skip to main content
10.1145/3411763.3441316acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Cycling@CHI: Towards a Research Agenda for HCI in the Bike Lane

Published:08 May 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this workshop, we will explore and discuss future developments in mobile user-interfaces for cyclists and users of similar interfaces or services. We highlight the challenge of balancing safety and ecological validity in experiments, and how novel and improved evaluation methods can improve the current situation. We aim to bring together researchers with a strong background in designing and evaluating novel user interfaces in the domain of bicycles and mobility, as well as practitioners who build consumer products in that domain. The workshop’s goal is to explore novel ways of designing and evaluating user interfaces for cyclists and similar users when it comes to interacting with mobile devices and services on the ride.

References

  1. Alexandru Dancu, Velko Vechev, Adviye Ayça Ünlüer, Simon Nilson, Oscar Nygren, Simon Eliasson, Jean-Elie Barjonet, Joe Marshall, and Morten Fjeld. 2015. Gesture Bike: Examining Projection Surfaces and Turn Signal Systems for Urban Cycling. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Interactive Tabletops & Surfaces (Madeira, Portugal) (ITS ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1145/2817721.2817748Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Dick de Waard, Paul Schepers, Wieke Ormel, and Karel Brookhuis. 2010. Mobile phone use while cycling: Incidence and effects on behaviour and safety. Ergonomics 53, 1 (2010), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130903381180 PMID: 20069479.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. European Transport Safety Council. 2020. HOW SAFE IS WALKING AND CYCLING IN EUROPE? PIN Flash Report 38. (2020). https://etsc.eu/wp-content/uploads/PIN-Flash-38_FINAL.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Michael D Jones, Zann Anderson, Jonna Häkkilä, Keith Cheverst, and Florian Daiber. 2018. HCI outdoors: understanding human-computer interaction in outdoor recreation. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Michael D. Jones, Zann Anderson, Jonna Häkkilä, Keith Cheverst, and Florian Daiber. 2018. HCI Outdoors: Understanding Human-Computer Interaction in Outdoor Recreation. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI EA ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3170624Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Markus Löchtefeld, Antonio Krüger, and Hans Gellersen. 2016. DeceptiBike: Assessing the Perception of Speed Deception in a Virtual Reality Training Bike System. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Gothenburg, Sweden) (NordiCHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 40, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2971513Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Joe Marshall, Alexandru Dancu, and Florian “Floyd” Mueller. 2016. Interaction in Motion: Designing Truly Mobile Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Brisbane, QLD, Australia) (DIS ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901844Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Andrii Matviienko. 2020. Designing Multimodal Assistance Systems for Child Cyclists. OlWIR Verlag für Wirtschaft, Informatik und Recht.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Andrii Matviienko, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Shadan Sadeghian Borojeni, Yannick Feld, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2018. Augmenting Bicycles and Helmets with Multimodal Warnings for Children. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Barcelona, Spain) (MobileHCI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 15, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3229434.3229479Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Andrii Matviienko, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Stephen Brewster, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2019. Comparing Unimodal Lane Keeping Cues for Child Cyclists. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (Pisa, Italy) (MUM ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 14, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3365610.3365632Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Andrii Matviienko, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Abdallah El Ali, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2019. NaviBike: Comparing Unimodal Navigation Cues for Child Cyclists. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300850Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Andrii Matviienko, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Raphael Kappes, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2020. Reminding Child Cyclists about Safety Gestures. In Proceedings of the 9TH ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Manchester, United Kingdom) (PerDis ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3393712.3394120Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Florian ”Floyd” Mueller, Joe Marshall, Rohit Ashok Khot, Stina Nylander, and Jakob Tholander. 2016. Jogging at CHI. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI EA ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1119–1122. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2886435Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. G Norman and N Kesha. 2015. Using smartphones for cycle planning. In IPENZ Transportation Group Conference. 22–24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Steve O’Hern, Jennie Oxley, and Mark Stevenson. 2017. Validation of a bicycle simulator for road safety research. Accident; analysis and prevention 100 (2017), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Martin Pielot, Benjamin Poppinga, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2012. Tacticycle: Supporting Exploratory Bicycle Trips. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (San Francisco, California, USA) (MobileHCI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1145/2371574.2371631Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lukasz Piwek, Adam Joinson, and James Morvan. 2015. The use of self-monitoring solutions amongst cyclists: An online survey and empirical study. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 77 (2015), 126–136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Gustavo Romanillos, Martin Zaltz Austwick, Dick Ettema, and Joost De Kruijf. 2016. Big data and cycling. Transport Reviews 36, 1 (2016), 114–133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Gian-Luca Savino, Niklas Emanuel, Steven Kowalzik, Felix Kroll, Marvin C. Lange, Matthis Laudan, Rieke Leder, Zhanhua Liang, Dayana Markhabayeva, Martin Schmeißer, Nicolai Schütz, Carolin Stellmacher, Zihe Xu, Kerstin Bub, Thorsten Kluss, Jaime Maldonado, Ernst Kruijff, and Johannes Schöning. 2019. Comparing Pedestrian Navigation Methods in Virtual Reality and Real Life. In 2019 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (Suzhou, China) (ICMI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340555.3353741Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Miriam Sturdee, Paul Coulton, Joseph G Lindley, Mike Stead, Haider Ali, and Andy Hudson-Smith. 2016. Design fiction: How to build a Voight-Kampff machine. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892574Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sylvaine Tuncer and Barry Brown. 2020. E-scooters on the Ground: Lessons for Redesigning Urban Micro-Mobility. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Tamara von Sawitzky, Thomas Grauschopf, and Andreas Riener. 2020. The Next Stage of Road Traffic Education: A Mixed Reality Bicycle Simulator to Improve Cyclist Safety. In GI VR / AR Workshop, Benjamin Weyers, Christoph Lürig, and Daniel Zielasko(Eds.). Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.https://doi.org/10.18420/vrar2020_31Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Tamara von Sawitzky, Thomas Grauschopf, and Andreas Riener. 2020. No Need to Slow Down! A Head-up Display Based Warning System for Cyclists for Safe Passage of Parked Vehicles. In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Virtual Event, DC, USA) (AutomotiveUI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409251.3411708Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Tamara von Sawitzky, Philipp Wintersberger, Andreas Löcken, Anna-Katharina Frison, and Andreas Riener. 2020. Augmentation Concepts with HUDs for Cyclists to Improve Road Safety in Shared Spaces. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3383022Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Pawel W. Woźniak, Lex Dekker, Francisco Kiss, Ella Velner, Andrea Kuijt, and Stella F. Donker. 2020. Brotate and Tribike: Designing Smartphone Control for Cycling(MobileHCI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3379503.3405660Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Cycling@CHI: Towards a Research Agenda for HCI in the Bike Lane
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2021
      2965 pages
      ISBN:9781450380959
      DOI:10.1145/3411763

      Copyright © 2021 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 May 2021

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • extended-abstract
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format