skip to main content
10.1145/3459637.3482167acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Public Access

Reevaluating the Change Point Detection Problem with Segment-based Bayesian Online Detection

Authors Info & Claims
Published:30 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Change point detection is widely used for finding transitions between states of data generation within a time series. Methods for change point detection currently assume this transition is instantaneous and therefore focus on finding a single point of data to classify as a change point. However, this assumption is flawed because many time series actually display short periods of transitions between different states of data generation. Previous work has shown Bayesian Online Change Point Detection (BOCPD) to be the most effective method for change point detection on a wide range of different time series. This paper explores adapting the change point detection algorithms to detect abrupt changes over short periods of time. We design a segment-based mechanism to examine a window of data points within a time series, rather than a single data point, to determine if the window captures abrupt change. We test our segment-based Bayesian change detection algorithm on 36 different time series and compare it to the original BOCPD algorithm. Our results show that, for some of these 36 time series, the segment-based approach for detecting abrupt changes can much more accurately identify change points based on standard metrics.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

10.1145:3459637.3482167.mp4

mp4

88.6 MB

References

  1. Ryan Prescott Adams and David JC MacKay. 2007. Bayesian online changepoint detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:0710.3742 (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Samaneh Aminikhanghahi and Diane J Cook. 2017. A survey of methods for time series change point detection. Knowledge and information systems 51, 2 (2017), 339--367. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Samaneh Aminikhanghahi and Diane J Cook. 2017. Using change point detection to automate daily activity segmentation. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops). IEEE, 262--267.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Michele Basseville. 1988. Detecting changes in signals and systems-a survey. Automatica 24, 3 (1988), 309--326. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Sooyoung Cheon and Jaehee Kim. 2010. Multiple change-point detection of multivariate mean vectors with the Bayesian approach. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 54, 2 (2010), 406--415. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Mark Everingham, Luc Van Gool, Christopher KI Williams, John Winn, and Andrew Zisserman. 2010. The pascal visual object classes (voc) challenge. International journal of computer vision 88, 2 (2010), 303--338. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Zhenmei Ma, Shaozhong Kang, Lu Zhang, Ling Tong, and Xiaoling Su. 2008. Analysis of impacts of climate variability and human activity on streamflow for a river basin in arid region of northwest China. Journal of hydrology 352, 3--4 (2008), 239--249.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Aleksey S Polunchenko and Alexander G Tartakovsky. 2012. State-of-the-art in sequential change-point detection. Methodology and computing in applied probability 14, 3 (2012), 649--684.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. C. J. Van Rijsbergen. 1979. Information Retrieval. Butterworths (1979). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. David Rybach, Christian Gollan, Ralf Schluter, and Hermann Ney. 2009. Audio segmentation for speech recognition using segment features. In 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. IEEE, 4197--4200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gábor J Székely. 2003. E-statistics: The energy of statistical samples. Bowling Green State University, Department of Mathematics and Statistics Technical Report 3, 05 (2003), 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Alexander G Tartakovsky and George V Moustakides. 2010. State-of-the-art in Bayesian changepoint detection. Sequential Analysis 29, 2 (2010), 125--145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Sven Thies and Peter Molnár. 2018. Bayesian change point analysis of Bitcoin returns. Finance Research Letters 27 (2018), 223--227.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Gerrit JJ van den Burg and Christopher KI Williams. 2020. An evaluation of change point detection algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.06222 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. S Zacks. 1983. Survey of classical and Bayesian approaches to the change-point problem: fixed sample and sequential procedures ofGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Reevaluating the Change Point Detection Problem with Segment-based Bayesian Online Detection

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '21: Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management
      October 2021
      4966 pages
      ISBN:9781450384469
      DOI:10.1145/3459637

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 October 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader