skip to main content
10.1145/3477495.3531959acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

CPFair: Personalized Consumer and Producer Fairness Re-ranking for Recommender Systems

Published:07 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recently, there has been a rising awareness that when machine learning (ML) algorithms are used to automate choices, they may treat/affect individuals unfairly, with legal, ethical, or economic consequences. Recommender systems are prominent examples of such ML systems that assist users in making high-stakes judgments.

A common trend in the previous literature research on fairness in recommender systems is that the majority of works treat user and item fairness concerns separately, ignoring the fact that recommender systems operate in a two-sided marketplace. In this work, we present an optimization-based re-ranking approach that seamlessly integrates fairness constraints from both the consumer and producer-side in a joint objective framework. We demonstrate through large-scale experiments on 8 datasets that our proposed method is capable of improving both consumer and producer fairness without reducing overall recommendation quality, demonstrating the role algorithms may play in minimizing data biases.

References

  1. Himan Abdollahpouri, Gediminas Adomavicius, Robin Burke, Ido Guy, Dietmar Jannach, Toshihiro Kamishima, Jan Krasnodebski, and Luiz Pizzato. 2020. Multistakeholder recommendation: Survey and research directions. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction , Vol. 30, 1 (2020), 127--158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Himan Abdollahpouri, Robin Burke, and Bamshad Mobasher. 2019 a. Managing popularity bias in recommender systems with personalized re-ranking. In The thirty-second international flairs conference .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Himan Abdollahpouri, Masoud Mansoury, Robin Burke, and Bamshad Mobasher. 2019 b. The unfairness of popularity bias in recommendation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.13286 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Himan Abdollahpouri, Masoud Mansoury, Robin Burke, Bamshad Mobasher, and Edward Malthouse. 2021. User-centered Evaluation of Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization . 119--129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Reuben Binns. 2018. Fairness in machine learning: Lessons from political philosophy. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency. PMLR, 149--159.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ludovico Boratto, Gianni Fenu, and Mirko Marras. 2021. Interplay between upsampling and regularization for provider fairness in recommender systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction , Vol. 31, 3 (2021), 421--455.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Robin Burke. 2017. Multisided fairness for recommendation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.00093 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Simon Caton and Christian Haas. 2020. Fairness in machine learning: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.04053 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Abhijnan Chakraborty, Aniko Hannak, Asia J Biega, and Krishna P Gummadi. 2017. Fair sharing for sharing economy platforms. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jiawei Chen, Hande Dong, Xiang Wang, Fuli Feng, Meng Wang, and Xiangnan He. 2020. Bias and debias in recommender system: A survey and future directions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.03240 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Maurizio Ferrari Dacrema, Paolo Cremonesi, and Dietmar Jannach. 2019. Are we really making much progress? A worrying analysis of recent neural recommendation approaches. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 101--109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Yashar Deldjoo, Vito Walter Anelli, Hamed Zamani, Alejandro Bellogin, and Tommaso Di Noia. 2021 a. A flexible framework for evaluating user and item fairness in recommender systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction (2021), 1--55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Yashar Deldjoo, Alejandro Bellogin, and Tommaso Di Noia. 2021 b. Explaining recommender systems fairness and accuracy through the lens of data characteristics. Information Processing & Management , Vol. 58, 5 (2021), 102662.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Virginie Do, Sam Corbett-Davies, Jamal Atif, and Nicolas Usunier. 2021. Two-sided fairness in rankings via Lorenz dominance. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , Vol. 34 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Qiang Dong, Shuang-Shuang Xie, Xiaofan Yang, and Yuan Yan Tang. 2020. User-item matching for recommendation fairness: a view from item-providers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.14474 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Cynthia Dwork, Moritz Hardt, Toniann Pitassi, Omer Reingold, and Richard Zemel. 2012. Fairness through awareness. In Proceedings of the 3rd innovations in theoretical computer science conference. 214--226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Michael D Ekstrand, Anubrata Das, Robin Burke, and Fernando Diaz. 2021. Fairness and Discrimination in Information Access Systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.05779 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Yingqiang Ge, Shuchang Liu, Ruoyuan Gao, Yikun Xian, Yunqi Li, Xiangyu Zhao, Changhua Pei, Fei Sun, Junfeng Ge, Wenwu Ou, et almbox. 2021. Towards Long-term Fairness in Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 445--453.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Elizabeth Gómez, Ludovico Boratto, and Maria Salamó. 2022. Provider fairness across continents in collaborative recommender systems. Information Processing & Management , Vol. 59, 1 (2022), 102719.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Prem Gopalan, Jake M Hofman, and David M Blei. 2015. Scalable Recommendation with Hierarchical Poisson Factorization.. In UAI . 326--335.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Xiangnan He, Lizi Liao, Hanwang Zhang, Liqiang Nie, Xia Hu, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2017. Neural collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 26th international conference on world wide web. 173--182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Yifan Hu, Yehuda Koren, and Chris Volinsky. 2008. Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets. In 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. Ieee, 263--272.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Rashidul Islam, Kamrun Naher Keya, Ziqian Zeng, Shimei Pan, and James Foulds. 2021. Debiasing career recommendations with neural fair collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. 3779--3790.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Ömer Kirnap, Fernando Diaz, Asia Biega, Michael Ekstrand, Ben Carterette, and Emine Yilmaz. 2021. Estimation of Fair Ranking Metrics with Incomplete Judgments. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. 1065--1075.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Yunqi Li, Hanxiong Chen, Zuohui Fu, Yingqiang Ge, and Yongfeng Zhang. 2021. User-oriented Fairness in Recommendation. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021 . 624--632.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Dawen Liang, Rahul G Krishnan, Matthew D Hoffman, and Tony Jebara. 2018. Variational autoencoders for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 2018 world wide web conference. 689--698.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Chen Lin, Xinyi Liu, Guipeng Xv, and Hui Li. 2021. Mitigating Sentiment Bias for Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval . 31--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Ninareh Mehrabi, Fred Morstatter, Nripsuta Saxena, Kristina Lerman, and Aram Galstyan. 2021. A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) , Vol. 54, 6 (2021), 1--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Mohammadmehdi Naghiaei, Hossein A. Rahmani, and Mahdi Dehghan. 2022. The Unfairness of Popularity Bias in Book Recommendation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.13446 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Rong Pan, Yunhong Zhou, Bin Cao, Nathan N Liu, Rajan Lukose, Martin Scholz, and Qiang Yang. 2008. One-class collaborative filtering. In 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE, 502--511.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Gourab K Patro, Arpita Biswas, Niloy Ganguly, Krishna P Gummadi, and Abhijnan Chakraborty. 2020. Fairrec: Two-sided fairness for personalized recommendations in two-sided platforms. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020 . 1194--1204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Dino Pedreschi, Salvatore Ruggieri, and Franco Turini. 2009. Measuring discrimination in socially-sensitive decision records. In Proceedings of the 2009 SIAM international conference on data mining. SIAM, 581--592.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Hossein A. Rahmani, Yashar Deldjoo, Ali Tourani, and Mohammadmehdi Naghiaei. 2022. The Unfairness of Active Users and Popularity Bias in Point-of-Interest Recommendation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.13307 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Aghiles Salah, Quoc-Tuan Truong, and Hady W Lauw. 2020. Cornac: A Comparative Framework for Multimodal Recommender Systems. J. Mach. Learn. Res. , Vol. 21 (2020), 95--1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Quoc-Tuan Truong, Aghiles Salah, Thanh-Binh Tran, Jingyao Guo, and Hady W Lauw. 2021. Exploring Cross-Modality Utilization in Recommender Systems. IEEE Internet Computing (2021).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Lequn Wang and Thorsten Joachims. 2021. User Fairness, Item Fairness, and Diversity for Rankings in Two-Sided Markets. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval. 23--41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Yao Wu, Jian Cao, Guandong Xu, and Yudong Tan. 2021. TFROM: A Two-sided Fairness-Aware Recommendation Model for Both Customers and Providers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.09024 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Bruna Wundervald. 2021. Cluster-based quotas for fairness improvements in music recommendation systems. International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval , Vol. 10, 1 (2021), 25--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Emre Yalcin and Alper Bilge. 2021. Investigating and counteracting popularity bias in group recommendations. Information Processing & Management , Vol. 58, 5 (2021), 102608.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. CPFair: Personalized Consumer and Producer Fairness Re-ranking for Recommender Systems

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR '22: Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
      July 2022
      3569 pages
      ISBN:9781450387323
      DOI:10.1145/3477495

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 July 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader