Abstract
A literature review reveals many technical weaknesses of readability formulas (when compared to direct usability testing with typical readers): they were developed for children s school books, not adult technical documentation;they ignore between-reader differences and the effects of content, layout, and retrieval aids on text usefulness; they emphasize countable features at the expense of more subtle contributors to text comprehension.
- Charrow, R. P. and Charrow, V. R. (1979). Making legal language understandable: A psycholinguistic study of jury instructions. Columbia Law Review, 79, 1306-1374.Google Scholar
- Dumas, J. S. and Redish, J. C. (1999). A Practical Guide to Usability Testing. Exeter, England: Intellect (revised edition); originally published by Ablex, 1993. Google Scholar
- Duffy, T. M. (1985). Readability formulas: What's the use? In T. M. Dully and R. M. Waller (Eds.), Designing Usable Texts (pp. 113-143). NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Holland, V. M. and Campbell, L. J. (1982). Understanding the language of public documents because readability formulas don't. In R. J. Di Pietro (Ed.), Linguistics and the Professions (pp. 157-171). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Hughes, M. (1999). Rigor in usability testing. Technical Communication, 46(4), Fourth Quarter, 488-494.Google Scholar
- Jacobson, M. D., Kirkland, C. E., and Selden, R. W. (1978). An examination of the McCall- Crabbs standard test lessons in reading. Journal of Reading, 22, 224-230.Google Scholar
- Klare, G. R. (1979). Readability Standards for Army- Wide Publications. Fort Benjamin Harrison, IN: U. S. Army Administrative Center.Google Scholar
- Klare, G. R. (1976). A second look at the validity of readability formulas. Journal of Reading Behavior, 8, 129-152.Google Scholar
- Klare, G. R. (1963). The Measurement of Readability. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
- Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering, San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Google Scholar
- Redish, J. C. (1980). Readability. In D. B. Felker (Ed.), Document Design: A Review of the Relevant Research (pp. 69-93). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.Google Scholar
- Redish, J. C. and Seizer, J. (1985). The place of readability formulas in technical communication. Technical Communication, 32(4), Fourth Quarter, 46-52.Google Scholar
- Rubin, J. (1994). Handbook of Usability Testing. NY: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
- Schriver, K. A. (1997). Dynamics in Document Design. NY: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
- Seizer, J. (1983). What constitutes a "readable" technical style? In E V. Anderson, J. Brockmann, and C. R. Miller (Eds.), New Essays in Technical and Scientific Communication: Research, Theory, and Practice (pp. 71-89). Farmington, NY: Baywood.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Readability formulas have even more limitations than Klare discusses
Recommendations
An augmentative and alternative communication tool for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy
Medical teamwork, collaboration and patient-centred carePeople with disabilities face many accessibility problems in their daily lives. One such group of disabled people, children who suffer from cerebral palsy, faces specific challenges, which arise due to motor dysfunction and communication disorders. In ...
Comparing google's readability of search results to the flesch readability formulae: a preliminary analysis on children's search queries
ASIST '13: Proceedings of the 76th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Beyond the Cloud: Rethinking Information BoundariesResults retrieved by Google on fifteen search queries formulated by middle school children were examined for readability based on Google Reading Level filter (Basic, Intermediate, Advanced). Three hundred retrieved results (links, snippets, and ...
Effects of reading medium on the processing, comprehension, and calibration of adolescent readers
AbstractThis study investigated the effects of reading texts on paper versus on screen on reading time, text comprehension, and calibration of performance, while controlling for relevant individual difference variables. In a within-subjects ...
Highlights- 8th graders read informational texts both on paper and screen.
- Interaction ...
Comments