skip to main content
10.1145/3439231.3440619acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdsaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Can NAO Robot Influence the Eye Gaze and Joint Attention of Mentally Impaired Young Adults?

Authors Info & Claims
Published:09 June 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the last decades due to technological advances, Robotics has change its paradigm, as well as, its course of development. Therefore, a new generation of robots has emerged, the Socially Assistive Robotics. These robots aim to improve the assistance to human users through social rather than physical interaction. Consequently, many are the developments made through the use of social robots in mental healthcare scenarios, regarding the elderly population and children or young adults with mental disorders, in order to either prevent cognitive decline, improve psycho-social outcomes or the patient capabilities and lifetime. However, few breakthroughs have been made in the mental disorders field that differ from studies with people with Autism Spectrum Disorders or that are conducted with adults. This study aims to demonstrate that humanoid NAO can improve attention in adults with mental disorders during certain task and kept through several sessions over time.

References

  1. Abdi, J., Al-Hindawi, A., Ng, T., and Vizcaychipi, M. P. (2018). Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care. BMJ Open, 8(2):e018815.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Alnajjar, F. S., Renawi, A. M., Cappuccio, M., and Mubain, O. (2019). A Low-Cost Autonomous Attention Assessment System for Robot Intervention with Autistic Children. In 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pages 787–792. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Arent, K., Kruk-Lasocka, J., Niemiec, T., and Szczepanowski, R. (2019). Social robot in diagnosis of autism among preschool children. In 2019 24th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR), pages 652–656. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bertel, L. B. and Hannibal, G. (2015). The NAO robot as a Persuasive Educational and Entertainment Robot (PEER) – a case study on children's articulation, categorization and interaction with a social robot for learning. Tidsskriftet Læring og Medier (LOM), 8(14).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Campa, R. (2016). Journal of evolution and technology. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 26(1):106–113.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cao, H. L., Van de Perre, G., Kennedy, J., Senft, E., Esteban, P. G., De Beir, A., Simut, R., Belpaeme, T., Lefeber, D., and Vanderborght, B. (2018). A personalized and platform-independent behavior control system for social robots in therapy: development and applications. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chandra, S., Dillenbourg, P., and Paiva, A. (2019). Children Teach Handwriting to a Social Robot with Different Learning Competencies. International Journal of Social Robotics.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Di Nuovo, A., Conti, D., Trubia, G., Buono, S., and Di Nuovo, S. (2018). Deep Learning Systems for Estimating Visual Attention in Robot-Assisted Therapy of Children with Autism and Intellectual Disability. Robotics, 7(25):21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Desideri, L., Ottaviani, C., Malavasi, M., di Marzio, R., and Bonifacci, P. (2019). Emotional processes in human-robot interaction during brief cognitive testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 90:331–342. xi, xiii, 1, 3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Feil-Seifer, D. and Mataric, M. (2005). Socially Assistive Robotics. In 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005., pages 465–468. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Freire, A., Valente, A., Filipe, V. (2020). NAO Robot as tool operator in therapy sessions with mentally impaired individuals. Workshop Social Robotics for Neurodevelopmental Disorders Held as Part of. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Feng, H., Gutierrez, A., Zhang, J., and Mahoor, M. H. (2013). Can NAO Robot Improve Eye-Gaze Attention of Children with High Functioning Autism? In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics, pages 484–484. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Geminiani, A., Santos, L., Casellato, C., Farabbi, A., Farella, N., Santos-Victor, J., Olivieri, I., and Pedrocchi, A. (2019). Design and validation of two embodied mirroring setups for interactive games with autistic children using the NAO humanoid robot. In 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pages 1641–1644. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Leonel Crisóstomo (2018), Robótica de Assistência a Idosos - Apoio à Toma de Medicamentos (in Portuguese). Msc in Computer Science, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ismail, L., Shamsuddin, S., Yussof, H., Hashim, H., Bahari, S., Jaafar, A., and Zahari, I. (2011). Face detection technique of Humanoid Robot NAO for application in robotic assistive therapy. In Proceedings - 2011 IEEE International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering, ICCSCE 2011, pages 517–521.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Ismail, L. I., Shamsudin, S., Yussof, H., Hanapiah, F. A., and Zahari, N. I. (2012). Robot-based Intervention Program for Autistic Children with Humanoid Robot NAO: Initial Response in Stereotyped Behavior. Procedia Engineering, 41:1441– 1447.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Jayawardena, C., Kuo, I.-H., Broadbent, E., and MacDonald, B. A. (2016). Socially Assistive Robot HealthBot: Design, Implementation, and Field Trials. IEEE Systems Journal, 10(3):1056–1067.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Joglekar, P. and Kulkarni, V. (2018). Humanoid Robot as a Companion for the Senior Citizens. In 2018 IEEE Punecon, pages 1–4. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. López Recio, D., Ma ́rquez Segura, L., Ma ́rquez Segura, E., and Waern, A. (2013). The NAO models for the elderly. In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 187–188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. MathWorks (2018). The Robot Made Me Do It: How Robots are Changing the Lives of Children with Disabilities.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Mavadati, S. M., Feng, H., Salvador, M., Silver, S., Gutierrez, A., and Mahoor, M. H. (2016). Robot-based therapeutic protocol for training children with Autism. In 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2016, pages 855–860. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Miskam, M. A., Masnin, N. F. S., Jamhuri, M. H., Shamsuddin, S., Omar, A. R., and Yussof, H. (2014a). Encouraging children with autism to improve social and communication skills through the game-based approach. In Procedia Computer Science, volume 42, pages 93–98. Elsevier B.V.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Miskam, M. A., Shamsuddin, S., Samat, M. R. A., Yussof, H., Ainudin, H. A., and Omar, A. R. (2014b). Humanoid robot NAO as a teaching tool of emotion recognition for children with autism using the Android app. In 2014 International Symposium on Micro-NanoMechatronics and Human Science (MHS), pages 1–5. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Rahman, R. A. A., Hanapiah, F. A., Basri, H. H., and Malik, N. A. (2015). Use of Humanoid Robot in Children with Cerebral Palsy: The Ups and Downs in Clinical Experience. Procedia Computer Science, 76:394–399.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Shamsuddin, S., Ismail, L. I., Mohamed, S., Hanapiah, F. A., and Zahari, N. I. (2012a). Humanoid Robot NAO Interacting with Autistic Children of Moderately Impaired Intelligence to Augment Communication Skills. Procedia Engineering, 41:1533–1538.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Shamsuddin, S., Yussof, H., Ismail, L. I., Mohamed, S., Hanapiah, F. A., and Zahari, N. I. (2012b). Initial Response in HRI- a Case Study on Evaluation of Child with Autism Spectrum Disorders Interacting with a Humanoid Robot NAO. Procedia Engineering, 41:1448–1455.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. SoftBank Robotics. Pepper and NAO in the service of the Healthcare sector — SoftBank Robotics EMEA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Tapus, A., Mataric, M., and Scassellati, B. (2007). Socially assistive robotics [Grand Challenges of Robotics]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 14(1):35–42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Tapus, A., Vazquez-Martin, R., and Calderita, L. V. (2019). Perceiving the person and their interactions with the others for social robotics – A review. Pattern Recognition Letters, 118:3–13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Vogt, P., van den Berghe, R., de Haas, M., Hoffman, L., Kanero, J., Mamus, E., Montanier, J.-M., Oranc, C., Oudgenoeg-Paz, O., Garcia, D. H., Papadopoulos, F., Schodde, T., Verhagen, J., Wallbridgell, C. D., Willemsen, B., de Wit, J., Belpaeme, T., Goksun, T., Kopp, S., Krahmer, E., Kuntay, A. C., Leseman, P., and Pandey, A. K. (2019). Second Language Tutoring Using Social Robots: A Large-Scale Study. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human- Robot Interaction (HRI), pages 497–505. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Yussof, H., Salleh, M. H., Miskam, M. A., Shamsuddin, S., and Omar, A. R. (2015). ASKNAO apps targeting at social skills development for children with autism. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), pages 973–978. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Zhang, Y., Song, W., Tan, Z., Zhu, H., Wang, Y., Lam, C. M., Weng, Y., Hoi, S. P., Lu, H., Man Chan, B. S., Chen, J., and Yi, L. (2019). Could social robots facilitate children with autism spectrum disorders in learning distrust and deception? Computers in Human Behavior, 98:140–149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    DSAI '20: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion
    December 2020
    245 pages
    ISBN:9781450389372
    DOI:10.1145/3439231

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 9 June 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate17of23submissions,74%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format