skip to main content
10.1145/3397271.3401101acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Recommending Podcasts for Cold-Start Users Based on Music Listening and Taste

Published:25 July 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recommender systems are increasingly used to predict and serve content that aligns with user taste, yet the task of matching new users with relevant content remains a challenge. We consider podcasting to be an emerging medium with rapid growth in adoption, and discuss challenges that arise when applying traditional recommendation approaches to address the cold-start problem. Using music consumption behavior, we examine two main techniques in inferring Spotify users preferences over more than 200k podcasts. Our results show significant improvements in consumption of up to 50% for both offline and online experiments. We provide extensive analysis on model performance and examine the degree to which music data as an input source introduces bias in recommendations.

References

  1. A Merve Acilar and Ahmet Arslan. 2009. A collaborative filtering method based on artificial immune network. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 36, 4 (2009), 8324--8332.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Taleb Alashkar, Songyao Jiang, Shuyang Wang, and Yun Fu. 2017. Examples-rules guided deep neural network for makeup recommendation. In Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Cen Chen, Peilin Zhao, Longfei Li, Jun Zhou, Xiaolong Li, and Minghui Qiu. 2017. Locally connected deep learning framework for industrial-scale recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 769--770.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Heng-Tze Cheng, Levent Koc, Jeremiah Harmsen, Tal Shaked, Tushar Chandra, Hrishi Aradhye, Glen Anderson, Greg Corrado, Wei Chai, Mustafa Ispir, et almbox. 2016. Wide & deep learning for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 1st workshop on deep learning for recommender systems. ACM, 7--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Paul Covington, Jay Adams, and Emre Sargin. 2016. Deep neural networks for youtube recommendations. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on recommender systems. ACM, 191--198.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ali Mamdouh Elkahky, Yang Song, and Xiaodong He. 2015. A multi-view deep learning approach for cross domain user modeling in recommendation systems. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 278--288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ignacio Fernández-Tob'iaís, Iván Cantador, Marius Kaminskas, and Francesco Ricci. 2012. Cross-domain recommender systems: A survey of the state of the art. In Spanish conference on information retrieval. sn, 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ignacio Fernández-Tob'ias, Iván Cantador, Paolo Tomeo, Vito Walter Anelli, and Tommaso Di Noia. 2019. Addressing the user cold start with cross-domain collaborative filtering: exploiting item metadata in matrix factorization. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, Vol. 29, 2 (2019), 443--486.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Sébastien Jean, Kyunghyun Cho, Roland Memisevic, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. On using very large target vocabulary for neural machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.2007 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jianxun Lian, Fuzheng Zhang, Xing Xie, and Guangzhong Sun. 2017. CCCFNet: A content-boosted collaborative filtering neural network for cross domain recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 26th international conference on World Wide Web companion. 817--818.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jovian Lin, Kazunari Sugiyama, Min-Yen Kan, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2013. Addressing cold-start in app recommendation: latent user models constructed from twitter followers. In Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 283--292.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jixiong Liu, Jiakun Shi, Wanling Cai, Bo Liu, Weike Pan, Qiang Yang, and Zhong Ming. 2017. Transfer Learning from APP Domain to News Domain for Dual Cold-Start Recommendation.. In RecSysKTL. 38--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Corrado, and Jeff Dean. 2013. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 3111--3119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Nima Mirbakhsh and Charles X Ling. 2015. Improving top-n recommendation for cold-start users via cross-domain information. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD), Vol. 9, 4 (2015), 33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Yoon-Joo Park and Alexander Tuzhilin. 2008. The long tail of recommender systems and how to leverage it. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Recommender systems. 11--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher Manning. 2014. Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP). 1532--1543.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Al Mamunur Rashid, Istvan Albert, Dan Cosley, Shyong K Lam, Sean M McNee, Joseph A Konstan, and John Riedl. 2002. Getting to know you: learning new user preferences in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. ACM, 127--134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Steffen Rendle and Lars Schmidt-Thieme. 2008. Online-updating regularized kernel matrix factorization models for large-scale recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Recommender systems. ACM, 251--258.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Badrul Sarwar, George Karypis, Joseph Konstan, and John Riedl. 2002. Incremental singular value decomposition algorithms for highly scalable recommender systems. In Fifth international conference on computer and information science, Vol. 27. Citeseer, 28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. J Ben Schafer, Dan Frankowski, Jon Herlocker, and Shilad Sen. 2007. Collaborative filtering recommender systems. In The adaptive web. Springer, 291--324.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Gábor Takács, István Pilászy, Bottyán Németh, and Domonkos Tikk. 2008. Investigation of various matrix factorization methods for large recommender systems. In 2008 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops. IEEE, 553--562.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Manos Tsagkias, Martha Larson, and Maarten De Rijke. 2010. Predicting podcast preference: An analysis framework and its application. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, Vol. 61, 2 (2010), 374--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Chirayu Wongchokprasitti, Jaakko Peltonen, Tuukka Ruotsalo, Payel Bandyopadhyay, Giulio Jacucci, and Peter Brusilovsky. 2015. User model in a box: Cross-system user model transfer for resolving cold start problems. In International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. Springer, 289--301.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Jingwei Xu, Yuan Yao, Hanghang Tong, Xianping Tao, and Jian Lu. 2017. R a P are: A Generic Strategy for Cold-Start Rating Prediction Problem. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 29, 6 (2017), 1296--1309.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Longqi Yang, Michael Sobolev, Yu Wang, Jenny Chen, Drew Dunne, Christina Tsangouri, Nicola Dell, Mor Naaman, and Deborah Estrin. 2019. How Intention Informed Recommendations Modulate Choices: A Field Study of Spoken Word Content. In The Web Conference. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Mi Zhang, Jie Tang, Xuchen Zhang, and Xiangyang Xue. 2014. Addressing cold start in recommender systems: A semi-supervised co-training algorithm. In Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval. ACM, 73--82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Shuai Zhang, Lina Yao, Aixin Sun, and Yi Tay. 2019. Deep learning based recommender system: A survey and new perspectives. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), Vol. 52, 1 (2019), 1--38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGIR '20: Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
    July 2020
    2548 pages
    ISBN:9781450380164
    DOI:10.1145/3397271

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 25 July 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader