained Visualization Tool for Web Page Loads

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in

              Full Access

              • Published in

                cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
                Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 4, Issue EICS
                EICS
                June 2020
                534 pages
                EISSN:2573-0142
                DOI:10.1145/3407187
                Issue’s Table of Contents

                Copyright © 2020 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 18 June 2020
                • Online AM: 7 May 2020
                Published in pacmhci Volume 4, Issue EICS

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader