ABSTRACT
Digital wallet in Indonesia exists to facilitate payment transactions without using cash. Popular brands of digital wallet products in Indonesia are Go-pay, Ovo, Dana, LinkAja. This study aims to identify the influencing factors of user intentions to use and recommend digital wallets based on a multi-generation preference perspective. The existing model is modified and adapted to the characteristics of users in Indonesia, then the model is validated by Expert Judgment. The data obtained from the respondents by filling in an online form at Google form, in which the link was spreaded out through social media such as WhatsApp and Instagram. The total of sample of this study is 205 respondents. This study is using the Partial Least Square (PLS) method using SMARTPLS 3 software, the results of data analysis show in Generation X, Perceived ease of use, Perceived Usefulness, Compatibility, and Trust positively influence Intention to Use, and the factors that influence intention to use in generation Y are Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Behavioral Control, and Trust. Factors that influence intention to use in generation Z are Perceived Ease of Use, and Perceived Usefulness. eventually, based on the data of each generation, the Intention to use indirectly influence Actual Use, Perceived Satisfaction, AND Recommendation to use.
- Liu, J., Kauffman, R.J. and Ma, D. 2015. Competition, cooperation and regulation: Understanding the evolution of the mobile payments technology ecosystem. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications.Google Scholar
- Aldridge, I. 2013. High-Frequency Trading: A Practical Guide to Algorithmic Strategies and Trading System, second edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
- Redaksi, 2019 "Daftar 10 Dompet Digital Terpopuler di RI, Siapa Jawaranya", CNBC Indonesia, Jakarta.Google Scholar
- Author, 2019 "Persaingan Dompet Digital", Indonesia.go.id, Jakarta.Google Scholar
- Indah Rahmayani, 2015 "Indonesia Raksasa Teknologi Digital Asia", Kominfo, Jakarta.Google Scholar
- Fahmi A. Burhan, 2020 "Bukan Bakar Uang, Begini Strategi DANA Capai 170 Juta Pengguna" katadata, Jakarta.Google Scholar
- Author, 2019 "Perilaku Belanja Online Generasi X, Y dan Z" Sirclo, Indonesia.Google Scholar
- I. Alnawas and F. Aburub, "The effect of benefits generated from interacting with branded mobile," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, vol. 31, pp. 313--322, 2016.Google Scholar
- Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F.D. 1996. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decision Sciences.Google Scholar
- F. D. Davis, User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts, International Journal of ManMachine Studies, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 475--487, 1.Google Scholar
- Madan, K., Yadav, R., 2016. Behavioural intention to adopt mobile wallet: a developing country perspective. Journal of Indian Business Research 8 (3), 227--244.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Natarajan, T., Balasubramanian, S.A., Kasilingam, D.L., 2017. Understanding the intention to use mobile shopping applications and its influence on price sensitivity. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 37, 8--22.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shin, D., & Kim, W. (2008). Applying the technology acceptance model and flowtheory to cyworld user behavior.Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 11 (4), 12--20Google Scholar
- Mallat, N., 2007. Exploring consumer adoption of mobile payments e a qualitative study. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 16, 413--432Google ScholarDigital Library
- Karnouskos, S., Fokus, F., 2004. Mobile Payment: a journey through existing procedures and standardization initiatives. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials 6 (4), 44--66.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ajzen, Icek (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), 179--211.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pavlou, P.A., & Gefen, D. (2004). Building effective online market places with institution-based trust. Information Systems Research, 15(1), 37--59..Google ScholarDigital Library
- Casidy, R., & Wymer, W. (2016). A risk worth taking: Perceived risk as moderator of perceived satisfaction, loyalty, and willingness to pay premium price. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 32, 189--197.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Miltgen, C.L., Popovic, A., & Oliveira, T. (2013). Determinants of end-user acceptance of biometrics: Integrating the "Big3" of technology acceptance with privacy context. Decision Support Systems, 56, 103--114.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Masud, "Partial Least Squares (PLS)". Hanbook of Brawijaya University, 2015. http://masud.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2015/05/14.PLS.pdf.Google Scholar
- Y. Nabila, "Analysis Impact of Knowledge Management System Implementation on Increasing Organizational Competitiveness" Industrial Engineering Department Universitas Indonesia, 2018.Google Scholar
- Ling, F., shan li, sui, p., & ofori, G. 2012, "mathematical models for predicting chinese A/E/C firms' competitiveness". Automotion in construction, 40--51.Google Scholar
- V. E. Vinzi et al., "PLS Path Modeling: From Foundations to Recent Developments and Open Issues for Model Assessment and Improvement", Handbook of Partial Least Square, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. F. Hair, C. M. Ringle and M. Sarstedt, "PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet," Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 139--151, 2011.Google Scholar
- R. P. Bagozzi and Y. Yi, "On the evaluation of structural equation models," Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 207--218, 1988.Google Scholar
- J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 1988.Google Scholar
- Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M, "A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM)", Thousand Oaks: Sage. 2013.Google Scholar
- Ghozali, "Structural Equation Modeling Metode Alternatif dengan Partial Least Square", ISBN:979.704.300.2.Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro Semarang. 2014Google Scholar
- Chatterjee, D., & Kartikeya Bolar (2018): Determinants of Mobile Wallet Intentions to Use: The Mental Cost Perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2018.1505697Google Scholar
- Singh, N., Neena, S., Francisco, J.C. (2020). Determining Factors In The Adoption And Recommendation of Mobile Wallet Services In India: Analysis of The Effect of Innovativeness, Stress to Use and Social Influence. International Journal of Information Management, 191--205.Google Scholar
- Ghozali, "Structural Equation Modeling Metode Alternatif dengan Partial Least Square", ISBN:979.704.300.2.Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro Semarang. 2014Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Multi-Generation Perception Towards Digital Wallet in Indonesia
Recommendations
Developing Digital Wallet Services in Indonesia: A Multigeneration Perspective
ICONETSI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Engineering and Information Technology for Sustainable IndustryDigital Wallet is growing rapidly in the last 5 years. This study aims to identify the influencing factors user intentions to use and recommend digital wallets based on a multi-generation preference perspective. 205 respondent's data obtained by filling ...
Towards an understanding of the consumer acceptance of mobile wallet
This study seeks to validate a comprehensive model of consumer acceptance in the context of mobile payment. It uses the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model with constructs of security, trust, social influence, and self-...
Virtual teamwork training: factors influencing the acceptance of collaboration technology
The purpose of this study was to identify the factors that influence the acceptance of electronic collaboration technology by higher education students and that influence their predicted usage of the technology for virtual team collaboration. The ...
Comments