skip to main content
10.1145/3458864.3466869acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobisysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Is your smoke detector working properly?: robust fault tolerance approaches for smoke detectors

Published:24 June 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Billions of smoke detectors are in use worldwide to provide early warning of fires. Despite this, they frequently fail to operate in an ongoing fire, risking death and property damage. A significant fraction of faults result from drift, or reduced sensitivity, and other faults in smoke detectors' phototransistors (PTs). Existing approaches attempt to detect drift from the PT output in normal conditions (without smoke). However, we find that drifted PTs mimic the output of working PTs in normal conditions, but diverge in the presence of smoke, making this approach ineffective.

This paper presents two novel approaches to systematically detect faults and measure and compensate for drift in smoke detectors' PTs. Our first approach, called FallTime, measures a PT "fingerprint," a unique electrical characteristic with distinct behavior for working, drifted, and faulty components. FallTime can be added to many existing smoke detector models in software alone, with no/minimal hardware modifications. Our second approach, DriftTestButton, is a mechanical test button that simulates the behavior of smoke when pressed. It offers a robust, straightforward approach to detect faults, and can measure and compensate for drift across the entire smoke detector system. We empirically evaluate both approaches and present extensive experimental results from actual smoke detectors deployed in a commercial building, along with custom-built smoke detectors. By conducting tests with live smoke, we show that both FallTime and DriftTestButton perform more effectively than existing fault tolerance techniques and stand to substantially reduce the risk that a smoke detector fails to alarm in the presence of smoke.

References

  1. 2005. System Sensor Europe. https://www.firelite.com/CatalogDocuments/df52384.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2017. Basic Characteristics and Application Circuit Design of Transistor Couplers. https://toshiba.semicon-storage.com/info/docget.jsp?did=13438Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 2018. First alert 9120 Smoke detector. https://www.firstalert.com/product/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 2018. GST I-9102 Intelligent Photoelectric Smoke Detector. https://www.gst.com.cn/en/data/products/Manuals/I-9102%20Intelligent%20Photoelectric%20Smoke%20Detector%20Issue1.03.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 2018. Kidde Battery Operated Photoelectric Smoke Alarm P9050. https://www.kidde.com/home-safety/en/us/products/fire-safety/smoke-alarms/p9050/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 2018. LTspice. http://www.analog.com/en/design-center/design-tools-and-calculators/ltspice-simulator.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 2019. NAtional Fire Protection Association, Ionization vs photoelectric. https://www.nfpa.org/Public-Education/Staying-safe/Safety-equipment/Smoke-alarms/Ionization-vs-photoelectricGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 2019. Photoelectric Proximity Sensors. https://www.fargocontrols.com/sensors/photoelectric.html/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 2019. STM32 IoT node. https://www.st.com/en/evaluation-tools/b-l475e-iot01a.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. MZ Abidin, Arnis Asmat, and MN Hamidon. 2018. Comparative Study of Drift Compensation Methods for Environmental Gas Sensors. Earth and Environmental Science 117 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M. G. Adlerstein and J. M. Gering. 2000. Current Induced Degradation in GaAs HBT's. IEEE Transactions on Electronic Devices 47 (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. Ahrens. 2009. Smoke Alarms in U.S. Home Fires. Technical Report. National Fire Protection Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. Ahrens. 2019. Smoke Alarms in US Home Fires. Technical Report. National Fire Protection Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. National Electrical Manufacturers Association. 2002. Mission Effectiveness and Failure Rates Drive Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Fire Detection, Alarm, and Signaling Systems. Technical Report. Society of Fire Protection Engineers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. National Fire Protection Association et al. 2010. NFPA 72: National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code. National Fire Protection Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. James P Barrett. 1974. The coefficient of determination. The American Statistician 28, 1 (1974), 19--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. J. J. Brenden. 1970. DETERMINING THE UTILITY OF A NEW OPTICAL TEST PROCEDURE FOR MEASURING SMOKE FROM VARIOUS WOOD PRODUCTS. Technical Report. Forest Products Laboratory.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. M. S. Carrol, A. Neugroschel, and C. T. Sah. 1997. Degradation of silicon bipolar junction transistors at high forward current densities. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 44 (1997), 110--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Tusher Chakraborty, Akshay Uttama Nambi, Ranveer Chandra, Rahul Sharma, Manohar Swaminathan, Zerina Kapetanovic, and Jonathan Appavoo. 2018. Fall-curve: A novel primitive for IoT Fault Detection and Isolation. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SenSys. 95--107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ratzlaff L. Bush D Chandler, B. 2016. Photoelectric Smoke Detector with Drift Compensation. https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/d3/f0/42/815589e7092124/US9396637.pdf US Patent 9,396,637B2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Thomas Cleary. 2016. A Study on the Performance of Current Smoke Alarms to the New Fire and Nuisance Tests Prescribed in ANSI/UL 217-2015. Technical Report. US Department of Commerce.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Shoucheng Ding and Wenhui Li. 2011. Research on photoelectric sensor turbidity detecting system. Sensor Letters 9, 4 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. W. F. Doherty. 1977. Smoke detector with test means for simulating a predetermined concentration of smoke. US Patent No. 4144458.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. K. W. Dungan. 2007. Reliability of Fire Alarm Systems. Fire Protection Engineering 2007 Q1 (2007), 11 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. J. Webster (ed.). 1999. Hot Carriers. Wiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. TT Electronics. 2016. NPN Silicon Phototransistor OP505. https://www.ttelectronics.com/TTElectronics/media/ProductFiles/Optoelectronics/Datasheets/OP505-506-535-705.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. A. Feinberg, P. Ersland, V. Kaper, and A. Widom. 2000. On Aging Of Key Transistor Device Parameters. Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology, Providence, USA, 231--236.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Firebus 2014. FB-AP Drift Compensation. Firebus. https://firebus.net/drift-compensationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Firelite Alarms 2015. SD355(A) Series Addressable Photoelectric Smoke Detectors. Firelite Alarms. https://www.firelite.com/CatalogDocuments/df-52384.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Joseph Fleming. 1999. Smoke Detector Technology and the Investigation of Fatal Fires. (1999). https://www.interfire.org/features/smokedetector.aspGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Allen Hess. 2011. Smoke Detector Sensitivity Testing. http://www.cfaa.ca/Files/flash/ontario/ats2011/Smoke_Detector_Sensitivity_Testing_by_Allen_Hess.pdf "Presentation".Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Chenming Hu. 2009. Modern Semiconductor Devices for Integrated Circuits. Pearson College Div.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. S. Y. Huang, K. M. Chen, G. W. Huang, V. Liang, H. C. Tseng, T. L. Hsu, and C. Y. Chang. 2005. Hot-Carrier Induced Degradations on RF Power Characteristics of SiGe Heterojunction Bipolar Transistors. IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability 5 (2005), 183--189.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Kidde Fire Systems 2011. SmartOne Devices. Kidde Fire Systems. https://www.kidde-fenwal.com/Media/Data%20Sheets/K-76-801_screen.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Shi-Kuk Kim, Hyun-Dai Yuk, Seung-Hyun Yang, Seung-Wook Jee, and Chun-Ha Lee. 2009. A Study on the Problem of Tester for the Field Inspection of the Photoelectric Smoke Detector. Fire Science and Engineering 23 (2009), 137--144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. S. L. Kosier, A. Wei, R. D. Schrimpf, D. M. Fleetwood, M. D. Delaus, R. L. Pease, and W. E. Combs. 1995. Physically based comparison of hot-carrier-induced and ionizing-radation-induced degradation in BJT's. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 42 (1995), 436--444.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Sovannarith Leng. 2017. Identifying and evaluating aging signatures in light emitting diode lighting systems. Ph.D. Dissertation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Sumukh Marathe, Akshay Nambi, Nishant Shrivastava, Manohar Swaminathan, and Ronak Sutaria. 2020. Fault Diagnosis System for Low-Cost Air Pollution Sensors: Demo Abstract. In Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (Virtual Event, Japan) (SenSys '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 611--612. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Sumukh Marathe, Akshay Nambi, Manohar Swaminathan, and Ronak Sutaria. 2021. CurrentSense: A novel approach for fault and drift detection in environmental IoT sensors. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things Design and Implementation (IoTDI). ACM, 99--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. A. A. Marsocci. 1975. Optical smoke detector with light scattering test device. US Patent No. 3868184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. George Mulholland. 2002. Smoke Production and Properties. In SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, Phillip DiNenno, Dougal Drysdale, Craig Beyler, W. D. Walton, Richard Custer, John R. Hall, and John M. Watts (Eds.). Society of Fire Protection Engineers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Ann Mutschler. 2017. Transistor Aging Intensifies At 10/7nm And Below. (2017). https://semiengineering.com/transistor-aging-intensifies-10nm/#:~:text=Devicedegradationbecomeslimitingfactor,significantchallengeinadvancedSoCs.&text=Transistoragingandreliabilityare,teamsat10nmandbelow.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Electronics Notes. 2020. Phototransistor Applications & Circuit Configurations. (2020). https://www.electronics-notes.com/articles/electronic_components/transistor/phototransistor-circuits-applications.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. NXP Semiconductor 2006. Photoelectric Smoke Detector IC with I/O and Temporal Pattern Horn Driver. NXP Semiconductor. https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/MC145012.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Bob Orwiler. 1969. Vertical Amplifier Circuits. Tektronix. (1969).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. OSRAM Opto Semiconductors 2018. SFH 4550. OSRAM Opto Semiconductors. https://www.osram.com/media/resource/hires/osram-dam-2496286/SFH%204550.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Corinne Peek-Asa, Jingzhen Yang, Cara Hamann, and Tracy Young. 2011. Smoke alarm tests may not adequately indicate smoke alarm function. Journal of Burn Care & Research 32, 4 (2011), e135--e139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Muhammad H Rashid and MH Rashid. 1995. SPICE for circuits and electronics using PSPICE. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. R. P. Schifiliti. 2006. Fire Alarm Systems for Life Safety Code Users. National Fire Protection Association, Arlington, VA. 1113 -- 1138 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Vishay Semiconductors. 2011. BPW96B, BPW96C Silicon NPN Phototransistor. https://www.vishay.com/docs/81532/bpw96.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Vishay Semiconductors. 2013. BPV11F Silicon NPN Phototransistor. http://www.vishay.com/photo-detectors/list/product-81505/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. AG Sensirion. 2017. Sensirion Particulate Matter Sensor SPS30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. ST Microelectronics 2019. Application guide: Fire alarms and smoke detectors. ST Microelectronics. https://www.st.com/content/ccc/resource/sales_and_marketing/presentation/product_presentation/ae/6c/ae/b5/db/88/45/a9/ulp_firealarms_appliguide.pdf/files/ulp_firealarms_appliguide.pdf/jcr:content/translations/en.ulp_firealarms_appliguide.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. System Sensor 2016. System Smoke Detectors Application Guide. System Sensor. https://www.systemsensor.com/en-us/Documents/System_Smoke_Detectors_AppGuide_SPAG91.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Texas Instrument 2017. ADS7056 Ultra-Low Power, Ultra-Small Size, 14-Bit, High-Speed SAR ADC. Texas Instrument. https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/ads7056.pdf?ts=1617225081254&ref_url=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.google.com%252FGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Texas Instruments 2018. MSP430FR596x, MSP430FR594x Mixed-Signal Microcontrollers. Texas Instruments. https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/msp430fr5969.pdf?ts=1617221382068&ref_url=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.ti.com%252Fproduct%252FMSP430FR5969Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. N. Thudsalingkarnsakul, S. Thainoi, and S. Kanjanachuchai. 2007. Characteristics of GaAs-based Phototransistors After High-Power Operation. In ECTI International Conference. ECTI, 141--144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. N. Toufik, F. Pelanchon, and P. Mialhe. 2001. Degradation of Junction Parameters of an Electrically Stressed NPN Bipolar Transistor. Active and Passive Electrical Components 24 (2001), 155--163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Van Tran, Robert Stuart, and Hardik Bhavskar. 2009. Phototransistor Switching Time Analysis. California Eastern Laboratories.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Gary Wasserman. 2002. Reliability Verification, Testing, and Analysis in Engineering Design. Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Noah Zamdmer. 1994. Hot-Electron Degradation of Bipolar Transistors. Ph.D. Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Is your smoke detector working properly?: robust fault tolerance approaches for smoke detectors

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MobiSys '21: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services
        June 2021
        528 pages
        ISBN:9781450384438
        DOI:10.1145/3458864

        Copyright © 2021 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 24 June 2021

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        MobiSys '21 Paper Acceptance Rate36of166submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate274of1,679submissions,16%

        Upcoming Conference

        MOBISYS '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      ePub

      View this article in ePub.

      View ePub