skip to main content
10.1145/3448891.3448942acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobiquitousConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

InsideOut: Model to Predict Outside CO Concentrations from Mobile CO Dosimeter Measurements Inside Vehicles

Published:09 August 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The current pollution measurement methodology is coarse-grained where the pollution measurements are spatiotemporally few and far in-between. Our vision is to provide broadly accessible, fine-grained pollution information to a variety of end-users, and in turn, allow them to make better informed decisions using a new, more accurate information stream. To this end, this study proposes a new neural network model to estimate Carbon Monoxide (CO) concentrations outside vehicle from crowd-sourced CO measurements inside vehicles measured using mobile devices (dosimeters). End-users can benefit from the fine-grained pollution information generated by this prediction model along with data from direct measurements. A neural network is used to model the dynamic relationship between the CO measurements inside and outside a moving vehicle. The resulting neural network model is then used to predict outside CO concentrations from CO measurements inside vehicles. Mobile CO dosimeters were used inside and outside vehicles to collect measurements used in training a neural network based regression model. For this regression task, a new neural network architecture was designed using Convolutional layers and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) layers. The results show that outside CO concentrations can be estimated from inside vehicle CO measurements with high accuracy. The proposed neural network model provides a promising new and novel source of fine-grained pollution information along with direct measurement streams.

References

  1. 2020. Air Quality Egg. Retrieved June 11, 2020 from https://airqualityegg.com/eggGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2020. Awair. Retrieved June 11, 2020 from https://getawair.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 2020. Categorical Variables. Retrieved November 15, 2020 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorical_variableGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 2020. Keras. Retrieved November 15, 2020 from https://keras.io/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 2020. NODE Sensor Platform. Retrieved June 11, 2020 from https://www.smarthome.com/variable-technologies-nk-0001-node-kore-wireless-bluetooth-smartphone-sensor.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 2020. One-hot Encoding. Retrieved November 15, 2020 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-hotGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 2020. Reverse geocoding API. Retrieved November 15, 2020 from https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/geocoding/startGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 2020. Sensirion. Retrieved June 11, 2020 from https://www.sensirion.com/en/environmental-sensors/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 2020. TensorFlow. Retrieved November 15, 2020 from https://www.tensorflow.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 2020. Waspmote. Retrieved June 11, 2020 from http://www.libelium.com/calibrated-air-quality-gas-dust-particle-matter-pm10-smart-cities/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 2020. Weather information. Retrieved November 15, 2020 from https://www.worldweatheronline.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Karl Aberer, Saket Sathe, Dipanjan Chakraborty, Alcherio Martinoli, Guillermo Barrenetxea, Boi Faltings, and Lothar Thiele. 2010. OpenSense: Open Community Driven Sensing of Environment. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on GeoStreaming. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 39–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/1878500.1878509Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. Budde, M. Berning, M. Busse, T. Miyaki, and M. Beigl. 2012. The TECO Envboard: A mobile sensor platform for accurate urban sensing — And more. In 2012 Ninth International Conference on Networked Sensing (INSS). 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1109/INSS.2012.6240573Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Kyunghyun Cho, Bart van Merriënboer, Caglar Gulcehre, Fethi Bougares, Holger Schwenk, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation. (06 2014). https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/D14-1179Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ralph J. Delfino and Jun Wu. 2012. In-vehicle air pollution exposure measurement and modeling. Technical Report. Irvine, CA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Srinivas Devarakonda, Parveen Sevusu, Hongzhang Liu, Ruilin Liu, Liviu Iftode, and Badri Nath. 2013. Real-time air quality monitoring through mobile sensing in metropolitan areas. In ACM SIGKDD International Workshop on Urban Computing (UrbComp ’13). ACM, New York, NY, 8. https://doi.org/10.1145/2505821.2505834Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Stuart K. Grange, Naomi J. Farren, Adam R. Vaughan, Rebecca A. Rose, and David C. Carslaw. 2019. Strong Temperature Dependence for Light-Duty Diesel Vehicle NOx Emissions. Environmental Science & Technology 53 (2019), 6587–6596. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01024Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Yu H, Samuels DC, Zhao YY, and Guo Y. 2019. Architectures and accuracy of artificial neural network for disease classification from omics data. BMC Genomics 20(1):167(2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5546-zGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Fei Hao, Mingjie Jiao, Geyong Min, and Laurence T. Yang. 2015. Launching an Efficient Participatory Sensing Campaign: A Smart Mobile Device-Based Approach. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 12, 1s, Article 18 (Oct. 2015), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2808198Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Sepp Hochreiter and Jurgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long Short-Term Memory. In Neural Computation, Vol. 9:8. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1735–1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Richard Honicky, Eric A. Brewer, Eric Paulos, and Richard White. 2008. N-smarts: Networked Suite of Mobile Atmospheric Real-time Sensors. In Proceedings of the Second ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Networked Systems for Developing Regions. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/1397705.1397713Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Andrew Kimbrell. 2000. An assessment of air quality inside automobile passenger compartments. Technical Report. Washington DC, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Luke D. Knibbs, Richard deDear, and Steven E. Atkinson. 2009. Field study of air change and flow rate in six automobiles, Vol. 19(4). 303–313.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Parviz A. Koushki, Khaled H. Al-Dhowalia, and Said A. Niaizi. 1992. Vehicle Occupant Exposure to Carbon Monoxide. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 42:12 (1992), 1603–1608. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1992.10467104Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Wayne R. Ott and Neil H. Willits. 1981. CO exposures of occupants of motor vehicles: modeling the dynamic response of the vehicle. Technical Report. Stanford, CA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Olalekan A.M. Popoola, Gregor B. Stewart, Mohammed I. Mead, and Roderic L. Jones. 2016. Development of a baseline-temperature correction methodology for electrochemical sensors and its implications for long-term stability. Atmospheric Environment 147 (2016), 330 – 343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.10.024Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Richard Rohwer. 1994. The Time Dimension of Neural Network Models. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Jurgen Schmidhuber. 1989. A Local Learning Algorithm for Dynamic Feedforward and Recurrent Networks. Connection Science 1:4(1989), 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540098908915650Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Claudia Ulbricht. 1994. Multi-Recurrent Networks for Traffic Forecasting. In Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 19(4). AAAI Press/MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 883–888.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Claudia Ulbricht, Georg Dorffner, Stéphane Canu, Didier Guillemyn, Gurutze Marijuán, Javier Olarte, Clemente Rodríguez, and Ignacio Martín. 1992. Mechanisms For Handling Sequences With Neural Networks. Intelligent Engineering Systems through Artificial Neural Networks 2 (1992).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. R. Villegas, Jimei Yang, Seunghoon Hong, Xunyu Lin, and H. Lee. 2017. Decomposing Motion and Content for Natural Video Sequence Prediction. ArXiv abs/1706.08033(2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MobiQuitous '20: MobiQuitous 2020 - 17th EAI International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services
    December 2020
    493 pages
    ISBN:9781450388405
    DOI:10.1145/3448891

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 9 August 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate26of87submissions,30%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format