skip to main content
10.1145/3411763.3451733acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

InterRings: Towards Understanding Design Micro-games to Fit Daily Work Routine

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 May 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Prior game researchers mostly focused on designing the ”macro” context which requires a decent proportion of time to engage and play, from which players may benefit. However, the demanding time and effort restrict playability during working hours. To our knowledge, there is little research exploring game design in a manner that enables momentary detachment from primary work for a mind refreshment and effortlessly resumes the suspended work after playing. In this paper, we propose a novel micro-game concept that enables the gamification of micro-breaks within working hours. To examine our concept, we adapted a conventional water-ring game into an interactive prototype, InterRings, which empowers users to play with handy objects. Our mixed observational studies and interviews revealed high acceptability and feasibility of the micro-game concept. Conclusively, three design guidelines are summarised for future development of micro-games.

References

  1. [n.d.]. Running dinosaur Game - Chrome Web Store. https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/running-dinosaur-game/nihmppmidbbbkfademfpjmhhogegjbjd. (Accessed on 02/20/2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [n.d.]. Star Wars: Tales from the Galaxy’s Edge. https://www.oculus.com/experiences/quest/3484270071659289. (Accessed on 02/20/2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [n.d.]. Teachable Machine. https://teachablemachine.withgoogle.com/. (Accessed on 01/02/2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Espen Aarseth, Solveig Marie Smedstad, and Lise Sunnanå. 2003. A multidimensional typology of games.. In DiGRA Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Vasundhara Agrawal, Varnika Naik, Mayuri Duggirala, and Sandeep Athavale. 2020. Color Me: A Game based on Art Therapy for Mental Health. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. 158–162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Thomas H Apperley. 2006. Genre and game studies: Toward a critical approach to video game genres. Simulation & Gaming 37, 1 (2006), 6–23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Liam Bannon, Allen Cypher, Steven Greenspan, and Melissa L Monty. 1983. Evaluation and analysis of users’ activity organization. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 54–57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Damon Brown. 2006. Playing to win: Video games and the fight against obesity. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 106, 2(2006), 188–189.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Paul Ed Cairns and Anna L Cox. 2008. Research methods for human-computer interaction.Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Emily Collins and Anna L Cox. 2014. Switch on to games: Can digital games aid post-work recovery?International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 72, 8-9 (2014), 654–662.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Anna L Cox, Sandy JJ Gould, Marta E Cecchinato, Ioanna Iacovides, and Ian Renfree. 2016. Design frictions for mindful interactions: The case for microboundaries. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1389–1397.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Douglas Easterly and Angela Blachnitzky. 2009. UbiBall: A Ubiquitous Computing Game for Children. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/1621841.1621850Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Christian Elverdam and Espen Aarseth. 2007. Game Classification and Game Design: Construction Through Critical Analysis. Games and Culture 2, 1 (2007), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412006286892 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412006286892Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Alex Frazer, David Argles, and Gary Wills. 2007. Is less actually more? The usefulness of educational mini-games. In Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007). IEEE, 533–537.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Tim Gabbett, David Jenkins, and Bruce Abernethy. 2009. Game-based training for improving skill and physical fitness in team sport athletes. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching 4, 2 (2009), 273–283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Victor M González and Gloria Mark. 2004. ” Constant, constant, multi-tasking craziness” managing multiple working spheres. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 113–120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lindsay Grace, G Tanner Jackson, Christopher Totten, Julian Parker, and Joyce Rice. 2015. Designing microgames for Assessment: A case study in rapid prototype iteration. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology. 1–4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Lindsay D Grace. 2012. Making and analyzing games: not as art, but as literature. In Proceeding of the 16th International Academic MindTrek Conference. 237–240.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Stephanie Heintz and Effie Lai-Chong Law. 2015. The Game Genre Map: A Revised Game Classification. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (London, United Kingdom) (CHI PLAY ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2793123Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ioanna Iacovides, Anna L Cox, Patrick McAndrew, James Aczel, and Eileen Scanlon. 2015. Game-play breakdowns and breakthroughs: exploring the relationship between action, understanding, and involvement. Human–computer interaction 30, 3-4 (2015), 202–231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Klaus P Jantke. 2006. Games that do not exist communication design beyond the current limits. In Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication. 35–42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Dagmar Kern, Mark Stringer, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2006. Curball–a prototype tangible game for inter-generational play. In 15th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE’06). IEEE, 412–418.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Sooyeol Kim, YoungAh Park, and Qikun Niu. 2017. Micro-break activities at work to recover from daily work demands. Journal of Organizational Behavior 38, 1 (2017), 28–44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Simone Kühn, Tobias Gleich, Robert C Lorenz, Ulman Lindenberger, and Jürgen Gallinat. 2014. Playing Super Mario induces structural brain plasticity: gray matter changes resulting from training with a commercial video game. Molecular psychiatry 19, 2 (2014), 265–271.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Gierad Laput, Karan Ahuja, Mayank Goel, and Chris Harrison. 2018. Ubicoustics: Plug-and-Play Acoustic Activity Recognition. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242587.3242609Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Kate E. Lee, Kathryn J.H. Williams, Leisa D. Sargent, Nicholas S.G. Williams, and Katherine A. Johnson. 2015. 40-second green roof views sustain attention: The role of micro-breaks in attention restoration. Journal of Environmental Psychology 42 (2015), 182 – 189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.04.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Tsung-Yu Liu and Yu-Ling Chu. 2010. Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers & Education 55, 2 (2010), 630 – 643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.023Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Kalle Lyytinen and Youngjin Yoo. 2002. Ubiquitous computing. Commun. ACM 45, 12 (2002), 63–96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Tony Manninen. 2002. Contextual virtual interaction as part of ubiquitous game design and development. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 6, 5-6 (2002), 390–406.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Javier Marco, Eva Cerezo, and Sandra Baldassarri. 2009. Evaluating a tangible game video console for kids. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 141–144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Henry Mintzberg. 2019. Structured observation as a method to study managerial work. Journal of (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Chris T Panagiotakopoulos. 2011. Applying a Conceptual Mini Game for Supporting Simple Mathematical Calculation Skills: Students’ Perceptions and Considerations.World Journal of Education 1, 1 (2011), 3–14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Leonard Reinecke. 2009. Games at work: The recreational use of computer games during working hours. CyberPsychology & Behavior 12, 4 (2009), 461–465.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Kay Römer and Svetlana Domnitcheva. 2002. Smart playing cards: A ubiquitous computing game. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 6, 5-6 (2002), 371–377.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Jeffrey Rzeszotarski, Ed Chi, Praveen Paritosh, and Peng Dai. 2013. Inserting micro-breaks into crowdsourcing workflows. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, Vol. 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. José-Manuel Sáez-López Sáez-López, M Luisa Sevillano-García Sevillano-García, M Ángeles Pascual-Sevillano Pascual-Sevillano, José-Manuel Sáez-López, María Luisa Sevillano-García-García, and María de los Ángeles Pascual-Sevillano. 2019. Application of the ubiquitous game with augmented reality in Primary Education. Comunicar. Media Education Research Journal 27, 2 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Peter A Smith and Alicia Sanchez. 2010. Mini-games with major impacts. In Serious game design and development: Technologies for training and learning. IGI Global, 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Stan W. Smith. 2010. An experiment in bibliographic mark-up: Parsing metadata for XML export. In Proceedings of the 3rd. annual workshop on Librarians and Computers(LAC ’10, Vol. 3), Reginald N. Smythe and Alexander Noble (Eds.). Paparazzi Press, Milan Italy, 422–431. https://doi.org/99.9999/woot07-S422Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. John P Trougakos and Ivona Hideg. 2009. Momentary work recovery: The role of within-day work breaks. In Current perspectives on job-stress recovery. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Matthew Wilkinson and Caitlin Demsky. 2016. Micro Breaks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Hannes Zacher, Holly A Brailsford, and Stacey L Parker. 2014. Micro-breaks matter: A diary study on the effects of energy management strategies on occupational well-being. Journal of Vocational Behavior 85, 3 (2014), 287–297.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. X. Zhai, Y. Dong, and J. Yuan. 2018. Investigating Learners’ Technology Engagement - A Perspective From Ubiquitous Game-Based Learning in Smart Campus. IEEE Access 6(2018), 10279–10287. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2805758Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. InterRings: Towards Understanding Design Micro-games to Fit Daily Work Routine
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CHI EA '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            May 2021
            2965 pages
            ISBN:9781450380959
            DOI:10.1145/3411763

            Copyright © 2021 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 8 May 2021

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • poster
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

            Upcoming Conference

            CHI PLAY '24
            The Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play
            October 14 - 17, 2024
            Tampere , Finland

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format