skip to main content
10.1145/3404835.3462895acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Graph-Enhanced Click Model for Web Search

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 July 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

To better exploit search logs and model users' behavior patterns, numerous click models are proposed to extract users' implicit interaction feedback. Most traditional click models are based on the probabilistic graphical model (PGM) framework, which requires manually designed dependencies and may oversimplify user behaviors. Recently, methods based on neural networks are proposed to improve the prediction accuracy of user behaviors by enhancing the expressive ability and allowing flexible dependencies. However, they still suffer from the data sparsity and cold-start problems. In this paper, we propose a novel graph-enhanced click model (GraphCM) for web search. Firstly, we regard each query or document as a vertex, and propose novel homogeneous graph construction methods for queries and documents respectively, to fully exploit both intra-session and inter-session information for the sparsity and cold-start problems. Secondly, following the examination hypothesis, we separately model the attractiveness estimator and examination predictor to output the attractiveness scores and examination probabilities, where graph neural networks and neighbor interaction techniques are applied to extract the auxiliary information encoded in the pre-constructed homogeneous graphs. Finally, we apply combination functions to integrate examination probabilities and attractiveness scores into click predictions. Extensive experiments conducted on three real-world session datasets show that GraphCM not only outperforms the state-of-art models, but also achieves superior performance in addressing the data sparsity and cold-start problems.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

SIGIR21-fp0470.mp4

mp4

28.9 MB

References

  1. Rianne van den Berg, Thomas N Kipf, and Max Welling. 2017. Graph convolutional matrix completion. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.02263 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexey Borisov, Ilya Markov, Maarten De Rijke, and Pavel Serdyukov. 2016. A neural click model for web search. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web. 531--541.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Alexey Borisov, Martijn Wardenaar, Ilya Markov, and Maarten de Rijke. 2018. A click sequence model for web search. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval. 45--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Olivier Chapelle and Ya Zhang. 2009. A Dynamic Bayesian Network Click Model for Web Search Ranking. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web. 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jia Chen. 2020. Beyond Sessions: Exploiting Hybrid Contextual Information for Web Search. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining . 915--916.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jia Chen, Jiaxin Mao, Yiqun Liu, Min Zhang, and Shaoping Ma. 2019. TianGong-ST: A New Dataset with Large-scale Refined Real-world Web Search Sessions. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2485--2488.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jia Chen, Jiaxin Mao, Yiqun Liu, Min Zhang, and Shaoping Ma. 2020. A Context-Aware Click Model for Web Search. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 88--96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Aleksandr Chuklin, Ilya Markov, and Maarten de Rijke. 2015. Click models for web search. Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services , Vol. 7, 3 (2015), 1--115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Junyoung Chung, Caglar Gulcehre, KyungHyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.3555 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Nick Craswell, Onno Zoeter, Michael Taylor, and Bill Ramsey. 2008. An experimental comparison of click position-bias models. In Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on web search and data mining. 87--94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Georges E Dupret and Benjamin Piwowarski. 2008. A user browsing model to predict search engine click data from past observations.. In Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. 331--338.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Aditya Grover and Jure Leskovec. 2016. node2vec: Scalable feature learning for networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining . 855--864.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Fan Guo, Chao Liu, Anitha Kannan, Tom Minka, Michael Taylor, Yi-Min Wang, and Christos Faloutsos. 2009b. Click Chain Model in Web Search. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web. 11--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Fan Guo, Chao Liu, and Yi Min Wang. 2009a. Efficient Multiple-Click Models in Web Search. In Proceedings of the Second ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 124--131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Will Hamilton, Zhitao Ying, and Jure Leskovec. 2017. Inductive representation learning on large graphs. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 1024--1034.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kalervo J"arvelin and Jaana Kek"al"ainen. 2017. IR Evaluation Methods for Retrieving Highly Relevant Documents. SIGIR Forum (2017), 243--250.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Thomas N Kipf and Max Welling. 2016. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.02907 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Daphne Koller and Nir Friedman. 2009. Probabilistic graphical models: principles and techniques .MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Bryan Perozzi, Rami Al-Rfou, and Steven Skiena. 2014. Deepwalk: Online learning of social representations. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining . 701--710.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Yanru Qu, Ting Bai, Weinan Zhang, Jianyun Nie, and Jian Tang. 2019. An end-to-end neighborhood-based interaction model for knowledge-enhanced recommendation. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Deep Learning Practice for High-Dimensional Sparse Data . 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Leonardo FR Ribeiro, Pedro HP Saverese, and Daniel R Figueiredo. 2017. struc2vec: Learning node representations from structural identity. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining . 385--394.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Matthew Richardson, Ewa Dominowska, and Robert Ragno. 2007. Predicting clicks: estimating the click-through rate for new ads. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web. 521--530.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 5998--6008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Guillem Cucurull, Arantxa Casanova, Adriana Romero, Pietro Liò, and Yoshua Bengio. 2018. Graph Attention Networks. In Proceedings of International Conference on Learning Representations .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Daixin Wang, Peng Cui, and Wenwu Zhu. 2016. Structural deep network embedding. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining . 1225--1234.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Hongning Wang, ChengXiang Zhai, Anlei Dong, and Yi Chang. 2013. Content-aware click modeling. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web. 1365--1376.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Xiang Wang, Xiangnan He, Yixin Cao, Meng Liu, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2019. Kgat: Knowledge graph attention network for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining . 950--958.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Danqing Xu, Yiqun Liu, Min Zhang, Shaoping Ma, and Liyun Ru. 2012. Incorporating revisiting behaviors into click models. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining . 303--312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Rex Ying, Ruining He, Kaifeng Chen, Pong Eksombatchai, William L Hamilton, and Jure Leskovec. 2018. Graph convolutional neural networks for web-scale recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining . 974--983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Chuxu Zhang, Dongjin Song, Chao Huang, Ananthram Swami, and Nitesh V Chawla. 2019. Heterogeneous graph neural network. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining . 793--803.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Yuchen Zhang, Weizhu Chen, Dong Wang, and Qiang Yang. 2011. User-click modeling for understanding and predicting search-behavior. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. 1388--1396.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Feimin Zhong, Dong Wang, Gang Wang, Weizhu Chen, Yuchen Zhang, Zheng Chen, and Haixun Wang. 2010. Incorporating post-click behaviors into a click model. In Proceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval . 355--362.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Zeyuan Allen Zhu, Weizhu Chen, Tom Minka, Chenguang Zhu, and Zheng Chen. 2010. A novel click model and its applications to online advertising. In Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Web search and data mining . 321--330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A Graph-Enhanced Click Model for Web Search

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGIR '21: Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
        July 2021
        2998 pages
        ISBN:9781450380379
        DOI:10.1145/3404835

        Copyright © 2021 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 11 July 2021

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader