skip to main content
10.1145/3404983.3405526acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmundcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

VacuumCleanAR: augmented reality-based self-explanatory physical artifacts

Published:06 September 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Consumer purchase decisions are not only determined by the quality or price of a product. Customers also want an innovative product that they can identify with in something more than just a functional way. Much of this appeal is often bound up with the innovative character of a product. However, the global market and the huge variety of products available make it challenging for companies to help customers understand the particular innovations in their products, especially in terms of technical "hidden" innovations. Augmented reality (AR) offers interactive experiences in real-world environments through digitalized information. In this paper, we present a design case study about an AR-based approach to reveal the hidden innovations to potential users in an engaging and "emotional" way by using the example of a vacuum cleaner. Based on an empirical study, we designed and implemented the fully functional HoloLens application VacuumCleanAR, which allows users to discover the hidden innovations of a vacuum cleaner in a less functional and more consumer-centric way. This reveals the scope for augmenting other physical artifacts in a similar fashion.

References

  1. Judith Adler, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, and Eugene Rochberg-Halton. 1983. The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self. Contemporary Sociology 12, 4: 452. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Zafar U. Ahmed, James P. Johnson, Xia Yang, Chen Kheng Fatt, Han Sack Teng, and Lim Chee Boon. 2004. Does country of origin matter for low-involvement products? International Marketing Review. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Junho Ahn, James Williamson, Mike Gartrell, Richard Han, Qin Lv, and Shivakant Mishra. 2015. Supporting Healthy Grocery Shopping via Mobile Augmented Reality. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 12, 1s: 16:1--16:24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Mahsa Akbari. 2015. Different Impacts of Advertising Appeals on Advertising Attitude for High and Low Involvement Products. Global Business Review. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Saifeddin Alimamy, Kenneth R. Deans, and Juergen Gnoth. 2017. Augmented Reality: Uses and Future Considerations in Marketing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Omar Jesús Álvarez Márquez and Jürgen Ziegler. 2017. Improving the Shopping Experience with an Augmented Reality-Enhanced Shelf. Mensch und Computer 2017 - Workshopband. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Gary Armstrong and Philip Kotler. 2015. Principles of Marketing. Pearson Global.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ronald T Azuma. 1997. A Survey of Augmented Reality. Presence Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 4, August: 355--385. https://doi.org/10.1162Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Richard P. Bagozzi, Manesh Gopinath, and Prashanth U. Nyer. 1999. The role of emotions in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. BusinessDictionary.com. 2019. High Involvement Product. BusinessDictionary. Retrieved from http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/high-involvement-product.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. BusinessDictionary.com. 2019. Low Involvement Product. BusinessDictionary. Retrieved from http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/low-involvement-product.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Bent Jesper Christensen and Carsten Kowalczyk. 2017. Introduction to Globalization: Strategies and Effects. In Globalization: Strategies and Effects, Bent Jesper Christensen and Carsten Kowalczyk (eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Niamh Conway, Alessandro Soro, Ross Brown, and Selen Turkay. 2019. Exploring Uses of Augmented Reality in Participatory Marketing. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Walters David. 1999. Value-based marketing and its usefulness to customers. Management Decision 37, 9: 697--708. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Nathalie Dens and Patrick De Pelsmacker. 2010. Consumer response to different advertising appeals for new products: The moderating influence of branding strategy and product category involvement. Journal of Brand Management. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Peter Doyle. 2008. Value-based marketing: Marketing strategies for corporate growth and shareholder value. Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Marshall Fishwick. 2004. Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. The Journal of American Culture. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Sven Gehring, Markus Löchtefeld, Johannes Schöning, Dominic Gorecky, Peter Stephan, Antonio Krüger, and Michael Rohs. 2010. Mobile product customization. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Gerd Gigerenzer. 1996. On narrow norms and vague heuristics: A reply to Kahneman and Tversky. Psychological Review. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Stephen W. Gilroy, Marc Cavazza, Rémi Chaignon, Satu Marja Mäkelä, Markus Niranen, Elisabeth André, Thurid Vogt, Jérôme Urbain, Mark Billinghurst, Hartmut Seichter, and Maurice Benayoun. 2008. E-tree: Emotionally driven augmented reality art. In MM'08 - Proceedings of the 2008 ACM International Conference on Multimedia, with co-located Symposium and Workshops. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Richard Harper, Dave Randall, and Wes Scharrock. 2017. Choice. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. InSites Consulting. 2018. Vacuum cleaner usage and attitudes. An online ethnographic survey in 11 European countries. For CECED.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ana Javornik. 2016. Augmented reality: Research agenda for studying the impact of its media characteristics on consumer behaviour. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 30: 252--261. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Ana Javornik. 2016. `It's an illusion, but it looks real!' Consumer affective, cognitive and behavioural responses to augmented reality applications. Journal of Marketing Management 32, 9--10: 987--1011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Ana Javornik, Yvonne Rogers, Ana Maria Moutinho, and Russell Freeman. 2016. Revealing the Shopper Experience of Using a "Magic Mirror" Augmented Reality Make-Up Application. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Daniel Kahneman. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Mirae Kim, Min Kyung Lee, and Laura Dabbish. 2015. Shop-i: Gaze based interaction in the physical world for in-store social shopping experience. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings 18: 1253--1258. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Mandy Korzetz, Romina Kühn, Maria Gohlke, and Uwe Aßmann. 2017. HoloFacility: Get in Touch with Machines at Trade Fairs using Holograms. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces (ISS '17). https://doi.org/ Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Thomas Ludwig, Alexander Boden, and Volkmar Pipek. 2017. 3D Printers as Sociable Technologies: Taking Appropriation Infrastructures to the Internet of Things. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 24, 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Thomas Ludwig, Oliver Stickel, Alexander Boden, and Volkmar Pipek. 2014. Towards Sociable Technologies: An Empirical Study on Designing Appropriation Infrastructures for 3D Printing. In Proceedings of DIS14 Designing Interactive Systems, 835--844. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Andreq McStay. 2018. Emotional AI: The rise of empathic media. SAGE Publications.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Paul Milgram and Fumio Kishino. 1994. A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays. IEICE Transactions on Information Systems, 12: 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Thomas Olsson, Else Lagerstam, Tuula Kärkkäinen, and Kaisa Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila. 2013. Expected user experience of mobile augmented reality services: A user study in the context of shopping centres. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17, 2: 287--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. J. Paul Peter and Jerry C. Olson. 2009. Consumer Behavior & Marketing Strategy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosalind W Picard. 1999. Affective Computing for HCI. In Proceedings of the 8th HCI International on Human-Computer Interaction: Ergonomics and User Interfaces.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Lev Poretski, Ofer Arazy, Joel Lanir, Shalev Shahar, and Oded Nov. 2019. Virtual objects in the physical world: Relatedness and psychological ownership in augmented reality. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings: 1--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Atieh Poushneh. 2018. Augmented reality in retail: A trade-off between user's control of access to personal information and augmentation quality. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Atieh Poushneh and Arturo Z. Vasquez-Parraga. 2017. Discernible impact of augmented reality on retail customer's experience, satisfaction and willingness to buy. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Todd Powers, Dorothy Advincula, Manila S. Austin, Stacy Graiko, and Jasper Snyder. 2012. Digital and social media in the purchase-decision process: A special report from the advertising research foundation. Journal of Advertising Research.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Scott Rick and George F. Loewenstein. 2012. The Role of Emotion in Economic Behavior. SSRN Electronic Journal. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Giuseppe Riva, Fabrizia Mantovani, Claret Samantha Capideville, Alessandra Preziosa, Francesca Morganti, Daniela Villani, Andrea Gaggioli, Cristina Botella, and Mariano Alcañiz. 2007. Affective interactions using virtual reality: The link between presence and emotions. Cyberpsychology and Behavior. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Tobias Röddiger, Dominik Doerner, and Michael Beigl. 2018. ARMart: AR-Based Shopping Assistant to Choose and Find Store Items. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Joint Conference and 2018 International Symposium on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Wearable Computers (UbiComp '18), 440--443. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Giuseppe Scavo. 2016. Technical Report: UX Design for Enterprise Augmented Reality.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Joachim Scholz and Andrew N. Smith. 2016. Augmented reality: Designing immersive experiences that maximize consumer engagement. Business Horizons. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Elaine Sherman, Anil Mathur, and Ruth Belk Smith. 1997. Store environment and consumer purchase behavior: Mediating role of consumer emotions. Psychology and Marketing. <361::AID-MAR4>3.0.CO;2--7 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Maximilian Speicher, Brian D. Hall, and Michael Nebeling. 2019. What is mixed reality? In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Heikki Tyni, Annakaisa Kultima, and Frans Mäyrä. 2013. Dimensions of Hybrid in Playful Products. In Proceedings of International Conference on Making Sense of Converging Media, 237--244. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Melanie Wallendorf and Eric J. Arnould. 1988. "My Favorite Things": A Cross-Cultural Inquiry into Object Attachment, Possessiveness, and Social Linkage. Journal of Consumer Research. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Chao Wang, Yihao Feng, Qi Guo, Zhaoxian Li, Kexin Liu, Zijian Tang, Anthony K H Tung, Lifu Wu, and Yuxin Zheng. 2017. ARShop: A Cloud-based Augmented Reality System for Shopping. Proc. VLDB Endow. 10, 12: 1845--1848. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Volker Wulf, Markus Rohde, Volkmar Pipek, and Gunnar Stevens. 2011. Engaging with Practices: Design Case Studies as a Research Framework in CSCW. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 505--512. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. VacuumCleanAR: augmented reality-based self-explanatory physical artifacts

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MuC '20: Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2020
      September 2020
      523 pages
      ISBN:9781450375405
      DOI:10.1145/3404983

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 September 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader