skip to main content
10.1145/3410670.3410861acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Can IoT Wearable Devices Feed Frugal Innovation?

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 September 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recently, there has been a lot of talk about Frugal services, that is, services that use existing technologies for a purpose other than the one for which they were designed. In this paper, we study whether the IoT wearable environment can be a fertile ground for the production of Frugal services. Through a real-world study, we investigate whether these devices are widespread, if there are obstacles that limit their diffusion, if the sensors they are equipped with are deemed reliable and, finally, if people who own them have an altruistic propensity or not. The results, from the frugal point of view, are encouraging: the IoT wearable environment seems to be pervasive enough and ubiquitous, without great obstacles for their adoption. The provided sensors seem to be generally reliable, whereas the altruistic propensity might be questioned: in general, people are not inclined to share, but if the goal is clear (in our case we hypothesized a fight against Covid-19), altruistic propensity grows a lot.

References

  1. Luke Nelson Allen and Gillian Pepall Christie. 2016. The emergence of personalized health technology. Journal of medical Internet research 18, 5 (2016), e99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Andrew Bastawrous, Mario Ettore Giardini, Nigel M Bolster, Tunde Peto, Nisha Shah, Iain AT Livingstone, Helen A Weiss, Sen Hu, Hillary Rono, Hannah Kuper, et al. 2016. Clinical validation of a smartphone-based adapter for optic disc imaging in Kenya. JAMA ophthalmology 134, 2 (2016), 151--158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Armir Bujari, Marco Furini, Federica Mandreoli, Riccardo Martoglia, Manuela Montangero, and Daniele Ronzani. 2017. Standards, Security and Business Models: Key Challenges for the IoT Scenario. Mobile Networks and Applications (2017), 1--8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-017-0835-8 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Angelica Moreno Cardenas, Miguel Kiyoshy Nakamura Pinto, Ermanno Pietrosemoli, Marco Zennaro, Marco Rainone, and Pietro Manzoni. 2018. A LoRa enabled sustainable messaging system for isolated communities. In Proceedings of the 4th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good. 118--123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Angelica Moreno Cardenas, Miguel Kiyoshy Nakamura Pinto, Ermanno Pietrosemoli, Marco Zennaro, Marco Rainone, and Pietro Manzoni. 2019. A Low-Cost and Low-Power Messaging System Based on the LoRa Wireless Technology. Mobile Networks and Applications (2019), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dario Deponti, Dario Maggiorini, and Claudio E Palazzi. 2009. DroidGlove: An android-based application for wrist rehabilitation. In 2009 International Conference on Ultra Modern Telecommunications & Workshops. IEEE, 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Maria Federico and Marco Furini. 2014. An automatic caption alignment mechanism for off-the-shelf speech recognition technologies. Multimedia Tools and Applications 72, 1 (2014), 21--40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-012-1318-3 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cat Ferguson. 2013. Discarded cellphones could protect the Indonesian rainforest.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Stefano Ferretti, Marco Furini, Claudio E. Palazzi, Marco Roccetti, and Paola Salomoni. 2010. WWW recycling for a better world. Commun. ACM 53, 4 (April 2010), 139--143. https://doi.org/10.1145/1721654.1721692 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Silvia Figueira. 2014. Empowering the Underserved, One App at a Time. In Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Symposium on Computing for Development. 125--126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Silvia Figueira. 2019. The Enabling Power of Mobile Devices. In 2019 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC). IEEE, 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Silvia Figueira, Kevin Nguyen, and Shweta Panditrao. 2014. HearThat?-An app for diagnosing hearing loss. In IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC 2014). IEEE, 518--524.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Marco Furini, Giovanna Galli, and Maria Cristiana Martini. 2019. An Online Education System to Produce and Distribute Video Lectures. Mobile Networks and Applications (02 Mar 2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-019-01236-4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Marco Furini, Silvia Mirri, Manuela Montangero, and Catia Prandi. 2020. Privacy Perception when Using Smartphone Applications. Mobile Networks and Applications (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-020-01529-zGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Rakhshanda Khan. 2016. How frugal innovation promotes social sustainability. Sustainability 8, 10 (2016), 1034.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Helinä Melkas, Tuija Oikarinen, and Satu Pekkarinen. 2019. Understanding frugal innovation: a case study of university professionals in developed countries. Innovation and Development 9, 1 (2019), 25--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Silvia Mirri, Catia Prandi, and Paola Salomoni. 2016. Personalizing Pedestrian Accessible way-finding with mPASS. In 2016 13th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC). IEEE, 1119--1124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Silvia Mirri, Catia Prandi, Paola Salomoni, Franco Callegati, Andrea Melis, and Marco Prandini. 2016. A service-oriented approach to crowdsensing for accessible smart mobility scenarios. Mobile Information Systems 2016 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sharada P Mohanty, David P Hughes, and Marcel Salathé. 2016. Using deep learning for image-based plant disease detection. Frontiers in plant science 7 (2016), 1419.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Catia Prandi, Valentina Nisi, Paola Salomoni, and Nuno Jardim Nunes. 2015. From gamification to pervasive game in mapping urban accessibility. In Proceedings of the 11th Biannual Conference on Italian SIGCHI Chapter. 126--129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Marco Roccetti, Stefano Ferretti, Claudio E. Palazzi, Marco Furini, and Paola Salomoni. 2008. Riding the Web Evolution: from Egoism to Altruism. In Proceedings of the IEEE Consumer Communication & Networking 2008 (CCNC2008). IEEE Communication Society, 1123--1127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. B. Salgues. 2018. Innovation in Society 5.0. 157--169.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Dinarte Vasconcelos, Nuno Nunes, Miguel Ribeiro, Catia Prandi, and Alex Rogers. 2019. LOCOMOBIS: a low-cost acoustic-based sensing system to monitor and classify mosquitoes. In 2019 16th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC). IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Marco Zennaro, Cristel Pelsser, Franck Albinet, and Pietro Manzoni. 2020. Evaluating the performance of NRENs in deploying IoT in Africa: the case for TTN. In 2020 IEEE 17th Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC). IEEE, 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Marco Zeschky, Bastian Widenmayer, and Oliver Gassmann. 2011. Frugal innovation in emerging markets. Research-Technology Management 54, 4 (2011), 38--45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Can IoT Wearable Devices Feed Frugal Innovation?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      FRUGALTHINGS'20: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Experiences with the Design and Implementation of Frugal Smart Objects
      September 2020
      47 pages
      ISBN:9781450380782
      DOI:10.1145/3410670

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 September 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      FRUGALTHINGS'20 Paper Acceptance Rate7of17submissions,41%Overall Acceptance Rate7of17submissions,41%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader