Lavinia Paganini
ABSTRACT
Hackathons are a sort of application development marathon typically lasting between 24 and 48 hours. They are increasingly becoming an alternative and popular method for fast learning and networking, bringing people together in a short period to do creative projects. However, the number of women participating in such events is extremely low and worrying, and literature lacks empirical evidence about the reasons for that. This qualitative study gathers data and brings a discussion about this topic, as an attempt to understand better why women are not so interested in this type of event. We interviewed participants of a female-focused hackathon and tried to (1) understand reasons for women not participating in hackathons; (2) understand motivational aspects; and (3) understand the main problems concerning gender in hackathons.
- [n.d.]. Annual Report - Google Diversity. Available at:<https://diversity.google/annual-report/>.Google Scholar
- [n.d.]. Apple - Inclusion & Diversity. Available at:<https://www.apple.com/diversity/>.Google Scholar
- [n.d.]. Diversify – Creating a Hackathon with 50/50 Female and Male Participants. Available at:<https://labs.spotify.com/2015/01/13/diversify-how-we-created-a-hackathon-with-50-50-female-male-participants/>.Google Scholar
- [n.d.]. Diversity and inclusion update: The journey continues. Available at:<https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2018/11/14/diversity-and-inclusion-update-the-journey-continues/>.Google Scholar
- [n.d.]. Women in Computer Science: Getting Involved in STEM. Available at:<https://www.computerscience.org/resources/women-in-computer-science/>.Google Scholar
- Sylvia Beyer. 2014. Why are women underrepresented in Computer Science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades. Computer Science Education 24, 2-3 (2014), 153–192.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gerard Briscoe. 2014. Digital innovation: The hackathon phenomenon. (2014).Google Scholar
- Jeffrey C Carver and Alexander Serebrenik. 2019. Gender in software engineering. IEEE Software 36, 6 (2019), 76–78.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sapna Cheryan, Allison Master, and Andrew N Meltzoff. 2015. Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: Increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in psychology 6 (2015), 49.Google Scholar
- Sapna Cheryan, Victoria C Plaut, Paul G Davies, and Claude M Steele. 2009. Ambient belonging: how stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science.Journal of personality and social psychology 97, 6(2009), 1045.Google Scholar
- Adrienne Decker, Kurt Eiselt, and Kimberly Voll. 2015. Understanding and improving the culture of hackathons: Think global hack local. In 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 1–8.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cristina Díaz-García, Angela González-Moreno, and Francisco Jose Sáez-Martínez. 2013. Gender diversity within R&D teams: Its impact on radicalness of innovation. Innovation 15, 2 (2013), 149–160.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wendy M DuBow, Beth A Quinn, Gloria Childress Townsend, Rosario Robinson, and Valerie Barr. 2016. Efforts to make computer science more inclusive of women. ACM Inroads 7, 4 (2016), 74–80.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cláudia Letícia Ferraz Dutra and Kiev Gama. 2018. Participação feminina em game jams: um estudo sobre igualdade de gêneros em maratonas de desenvolvimento de jogos. In 12º Women in Information Technology (WIT 2018), Vol. 12. SBC.Google Scholar
- National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (US)(NCSES). 2019. Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. (2019).Google Scholar
- Allan Fowler, Foaad Khosmood, Ali Arya, and Gorm Lai. 2013. The global game jam for teaching and learning. In Proccedings of the 4th Annual Conference on Computing and Information Technology Research and Education New Zealand. 28–34.Google Scholar
- Carol Frieze and Jeria L Quesenberry. 2019. How computer science at CMU is attracting and retaining women. Commun. ACM 62, 2 (2019), 23–26.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kiev Gama. 2017. Crowdsourced Software Development in Civic Apps - Motivations of Civic Hackathons Participants. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Volume 2. 550–555.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jennifer L Glass, Sharon Sassler, Yael Levitte, and Katherine M Michelmore. 2013. What’s so special about STEM? A comparison of women’s retention in STEM and professional occupations. Social forces 92, 2 (2013), 723–756.Google Scholar
- William Goddard, Richard Byrne, and Florian’Floyd’ Mueller. 2014. Playful game jams: guidelines for designed outcomes. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interactive Entertainment. ACM, 1–10.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Denise Gürer. 2002. Women in Computing History. SIGCSE Bull. 34, 2 (June 2002), 116–120. https://doi.org/10.1145/543812.543843Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vivian Hunt, Sara Prince, Sundiatu Dixon-Fyle, and Lareina Yee. 2018. Delivering through diversity. Mckinsey & Company. Retrieved July 26 (2018), 2018.Google Scholar
- Stefanie K Johnson. 2017. What 11 CEOs Have Learned About Championing Diversity. Harvard Business Review(2017).Google Scholar
- Peter EJ Kemp, Billy Wong, and Miles G Berry. 2019. Female performance and participation in computer science: a national picture. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 20, 1 (2019), 1–28.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brittany Ann Kos. 2018. The Collegiate Hackathon Experience. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. ACM, 274–275.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brittany Ann Kos. 2019. Understanding Female-Focused Hackathon Participants’ Collaboration Styles and Event Goals. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Game Jams, Hackathons and Game Creation Events 2019. ACM, 5.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Annakaisa Kultima. 2015. Defining Game Jam.. In FDG.Google Scholar
- Maria Lugones and Pat Alaka Rosezelle. 1995. Sisterhood and friendship as feminist models. Feminism and community(1995), 135–145.Google Scholar
- Arnab Nandi and Meris Mandernach. 2016. Hackathons as an informal learning platform. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education. ACM, 346–351.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lavinia Paganini and Kiev Gama. 2020. A preliminary study about the low engagement of female participation in hackathons. In 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops (ICSEW’20), May 23–29, 2020, Seoul, Republic of Korea. IEEE / ACM, 193–194. https://doi.org/10.1145/3387940.3392163Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gabriela T Richard, Yasmin B Kafai, Barrie Adleberg, and Orkan Telhan. 2015. StitchFest: Diversifying a College Hackathon to broaden participation and perceptions in computing. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM technical symposium on computer science education. ACM, 114–119.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Johnny Saldana. 2011. Fundamentals of qualitative research. OUP USA.Google Scholar
- Anastasia Salter. 2017. Code before content? Brogrammer culture in games and electronic literature. Hyperrhiz: New Media Cultures17 (2017).Google Scholar
- Jane G Stout and Heather M Wright. 2016. Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Students’ Sense of Belonging in Computing: An Intersectional Approach. Computing in Science & Engineering 18, 3 (2016), 24–30.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Erik H Trainer, Arun Kalyanasundaram, Chalalai Chaihirunkarn, and James D Herbsleb. 2016. How to hackathon: Socio-technical tradeoffs in brief, intensive collocation. In proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing. ACM, 1118–1130.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bogdan Vasilescu, Daryl Posnett, Baishakhi Ray, Mark GJ van den Brand, Alexander Serebrenik, Premkumar Devanbu, and Vladimir Filkov. 2015. Gender and tenure diversity in GitHub teams. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 3789–3798.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jeremy Warner and Philip J Guo. 2017. Hack. edu: Examining how college hackathons are perceived by student attendees and non-attendees. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. ACM, 254–262.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anita Williams Woolley, Christopher F Chabris, Alex Pentland, Nada Hashmi, and Thomas W Malone. 2010. Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. science 330, 6004 (2010), 686–688.Google Scholar
- Stuart Zweben and Betsy Bizot. 2015. 2014 Taulbee Survey. Computing Research Association 27, 5 (2015).Google Scholar
- Stuart Zweben and Betsy Bizot. 2019. 2018 Taulbee Survey. Computing Research Association May 2019 (2019).Google Scholar
Recommendations
What Do Hackathons Do? Understanding Participation in Hackathons Through Program Theory Analysis
CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsHackathons are increasingly embraced across diverse sectors as a way of democratizing the design of technology. Several attempts have been made to redefine the format and desired end goal of hackathons in recent years thereby warranting closer ...
10 Years of Research With and On Hackathons
DIS '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems ConferenceHackathon formats have been praised for their potential for promoting innovative thinking and making in a short time-frame. For this reason, hackathons have also been embraced by many researchers who use hackathons as part of their research in various ...
Understanding Female-Focused Hackathon Participants' Collaboration Styles and Event Goals
ICGJ '19: Proceedings of the International Conference on Game Jams, Hackathons and Game Creation Events 2019Collegiate hackathons are informal learning environments where students build new projects in a limited amount of time and often compete for prizes. Previous hackathon research has shown that students go to these events to learn new technical skills, ...
Comments