skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

The Matter of Tools: Designing, Using and Reflecting on New Tools for Emerging eTextile Craft Practices

Published:01 February 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Tools, as extensions of hand and mind, prescribe defining properties for a practice. We anchor our tools research within a case study of electronic textiles (eTextiles), combining textile materials and electronic and computational functionality. While the field of eTextiles is expanding into new personal and ubiquitous applications, its tools as productive means, however, are rarely investigated. We fill this gap by both proposing and exploring new tools, aiming at an integrated eTextile craft practice across disciplinary boundaries. Results from a research through design process have been developed into research products and proposed to a wider community of novices and practitioners. Research insights from making, using and reflecting on our new tools show they not only guide habits of making, but also are formative to the understanding of eTextiles as a practice and a field. Their form and function matter for the skills, processes and users, ultimately prescribing the technologies that surround us.

References

  1. Adafruit. 2012. Announcing the FLORA, Adafruit’s wearable electronics platform and accessories. Retrieved from https://blog.adafruit.com/2012/01/20/announcing-the-flora-adafruits-wearable-electronics-platform-and-accessories.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Glenn Adamson. 2013. The Invention of Craft. Bloomsbury, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Philip E. Agre. 1997. Toward a critical technical practice toward a critical technical practice: Lessons learned in trying to reform AI. In Social Science, Technical Systems and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide. Geoffrey Bowker, Susan Leigh Star, William Turner, and Les Gasser (Eds.). L. Erlbaum Associates Inc. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.123.6792.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Lea Albaugh, Scott Hudson, and Lining Yao. 2019. Digital fabrication of soft actuated objects by machine knitting. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’19). ACM, New York, NY, 1--13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300414Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Teresa Almeida, Rob Comber, Patrick Olivier, and Madeline Balaam. 2014. Intimate care: Exploring eTextiles for teaching female pelvic fitness. In Proceedings of the 2014 Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS Companion’14). ACM, New York, NY, 5--8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2598784.2602768Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Chris Anderson. 2012. Makers: The New Industrial Revolution (1st ed.). Crown Business, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Arduino. 2020. Home. Retrieved from https://www.arduino.cc/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, Carl DiSalvo, Ann Light, and Daniela K. Rosner. 2014. Making Cultures Spotlight. Retrieved from https://chi2014.acm.org/spotlights/making-cultures.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: Taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’10). ACM Press, Atlanta, Georgia, 1301. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753521Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Shaowen Bardzell, Daniela K. Rosner, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2012. Crafting quality in design: Integrity, creativity, and public sensibility. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS’12). ACM, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom, 11--20. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2317959Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Mary Carolyn Beaudry. 2006. Findings: The Material Culture of Needlework and Sewing. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Joanna Berzowska. 2005. Electronic textiles: Wearable computers, reactive fashion, and soft computation. Textile, The Jounral of Cloth & Culture, Digital Dialogues 2: Textiles and Technology 3, 1 (2005), 2--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (Jan. 2006), 77--101. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2020. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology (Aug. 2020), 1--25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Philipp Brauner, Julia van Heek, Martina Ziefle, Nur Al-huda Hamdan, and Jan Borchers. 2017. Interactive FUrniTURE: Evaluation of smart interactive textile interfaces for home environments. In Proceedings of the Interactive Surfaces and Spaces on ZZZ (ISS’17). ACM Press, Brighton, United Kingdom, 151--160. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3132272.3134128Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sophia Brueckner and Rachel Freire. 2018. Embodisuit: A wearable platform for embodied knowledge. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI’18). ACM, New York, NY, 542--548. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3173225.3173305Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Leah Buechley. 2006. A construction kit for electronic textiles. In Proceedings of the 2006 10th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers. IEEE, Montreux, Switzerland, 83--90. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.2006.286348Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Leah Buechley. 2010. LilyPad Arduino: Rethinking the materials and cultures of educational technology. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - Volume 2 (ICLS’10). International Society of the Learning Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, 127--128. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1854509.1854566.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Leah Buechley and Mike. Eisenberg. 2008. The LilyPad Arduino: Toward wearable engineering for everyone. IEEE Pervasive Computing 7, 2 (April 2008), 12--15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2008.38Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Leah Buechley and Michael Eisenberg. 2009. Fabric PCBs, electronic sequins, and socket buttons: Techniques for e-Textile craft. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 13, 2 (Feb. 2009), 133--150. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-007-0181-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Leah Buechley, Mike Eisenberg, Jaime Catchen, and Ali Crockett. 2008. The LilyPad Arduino: Using computational textiles to investigate engagement, aesthetics, and diversity in computer science education. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’08). ACM, New York, NY, 423--432. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357123Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Leah Buechley, Nwanua Elumeze, and Michael Eisenberg. 2006. Electronic/computational textiles and children’s crafts. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC’06). ACM, New York, NY, 49--56. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1139073.1139091Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Leah Buechley and Benjamin Mako Hill. 2010. LilyPad in the wild: How hardware’s long tail is supporting new engineering and design communities. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS’10). ACM, New York, NY, 199--207. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858206Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Leah Buechley and Hannah Perner-Wilson. 2012. Crafting technology: Reimagining the processes, materials, and cultures of electronics. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 19, 3 (Oct. 2012), 1--21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2362364.2362369Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Leah Buechley, Kanjun Qiu, Jocely Goldfein, and Sonja de Boer. 2013. Sew Electric: A Collection of DIY Projects that Combine Fabric, Electronics, and Programming. HLT Press, Cambrdige, MA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Laura Devendorf, Joanne Lo, Noura Howell, Jung Lin Lee, Nan-Wei Gong, M. Emre Karagozler, Shiho Fukuhara, Ivan Poupyrev, Eric Paulos, and Kimiko Ryokai. 2016. “I don’t want to wear a screen”: Probing perceptions of and possibilities for dynamic displays on clothing. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’16). ACM, New York, NY, 6028--6039. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858192Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Laura Devendorf and Kimiko Ryokai. 2014. Being the machine: Exploring new modes of making. In Proceedings of the 2014 Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM Press, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 33--36. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2598784.2602775Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Maurin Donneaud, Hannah Perner-Wilson, and Mika Satomi. 2019. Lulu. Retrieved from https://lulu.etextile.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Paul Dourish, Janet Finlay, Phoebe Sengers, and Peter Wright. 2004. Reflective HCI: Towards a critical technical practice. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’04). ACM, New York, NY, 1727--1728. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/985921.986203Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2013. Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. James Fallows. 2016. Why the Maker Movement Matters: Part 1, the Tools Revolution. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/06/why-the-maker-movement-matters-part-1-the-tools-revolution/485720/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Ylva Fernaeus, Martin Jonsson, and Jakob Tholander. 2012. Revisiting the jacquard loom: Threads of history and current patterns in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’12). ACM, Austin, Texas, 1593--1602. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208280Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. National Center for Women and Information Technology. 2014. e-Textiles-in-a-box. Retrieved from https://www.ncwit.org/etextiles.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Raune Frankjaer and Peter Dalsgaard. 2018. Understanding craft-based inquiry in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS’18). ACM, New York, NY, 473--484. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196750Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Rachel Freire, Cedric Honnet, and Paul Strohmeier. 2017. Second skin: An exploration of eTextile stretch circuits on the body. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI’17). ACM, New York, NY, 653--658. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3024969.3025054Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Sophie Fürnkranz. 2005. Metallstickerei im außereuropäischen Raum. Beispiele aus der Sammlung des Weltmuseums Wien. In Kunsthistorisches Museum: Konservierung - Restaurierung - Forschung -- Technologie. Number 2 in Technologische Studien. KHM-Museumsverband, Wien, 10--49. Retrieved from https://www.khm.at/en/learn/research/technologische-studien/band-22005/aussereuropaeische-metallstickerei/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Aneta Genova and Katherine Moriwaki. 2016. Fashion and Technology: A Guide to Materials and Applications. Fairchild Books, Inc, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Texible Gmbh. 2019. Welcome to WEARIC Smart Textiles. Retrieved from https://wearic.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Connie Golsteijn, Elise Hoven, David Frohlich, and Abigail Sellen. 2014. Hybrid crafting: Towards an integrated practice of crafting with physical and digital components. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 18, 3 (2014), 593--611. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0684-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Chandramohan Gopalsamy, Sungmee Park, Rangaswamy Rajamanickam, and Sundaresan Jayaraman. 1999. The Wearable Motherboard™: The first generation of adaptive and responsive textile structures (ARTS) for medical applications. Virtual Reality 4, 3 (Sept. 1999), 152--168. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01418152Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Beverly Gordon. 2011. Textiles: The Whole Story: Uses, Meanings, Significance. Thames and Hudson, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Michael M. Gorlick. 1999. Electric suspenders: A fabric power bus and data network for wearable digital devices. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Wearable Computers. IEEE, San Francisco, CA, 114--121. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.1999.806684Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Lara Grant. 2016. Wearable Electronics Class. Retrieved from https://www.instructables.com/class/Wearable-Electronics-Class/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Mike Grusin and Angela Sheehan. 2017. LilyPad ProtoSnap Plus Hookup Guide - learn.sparkfun.com. Retrieved from https://learn.sparkfun.com/tutorials/lilypad-protosnap-plus-hookup-guide/all.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Sibel Deren Guler, Madeline Gannon, and Kate Sicchio. 2016. Crafting Wearables: Blending Technology with Fashion. Apress, New York.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Donna Jeanne Haraway. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press, Durham.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Kate Hartman. 2014. Make: Wearable Electronics (1st ed.). Maker Media, Sebastopol, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Anja Hertenberger, Barbro Scholz, Beam Contrechoc, Becky Stewart, Ebru Kurbak, Hannah Perner-Wilson, Irene Posch, Isabel Cabral, Jie Qi, Katharina Childs, Kristi Kuusk, Lynsey Calder, Marina Toeters, Marta Kisand, Martijn ten Bhömer, Maurin Donneaud, Meg Grant, Melissa Coleman, Mika Satomi, Mili Tharakan, Pauline Vierne, Sara Robertson, Sarah Taylor, and Troy Robert Nachtigall. 2014. 2013 e-Textile swatchbook exchange: The importance of sharing physical work. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers: Adjunct Program (ISWC’14). ACM, New York, NY, 77--81. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2641248.2641276Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Garnet Hertz (Ed.). 2012. Critical Making. Telharmonium Press, Hollywood, California. Retrieved from http://conceptlab.com/criticalmaking/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Adafruit Industries. 2018. FLORA Budget Pack. Retrieved from https://www.adafruit.com/product/1405.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Tim Ingold. 2007. Lines: A Brief History. Routledge, London.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Jennifer Jacobs, David Mellis, Amit Zoran, Cesar Torres, Joel Brandt, and Joshua Tanenbaum. 2016. Digital craftsmanship: HCI takes on technology as an expressive medium. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS’16). ACM, Brisbane, Australia, 57--60. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2908805.2913018Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Eva-Sophie Katterfeldt, Nadine Dittert, and Heidi Schelhowe. 2009. EduWear: Smart textiles as ways of relating computing technology to everyday life. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC’09). ACM, New York, NY, 9--17. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1551788.1551791Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Kitronik. 2018. E-Textiles Kit for the BBC micro:bit. Retrieved from https://www.kitronik.co.uk/5607-e-textiles-kit-for-the-bbc-microbit.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Ebru Kurbak, Hannah Perner-Wilson, Irene Posch, and Mika Satomi. 2018. Tools we want. In Stitching Worlds: Exploring Textiles and Electronics. Revolver Publishing, Berlin, 158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Ebru Kurbak, Irene Posch, Hannah Perner-Wilson, and Satomi Mika. 2014. Connected Research: KOBAKANT | stitching worlds. Retrieved from http://www.stitchingworlds.net/experimentation/connected-research-kobakant/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Stacey Kuznetsov and Eric Paulos. 2010. Rise of the expert amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries (NordiCHI’10). ACM, Reykjavik, Iceland, 295--304. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1868914.1868950Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Joanne Leong, Patrick Parzer, Florian Perteneder, Teo Babic, Christian Rendl, Anita Vogl, Hubert Egger, Alex Olwal, and Michael Haller. 2016. proCover: Sensory augmentation of prosthetic limbs using smart textile covers. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM User Interface Software and Technology Symposium. ACM, Tokyo, Japan, 335--346. Retrieved from http://mi-lab.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/2016-08-16-proCover.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Alison Lewis, Fang-Yu Lin, Heather Weston, and Hiromi Sugie. 2008. Switch Craft: Battery-powered Crafts to Make and Sew (1st ed.). Potter Craft, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Lightstitches. 2017. Lightstitches - E-Textiles for Education. Project Resources Book. Retrieved from https://lightstitches.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Light-Stitches-Project-Resources-2017-ilovepdf-compressed.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Arduino Lilypad. 2018. LilyPad Arduino Main Board. Retrieved from https://www.arduino.cc/en/Main/ArduinoBoardLilyPad.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Cara McCarty and Matilda MCQuaid. 2014. Tools: Extending Our Reach. Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Malcolm McCullough. 1998. Abstracting Craft: The Practiced Digital Hand (1st ed.). MIT Press, Campridge, Mass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Sara Mlakar and Michael Haller. 2020. Design investigation of embroidered interactive elements on non-wearable textile interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’20). ACM, New York, NY, 1--10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376692Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Gauri Nanda, Adrian Cable, V. Michael Bove, Moneta Ho, and Han Hoang. 2004. bYOB [Build Your Own Bag]: A computationally-enhanced modular textile system. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM’04). ACM, New York, NY, 1--4. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1052380.1052381 event-place: College Park, Maryland.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Grace Ngai, Stephen C. F. Chan, Joey C. Y. Cheung, and Winnie W. Y. Lau. 2009. The TeeBoard: An education-friendly construction platform for e-Textiles and wearable computing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’09). ACM, New York, NY, 249--258. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518742Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Michael Nitsche and Anna Weisling. 2019. When is it not craft?: Materiality and mediation when craft and computing meet. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI’19). ACM, New York, NY, 683--689. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3294109.3295651Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Donald A. Norman. 1999. Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions 6, 3 (1999), 38--43. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/2849872/Affordance_conventions_and_design.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. William Odom, Ron Wakkary, Youn-kyung Lim, Audrey Desjardins, Bart Hengeveld, and Richard Banks. 2016. From research prototype to research product. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’16). ACM, New York, NY, 2549--2561. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858447Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Syuzi Pakhchyan. 2008. Fashioning Technology (1st ed.). O’Reilly, Sebastopol, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Despina Papadopoulos and Zach Eveland. 2010. fabrickit : fabrickit. Retrieved from http://www.fabrick.it/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Kylie Peppler. 2016. A review of E-Textiles in education and society. In Handbook of Research on the Societal Impact of Digital Media. Barbara Guzzetti and Lesley Mellinee (Eds.). Information Science Reference, 268--290. Retrieved from https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/a-review-of-e-textiles-in-education-and-society/136676.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Hannah Perner-Wilson, Leah Buechley, and Mika Satomi. 2011. Handcrafting textile interfaces from a kit-of-no-parts. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI’11). ACM, New York, NY, 61--68. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1935701.1935715Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Hannah Perner-Wilson, Mika Satomi, Irene Posch, and Ebru Kurbak. 2016. Tools We Want. Retrieved from http://toolswewant.at/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Irene Posch. 2017. eTextile Clip Probe. Retrieved from https://www.instructables.com/id/ETextile-Clip-Probe/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Irene Posch. 2017. eTextile Clip Probe. Retrieved from https://www.instructables.com/id/ETextile-Cable/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Irene Posch. 2017. ETextile Multimeter Pin Probe. Retrieved from https://www.instructables.com/id/ETextile-Multimeter-Pin-Probe/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Irene Posch. 2018. ETextile Connectable Needlework Tools: Crochet Hook. Retrieved from https://www.instructables.com/id/ETextile-Connectable-Needlework-Tools-Crochet-Hook/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Irene Posch. 2018. ETextile Connectable Needlework Tools: Seam Ripper. Retrieved from https://www.instructables.com/id/ETextile-Connectable-Needlework-Tools-Seam-Ripper/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Irene Posch. 2018. Handcrafting the digital. In Stitching Worlds: Exploring Textiles and Electronics. Revolver Publishing, Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Irene Posch. 2020. Burglar alarm: More than 100 years of smart textiles. In Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2020 ACM on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS’20). ACM, New York, NY, 473--476. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3393914.3395847Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Irene Posch and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2018. Integrating textile materials with electronic making: Creating new tools and practices. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI’18). ACM, New York, NY, 158--165. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3173225.3173255Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Irene Posch and Ebru Kurbak. 2016. Crafted logic towards hand-crafting a computer. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’16). ACM, New York, NY, 3881--3884. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2891101Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Irene Posch, Liza Stark, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2019. eTextiles: Reviewing a practice through its tool/kits. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC’19). ACM, New York, NY, 195--205. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3341163.3347738Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Irene Posch, Ozge Subasi, Daniela K. Rosner, Raune Frankjaer, Amit Zoran, and Tania Pérez-Bustos. 2019. Troubling innovation: Craft and computing across boundaries. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’19). ACM, Glasgow, Scotland, 1--8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3299010Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. E. Rehmi Post and Margaret Orth. 1997. Smart fabric, or “wearable clothing”. In Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC’97). IEEE Computer Society, 167--168. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.1997.629937Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. E. Rehmi Post, Margaret. Orth, Peter R. Russo, and Neil Gershenfeld. 2000. E-broidery: Design and fabrication of textile-based computing. IBM Systems Journal 39, 3.4 (2000), 840--860. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.393.0840Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. Ivan Poupyrev, Nan-Wei Gong, Shiho Fukuhara, Mustafa Emre Karagozler, Carsten Schwesig, and Karen E. Robinson. 2016. Project Jacquard: Interactive digital textiles at scale. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’16). ACM, New York, NY, 4216--4227. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858176Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Oxford University Press. 2019. Material. Retrieved from https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/material.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. Oxford University Press. 2019. Tool. Retrieved from https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/tool.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Afroditi Psarra. 2012. Lilytronica. Retrieved from http://afroditipsarra.com/index.php?/on-going/lily/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. David Pye. 1995. The Nature and Art of Workmanship. The Herbert Press, London. Retrieved from gb95044219 https://books.google.at/books?id=z-o9AQAAIAAJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. Matt Ratto, Sara Ann Wylie, and Kirk Jalbert. 2014. Introduction to the special forum on critical making as research program. The Information Society 30, 2 (March 2014), 85--95. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2014.875767Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  94. Daniela K. Rosner and Kimiko Ryokai. 2009. Reflections on craft: Probing the creative process of everyday knitters. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C’’09). ACM, Berkeley, California, 195--204. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1640233.1640264Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. Daniela K. Rosner, Samantha Shorey, Brock R. Craft, and Helen Remick. 2018. Making core memory: Design inquiry into gendered legacies of engineering and craftwork. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’18). ACM, New York, NY, 531:1--531:13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174105Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  96. Donald A. Schon. 1992. Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Research in Engineering Design 3, 3 (Sept. 1992), 131--147. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580516Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  97. Phoebe Sengers, Kirsten Boehner, Shay David, and Joseph “Jofish” Kaye. 2005. Reflective design. In Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility (CC’05). ACM, New York, NY, 49--58. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1094562.1094569Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Richard Sennett. 2008. The Craftsman. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. Sophie Skach and Rebecca Stewart. 2019. One leg at a time: Towards optimised design engineering of textile sensors in trousers. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (UbiComp/ISWC’19). ACM, New York, NY, 206--209. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3341162.3343775Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  100. Liza Stark. 2017. Data Vows: Reimagining ritual through eTextile practice. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC’17). ACM, New York, NY, 244--248. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3123021.3123072Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  101. Ruojia Sun, Ryosuke Onose, Margaret Dunne, Andrea Ling, Amanda Denham, and Hsin-Liu (Cindy) Kao. 2020. Weaving a second skin: Exploring opportunities for crafting on-skin interfaces through weaving. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS’20). ACM, New York, NY, 365--377. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395548Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  102. Anita Vogl, Patrick Parzer, Teo Babic, Joanne Leong, Alex Olwal, and Michael Haller. 2017. StretchEBand: Enabling fabric-based interactions through rapid fabrication of textile stretch sensors. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’17). ACM, New York, NY, 2617--2627. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025938Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  103. Ron Wakkary, William Odom, Sabrina Hauser, Garnet Hertz, and Henry Lin. 2015. Material speculation: Actual artifacts for critical inquiry. In Proceedings of the 5th Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives (CA’15). Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark, 97--108. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21299Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  104. Mark Weiser. 1991. The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American 265, 3 (1991), 94--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  105. Amit Zoran and Leah Buechley. 2012. Hybrid reassemblage: An exploration of craft, digital fabrication and artifact uniqueness. Leonardo 46, 1 (2012), 4--10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_00477Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  106. Amit Zoran, Roy Shilkrot, Suranga Nanyakkara, and Joseph Paradiso. 2014. The hybrid artisans: A case study in smart tools. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 21, 3 (2014), 15:1--15:29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2617570Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The Matter of Tools: Designing, Using and Reflecting on New Tools for Emerging eTextile Craft Practices

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format