skip to main content
10.1145/3419614.3423256acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaftConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Streamlet: Textbook Streamlined Blockchains

Published:26 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the past five years or so, numerous blockchain projects have made tremendous progress towards improving permissioned consensus protocols (partly due to their promised applications in Proof-of-Stake cryptocurrencies). Although a significant leap has silently taken place in our understanding of consensus protocols, it is rather difficult to navigate this body of work, and knowledge of the new techniques appears scattered.

In this paper, we describe an extremely simple and natural paradigm called Streamlet for constructing consensus protocols. Our protocols are inspired by the core techniques that have been uncovered in the past five years of work; but to the best of our knowledge our embodiment is simpler than ever before and we accomplish this by taking a "streamlining" idea to its full potential. We hope that our textbook constructions will help to decipher the past five years of work on consensus partly driven by the cryptocurrency community --- in particular, how remarkably simple the new generation of consensus protocols has become in comparison with classical mainstream approaches such as PBFT and Paxos.

References

  1. Ittai Abraham, Dahlia Malkhi, Kartik Nayak, Ling Ren, and Maofan Yin. Sync hotstuff: Simple and practical synchronous state machine replication. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2019/270, 2019. https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/270.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Vitalik Buterin and Vlad Zamfir. Casper. https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.09437, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Miguel Castro and Barbara Liskov. Practical byzantine fault tolerance. In OSDI, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. T-H. Hubert Chan, Rafael Pass, and Elaine Shi. Pala: A simple partially synchronous blockchain. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2018/981, 2018. https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. T-H. Hubert Chan, Rafael Pass, and Elaine Shi. Pili: An extremely simple synchronous blockchain. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2018/980, 2018. https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jing Chen and Silvio Micali. Algorand: The efficient and democratic ledger. https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.01341, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Phil Daian, Rafael Pass, and Elaine Shi. Snow white: Robustly reconfigurable consensus and applications to provably secure proofs of stake. In Financial Crypto, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Cynthia Dwork, Nancy Lynch, and Larry Stockmeyer. Consensus in the presence of partial synchrony. J. ACM, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Juan A. Garay, Aggelos Kiayias, and Nikos Leonardos. The bitcoin backbone protocol: Analysis and applications. In Eurocrypt, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Rachid Guerraoui, Nikola Knežević, Vivien Quéma, and Marko Vukolić. The next 700 bft protocols. In Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Computer Systems, EuroSys '10, pages 363--376, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Timo Hanke, Mahnush Movahedi, and Dominic Williams. Dfinity technology overview seriesconsensus system. https://dfinity.org/tech.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Aggelos Kiayias, Alexander Russell, Bernardo David, and Roman Oliynykov. Ouroboros: A provably secure proof-of-stake blockchain protocol. In Crypto, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Ramakrishna Kotla, Lorenzo Alvisi, Michael Dahlin, Allen Clement, and Edmund L. Wong. Zyzzyva: speculative byzantine fault tolerance. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles 2007, SOSP 2007, Stevenson, Washington, USA, October 14--17, 2007, pages 45--58, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Leslie Lamport. The part-time parliament. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst., 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Leslie Lamport. Paxos made simple. ACM SIGACT News (Distributed Computing Column) 32, 4 (Whole Number 121, December 2001), pages 51--58, December 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Leslie Lamport, Robert Shostak, and Marshall Pease. The byzantine generals problem. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst., 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Butler Lampson. The abcd's of paxos. In PODC, page 13, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jean-Philippe Martin and Lorenzo Alvisi. Fast byzantine consensus. IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput., 3(3), 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Satoshi Nakamoto. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Diego Ongaro and John Ousterhout. In search of an understandable consensus algorithm. In Proceedings of the 2014 USENIX Conference on USENIX Annual Technical Conference, USENIX ATC'14, page 305--320, USA, 2014. USENIX Association.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Rafael Pass, Lior Seeman, and Abhi Shelat. Analysis of the blockchain protocol in asynchronous networks. In Eurocrypt, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Rafael Pass and Elaine Shi. Hybrid consensus: Efficient consensus in the permissionless model. In DISC, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Rafael Pass and Elaine Shi. Rethinking large-scale consensus (invited paper). In CSF, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Fred B. Schneider. Implementing fault-tolerant services using the state machine approach: A tutorial. ACM Comput. Surv., 22(4):299--319, December 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Elaine Shi. Streamlined blockchains: A simple and elegant approach (A tutorial and survey). In Advances in Cryptology - ASIACRYPT 2019 - 25th International Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptology and Information Security, Kobe, Japan, December 8--12, 2019, Proceedings, Part I, pages 3--17, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Elaine Shi. Streamlined blockchains: A simple and elegant approach (a tutorial and survey). In Asiacrypt, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Robbert Van Renesse and Deniz Altinbuken. Paxos made moderately complex. ACM Comput. Surv., 47(3), February 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Maofan Yin, Dahlia Malkhi, Michael K. Reiter, Guy Golan-Gueta, and Ittai Abraham. Hotstuff: BFT consensus with linearity and responsiveness. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC 2019, Toronto, ON, Canada, July 29 - August 2, 2019, pages 347--356, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    AFT '20: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies
    October 2020
    275 pages
    ISBN:9781450381390
    DOI:10.1145/3419614

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 26 October 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader