skip to main content
10.1145/3429789.3429811acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiconetsiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Developing Digital Wallet Services in Indonesia: A Multigeneration Perspective

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 November 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Digital Wallet is growing rapidly in the last 5 years. This study aims to identify the influencing factors user intentions to use and recommend digital wallets based on a multi-generation preference perspective. 205 respondent's data obtained by filling in an online form at Google form. This study is using the Partial Least Square (PLS) method using SMARTPLS 3 software, the results of data analysis show in Generation X, Perceived ease of use, Perceived Usefulness, Compatibility, and Trust positively influence Intention to Use. factors that influence intention to use in generation Y are Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Behavioral Control, and Trust. Factors that influence generation Z are Perceived Ease of Use, and Perceived Usefulness. Based on these results, 10 strategic recommendations were proposed. Based on the TOPSIS method and importance-performance analysis, the best strategy for generation X is the compatibility of digital wallet to the payment of transportation services, while in generation Y and generation Z The priority strategy is campaigning the uses of the wallet digital. In general, strategies that have high priority are those related to conformity with public transportation payments, campaigns about the use of digital wallets, the conciseness of digital wallet applications, and the completeness of bill payment services.

References

  1. Liu, J., Kauffman, R.J. and Ma, D. 2015. Competition, cooperation and regulation: Understanding the evolution of the mobile payments technology ecosystem. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldridge, I. 2013. High-Frequency Trading: A Practical Guide to Algorithmic Strategies and Trading System, second edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Amoroso, DL, & Magnier-Watanabe, R. 2012. Building a research models for consumer adoption of mobile wallet: the case of mobile Suica in Japan. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research, 7 (1), 94--110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bansal, HS, & Voyer, PA 2000. Word-of-mouth processes within a services purchase decision context. Journal of service research, 3 (2), 166--177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Chen, LD, Gillenson, ML, & Sherrell, DL 2002. Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective. Information & Management, 39 (8), 705--719.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Oktaviani, RS., Dewi, PF., Ratih, PF., & Rinny, M 2019. Implementation of Mobile Payment in Indonesia. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), Volume-8 Issue-2S4, 2277--3878.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Redaksi, 2019. "Daftar 10 Dompet Digital Terpopuler di RI, Siapa Jawaranya", Jakarta: CNBC Indonesia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Narasi, 2019 "Persaingan Dompet Digital", Indonesia.go.id, Jakarta.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Indah Rahmayani, 2015 "Indonesia Raksasa Teknologi Digital Asia", Kominfo, Jakarta.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Fahmi A. Burhan, 2020 "Bukan Bakar Uang, Begini Strategi DANA Capai 170 Juta Pengguna" katadata, Jakarta.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Sirclo, 2019 "Perilaku Belanja Online Generasi X, Y dan Z" Sirclo, Indonesia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. I. Alnawas and F. Aburub, "The effect of benefits generated from interacting with branded mobile," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, vol. 31, pp. 313--322, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kemenpppa 2018. "Statistik gender tematik: profil generasi milenial indonesia". Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M., 2011. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), pp. 139--151.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Hshiung, T. G. & Jeng, H. J., 2011. Multiple Attribute Decision Making. 1 ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Levenburg, N. M. & Magal, S. R., 2005. Applying importance-performance analysis to evaluate e-business strategies among small firms. E-service Journal, pp. 29--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Chatterjee, D., & Kartikeya Bolar (2018): Determinants of Mobile Wallet Intentions to Use: The Mental Cost Perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2018.1505697Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Singh, N., Neena, S., Francisco, J.C. (2020). Determining Factors In The Adoption And Recommendation of Mobile Wallet Services In India: Analysis of The Effect of Innovativeness, Stress to Use and Social Influence. International Journal of Information Management, 191--205.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ghozali, "Structural Equation Modeling Metode Alternatif dengan Partial Least Square", ISBN:979.704.300.2.Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro Semarang. 2014Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. E. Masud, "Partial Least Squares (PLS)". Hanbook of Brawijaya University, 2015. http://masud.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2015/05/14.PLS.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Y. Nabila, "Analysis Impact of Knowledge Management System Implementation on Increasing Organizational Competitiveness" Industrial Engineering Department Universitas Indonesia, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ling, F., shan li, sui, p., & ofori, G. 2012, "mathematical models for predicting chinese A/E/C firms' competitiveness". Automotion in construction, 40--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoyle, R. H., 2012. Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Developing Digital Wallet Services in Indonesia: A Multigeneration Perspective

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICONETSI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Engineering and Information Technology for Sustainable Industry
        September 2020
        466 pages
        ISBN:9781450387712
        DOI:10.1145/3429789

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 November 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader