Oliver Korn
Neziha Akalin
Ruben Gouveia
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
This article presents a study of cultural differences affecting the acceptance and design preferences of social robots. Based on a survey with 794 participants from Germany and the three Arab countries of Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia, we discuss how culture influences the preferences for certain attributes. We look at social roles, abilities and appearance, emotional awareness and interactivity of social robots, as well as the attitude toward automation. Preferences were found to differ not only across cultures, but also within countries with similar cultural backgrounds. Our findings also show a nuanced picture of the impact of previously identified culturally variable factors, such as attitudes toward traditions and innovations. While the participants’ perspectives toward traditions and innovations varied, these factors did not fully account for the cultural variations in their perceptions of social robots. In conclusion, we believe that more real-life practices emerging from the situated use of robots should be investigated. Besides focusing on the impact of broader cultural values such as those associated with religion and traditions, future studies should examine how users interact, or avoid interaction, with robots within specific contexts of use.
- Arab-German Young Academy. [n.d.]. Arab-German Young Academy of Sciences and Humanities. Retrieved on February 26, 2019 from http://agya.info/.Google Scholar
- Sean Andrist, Micheline Ziadee, Halim Boukaram, Bilge Mutlu, and Majd Sakr. 2015. Effects of culture on the credibility of robot speech: A comparison between English and Arabic. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction. ACM, 157--164.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christoph Bartneck, Tomohiro Suzuki, Takayuki Kanda, and Tatsuya Nomura. 2007. The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots. AI Soc. 21, 1--2 (2007), 217--230.Google Scholar
- Barbara Bruno, Nak Young Chong, Hiroko Kamide, Sanjeev Kanoria, Jaeryoung Lee, Yuto Lim, Amit Kumar Pandey, Chris Papadopoulos, Irena Papadopoulos, Federico Pecora, et al. 2017. Paving the way for culturally competent robots: A position paper. In Proceedings of the 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN’17). IEEE, 553--560.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brian R. Duffy. 2003. Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robot. Auton. Syst. 42, 3--4 (2003), 177--190.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Edward T. Hall. 1966. The Hidden Dimension. Doubleday, Garden City, N.Y.Google Scholar
- Ali F. Emdad, Muhammed Badamas, and Samar Mouakket. 2009. Factors and impacts of low utilization of Internet: The case of Arab countries. J. Int. Technol. Inf. Manag. 18, 3 (2009), 2.Google Scholar
- Sibylle Enz, Martin Diruf, Caroline Spielhagen, Carsten Zoll, and Patricia A. Vargas. 2011. The social role of robots in the future—Explorative measurement of hopes and fears. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 3, 3 (2011), 263.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ghadeer Eresha, Markus Häring, Birgit Endrass, Elisabeth André, and Mohammad Obaid. 2013. Investigating the influence of culture on proxemic behaviors for humanoid robots. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN’13). IEEE, 430--435.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jodi Forlizzi and Carl DiSalvo. 2006. Service robots in the domestic environment: A study of the Roomba vacuum in the home. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-robot Interaction. ACM, 258--265.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marlena R. Fraune, Satoru Kawakami, Selma Sabanovic, P. Ravindra S. De Silva, and Michio Okada. 2015. Three’s company, or a crowd?: The effects of robot number and behavior on HRI in Japan and the USA. In Robotics: Science and Systems. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Christian Fron and Oliver Korn. 2019. A short history of the perception of robots and automata from antiquity to modern times. In Social Robots: Technological, Societal and Ethical Aspects of Human-robot Interaction, Oliver Korn (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 1--12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17107-0_1Google Scholar
- Robert M. Geraci. 2006. Spiritual robots: Religion and our scientific view of the natural world. Theol. Sci. 4, 3 (2006), 229--246.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Claudia Grüne. 2018. The Robotics & Automation Industry in Germany. Retrieved from https://www.gtai.de/GTAI/Content/EN/Invest/_SharedDocs/Downloads/GTAI/Fact-sheets/MET/fact-sheet-robotics-automation-en.pdf?v=4.Google Scholar
- Rugayah Hashim and Hanafiah Yussof. 2017. A review of the ambit of politics in social robotics. Procedia Comput. Sci. 105 (2017), 316--321.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Geert Hofstede, Gert Jan Hofstede, and Michael Minkov. 2010. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. Revised and expanded 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
- IFR. 2016. World Robotics Report 2016. Retrieved from https://ifr.org/ifr-press-releases/news/world-robotics-report-2016.Google Scholar
- Jolanda Jetten, Brendan J. McAuliffe, Matthew J. Hornsey, and Michael A. Hogg. 2006. Differentiation between and within groups: The influence of individualist and collectivist group norms. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 36, 6 (2006), 825--843.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Takayuki Kanda, Takayuki Hirano, Daniel Eaton, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. 2004. Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial. Human--comput. Interact. 19, 1--2 (2004), 61--84.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Frédéric Kaplan. 2004. Who is afraid of the humanoid? Investigating cultural differences in the acceptance of robots. Int. J. Human. Robot. 1, 03 (2004), 465--480.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Naho Kitano. 2006. “Rinri”: An incitement towards the existence of robots in Japanese society. Eth. Robot. 6 (2006), 78.Google Scholar
- Oliver Korn (Ed.). 2019. Social Robots: Technological, Societal and Ethical Aspects of Human-robot Interaction. Springer International Publishing, Cham. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17107-0Google ScholarCross Ref
- Oliver Korn, Gerald Bieber, and Christian Fron. 2018. Perspectives on social robots: From the historic background to an experts’ view on future developments. In Proceedings of the 11th Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments Conference. ACM, 186--193.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hee Rin Lee and Selma Sabanović. 2014. Culturally variable preferences for robot design and use in South Korea, Turkey, and the United States. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction. ACM, 17--24.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hee Rin Lee, JaYoung Sung, Selma Šabanović, and Joenghye Han. 2012. Cultural design of domestic robots: A study of user expectations in Korea and the United States. In Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN’12). IEEE, 803--808.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dingjun Li, P. L. Patrick Rau, and Ye Li. 2010. A cross-cultural study: Effect of robot appearance and task. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2, 2 (2010), 175--186.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Manja Lohse, Frank Hegel, and Britta Wrede. 2008. Domestic applications for social robots: An online survey on the influence of appearance and capabilities. Journal of Physical Agents 2, 2 (June 2008), 21--32. DOI:10.14198/JoPha.2008.2.2.04Google Scholar
- Karl F. MacDorman, Sandosh K. Vasudevan, and Chin-Chang Ho. 2009. Does Japan really have robot mania? Comparing attitudes by implicit and explicit measures. AI Soc. 23, 4 (2009), 485--510.Google ScholarDigital Library
- NEOM. [n.d.]. NEOM. Retrieved on February 2, 2021 from http://www.discoverneom.com/.Google Scholar
- Tatsuya Nomura, Keisuke Sugimoto, Dag Sverre Syrdal, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2012. Social acceptance of humanoid robots in Japan: A survey for development of the Frankenstein syndrome questionnaire. In Proceedings of the 12th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids’12). IEEE, 242--247.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Geoff Norman. 2010. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Adv. Health Sci. Educ. 15, 5 (2010), 625--632.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ministry of Communication & Information Technology. 2005. Egypt’s Information Society. Retrieved from http://www.mcit.gov.eg/Upcont/Documents/EgyInfo_Society.pdf.Google Scholar
- Lucia Pigini, David Facal, Lorenzo Blasi, and Renzo Andrich. 2012. Service robots in elderly care at home: Users’ needs and perceptions as a basis for concept development. Technol. Disab. 24, 4 (2012), 303--311.Google ScholarCross Ref
- PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2017. Middle East consumers ready to embrace AI and robots for their healthcare needs. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/m1/en/media-centre/2017/middle-east-consumers-embrace-ai-robots-healthcare-needs.html.Google Scholar
- P. L. Patrick Rau, Ye Li, and Dingjun Li. 2009. Effects of communication style and culture on ability to accept recommendations from robots. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25, 2 (2009), 587--595.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Laurel D. Riek, Nikolaos Mavridis, Shammah Antali, Noura Darmaki, Zeeshan Ahmed, Maitha Al-Neyadi, and Amina Alketheri. 2010. Ibn Sina steps out: Exploring Arabic attitudes toward humanoid robots. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on New Frontiers in Human--robot Interaction, Vol. 1.Google Scholar
- Alessandra Maria Sabelli, Takayuki Kanda, and Norihiro Hagita. 2011. A conversational robot in an elderly care center: An ethnographic study. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction (HRI’11). IEEE, 37--44.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maha Salem, Micheline Ziadee, and Majd Sakr. 2014. Marhaba, how may I help you? Effects of politeness and culture on robot acceptance and anthropomorphization. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction (HRI’14). IEEE, 74--81.Google Scholar
- Hooman Samani, Elham Saadatian, Natalie Pang, Doros Polydorou, Owen Noel Newton Fernando, Ryohei Nakatsu, and Jeffrey Tzu Kwan Valino Koh. 2013. Cultural robotics: The culture of robotics and robotics in culture. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 10, 12 (2013), 400.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Matthias Scheutz and Thomas Arnold. 2016. Are we ready for sex robots? In Proceedings of the 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction. IEEE Press, 351--358.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Megan Strait, Priscilla Briggs, and Matthias Scheutz. 2015. Gender, more so than age, modulates positive perceptions of language-based human-robot interactions. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on New Frontiers in Human-robot Interaction.Google Scholar
- T. Fong, I. Nourbakhsh, and K. Dautenhahn. 2002. A Survey of Socially Interactive Robots: Concepts, Design and Applications. Technical Report No. CMU-RI-TR-02-29. Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
- Gabriele Trovato, Massimiliano Zecca, Salvatore Sessa, Lorenzo Jamone, Jaap Ham, Kenji Hashimoto, and Atsuo Takanishi. 2013. Cross-cultural study on human-robot greeting interaction: Acceptance and discomfort by Egyptians and Japanese. Paladyn, J. Behav. Robot. 4, 2 (2013), 83--93.Google Scholar
- Viswanath Venkatesh, James Y. L. Thong, and Xin Xu. 2012. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quart. 36, 1 (2012), 157--178.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lin Wang, Pei-Luen Patrick Rau, Vanessa Evers, Benjamin Krisper Robinson, and Pamela Hinds. 2010. When in Rome: The role of culture & context in adherence to robot recommendations. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction. IEEE Press, 359--366.Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Understanding Cultural Preferences for Social Robots: A Study in German and Arab Communities
Recommendations
Towards the Definition of Cultural Robotics
CULTURECOMPUTING '13: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Culture and ComputingIn this study we have explored the concept of ``Cultural Robotics" for the evolution of social to cultural Robots for contemporary society. By defining the concept of culture in computing, the potential creation of a culture between humans and robots is ...
Redefining culture in cultural robotics
AbstractCultural influences are pervasive throughout human behaviour, and as human–robot interactions become more common, roboticists are increasingly focusing attention on how to build robots that are culturally competent and culturally sustainable. The ...
A Multimodal Robot Based Model for the Preservation of Intangible Cultural Heritage
HRI '17: Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionThe United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) has expressed on several occasions the importance of the preservation of cultural identity through the protection of tangible and intangible cultural heritage. Although there ...
Comments