skip to main content
10.1145/3473856.3473872acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmundcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Time to Get Conversational: Assessment of the Potential of Conversational User Interfaces for Mobile Banking

Published:13 September 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Conversational user interfaces have recently gained in popularity, for example in chatbot systems for customer service or as intelligent assistants on Smartphones or other IoT devices. However, conversational banking interfaces have also found their way into the mobile banking sector and allow banks to offer their customers a cost-effective and personalized solution to perform financial services via natural language. Conversational interfaces, in particular for mobile banking applications, are very sensitive to user acceptance and trust. Also, user experience and the perceived security influence their adoption significantly. To explore the influence of these dimensions we have implemented three prototypes for conversational banking and evaluated them in a user study with n=18 subjects concerning the factors mentioned above. Although the results suggest no significant differences between the prototypes, we can draw design implications for conversational interfaces for mobile banking from the collected quantitative and qualitative data.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3473856.3473872.mp4

mp4

18 MB

References

  1. Ali Abdallah Alalwan, Yogesh K. Dwivedi, and Nripendra P. Rana. 2017. Factors influencing adoption of mobile banking by Jordanian bank customers: Extending UTAUT2 with trust. International Journal of Information Management 37, 3 (June 2017), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.01.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Rainer Alt and Thomas Puschmann. 2016. Digitalisierung der Finanzindustrie. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-50542-7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Giorgio Andreoli, Giuseppe Billé, and Nicola Meleagri. 2017. Ready to Talk!https://www.accenture.com/_acnmedia/pdf-69/accenture-ready-talk-pov.pdf [Accessed: 2020-07-27].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Henri Arslanian and Fabrice Fischer. 2019. The Rise of Fintech. In The Future of Finance. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 25–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14533-0_3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Timothy Bickmore and Justine Cassell. 2001. Relational Agents: A Model and Implementation of Building User Trust. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’01. ACM Press, Seattle, Washington, United States, 396–403. https://doi.org/10.1145/365024.365304Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (Jan. 2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jerome Buvat, Mark Taylor, Kees Jacobs, Amol Khadikar, and Amrita Sengupta. 2018. Conversational Commerce. Why Consumers Are Embracing Voice Assistants in Their Lives. https://www.capgemini.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/dti-conversational-commerce.pdf [Accessed: 2020-07-27].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. T. C. Edwin Cheng, David Y. C. Lam, and Andy C. L. Yeung. 2006. Adoption of internet banking: An empirical study in Hong Kong. Decision Support Systems 42, 3 (Dec. 2006), 1558–1572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.01.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Leon Ciechanowski, Aleksandra Przegalinska, Mikolaj Magnuski, and Peter Gloor. 2019. In the shades of the uncanny valley: An experimental study of human–chatbot interaction. Future Generation Computer Systems 92 (2019), 539 – 548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.01.055Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Benjamin R. Cowan, Nadia Pantidi, David Coyle, Kellie Morrissey, Peter Clarke, Sara Al-Shehri, David Earley, and Natasha Bandeira. 2017. “What Can I Help You With?”: Infrequent Users’ Experiences of Intelligent Personal Assistants. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, Vienna Austria, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3098279.3098539Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Crealogix. 2019. Convenience first: Wie Challenger-Banken Lust auf Mobile Banking machen. https://media-paymentandbanking.com/2019/08/CREALOGIX_Bankkundenbefragung_Deutschland_Schweiz_2019.pdf [Accessed: 2020-07-27].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Fred D. Davis. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 3 (1989), 319–340. http://www.jstor.org/stable/249008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Fred D. Davis. 1993. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 38, 3 (1993), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1022Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Dana Doherty and Kevin Curran. 2019. Chatbots for online banking services. Web Intelligence 17, 4 (Dec. 2019), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.3233/WEB-190422Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Gregor Dorfleitner, Lars Hornuf, Matthias Schmitt, and Martina Weber. 2017. Definition of FinTech and Description of the FinTech Industry. In FinTech in Germany. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54666-7_2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Upol Ehsan, Q. Vera Liao, Michael Muller, Mark O. Riedl, and Justin D. Weisz. 2021. Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systems. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (May 2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445188Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Nicholas Epley, Adam Waytz, and John T. Cacioppo. 2007. On Seeing Human: A Three-Factor Theory of Anthropomorphism. Psychological Review 114, 4 (2007), 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Asbjørn Følstad and Petter Bae Brandtzaeg. 2020. Users’ experiences with chatbots: findings from a questionnaire study. Quality and User Experience 5, 1 (11 Apr 2020), 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41233-020-00033-2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Asbjørn Følstad, Cecilie Bertinussen Nordheim, and Cato Alexander Bjørkli. 2018. What Makes Users Trust a Chatbot for Customer Service? An Exploratory Interview Study. In Internet Science. Vol. 11193. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 194–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01437-7_16 Series Title: Lecture Notes in Computer Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Asbjørn Følstad and Marita Skjuve. 2019. Chatbots for Customer Service: User Experience and Motivation. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (Dublin, Ireland) (CUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342775.3342784Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. Furini, S. Mirri, M. Montangero, and C. Prandi. 2020. Do Conversational Interfaces Kill Web Accessibility?. In 2020 IEEE 17th Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC) (Las Vegas, NV, USA). IEEE, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCNC46108.2020.9045477Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. J. Grudin and J. M. Carroll. 2017. From Tool to Partner: The Evolution of Human-Computer Interaction. Morgan & Claypool. i–183 pages. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00745ED1V01Y201612HCI035Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Mohit Jain, Ramachandra Kota, Pratyush Kumar, and Shwetak N. Patel. 2018. Convey: Exploring the Use of a Context View for Chatbots. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174042Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Mohit Jain, Pratyush Kumar, Ramachandra Kota, and Shwetak N. Patel. 2018. Evaluating and Informing the Design of Chatbots. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Hong Kong, China) (DIS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 895–906. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196735Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Jiun-Yin Jian, Ann M. Bisantz, and Colin G. Drury. 2000. Foundations for an Empirically Determined Scale of Trust in Automated Systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics 4, 1 (March 2000), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327566IJCE0401_04Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Songhyun Kim, Junseok Goh, and Soojin Jun. 2018. The Use of Voice Input to Induce Human Communication with Banking Chatbots. In Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction(Chicago, IL, USA) (HRI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 151–152. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173386.3176970Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Lorenz Cuno Klopfenstein, Saverio Delpriori, Silvia Malatini, and Alessandro Bogliolo. 2017. The Rise of Bots: A Survey of Conversational Interfaces, Patterns, and Paradigms. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, Edinburgh United Kingdom, 555–565. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064672Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Bart P. Knijnenburg and Martijn C. Willemsen. 2016. Inferring Capabilities of Intelligent Agents from Their External Traits. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems 6, 4, Article 28 (Nov. 2016), 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2963106Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Nicole Koenig-Lewis, Adrian Palmer, and Alexander Moll. 2010. Predicting young consumers’ take up of mobile banking services. International Journal of Bank Marketing 28, 5 (July 2010), 410–432. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652321011064917Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Matthias Kröner. 2017. Best of Both Worlds: Banken vs. FinTech?In FinTechs, Victor Tiberius and Christoph Rasche (Eds.). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14187-5_2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Robert Kusber. 2017. Chatbots – Conversational UX Platforms. In Innovationen und Innovationsmanagement in der Finanzbranche. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15648-0_11Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Richard Lackes, Markus Siepermann, and Georg Vetter. 2019. Can I Help You? – The Acceptance of Intelligent Personal Assistants. In Perspectives in Business Informatics Research, Małgorzata Pańkowska and Kurt Sandkuhl (Eds.). Vol. 365. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31143-8_15 Series Title: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Sven Laumer, Christian Maier, and Fabian Tobias Gubler. 2019. CHATBOT ACCEPTANCE IN HEALTHCARE: EXPLAINING USER ADOPTION OF CONVERSATIONAL AGENTS FOR DISEASE DIAGNOSIS. In Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) (Stockholm & Uppsala, Sweden). AISeL, 1–18. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2019_rp/88Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Kate Letheren and Paula Dootson. 2017. Banking with a chatbot: a battle between convenience and security. https://theconversation.com/banking-with-a-chatbot-a-battle-between-convenience-and-security-81328 [Accessed: 09/06/2020].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Irene Lopatovska, Alice London Griffin, Kelsey Gallagher, Caitlin Ballingall, Clair Rock, and Mildred Velazquez. 2020. User recommendations for intelligent personal assistants. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 52, 2 (2020), 577–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000619841107 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000619841107Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Ewa Luger and Abigail Sellen. 2016. “Like Having a Really Bad PA”: The Gulf between User Expectation and Experience of Conversational Agents. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 5286–5297. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858288Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Roger C. Mayer, James H. Davis, and F. David Schoorman. 1995. An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. The Academy of Management Review 20, 3 (1995), 709–734. http://www.jstor.org/stable/258792Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Michael McTear, Zoraida Callejas, and David Griol. 2016. The Conversational Interface. Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32967-3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Michael F. McTear. 2017. The Rise of the Conversational Interface: A New Kid on the Block?. In Future and Emerging Trends in Language Technology. Machine Learning and Big Data, José F Quesada, Francisco-Jesús Martín Mateos, and Teresa López Soto (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69365-1_3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Robert J. Moore and Raphael Arar. 2018. Conversational UX Design: An Introduction. In Studies in Conversational UX Design, Robert J. Moore, Margaret H. Szymanski, Raphael Arar, and Guang-Jie Ren (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95579-7_1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. M. Mori, K. F. MacDorman, and N. Kageki. 2012. The Uncanny Valley [From the Field]. IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine 19, 2 (June 2012), 98–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Bernardo Nicoletti. 2017. Financial Services and Fintech. In The Future of FinTech. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51415-4_2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Christi Olsen and Kelli Kemery. 2019. Voice report. From answers to action: customer adoption of voice technology and digital assistants. https://advertiseonbing-blob.azureedge.net/blob/bingads/media/insight/whitepapers/2019/04%20apr/voice-report/bingads_2019_voicereport.pdf [Accessed: 08/05/2020].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Nicolas Pfeuffer, Alexander Benlian, Henner Gimpel, and Oliver Hinz. 2019. Anthropomorphic Information Systems. Business & Information Systems Engineering 61, 4 (01 Aug. 2019), 523–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-019-00599-yGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Julia Ptock. 2019. PSD2: Die starke Kundenauthentifizierung und das Sorgenkind Kreditkarte. https://www.bonify.de/psd2-starke-kundenauthentifizierung-sorgenkind-kreditkarte [Accessed: 09/01/2020].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Lingyun Qiu and Izak Benbasat. 2009. Evaluating Anthropomorphic Product Recommendation Agents: A Social Relationship Perspective to Designing Information Systems. Journal of Management Information Systems 25, 4 (2009), 145–182. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222250405 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222250405Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Jon T. S. Quah and Y. W. Chua. 2019. Chatbot Assisted Marketing in Financial Service Industry. In Services Computing – SCC 2019, Vol. 11515. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23554-3_8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Tim Rietz, Ivo Benke, and Alexander Maedche. 2019. The Impact of Anthropomorphic and Functional Chatbot Design Features in Enterprise Collaboration Systems on User Acceptance. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (2019) (Siegen, Germany).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Martin Schrepp, Andreas Hinderks, and Jörg Thomaschewski. 2017. Design and Evaluation of a Short Version of the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ-S). International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence 4, 6 (2017), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2017.09.001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Ella Tallyn, Hector Fried, Rory Gianni, Amy Isard, and Chris Speed. 2018. The Ethnobot: Gathering Ethnographies in the Age of IoT. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174178Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Danny Tang. 2017. The Future of Banking: A Financial Concierge for Everyone. https://www.ibm.com/downloads/cas/YWEDLEDB [Accessed: 2020-07-27].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Francisco A. M. Valério, Tatiane G. Guimar aes, Raquel O. Prates, and Heloisa Candello. 2017. Here’s What I Can Do: Chatbots’ Strategies to Convey Their Features to Users. In Proceedings of the XVI Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Joinville, Brazil) (IHC 2017). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3160504.3160544Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Viswanath Venkatesh, Michael G. Morris, Gordon B. Davis, and Fred D. Davis. 2003. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly 27, 3 (2003), 425–478. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30036540Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. YouGov. 2018. Können Sie sich ganz allgemein vorstellen, mit einem “Chatbot” zu kommunizieren?https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/872922/umfrage/bereitschaft-zur-kommunikation-mit-chatbots-in-deutschland/ [Accessed: 08/05/2020].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Jennifer Zamora. 2017. I’m Sorry, Dave, I’m Afraid I Can’t Do That: Chatbot Perception and Expectations. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction(HAI ’17). ACM, Bielefeld, Germany, 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1145/3125739.3125766Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Tao Zhou. 2012. Examining mobile banking user adoption from the perspectives of trust and flow experience. Information Technology and Management 13, 1 (01 March 2012), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-011-0111-8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. V.W. Zue and J.R. Glass. 2000. Conversational Interfaces: Advances and Challenges. Proc. IEEE 88, 8 (Aug. 2000), 1166–1180. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.880078Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MuC '21: Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2021
    September 2021
    613 pages
    ISBN:9781450386456
    DOI:10.1145/3473856

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 13 September 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format