skip to main content
research-article

Control Communication Co-Design for Wide Area Cyber-Physical Systems

Published:04 January 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Wide Area Cyber-Physical Systems (WA-CPSs) are a class of control systems that integrate low-powered sensors, heterogeneous actuators, and computer controllers into large infrastructure that span multi-kilometre distances. Current wireless communication technologies are incapable of meeting the communication requirements of range and bounded delays needed for the control of WA-CPSs. To solve this problem, we use a Control Communication Co-design approach for WA-CPSs, that we refer to as the C3 approach, to design a novel Low-Power Wide Area (LPWA) MAC protocol called Ctrl-MAC and its associated event-triggered controller that can guarantee the closed-loop stability of a WA-CPS. This is the first article to show that LPWA wireless communication technologies can support the control of WA-CPSs. LPWA technologies are designed to support one-way communication for monitoring and are not appropriate for control. We present this work using an example of a water distribution network application, which we evaluate both through a co-simulator (modeling both physical and cyber subsystems) and testbed deployments. Our evaluation demonstrates full control stability, with up to 50% better packet delivery ratios and 80% less average end-to-end delays when compared to a state-of-the-art LPWA technology. We also evaluate our scheme against an idealised, wired, centralised, control architecture, and show that the controller maintains stability and the overshoots remain within bounds.

References

  1. Ferran Adelantado, Xavier Vilajosana, Pere Tuset-Peiro, Borja Martinez, Joan Melia-Segui, and Thomas Watteyne. 2017. Understanding the limits of LoRaWAN. IEEE Communications Magazine 55, 9 (2017), 34--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. José Araújo, Manuel Mazo, Adolfo Anta, Paulo Tabuada, and Karl H. Johansson. 2014. System architectures, protocols and algorithms for aperiodic wireless control systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 10, 1 (2014), 175--184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Belimo. 2019. NRQ24A-SR Datasheet. Retrieved June 23, 2019 from https://www.belimo.ch/pdf/e/NRQ24A-SR_datasheet_en-gb.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dominicus Paulus Borgers, Victor Sebastiaan Dolk, and WPMH Heemels. 2018. Riccati-based design of event-triggered controllers for linear systems with delays. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 63, 1 (2018), 174--188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Balakrishnan Chandrasekaran. 2006. Survey of Network Traffic Models. Retrieved June 3, 2019 from https://www.cse.wustl.edu/ jain/cse567-06/ftp/traffic_models3.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Lora Alliance Technical Committee. 2018. LoRaWAN 1.1 Specification. Retrieved June 3, 2019 from https://lora-alliance.org/sites/default/files/2018-07/lorawan1.0.3.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. James Dicken, Paul D. Mitcheson, Ivan Stoianov, and Eric M. Yeatman. 2012. Power-extraction circuits for piezoelectric energy harvesters in miniature and low-power applications. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 27, 11 (2012), 4514--4529.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Mark Eisen, Mohammad M. Rashid, Konstantinos Gatsis, Dave Cavalcanti, Nageen Himayat, and Alejandro Ribeiro. 2019. Control aware radio resource allocation in low latency wireless control systems. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 6, 5 (2019), 7878--7890.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Etimad Fadel, Vehbi C. Gungor, Laila Nassef, Nadine Akkari, M. G. Abbas Malik, Suleiman Almasri, and Ian F. Akyildiz. 2015. A survey on wireless sensor networks for smart grid. Computer Communication 71 (2015), 22--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Thulo Ram Gurung, Rodney A. Stewart, Cara D. Beal, and Ashok K. Sharma. 2015. Smart meter enabled water end-use demand data: Platform for the enhanced infrastructure planning of contemporary urban water supply networks. Journal of Cleaner Production 87 (2015), 642--654.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. W. P. M. Heemels, M. C. F. Donkers, and Andrew R. Teel. 2013. Periodic event-triggered control for linear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 58, 4 (2013), 847--861.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. X. Jin, A. Saifullah, C. Lu, and P. Zeng. 2019. Real-time scheduling for event-triggered and time-triggered flows in industrial wireless sensor-actuator networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2019 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. 1684--1692.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Kartakis, A. Fu, M. Mazo, and J. A. McCann. 2018. Communication schemes for centralized and decentralized event-triggered control systems. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 26, 6 (2018), 2035--2048.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Sokratis Kartakis, Weiren Yu, Reza Akhavan, and Julie A. McCann. 2016. Adaptive edge analytics for distributed networked control of water systems. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE First International Conference on Internet-of-Things Design and Implementations. IEEE, 72--82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Xiangheng Liu and Andrea Goldsmith. 2004. Wireless network design for distributed control. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 3 (2004), 2823--2829.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Chenyang Lu, Abusayeed Saifullah, Bo Li, Mo Sha, Humberto Gonzalez, Dolvara Gunatilaka, Chengjie Wu, Lanshun Nie, and Yixin Chen. 2016. Real-time wireless sensor-actuator networks for industrial cyber-physical systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE 104, 5 (2016), 1013--1024.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Fabian Mager, Dominik Baumann, Romain Jacob, Lothar Thiele, Sebastian Trimpe, and Marco Zimmerling. 2019. Feedback control goes wireless: Guaranteed stability over low-power multi-hop networks. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS’19). ACM, New York, NY, 97--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Manuel Mazo and Paulo Tabuada. 2011. Decentralized event-triggered control over wireless sensor/actuator networks. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 56, 10 (2011), 2456--2461.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Manuel Mazo Jr and Anqi Fu. 2015. Decentralized event-triggered controller implementations. Event-Based Control and Signal Processing (2015), 121.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Alain Moreau. 2011. Control strategy for domestic water heaters during peak periods and its impact on the demand for electricity. Energy Procedia 12 (2011), 1074--1082.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Pangun Park, Sinem Coleri Ergen, Carlo Fischione, Chenyang Lu, and Karl H. Johansson. 2018. Wireless network design for control systems: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials 20, 2 (2018), 978--1013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Anna Pellegrino, Valerio RM Lo Verso, Laura Blaso, Andrea Acquaviva, Edoardo Patti, and Anna Osello. 2016. Lighting control and monitoring for energy efficiency: A case study focused on the interoperability of building management systems. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 52, 3 (2016), 2627--2637.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Stig Petersen and Simon Carlsen. 2011. WirelessHART versus ISA100. 11a: The format war hits the factory floor. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine 5, 4 (2011), 23--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Alexandru-Ioan Ioan Pop, Usman Raza, Parag Kulkarni, and Mahesh Sooriyabandara. 2018. Does bidirectional traffic do more harm than good in LoRaWAN based LPWA networks? In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference (2018), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Usman Raza, Parag Kulkarni, and Mahesh Sooriyabandara. 2017. Low power wide area networks: An overview. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials. 19, 2 (2017), 855--873.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Craig B. Schindler, Thomas Watteyne, Xavier Vilajosana, and Kristofer S. J. Pister. 2017. Implementation and characterization of a multi-hop 6TiSCH network for experimental feedback control of an inverted pendulum. In 15th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOpt’17). IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Jianping Song, Song Han, Al Mok, Deji Chen, Mike Lucas, Mark Nixon, and Wally Pratt. 2008. WirelessHART: Applying wireless technology in real-time industrial process control. In IEEE Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Nagender Kumar Suryadevara, Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay, Sean Dieter Tebje Kelly, and Satinder Pal Singh Gill. 2015. WSN-based smart sensors and actuator for power management in intelligent buildings. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 20, 2 (2015), 564--571.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Ivana Tomić, Laksh Bhatia, Michael J. Breza, and Julie A. McCann. 2018. The limits of LoRaWAN in event-triggered wireless networked control systems. In Proceedings of the 2018 UKACC 12th International Conference on Control (CONTROL’18). 101--106.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Malik Tubaishat, Yi Shang, and Hongchi Shi. 2007. Adaptive traffic light control with wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE 2007 Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC’07). IEEE, 187--191. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Xavier Vilajosana, Thomas Watteyne, Mališa Vučinić, Tengfei Chang, and Kristofer S. J. Pister. 2019. 6TiSCH: Industrial performance for IPv6 Internet-of-Things networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE (2019), 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Thiemo Voigt, Martin Bor, Utz Roedig, and Juan Alonso. 2017. Mitigating inter-network interference in LoRa networks. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks (EWSN). 323--328.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Xiaofeng Wang and Michael D. Lemmon. 2011. Event-triggering in distributed networked control systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 56, 3 (2011), 586.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Weiren Yu and Julie A. McCann. 2015. Effectively positioning water loss event in smart water networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Electronic Conference on Sensors and Applications (IECSA’15). 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Control Communication Co-Design for Wide Area Cyber-Physical Systems

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems
            ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems  Volume 5, Issue 2
            Special Issue on Time for CPS and Regular Papers
            April 2021
            238 pages
            ISSN:2378-962X
            EISSN:2378-9638
            DOI:10.1145/3446669
            • Editor:
            • Tei-Wei Kuo
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2021 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 4 January 2021
            • Accepted: 1 August 2020
            • Revised: 1 June 2020
            • Received: 1 July 2019
            Published in tcps Volume 5, Issue 2

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format