Sarah Sebo
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Autonomous robots are increasingly placed in contexts that require them to interact with groups of people rather than just a single individual. Interactions with groups of people introduce nuanced challenges for robots, since robots? actions influence both individual group members and complex group dynamics. We review the unique roles robots can play in groups, finding that small changes in their nonverbal behavior and personality impacts group behavior and, by extension, influences ongoing interpersonal interactions.
- Ruth Ablett, Ehud Sharlin, Frank Maurer, Jorg Denzinger, and Craig Schock. 2007. BuildBot: Robotic Monitoring of Agile Software Development Teams. In Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN '07). IEEE Press, Jeju, South Korea, 931--936. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2007.4415217Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Anna MH Abrams and Astrid M Rosenthal-von der Pütten. 2020. I--C--E Framework: Concepts for Group Dynamics Research in Human-Robot Interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics (2020), 1--17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00642-zGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Minoo Alemi, Ashkan Ghanbarzadeh, Ali Meghdari, and Leila Jafari Moghadam. 2016. Clinical Application of a Humanoid Robot in Pediatric Cancer Interventions. International Journal of Social Robotics, Vol. 8, 5 (01 Nov 2016), 743--759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0294-yGoogle Scholar
- Minoo Alemi, Ali Meghdari, and M. Ghazisaedy. 2015. The Impact of Social Robotics on L2 Learners' Anxiety and Attitude in English Vocabulary Acquisition. International Journal of Social Robotics, Vol. 7, 4 (01 Aug 2015), 523--535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0286-yGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Philipp Althaus, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Takayuki Kanda, Takahiro Miyashita, and Henrik Christensen. 2004. Navigation for human-robot interaction tasks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA '04). IEEE Press, New Orleans, LA, USA, 1894--1900. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2004.1308100Google ScholarCross Ref
- Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, Tiago Ribeiro, Sofia Petisca, Eugenio Di Tullio, Francisco Melo, and Ana Paiva. 2015. An Empathic Robotic Tutor for School Classrooms: Considering Expectation and Satisfaction of Children as End-Users. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, Cham, 21--30. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4789.9604Google ScholarCross Ref
- Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, Pedro Sequeira, and Ana Paiva. 2016. The Role that an Educational Robot Plays. In Proceedings of the 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN '16). IEEE Press, New York, NY, USA, 817--822. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745213Google ScholarDigital Library
- Linda Argote and Paul S. Goodman. 1985. The organizational implications of robotics. In Managing Technological Innovation, D.D. Davis (Ed.). Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, USA, 127--153.Google Scholar
- Linda Argote, Paul S. Goodman, and David Schkade. 1983. The Human Side of Robotics: How Workers React to a Robot. Sloan Management Review, Vol. 24 (June 1983), 19--32.Google Scholar
- Solomon E Asch. 1951. Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. Organizational Influence Processes (1951), 295--303.Google Scholar
- Ritta Baddoura and Gentiane Venture. 2013. Social vs. Useful HRI: Experiencing the Familiar, Perceiving the Robot as a Sociable Partner and Responding to Its Actions. International Journal of Social Robotics, Vol. 5, 4 (Nov 2013), 529--547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0207-xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Wilma A Bainbridge, Justin W Hart, Elizabeth S Kim, and Brian Scassellati. 2011. The benefits of interactions with physically present robots over video-displayed agents. International Journal of Social Robotics, Vol. 3, 1 (2011), 41--52.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Adrian Keith Ball, David C. Rye, David Silvera-Tawil, and Mari Velonaki. 2017. How Should a Robot Approach Two People? Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, Vol. 6, 3 (Dec. 2017), 71--91. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.6.3.BallGoogle ScholarDigital Library
- Andrew Scott Baron and Yarrow Dunham. 2015. Representing 'us' and 'them': Building blocks of intergroup cognition. Journal of Cognition and Development, Vol. 16, 5 (2015), 780--801.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Matt Beane and Wanda J. Orlikowski. 2015. What difference does a robot make? The material enactment of distributed coordination. Organization Science, Vol. 26, 6 (07 10 2015), 1553--1573. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1004Google Scholar
- Tony Belpaeme, James Kennedy, Aditi Ramachandran, Brian Scassellati, and Fumihide Tanaka. 2018. Social robots for education: A review. Science Robotics, Vol. 3, 21 (2018), eaat5954.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dan Bohus, Chit W. Saw, and Eric Horvitz. 2014. Directions Robot: In-the-wild Experiences and Lessons Learned. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (Paris, France) (AAMAS '14). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC, 637--644. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2615731.2615835Google Scholar
- Serena Booth, James Tompkin, Hanspeter Pfister, Jim Waldo, Krzysztof Gajos, and Radhika Nagpal. 2017. Piggybacking robots: Human-robot overtrust in university dormitory security. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '17). ACM, Vienna, Austria, 426--434.Google ScholarDigital Library
- David P Brandon and Andrea B Hollingshead. 2004. Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organization Science, Vol. 15, 6 (2004), 633--644.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Drazen Brscić, Hiroyuki Kidokoro, Yoshitaka Suehiro, and Takayuki Kanda. 2015. Escaping from Children's Abuse of Social Robots. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Portland, Oregon, USA) (HRI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 59--66. https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696468Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shruti Chandra, Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, Séverin Lemaignan, Pedro Sequeira, Ana Paiva, and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2015. Can a Child Feel Responsible for Another in the Presence of a Robot in a Collaborative Learning Activity?. In Proceedings of the 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN '16). IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 167--172. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2015.7333678Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shruti Chandra, Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, Séverin Lemaignan, Pedro Sequeira, Ana Paiva, and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2016. Children's Peer Assessment and Self-disclosure in the Presence of an Educational Robot. In Proceedings of the 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 539--544. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745170Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wan-Ling Chang, Selma vS abanović, and Lesa Huber. 2013. Situated Analysis of Interactions between Cognitively Impaired Older Adults and the Therapeutic Robot PARO. In Social Robotics, Guido Herrmann, Martin J. Pearson, Alexander Lenz, Paul Bremner, Adam Spiers, and Ute Leonards (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 371--380.Google Scholar
- Wan-Ling Chang, Jeremy P. White, Joohyun Park, Anna Holm, and Selma vS abanović. 2012. The effect of group size on people's attitudes and cooperative behaviors toward robots in interactive gameplay. In Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN '12). IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 845--850. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343857Google ScholarCross Ref
- Caitlyn Clabaugh and Maja Matarić. 2019. Escaping Oz: Autonomy in Socially Assistive Robotics. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, Vol. 2 (2019), 33--61.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Margaret S Clark and Judson Mils. 1993. The difference between communal and exchange relationships: What it is and is not. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 19, 6 (1993), 684--691.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Susan G. Cohen and Diane E. Bailey. 1997. What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite. Journal of Management, Vol. 23, 3 (01 06 1997), 239--290. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300303Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michol A. Cooper, Andrew Ibrahim, Heather Lyu, and Martin Makary. 2013. Underreporting of Robotic Surgery Complications. Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality, Vol. 37 (08 2013), 133--138. https://doi.org/10.1111/jhq.12036Google Scholar
- Filipa Correia, Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, Nuno Maia, Tiago Ribeiro, Sofia Petisca, Francisco Melo, and Ana Paiva. 2016. Just follow the suit! Trust in Human-Robot Interactions during Card Game Playing. In Proceedings of the 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE Press, New York, NY, USA, 507--512. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745165Google ScholarDigital Library
- Filipa Correia, Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, Tiago Ribeiro, Francisco Melo, and Ana Paiva. 2017a. A social robot as a card game player. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment (AIIDE '17). AAAI, Little Cottonwood Canyon, UT, USA, 23--29.Google Scholar
- Filipa Correia, Samuel Mascarenhas, Rui Prada, Francisco S. Melo, and Ana Paiva. 2018. Group-based Emotions in Teams of Humans and Robots. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Chicago, IL, USA) (HRI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 261--269. https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171252Google ScholarDigital Library
- Filipa Correia, Sofia Petisca, Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, Tiago Ribeiro, Francisco S. Melo, and Ana Paiva. 2017b. Groups of humans and robots: Understanding membership preferences and team formation. In Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS '17). RSS, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1--10. https://doi.org/10.15607/RSS.2017.XIII.024Google ScholarCross Ref
- Filipa Correia, Sofia Petisca, Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, Tiago Ribeiro, Francisco S. Melo, and Ana Paiva. 2019. “I Choose... YOU!” Membership preferences in human--robot teams. Autonomous Robots, Vol. 43, 2 (01 Feb 2019), 359--373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-018--9767--9Google Scholar
- Eric Deng, Bilge Mutlu, and Maja J Mataric. 2019. Embodiment in Socially Interactive Robots. Foundations and Trends in Robotics, Vol. 7, 4 (2019), 251--356.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lorin Dole. 2017. The Influence of a Robot's Mere Presence on Human Communication. Ph.D. Dissertation. Ph. D. Dissertation. Stanford University, CA.Google Scholar
- Pieter Duysburgh, Shirley A. Elprama, and An Jacobs. 2014. Exploring the Social-technological Gap in Telesurgery: Collaboration Within Distributed or Teams. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (CSCW '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1537--1548. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531717Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nicholas Epley, Adam Waytz, and John T Cacioppo. 2007. On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, Vol. 114, 4 (2007), 864.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jing Fan, Linda Beuscher, Paul A. Newhouse, Lorraine C. Mion, and Nilanjan Sarkar. 2016. A robotic coach architecture for multi-user human-robot interaction (RAMU) with the elderly and cognitively impaired. In Proceedings of the 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN '16). IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 445--450. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745157Google ScholarDigital Library
- Miguel Faria, Rui Silva, Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, Francisco Melo, and Ana Paiva. 2017. “Me and You Together” Movement Impact in Multi-user Collaboration Tasks. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2793--2798. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2017.8206109Google ScholarCross Ref
- Juan Fasola and M Mataric. 2011. Comparing physical and virtual embodiment in a socially assistive robot exercise coach for the elderly.Google Scholar
- Camino Fernández-Llamas, Miguel Ángel Conde, Francisco J. Rodríguez-Sedano, Francisco J. Rodríguez-Lera, and Vicente Matellán-Olivera. 2017. Analysing the Computational Competences Acquired by K-12 Students When Lectured by Robotic and Human Teachers. International Journal of Social Robotics (Nov 2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0440--9Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kerstin Fischer. 2011. Interpersonal variation in understanding robots as social actors. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. IEEE, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 53--60.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kerstin Fischer. 2019. Why Collaborative Robots Must Be Social (and even Emotional) Actors. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, Vol. 23, 3 (2019), 270--289.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Terrence Fong, Illah Nourbakhsh, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2003. A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Vol. 42, 3--4 (2003), 143--166.Google Scholar
- Jodi Forlizzi. 2007. How Robotic Products Become Social Products: An Ethnographic Study of Cleaning in the Home. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Arlington, Virginia, USA) (HRI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 129--136. https://doi.org/10.1145/1228716.1228734Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jodi Forlizzi and Carl DiSalvo. 2006. Service Robots in the Domestic Environment: A Study of the Roomba Vacuum in the Home. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Salt Lake City, Utah, USA) (HRI '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 258--265. https://doi.org/10.1145/1121241.1121286Google ScholarDigital Library
- Donelson R Forsyth. 2018. Group dynamics .Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Belmont, CA.Google Scholar
- Leopoldina Fortunati, Filippo Cavallo, and Mauro Sarrica. 2018. Multiple Communication Roles in Human--Robot Interactions in Public Space. International Journal of Social Robotics (07 Dec 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0509-0Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mary Ellen Foster, Andre Gaschler, Manuel Giuliani, Amy Isard, Maria Pateraki, and Ronald P.A. Petrick. 2012. Two People Walk into a Bar: Dynamic Multi-party Social Interaction with a Robot Agent. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (Santa Monica, California, USA) (ICMI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3--10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2388676.2388680Google Scholar
- Marlena R Fraune, Selma vS abanović, Eliot R Smith, Yusaku Nishiwaki, and Michio Okada. 2017. Threatening flocks and mindful snowflakes: How group entitativity affects perceptions of robots. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI. IEEE, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 205--213.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marlena R. Fraune, Steven Sherrin, Selma Sabanović, and Eliot R. Smith. 2015. Rabble of Robots Effects: Number and Type of Robots Modulates Attitudes, Emotions, and Stereotypes. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Portland, Oregon, USA) (HRI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 109--116. https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696483Google Scholar
- Marlena R. Fraune, Steven Sherrin, Selma vS abanović, and Eliot R. Smith. 2019. Is Human-Robot Interaction More Competitive Between Groups Than Between Individuals?. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '19). IEEE Press, Daegu, South Korea, 104--113. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673241Google Scholar
- H. Fukuda, Y. Kobayashi, Y. Kuno, A. Yamazaki, K. Ikeda, and K. Yamazaki. 2016. Analysis of multi-party human interaction towards a robot mediator. In Proceedings of the 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN '16). IEEE Press, New York, NY, USA, 17--21. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745085Google Scholar
- Susan R. Fussell, Sara Kiesler, Leslie D. Setlock, and Victoria Yew. 2008. How People Anthropomorphize Robots. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) (HRI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 145--152. https://doi.org/10.1145/1349822.1349842Google ScholarDigital Library
- Raphaela Gehle, Karola Pitsch, Timo Dankert, and Sebastian Wrede. 2015. Trouble-based group dynamics in real-world HRI - Reactions on unexpected next moves of a museum guide robot. In Proceedings of the 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN '15). IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 407--412.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rachel Gockley, Jodi Forlizzi, and Reid Simmons. 2006. Interactions with a Moody Robot. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-robot Interaction (Salt Lake City, Utah, USA) (HRI '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 186--193. https://doi.org/10.1145/1121241.1121274Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matthew C. Gombolay, Reymundo A. Gutierrez, Shanelle G. Clarke, Giancarlo F. Sturla, and Julie A. Shah. 2015. Decision-making authority, team efficiency and human worker satisfaction in mixed human--robot teams. Autonomous Robots, Vol. 39, 3 (01 Oct 2015), 293--312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-015--9457--9Google Scholar
- Michael A. Goodrich and Alan C. Schultz. 2007. Human-robot Interaction: A Survey. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 1, 3 (Jan. 2007), 203--275. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000005Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Mordechai Gottman. 2014. What predicts divorce?: The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes .Psychology Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Victoria Groom and Clifford Nass. 2007. Can robots be teammates? Benchmarks in human-robot teams. Interaction Studies, Vol. 8 (10 2007), 483--500. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.8.3.10groGoogle Scholar
- Jonathan Grudin. 1994. Computer-supported cooperative work: History and focus. Computer, Vol. 27, 5 (1994), 19--26.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jonathan Grudin and Steven Poltrock. 2012. Taxonomy and theory in computer supported cooperative work. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology, Vol. 2 (2012), 1323--1348.Google Scholar
- Jonathan Grudin and Steven E Poltrock. 1997. Computer-supported cooperative work and groupware. Advances in Computers, Vol. 45 (1997), 269--320.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J Richard Hackman and Charles G Morris. 1975. Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 8 (1975), 45--99.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peter A. Hancock, Deborah R. Billings, Kristin E. Schaefer, Jessie Y. C. Chen, Ewart J. de Visser, and Raja Parasuraman. 2011. A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction. Human Factors, Vol. 53, 5 (2011), 517--527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811417254 https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2004.835378Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joshua Wainer, David J Feil-Seifer, Dylan A Shell, and Maja J Mataric. 2007. Embodiment and human-robot interaction: A task-based perspective. In Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 872--877.Google ScholarCross Ref
- James R Wallace, Saba Oji, and Craig Anslow. 2017. Technologies, methods, and values: changes in empirical research at CSCW 1990--2015. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 1, CSCW (2017), 1--18.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lin Wang, Pei-Luen Patrick Rau, Vanessa Evers, Benjamin Krisper Robinson, and Pamela Hinds. 2010. When in Rome: the role of culture & context in adherence to robot recommendations. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction. IEEE Press, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 359--366.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Adam Waytz, Kurt Gray, Nicholas Epley, and Daniel M Wegner. 2010. Causes and consequences of mind perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 14, 8 (2010), 383--388.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniel M. Wegner. 1987. Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind .Springer New York, New York, NY, 185--208. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--1--4612--4634--3_9Google Scholar
- Kipling D Williams. 2010. Dyads can be groups (and often are). Small Group Research, Vol. 41, 2 (2010), 268--274.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anita Williams Woolley, Christopher F Chabris, Alex Pentland, Nada Hashmi, and Thomas W Malone. 2010. Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, Vol. 330, 6004 (2010), 686--688.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Akiko Yamazaki, Keiichi Yamazaki, Takaya Ohyama, Yoshinori Kobayashi, and Yoshinori Kuno. 2012. A Techno-sociological Solution for Designing a Museum Guide Robot: Regarding Choosing an Appropriate Visitor. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Boston, Massachusetts, USA) (HRI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 309--316. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157689.2157800Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sangseok You and Lionel Robert. 2017. Teaming up with Robots: An IMOI (Inputs-Mediators-Outputs-Inputs) Framework for Human-Robot Teamwork. International Journal of Robotic Engineering, Vol. 2, 3 (2017), 1--7.Google Scholar
- Sangseok You and Lionel Robert. 2018. Emotional Attachment, Performance, and Viability in Teams Collaborating with Embodied Physical Action (EPA) Robots. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 19 (05 2018), 377--407. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00496Google ScholarCross Ref
- Igor Zubrycki and Grzegorz Granosik. 2016. Understanding Therapists' Needs and Attitudes Towards Robotic Support. The Roboterapia Project. International Journal of Social Robotics, Vol. 8, 4 (01 Aug 2016), 553--563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0372--9Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Robots in Groups and Teams: A Literature Review
Recommendations
Robots in Groups and Teams
CSCW '17 Companion: Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social ComputingOver the last decade, the idea that robots could become an integral part of groups and teams has developed from a promising vision into a reality. Robots are increasingly designed to interact with groups and teams of people, yet most human-robot ...
Strategies for the Inclusion of Human Members within Human-Robot Teams
HRI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionTeam member inclusion is vital in collaborative teams. In this work, we explore two strategies to increase the inclusion of human team members in a human-robot team: 1) giving a person in the group a specialized role (the 'robot liaison') and 2) having ...
Autonomy, Embodiment, and Obedience to Robots
HRI'15 Extended Abstracts: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended AbstractsWe conducted an HRI obedience experiment comparing an autonomous robotic authority to: (i) a remote-controlled robot, and (ii) robots of variant embodiments during a deterrent task. The results suggest that half of people will continue to perform a ...
Comments