Abstract
Human-computer interaction has a long history of working with marginalized people. We sought to understand how HCI researchers navigate work that engages with marginalized people and considerations researchers might work through to expand benefits and mitigate potential harms. In total, 24 HCI researchers, located primarily in the United States, participated in an interview, survey, or both. Through a reflexive thematic analysis, we identified four tensions—exploitation, membership, disclosure, and allyship. We explore the complexity involved in each, demonstrating that an equitable endpoint may not be possible, but this work is still worth pursuing when researchers make certain considerations. We emphasize that researchers who work with marginalized people should account for each tension in their research approaches to move forward. Finally, we propose an allyship-oriented approach to research that draws inspiration from discourse occurring in tangential fields and activist spaces and pushes the field into a new paradigm of research with marginalized people.
- Indigenous Action. 2014. Accomplices Not Allies: Abolishing the Ally Industrial Complex. Retrieved from http://www.indigenousaction.org/accomplices-not-allies-abolishing-the-ally-industrial-complex/.Google Scholar
- A. Aguirre. 2000. Women and Minority Faculty in the Academic Workplace: Recruitment, Retention, and Academic Culture. SHE-ERIC Higher Education Report. ERIC Publications. DOI:https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED447752.pdfGoogle Scholar
- A. A. Ahmed. 2018. Trans competent interaction design: A qualitative study on voice, identity, and technology. Interacting with Computers 30, 1 (2018), 53--71. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwx018Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Ahmed. 2012. On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Sociological Research Online. Duke University Press Books.Google Scholar
- N. Kumar and S. Bardzell. 2020. An unofficial guide to seven stages of reviewing for CHI. Retrieved from https://nehakumar.medium.com/an-unofficial-guide-to-seven-stages-of-reviewing-for-chi-7938880fc895.Google Scholar
- A. N. Antle. 2017. The ethics of doing research with vulnerable populations. Interactions. 24, 6 (2017), 74--77. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3137107Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Bardzell and J. Bardzell. 2011. Towards a feminist HCI methodology: Social science, feminism, and HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 675--684. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979041Google Scholar
- G. Bauer, A. Devor, M. Heinz, Z. Marshall, A. Pullen Sansfaçon, and J. Pyne. 2019. CPATH Ethical Guidelines for Research Involving Transgender People & Communities. Retrieved from https://cpath.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/CPATH-Ethical-Guidelines-EN.pdf.Google Scholar
- E. P. S. Baumer and M. S. Silberman. 2011. When the implication is not to design (technology). In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Paper 25, 1--9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420172Google Scholar
- R. Benjamin. 2020. Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new jim code. Social Forces 98, 4 (2020), 1--3. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz162Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. L. Bennett, E. Brady, and S. M. Branham. 2018. Interdependence as a frame for assistive technology research and design. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’18). 161--173. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3236348Google Scholar
- C. L. Bennett and O. Keyes. 2019. What is the point of fairness? Disability, AI and the complexity of justice. ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing 125 (2019), Article 5, 1. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3386296.3386301Google Scholar
- C. L. Bennett and D. K. Rosner. 2019. The promise of empathy: Design, disability, and knowing the “other.” In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Paper 298, 1--13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300528Google Scholar
- N. Berenstain. 2016. Epistemic exploitation.Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy 3, 22 (2016). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0003.022Google Scholar
- Black in Computing and Our Allies for Equity and Fairness: 2020. Retrieved from https://blackincomputing.org/.Google Scholar
- T. Bratteteig and I. Wagner. 2012. Disentangling power and decision-making in participatory design. In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers (PDC’12). 41--50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2347635.2347642Google Scholar
- V. Braun and V. Clarke. 2019. To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 13, 2 (2019), 201--216. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846Google ScholarCross Ref
- V. Braun and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- P. H. Collins. 2002. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics Of Empowerment. Routledge. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2074808Google Scholar
- R. N. Brewer. 2017. Understanding and Developing Interactive Voice Response Systems to Support Online Engagement of Older Adults. Ph.D. Dissertation. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. Proquest Number: 10603427.Google Scholar
- E. M. Broido. 2000. The development of social justice allies during college: A phenomenological investigation. Journal of College Student Development 41, 1 (2000), 3--18. Retrieved from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.470.1439&rep=rep1&type=pdf.Google Scholar
- A. K. Brooks and K. Edwards. 2009. Allies in the workplace: Including LGBT in HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources 11, 1 (2009), 136--149. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422308328500Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Brulé and K. Spiel. 2019. Negotiating gender and disability identities in participatory design. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Communities & Technologies—Transforming Communities. 218--227. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3328320.3328369Google Scholar
- C. Cahill. 2007. Including excluded perspectives in participatory action research. Design Studies 28, 3 (2007), 325--340. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2007.02.006Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Caldwell. 2010. We exist: Intersectional in/visibility in bisexuality & disability. Disability Studies Quarterly 30, 3/4 (2010). DOI:https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v30i3/4.1273Google Scholar
- H. Castleden, T. Garvin, and H. First Nation. 2008. Modifying photovoice for community-based participatory indigenous research. Social Science and Medicine 66, 6 (2008), 1393--1405. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.030Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Charlotte Smith, H. Winschiers-Theophilus, A. Paula Kambunga, and S. Krishnamurthy. 2020. Decolonizing participatory design: Memory making in Namibia. In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020. 96--106. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3385010.3385021Google Scholar
- P. A. L. Cochran, C. A. Marshall, C. Garcia-Downing, E. Kendall, D. Cook, L. McCubbin, and R. M. S. Gover. 2008. Indigenous ways of knowing: Implications for participatory research and community. American Journal of Public Health 98, 1 (2008), 22--27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2006.093641Google ScholarCross Ref
- Combahee River Collective. 1977. Combahee River Collective: A Black Feminist Statement. Let Nobody Turn Us Around: Voices of Resistance, Reform and Renewal; An African American Anthology. Retrieved from https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/combahee-river-collective-statement-1977/.Google Scholar
- R. Cornejo, R. Brewer, C. Edasis, and A. M. Piper. 2016. Vulnerability, sharing, and privacy: Analyzing art therapy for older adults with dementia. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’16). 1572--1583. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819960Google Scholar
- S. Costanza-Chock. 2018. Design justice: Towards an intersectional feminist framework for design theory and practice. In Proceedings of the Design Research Society 2018. DOI:https://ssrn.com/abstract=3189696Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Costanza-Chock. 2020. Introduction: #Travelingwhiletrans, Design Justice, and Escape from the Matrix of Domination. MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Crenshaw Kimberle. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989 (1989), Article 8, 139--163. http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8.Google Scholar
- K. Crenshaw. 1991. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43, 6 (1991), 1241--1299. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Gaeta. 2019. Cripping Emotional Labor: A Field Guide. Retrieved from https://disabilityvisibilityproject.com/2019/06/03/cripping-emotional-labor-a-field-guide/.Google Scholar
- C. D'Ignazio, A. Hope, B. Michelson, R. Churchill, and E. Zuckerman. 2016. A feminist HCI approach to designing postpartum technologies: “When I first saw a breast pump I was wondering if it was a joke.” In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2612--2622. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858460Google Scholar
- C. D'Ignazio and L. F. Klein. 2020. Data Feminism. MIT Press.Google Scholar
- S. Daley, D. L. Wingard, and V. Reznik. 2006. Improving the retention of underrepresented minority faculty in academic medicine. Journal of the National Medical Association 98, 9 (2006), 1435--1440.Google Scholar
- C. A. Le Dantec and W. K. Edwards. 2008. Designs on dignity: Perceptions of technology among the homeless. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 627--636. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357155Google Scholar
- C. A. Le Dantec, R. G. Farrell, J. E. Christensen, M. Bailey, J. B. Ellis, W. A. Kellogg, and W. K. Edwards. 2011. Publics in practice: Ubiquitous computing at a shelter for homeless mothers. In Proceedings of the 2011 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1687--1696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979189Google Scholar
- C. W. Daum. 2020. Social equity, homonormativity, and equality: An intersectional critique of the administration of marriage equality and opportunities for LGBTQ social justice. Administrative Theory and Praxis 42, 2 (2020), 115--132. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2019.1659044Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Dell and N. Kumar. 2016. The ins and outs of HCI for development. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2220--2232. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858081Google Scholar
- Design Justice Network. 2018. Design Justice Network Principles. Retrieved from https://designjustice.org/read-the-principles.Google Scholar
- I. Dey. 1999. Grounding Grounded Theory: Guidelines for Qualitative Inquiry. Emerald Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
- T. Dillahunt, J. Mankoff, and E. Paulos. 2010. Understanding conflict between landlords and tenants: Implications for energy sensing and feedback. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’10). 149--158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1864349.1864376Google Scholar
- T. R. Dillahunt and T. C. Veinot. 2018. Getting there: Barriers and facilitators to transportation access in underserved communities. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 25, 5 (2018), Article 29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3233985Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. P. Morgan. 1996. Describing the emperor's new clothes: Three myths of educational (In-)equity. In The Gender Question in Education. A. Diller, B. Houston, K. P. Morgan, M. Ayim, and K. P. Morgan (Eds.), Routledge.Google Scholar
- J. P. Dimond, M. Dye, D. Larose, and A. S. Bruckman. 2013. Hollaback!: The role of collective storytelling online in a social movement organization. In Proceedi ngs of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’13). 477--490. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441831Google Scholar
- L. Dombrowski, E. Harmon, and S. Fox. 2016. Social justice-oriented interaction design: Outlining key design strategies and commitments. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Fuse (DIS’16). 656--671. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901861Google Scholar
- L. Duggan. 2002. The new homonormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism. In Materializing Democracy Toward a Revitalized Cultural Politics. R. Castronovo and D. Nelson (Eds.), Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- M. Dye, D. Nemer, L. R. Pina, N. Sambasivan, A. S. Bruckman, and N. Kumar. 2017. Locating the internet in the parks of Havana. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3867--3878. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025728Google Scholar
- L. Palen. 2014. Empirical Epistemologies Applied to Human-Centered Computing Research: 2014. Retrieved from https://cmci.colorado.edu/~palen/EmpiricalEpistemologiesforHCC-7.pdf.Google Scholar
- K. V. L. England. 1994. Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. Professional Geographer 46, 1 (1994), 80--89. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00080.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- D. A. Epstein, N. B. Lee, J. H. Kang, E. Agapie, J. Schroeder, L. R. Pina, J. Fogarty, J. A. Kientz, and S. A. Munson. 2017. Examining menstrual tracking to inform the design of personal informatics tools. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 6876--6888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025635Google Scholar
- S. Erete, A. Israni, and T. Dillahunt. 2018. An intersectional approach to designing in the margins. Interactions 25, 3 (2018), 66--69. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3194349Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Erete, Y. A. Rankin, and J. O. Thomas. 2020. I can't breathe: Reflections from black women in CSCW and HCI. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW3 (2020), Article 234, 23 pages. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1122445.1122456Google Scholar
- S. L. Erete. 2015. Engaging around neighborhood issues: How online communication affects offline behavior. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW’15). 1590--1601. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675182Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. J. Evans, J. L. Assadi, and T. K. Herriott. 2005. Encouraging the development of disability allies. New Directions for Student Services 2005, 110 (2005), 67--79. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.166Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. J. Evans and V. A. Wall. 1991. Beyond Tolerance: Gays, Lesbians and Bisexuals on Campus. UPA.Google Scholar
- M. Cifor, P. Garcia, T. L. Cowan, J. Rault, T. Sutherland, A. Chan, J. Rode, A. L. Hoffmann, N. Salehi, and L. Nakamura. 2019. Feminist Data Manifest-No. Retrieved from https://www.manifestno.com/.Google Scholar
- C. Fiesler, S. Morrison, and A. S. Bruckman. 2016. An archive of their own: A case study of feminist HCI and values in design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2574--2585. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858409Google Scholar
- M. Fine. 1994. Working the hyphens: Reinventing self and other in qualitative research. In Handbook of Qualitative Research. SAGE. Retrieved from http://www.uky.edu/~addesa01/documents/Fine_Hyphens.pdfGoogle Scholar
- M. Franks. 2002. Feminisms and cross-ideological feminist social research: Standpoint, situatedness and positionality—Developing cross-ideological feminist research. Journal of International Women's Studies 3, 2 (2002), 38--50. Retrieved from http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol3/iss2/3.Google Scholar
- M. Fricker. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- P. I. Fusch and L. R. Ness. 2015. Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. Qualitative Report 20, 9 (2015), 1408--1416. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol20/iss9/3.Google Scholar
- M. Gallagher. 2008. “Power is not an evil”: Rethinking power in participatory methods. Children's Geographies 6, 2 (2008), 137--150. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14733280801963045Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Ghoshal and A. Bruckman. 2019. The role of social computing technologies in grassroots movement building. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 26, 3 (2019), Article 18, 36 pages. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3318140Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Gillespie. 2018. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions that Shape Social Media. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- S. D. Grady, P. J. Wisniewski, R. Metoyer, P. Gibbs, K. Badillo-Urquiola, S. Elsayed-Ali, and E. Yafi. 2020. Addressing institutional racism within initiatives for SIGCHI's diversity and inclusion. Interactions. Retrieved from https://interactions.acm.org/blog/view/addressing-institutional-racism-within-initiatives-for-sigchis-diversity-an.Google Scholar
- S. D. Grieb, M. M. Eder, K. C. Smith, K. Calhoun, and D. Tandon. 2015. Qualitative research and community-based participatory research: Considerations for effective dissemination in the peer-reviewed literature. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action 9, 2 (2015), 275--282. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2015.0041Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Grimes and R. E. Grinter. 2007. Designing persuasion: Health technology for low-income African American communities. In Persuasive Technology (PERSUASIVE’07). Y. de Kort, W. IJsselsteijn, C. Midden, B. Eggen, B. J. Fogg (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4744. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77006-0_4Google Scholar
- Oliver L. Haimson, Dykee Gorrell, Denny L. Starks, and Z. Weinger. 2020. Designing trans technology: Defining challenges and envisioning community-centered solutions. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’20). 1--13.Google Scholar
- D. M. Halperin. 2012. How To Be Gay. Belknap Press.Google Scholar
- A. M. Hancock. 2007. When multiplication doesn't equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics 5, 1 (2007), 63--79. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707070065Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Hankerson, A. R. Marshall, J. Booker, H. El Mimouni, I. Walker, and J. A. Rode. 2016. Does technology have race? In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 473--486. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892578Google Scholar
- D. J. Haraway. 2016. Staying with the Trouble. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- S. Harding. 1992. Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity?” The Centennial Review 36, 3 (1992), 437--470. Retrieved December 23, 2020 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23739232Google Scholar
- S. G. Harding. 2004. The feminist standpoint theory reader. In The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. Routledge.Google Scholar
- S. Hardouin, T. W. Cheng, E. L. Mitchell, S. J. Raulli, D. W. Jones, J. J. Siracuse, and A. Farber. 2020. Prevalence of unprofessional social media content among young vascular surgeons. Journal of Vascular Surgery 72, 2 (2020), 667--671.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. N. Harrington, K. Borgos-Rodriguez, and A. M. Piper. 2019. Engaging low-income African American older adults in health discussions through community-based design workshops. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Paper 593, 1--15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300823Google Scholar
- C. N. Harrington, S. Erete, and A. M. Piper. 2019. Deconstructing community-based collaborative design: Towards more equitable participatory design engagements. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW, Article 216 (2019), 25 pages. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3359318Google Scholar
- C. N. Harrington and A. M. Piper. 2018. Informing design through sociocultural values: Co-creation with low-income African-American older adults. In Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth’18). 294--298. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3240925.3240966Google Scholar
- P. Harris. 1995. Who am I? Concepts of disability and their implications for people with learning difficulties. Disability & Society 10, 3 (1995), 341--352. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599550023570Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. R. Hayes. 2011. The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 18, 3 (2011) Article 15, 20 pages. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1993060.1993065Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. K. Scheuerman, K. Spiel, O. Haimson, F. Hamidi, and S. M. Branham. 2019. HCI Guidelines for Gender Equity and Inclusivity. Retrieved from https://www.morgan-klaus.com/sigchi-gender-guidelines.Google Scholar
- G. Bauer, A. Devor, M. Heinz, Z. Marshall, A. Pullen Sansfaçon, and J. Pyne. 2019. CPATH Ethical Guidelines for Research Involving Transgender People & Communities. Retrieved from https://cpath.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/CPATH-Ethical-Guidelines-EN.pdf.Google Scholar
- R. Heeks. 2002. Information systems and developing countries: Failure, success, and local improvisations. Information Society 18, 2 (2002), 101--112. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240290075039Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Heimerl, S. Hasan, K. Ali, E. Brewer, and T. Parikh. 2013. Local, sustainable, small-scale cellular networks. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development: Full Papers: Volume 1 (ICTD’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 2--12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2516604.2516616Google Scholar
- P. Hill Collins and S. Bilge. 2016. What is intersectionality? Using intersectionality as an analytic tool. Intersectionality 61, 11 (2016), 1036--1039. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.08.024Google Scholar
- A. L. Hoffmann. 2019. Where fairness fails: data, algorithms, and the limits of antidiscrimination discourse. Information Communication and Society 22, 7 (2019), 900--915. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573912Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. E. Hopkins. 2009. Women, men, positionalities and emotion: Doing feminist geographies of religion. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 8, 1 (2009), 1--17. Retrieved from https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/818.Google Scholar
- D. Howard and L. Irani. 2019. Ways of knowing when research subjects care. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Paper 97, 1--16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300327Google Scholar
- J. Hui, N. R. Barber, W. Casey, S. Cleage, D. C. Dolley, F. Worthy, K. Toyama, and T. R. Dillahunt. 2020. Community collectives: Low-tech social support for digitally-engaged entrepreneurship. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376363Google Scholar
- R. Imrie. 2012. Universalism, universal design and equitable access to the built environment. Disability and Rehabilitation 34, 10 (2012), 873--882. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.624250Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Dutt-Ballerstadt. 2020. In Our Own Words: Institutional betrayals. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2020/03/06/underrepresented-faculty-members-share-real-reasons-they-have-left-various.Google Scholar
- L. Irani, J. Vertesi, P. Dourish, K. Philip, and R. E. Grinter. 2010. Postcolonial computing: A lens on design and development. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1311--1320. DOI:https://doi.org./10.1145/1753326.1753522Google Scholar
- B. A. Israel, E. A. Parker, Z. Rowe, A. Salvatore, M. Minkler, J. López, A. Butz, A. Mosley, L. Coates, G. Lambert, P. A. Potito, B. Brenner, M. Rivera, H. Romero, B. Thompson, G. Coronado, and S. Halstead. 2005. Community-based participatory research: Lessons learned from the centers for children's environmental health and disease prevention research. Environmental Health Perspectives 113, 10 (2005), 1463--1471. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7675Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. A. Israel, C. M. Coombe, R. R. Cheezum, A. J. Schulz, R. J. McGranaghan, R. Lichtenstein, A. G. Reyes, J. Clement, and A. Burris. 2010. Community-based participatory research: A capacity-building approach for policy advocacy aimed at eliminating health disparities. American Journal of Public Health 100, 11 (2010), 2094--2102. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.170506Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Iyer and C. W. Leach. 2009. Helping disadvantaged out-groups challenge unjust inequality: The role of group-based emotions. In The Psychology of Prosocial Behavior: Group Processes, Intergroup Relations, and Helping. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444307948.ch17Google Scholar
- S. K. Kane, J. P. Bigham, and J. O. Wobbrock. 2008. Slide rule: Making mobile touch screens accessible to blind people using multi-touch interaction techniques. In Proceedings of the 10th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’08). 73--80. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1414471.1414487Google Scholar
- O. Keyes. 2018. The misgendering machines: Trans/HCI implications of automatic gender recognition. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), Article 88, 22 pages. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3274357Google ScholarDigital Library
- O. Keyes, J. Hoy, and M. Drouhard. 2019. Human-computer insurrection: Notes on an Anarchist HCI. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Paper 339, 1--13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300569Google Scholar
- O. Keyes, B. Peil, R. M. Williams, and K. Spiel. 2020. Reimagining (Women's) health: HCI, gender and essentialised embodiment. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 27, 4 (2020) Article 25, 42 pages. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3404218Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Kluttz, J. Walker, and P. Walter. 2019. Unsettling allyship, unlearning and learning towards decolonising solidarity. Studies in the Education of Adults 52, 1 (2019), 49--66. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2019.1654591Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Kolovson, A. Pratap, J. Duffy, R. Allred, S. A. Munson, and P. A. Areán. 2020. Understanding participant needs for engagement and attitudes towards passive sensing in remote digital health studies. In Proceedings of the 14th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth’20). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3421937.3422025Google Scholar
- R. Koster, K. Baccar, and R. H. Lemelin. 2012. Moving from research ON, to research with and for indigenous communities: A critical reflection on community-based participatory research. Canadian Geographer 56, 2 (2012). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0064.2012.00428.xGoogle Scholar
- J. L. Laws. 1975. The psychology of tokenism: An analysis. Sex Roles 1, 51--67 (1975). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287213Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. De Leeuw, E. S. Cameron, and M. L. Greenwood. 2012. Participatory and community-based research, indigenous geographies, and the spaces of friendship: A critical engagement. Canadian Geographer 56, 2 (2012), 180--194. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0064.2012.00434.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- G. Leonard and L. Misumi. 2016. W.A.I.T. (Why Am I Talking?): A dialogue on solidarity, allyship, and supporting the struggle for racial justice without reproducing white supremacy. Harvard Journal of African American Public Policy 61--74.Google Scholar
- C. Lee and J. Hume-Pratuch. 2013. Let's Talk About Research Participants. Retrieved from http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2013/08/lets-talk-about-research-participants.html.Google Scholar
- E. Lightman, A. Vick, D. Herd, and A. Mitchell. 2009. ‘Not disabled enough’: Episodic disabilities and the Ontario disability support program. Disability Studies Quarterly 29, 3 (2009). DOI:https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v29i3.932Google Scholar
- B. Lloyd-Jones. 2014. African-American women in the professoriate: Addressing social exclusion and scholarly marginalization through mentoring. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning 22, 4 (2014), 269--283. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2014.945737Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Lugones. 2007. Heterosexualism and the colonial/modern gender system. Hypatia. 22, 1 (2007), 186--219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2007.tb01156.xGoogle Scholar
- L. Malinverni and N. Pares. 2017. An autoethnographic approach to guide situated ethical decisions in participatory design with teenagers. Interacting with Computers. (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iww031Google Scholar
- Black Lives Matter. #TalkAbout Trayvon: A Toolkit for White People. 2017. Retrieved from https://blacklivesmatter.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Toolkit-WhitePpl-Trayvon.pdf.Google Scholar
- W. D. Mignolo. 2018. What does it mean to decolonize? In On Decoloniality. W. D. Mignolo and C. E. Walsh (Eds.), Duke University Press, 105--134.Google Scholar
- M. Minkler. 2004. Ethical challenges for the “outside” researcher in community-based participatory research. Health Education and Behavior 31, 6 (2004), 684--697. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198104269566Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Mizock and K. V. Page. 2016. Evaluating the ally role: Contributions, limitations, and the activist position in counseling and psychology. Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology 8, 1 (2016). DOI:https://doi.org/10.33043/JSACP.8.1.17-33Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Moon and D. Blackman. 2014. A guide to understanding social science research for natural scientists. Conservation Biology 28, 5 (2014), 1167--1177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12326Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Moss, J. P. Jones, H. J. Nast, and S. M. Roberts. 1999. Thresholds in feminist geography: Difference, methodology, representation. Economic Geography 27, 11 (1999), 1659--1662. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/144254Google Scholar
- M. J. Muller. 2003. Participatory design: The third space in HCI. In Human-Computer Interaction Handbook (2nd ed.). CRC Press. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/153571.255960Google Scholar
- C. Munteanu, H. Molyneaux, W. Moncur, M. Romero, S. O'Donnell, and J. Vines. 2015. Situational ethics: Re-thinking approaches to formal ethics requirements for human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 105--114. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702481Google Scholar
- A. Waller. 2020. Nextdoor removes app's ‘forward to police’ feature. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/23/us/nextdoor-forward-to-police-.html.Google Scholar
- J. T. O'Leary, S. Zewde, J. Mankoff, and D. K. Rosner. 2019. Who gets to future? Race, representation, and design methods in Africatown. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Paper 561, 1--13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300791Google Scholar
- I. F. Ogbonnaya-Ogburu, A. D. Smith, A. To, and K. Toyama. 2020. Critical race theory for HCI. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376392Google Scholar
- R. Gay. 2016. On making Black Lives Matter: 2016. Retrieved from https://www.marieclaire.com/culture/a21423/roxane-gay-philando-castile-alton-sterling/.Google Scholar
- W. J. Orlikowski and J. J. Baroudi. 1991. Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research 2, 1 (1991), 1--84. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.1.1Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. G. Parker, V. Kantroo, H. R. Lee, M. Osornio, M. Sharma, and R. E. Grinter. 2012. Health promotion as activism: Building community capacity to effect social change. In Proceedings of the 2012 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 99--108. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207692Google Scholar
- A. Peshkin. 1988. In search of subjectivity—One's own. Educational Researcher 17, 7 (1988), 17--21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X017007017Google Scholar
- E. S. Poole and T. Peyton. 2013. Interaction design research with adolescents: Methodological challenges and best practices. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC’13). 211--217. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485766Google Scholar
- J. Powell and A. Kelly. 2018. Accomplices in the academy in the age of Black Lives Matter. Journal of Critical Thought and Praxis 6, 2 (2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.31274/jctp-180810-73Google Scholar
- A. Quijano. 2000. Coloniality of power and eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology 15, 2 (2000), 215--232. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005Google ScholarCross Ref
- Y. A. Rankin and J. O. Thomas. 2019. Straighten up and fly right: Rethinking intersectionality in HCI research. Interactions 26, 6 (2019), 64--68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3363033Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. A. Rankin, J. O. Thomas, and N. M. Joseph. 2020. Intersectionality in HCI: lost in translation. Interactions 27, 5 (2020), 68--71. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3416498Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. W. J. Rittel and M. M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences. 4, 2 (1973), 155--169. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. S. Rodopoulos. 2004. Becoming an ally: Breaking the cycle of oppression (2nd edn). Australian Social Work 57, 4 (2004), 410--412. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0312-407x.2004.00170.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- G. M. Russell. 2011. Motives of heterosexual allies in collective action for equality. Journal of Social Issues 67, 2 (2011), 376--393. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01703.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- G. M. Russell and J. S. Bohan. 2016. Institutional allyship for LGBT equality: Underlying processes and potentials for change. Journal of Social Issues 72, 2 (2016), 335--354. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12169Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Ryan, J. Yip, M. Stieff, and A. Druin. 2013. Cooperative inquiry as a community of practice. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference 2, CSCL (2013), 145--148. Retrieved from http://bigyipper.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/CSCL2013_ShortPaper_Submission.pdf.Google Scholar
- B. de Sousa Santos. 2014. A critique of lazy reason: Against the waste of experience and toward the sociology of absences and the sociology of emergences. In Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. B. de S. Santos (Ed.), Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315634876Google Scholar
- A. M. Santuzzi, P. R. Waltz, L. M. Finkelstein, and D. E. Rupp. 2014. Invisible disabilities: Unique challenges for employees and organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2014). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/iops.12134Google Scholar
- S. Schalk. 2013. Coming to claim crip: Disidentification with/in disability studies. Disability Studies Quarterly 33, 2 (2013). 10.18061/dsq.v33i2.3705Google Scholar
- M. K. Scheuerman, S. M. Branham, and F. Hamidi. 2018. Safe spaces and safe places: Unpacking technology-mediated experiences of safety and harm with transgender people. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018) Article 155. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3274424Google Scholar
- A. Schlesinger, W. K. Edwards, and R. E. Grinter. 2017. Intersectional HCI: Engaging identity through gender, race, and class. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 5412--5427. DOI::https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025766Google Scholar
- Y. B. Shrinivasan, M. Jain, D. P. Seetharam, A. Choudhary, E. Huang, T. Dillahunt, and J. Mankoff. 2013. Deep conservation in urban India and its implications for the design of conservation technologies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1969--1978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466261Google Scholar
- K. A. Siek, J. S. LaMarche, and J. Maitland. 2009. Bridging the information gap: Collaborative technology design with low-income at-risk families to engender healthy behaviors. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group - Design: Open 24/7 (OZCHI’09). 89--96. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1738826.1738841Google Scholar
- C. E. Smith, X. Wang, R. P. Karumur, and H. Zhu. 2018. [Un]breaking news: Design opportunities for enhancing collaboration in scientific media production. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Paper 381, 1--13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173955Google Scholar
- L. T. Smith. 2012. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples (2nd ed.). Zed Books.Google Scholar
- K. Spiel, A. M. Walker, M. A. DeVito, J. Birnholtz, P. Barlas, A. Ahmed, J. R. Brubaker, O. Keyes, E. Brulé, A. Light, J. Hardy, J. A. Rode, and G. Kannabiran. 2019. Queer(ing) HCI: Moving forward in theory and practice. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Paper SIG11, 1--4. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3311750Google Scholar
- A. Strohmayer, R. Comber, and M. Balaam. 2015. Exploring learning ecologies among people experiencing homelessness. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2275--2284. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702157Google Scholar
- C. Sturm, A. Oh, S. Linxen, J. Abdelnour-Nocera, S. Dray, and K. Reinecke. 2015. How WEIRD is HCI? Extending HCI principles to other countries and cultures. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2425--2428. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2702656Google Scholar
- E. Subašić, K. J. Reynolds, and J. C. Turner. 2008. The political solidarity model of social change: Dynamics of self-categorization in intergroup power relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review 12, 4 (2008), 330--342. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308323223Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Sultana, F. Guimbretière, P. Sengers, and N. Dell. 2018. Design within a patriarchal society: Opportunities and challenges in designing for rural women in Bangladesh. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Paper 536, 1--13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174110Google Scholar
- M. Tanis and T. Postmes. 2005. Short communication a social identity approach to trust: Interpersonal perception, group membership and trusting behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology (2005). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.256Google Scholar
- B. D. Tatum. 1994. Teaching white students about racism: The search for White allies and the restoration of hope. Teachers College Record 95, 4 (1994), 462--476. Retrieved from http://www.goldenbridgesschool.org/uploads/1/9/5/4/19541249/teaching_white_students_about_racism.pdf.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Taylor. 2011. Out there. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 685--694. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979042Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. O. Thomas, N. Joseph, A. Williams, C. Crum, and J. Burge. 2018. Speaking truth to power: Exploring the intersectional experiences of Black women in computing. In Proceedings of the 2018 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT’18). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT.2018.8491718Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Thompson and S. Reinharz. 1992. Feminist methods in social research. Journal of Marriage and the Family 54, 4 (1992), 996--997. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/353180Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. To, W. Sweeney, J. Hammer, and G. Kaufman. 2020. “They just don't get it”: Towards social technologies for coping with interpersonal racism. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW (2020), Article 024, 29 pages. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3392828Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. M. Unertl, C. L. Schaefbauer, T. R. Campbell, C. Senteio, K. A. Siek, S. Bakken, and T. C. Veinot. 2016. Integrating community-based participatory research and informatics approaches to improve the engagement and health of underserved populations. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 23, 1 (2016), 60--73. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv094Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Vashistha, R. Anderson, A. Garg, and A. A. Raza. 2019. Threats, abuses, flirting, and blackmail: Gender inequity in social media voice forums. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Paper 72, 1--13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300302Google Scholar
- A. Vashistha, P. Sethi, and R. Anderson. 2018. BSpeak: An accessible crowdsourcing marketplace for low-income blind people. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Paper 57, 1--13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173631Google Scholar
- T. C. Veinot, J. S. Ancker, H. Cole-Lewis, E. D. Mynatt, A. G. Parker, K. A. Siek, and L. Mamykina. 2019. Leveling up: On the potential of upstream health informatics interventions to enhance health equity. Medical Care 57, 6 (2019), S108--S114. DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001032Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Villenas. 1996. The colonizer/colonized Chicana ethnographer: Identity, marginalization, and co-optation in the field. Harvard Educational Review 66, 4 (1996), 711--732. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.4.3483672630865482Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Vines, R. McNaney, R. Clarke, S. Lindsay, J. McCarthy, S. Howard, M. Romero, and J. Wallace. 2013. Designing for- and with- vulnerable people. In Proceedings of the CHI’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3231--3234. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2479654Google Scholar
- J. Vines, R. McNaney, S. Lindsay, J. Wallace, and J. McCarthy. 2014. Designing for and with vulnerable people. Interactions 21, 1 (2014), 44--46. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2543490Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Shaprio. 2020. Viral #medbikini response to controversial manuscript leads editor to retract article. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/ninashapiro/2020/07/25/viral-medbikini-response-to-controversial-manuscript-leads-editor-to-retract-article/?sh=283a146c1f47.Google Scholar
- N. B. Wallerstein and B. Duran. 2006. Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities. Health Promotion Practice. (2006). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839906289376Google Scholar
- J. K. Walter, J. F. Burke, and M. M. Davis. 2013. Research participation by low-income and racial/ethnic minority groups: How payment may change the balance. Clinical and Translational Science 6, 5 (2013), 363--371. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12084Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Waycott, G. Wadley, S. Schutt, A. Stabolidis, and R. Lederman. 2015. The challenge of technology research in sensitive settings: Case studies in “Sensitive HCI.” In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction (OzCHI’15). 240--249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2838739.2838773Google Scholar
- S. Wendell. 2016. Unhealthy disabled: Treating chronic illnesses as disabilities. In The Disability Studies Reader (5th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527–2001.2001.tb00751.xGoogle Scholar
- E. P. Williams and J. K. Walter. 2015. When does the amount we pay research participants become “undue influence”? AMA Journal of Ethics 17, 12 (2015), 1116--1121. DOI:10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.12.ecas2-1512Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. R. Williamson and S. Prosser. 2002. Action research: Politics, ethics and participation. Journal of Advanced Nursing 40, 5 (2002), 587--593. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02416.x.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Winner. 1985. Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus 109, 1 (1985), 26--38 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315259697-21Google Scholar
- M. Wong-Villacres, A. Kumar, A. Vishwanath, N. Karusala, B. DiSalvo, and N. Kumar. 2018. Designing for intersections. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS’18). 45--58. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196794Google Scholar
- S. Wyche, T. R. Dillahunt, N. Simiyu, and S. Alaka. 2015. “If god gives me the chance I will design my own phone”: Exploring mobile phone repair and postcolonial approaches to design in rural Kenya. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’15). 463--473. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2804249Google Scholar
- S. P. Wyche, M. Densmore, and B. S. Geyer. 2015. Real mobiles: Kenyan and Zambian smallholder farmers? Current attitudes towards mobile phones. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. Article 9, 1--10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2737856.2738013Google Scholar
- S. P. Wyche and L. L. Murphy. 2012. “Dead china-make” phones off the grid: Investigating and designing for mobile phone use in rural Africa. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS’12). 186--195. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2317985Google Scholar
- A. Ymous, K. Spiel, O. Keyes, R. M. Williams, J. Good, E. Hornecker, and C. L. Bennett. 2020. “I am just terrified of my future”: Epistemic violence in disability related technology research. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3381828Google Scholar
- S. Linton. 1998. Claiming Disability: Knowledge and Identity. NYU Press. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-6303Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Embracing Four Tensions in Human-Computer Interaction Research with Marginalized People
Recommendations
Reflexive Ethnographies in Human-Computer Interaction: Theory and Practice
CHI EA '18: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThis course aims at introducing some key issues in contemporary ethnographic practice, emphasizing the role of the writing style and the epistemic position of the fieldworker in shaping a particular perspective on the observed phenomena. It outlines the ...
Human-computer interaction as science
CA '15: Proceedings of The Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical AlternativesThe human-computer interaction (HCI) has had a long and troublesome relationship to the role of 'science'. HCI's status as an academic object in terms of coherence and adequacy is often in question---leading to desires for establishing a true scientific ...
Methods for Human-Computer Interaction Research
CHI EA '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThis course delivers an introduction to a range of methods used in the exploration of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) problems. Guided by leading HCI researchers and educators, attendees will be introduced to both qualitative and quantitative research ...
Comments