skip to main content
10.1145/3406324.3410719acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Understanding Decline in Medical Video Consultation: A User-Centred Approach

Published:25 February 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The world’s population is growing and ageing. Consequently, the demand for health care services increases, which leads to the need for health care providers to find new ways to provide services. Video consultations (VCs) are a cost-efficient way to address this problem. However, they can only work if both health professionals and patients trust and make use of VC systems. We describe our work on determining the reasons behind why the use of VC declined after an initial period of intensive use at a local Dutch medical centre. Questioning patients why they no longer contact their doctors via video was not possible as it would violate privacy law. We propose an alternative method that combines interviews with medical professionals and vignette studies, which can be used to follow up with patients potentially using VCs. We provide a set of lessons learned, which can support future inquiries in the medical domain.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3406324.3410719.mp4

mp4

125.7 MB

References

  1. Rikke Aarhus, Stinne Aaløkke Ballegaard, and Thomas Riisgaard Hansen. 2009. The eDiary: Bridging home and hospital through healthcare technology. In ECSCW 2009. Springer, 63–83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Deepti Aggarwal. 2016. Supporting Bodily Communication in Video-based Clinical Consultations. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(San Jose, California, USA) (CHI EA ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 188–192. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2859019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Deepti Aggarwal, Bernd Ploderer, Frank Vetere, Mark Bradford, and Thuong Hoang. 2016. Doctor, Can You See My Squats? Understanding Bodily Communication in Video Consultations for Physiotherapy. In Proceedings of DIS ’16 (Brisbane, QLD, Australia). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1197–1208. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901871Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Deepti Aggarwal, Weiyi Zhang, Thuong Hoang, Bernd Ploderer, Frank Vetere, and Mark Bradford. 2017. SoPhy: A Wearable Technology for Lower Limb Assessment in Video Consultations of Physiotherapy. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3916–3928. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025489Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Herman Aguinis and Kyle J Bradley. 2014. Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organizational Research Methods 17, 4 (2014), 351–371.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Christiane Atzmüller and Peter M Steiner. 2010. Experimental vignette studies in survey research. Methodology (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ann Blandford, Dominic Furniss, and Stephann Makri. 2016. Qualitative HCI research: Going behind the scenes. Vol. 9. Morgan & Claypool Publishers. 1–115 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ann E. Blandford. 2013. Semi-structured qualitative studies. Interaction Design Foundation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Fred D Davis. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly (1989), 319–340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Heather A. Faucett, Matthew L. Lee, and Scott Carter. 2017. I Should Listen More: Real-Time Sensing and Feedback of Non-Verbal Communication in Video Telehealth. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW, Article 44 (Dec. 2017), 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134679Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. David Gefen. 2000. E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust. Omega 28, 6 (2000), 725–737.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Stephanie M Merritt, Heather Heimbaugh, Jennifer LaChapell, and Deborah Lee. 2013. I trust it, but I don’t know why: Effects of implicit attitudes toward automation on trust in an automated system. Human factors 55, 3 (2013), 520–534.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Francisco Nunes, Nervo Verdezoto, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Morten Kyng, Erik Grönvall, and Cristiano Storni. 2015. Self-Care Technologies in HCI: Trends, Tensions, and Opportunities. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 22, 6, Article 33 (Dec. 2015), 45 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2803173Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MobileHCI '20: 22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
    October 2020
    248 pages
    ISBN:9781450380522
    DOI:10.1145/3406324

    Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 25 February 2021

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • extended-abstract
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format